Compare OnePlus Buds 3 vs Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

P1 OnePlus Buds 3
P2 Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Comparison Takeaways

OnePlus Buds 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • Water/sweat resistance rating is 4.2 vs 3.5. Water and sweat protection is treated positively for rain and sweat use, though reviewers do not frame it...
  • Stability is 4.2 vs 3.5. Fit stability is mostly good for exercise and daily use, though some reviewers see it as better for...
  • Microphone quality for calls is 4.2 vs 3.7. Call microphone quality is usually good to excellent, with praise for loud, clear voices, though a few reviewers...
  • Value for money is 4.5 vs 4.1. Value for money is one of the clearest strengths, with most reviewers praising the $100 feature set despite...

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Charging is 4.5 vs 3.0. Charging is viewed positively where evaluated, especially wireless charging and case convenience.
  • Ear tip size options is 4.5 vs 3.0. Ear tip options are considered useful and generous, especially for finding the right fit across ear sizes.
  • Midrange clarity is 4.7 vs 3.6. Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.
  • Codec support is 4.3 vs 3.3. Codec support is praised for LDAC/LC3 breadth, but the absence of aptX is called a mild limitation.
Average score
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6

ANC is the most divided area: several reviewers call it strong or impressive for the price, while others say it is average, weak, or below competitors.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

ANC is broadly strong and often near flagship level, though several reviewers say it still falls short of the very best Bose-style silence.

Android compatibility
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.7

Android compatibility is strong because reviewers emphasize that a OnePlus phone is not necessary to access core features.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Android compatibility is praised for LDAC, fast pairing, and strong ANC value with Android phones.

App
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.3

The app is a major strength, with reviewers praising easy setup, strong feature access, stability, and broad control options.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.4

The app is mostly praised for useful controls, customization, stability, and EQ access, despite some complaints about layout.

aptX
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

aptX support is a weakness because one reviewer specifically wished Qualcomm aptX codecs were included.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.3

Audio-video sync is generally strong for video and casual gaming, with occasional gaming delay noted in demanding cases.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Video sync is mostly strong, with two reviewers reporting zero or no visible lag, while one notes a slight delay with some codecs.

Auracast support
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

Auracast support is a concern in one scored review because the reviewer criticizes its absence.

Bass performance
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Bass is one of the strongest themes: many reviewers praise its punch, depth, and fun energy, while a few find it too much or underwhelming out of the box.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Bass is widely praised for depth, control, punch, and low distortion, with only one review criticizing the default balance as too boomy.

Battery
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.9

Battery life is viewed as good enough by most reviewers, but not universally impressive and vulnerable to feature drain.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Battery life is consistently a strength, with reviewers praising long ANC runtime and major improvement over the AZ80.

Bluetooth
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6

Bluetooth reliability is positive where tested, with strong range and stable everyday connectivity noted by reviewers.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Bluetooth reliability is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting stable connections and no meaningful dropouts.

Build quality
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4

Build quality is generally positive, with reviewers noting durable finishes and solid construction after use.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Build quality is praised as premium, tactile, mature, and a substantial step forward.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.0

Hi-res playback brings some benefits, such as lower distortion or slightly better quality, but reviewers describe the improvement as limited.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Hi-res playback is praised in the one scored review, where LDAC/FLAC listening brought more detail, solidity, and space.

Button control usability
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4

Control usability is strong where volume swipes are discussed, although one review criticized the default omission of play/pause.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.

Cable quality
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
2.8

The included cable drew a mild negative note because PCMag called it short despite recognizing the signature USB-C cable.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Carry case quality
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.7

Carry case quality is mixed: reviewers like the compact pocketable case, but one questioned the plastic case’s toughness.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Case quality is mixed: it is compact and pocketable, but multiple reviewers criticize weak magnets, rattle, scratches, or bland styling.

Charging
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.0

Charging is mixed: fast charging helps, but the repeated lack of wireless charging is one of the most common drawbacks.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Charging is viewed positively where evaluated, especially wireless charging and case convenience.

Codec support
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.3

Codec support is useful but imperfect: LHDC support earns interest, yet limited device support and unstable high bitrates reduce its practical value.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Codec support is praised for LDAC/LC3 breadth, but the absence of aptX is called a mild limitation.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Comfort is widely praised, with many reviewers saying the earbuds are comfortable for long sessions, though one found fit only moderately comfortable.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Comfort trends positive thanks to smaller, lighter ergonomics, but fit fatigue and bulk remain concerns for some ears.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Design is broadly praised for looking stylish, premium, sleek, and attractive, with only smudging treated separately as a drawback.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Design and aesthetics are generally praised as premium, sleek, compact, or classy, though a few reviewers find the look plain.

Eartips fit
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.0

Eartip fit is mostly positive for comfort and seal, though one review notes the looser fit can let a bud slip out.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Eartip fit is generally good with the right size, but some reviewers report looseness, bulk, or falling out.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.0

Ear tip sizing receives one mild complaint that extra-large tips would have been useful.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Ear tip options are considered useful and generous, especially for finding the right fit across ear sizes.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1

EQ customization is useful and often effective, though one review found it too light-touch to correct the bass-heavy sound.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

EQ customization is a clear strength, with many reviewers praising the eight-band control and meaningful tuning options.

Find My
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Find My support is useful for peace of mind, though one reviewer is disappointed by the location behavior.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4

Frequency balance is often considered improved or well tuned, but reviewers frame it as consumer-friendly rather than strictly neutral.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Frequency response impressions are mixed: one review calls it strange, while others praise accuracy, balance, and low distortion.

Hinge durability
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6

Hinge durability is positive in the reviews that mention it, with both describing the case hinge as sturdy and not flimsy.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Included accessories draw criticism where reviewed because foam tips are missing despite multiple silicone tip sizes.

Instrument separation
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Instrument separation and imaging are frequently praised, with reviewers noting above-average placement, exceptional separation, and clear directional cues.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.9

Instrument separation is a standout strength, with reviewers hearing layers, voices, and complex arrangements as distinct and clearly placed.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6

The integrated mic array is praised in the scored review for supporting clear speech recognition.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Interchangeable left/right bud design
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Independent left/right earbud use is praised as convenient and useful when scored.

LDAC
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1

Maximum-volume clarity is mixed: PCMag praised distortion-free bass at top volumes, while Scarbir warned treble can become overwhelming.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4

Microphone noise reduction is often praised for suppressing background noise and wind, though Android Central was less convinced outdoors.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

Microphone noise reduction is polarized: several reviewers praise wind and background suppression, while one reports failed clarity and cutouts.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Call microphone quality is usually good to excellent, with praise for loud, clear voices, though a few reviewers consider it merely adequate.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.7

Call quality is mixed, ranging from serviceable or excellent in some reviews to choppy, robotic, or poor in others.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6

Midrange impressions vary: some hear clear vocals and mids, while others find the mids veiled or recessed behind the stronger bass and treble.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Multi-platform compatibility is positive in the scored review, which found audio quality consistent across several phones.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Multi-platform compatibility is praised because the app and customization work across iOS and Android.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Multipoint is a consistent strength, with reviewers calling it brilliant, flawless, convenient, and useful across phones, laptops, and other devices.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Passive isolation is viewed positively when the tips seal well, with reviewers noting isolation even before ANC is active.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Portability is positive in the scored review, which highlights the compact, lightweight design of the buds and case.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Preset EQ quality is mostly positive, especially Direct, Dynamic, and Treble+ modes, though SuperBass+ is too heavy for one reviewer.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
2.4

Smudge resistance is weak because reviewers repeatedly describe the glossy earbuds as fingerprint-prone.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6

Setup and software simplicity are mixed: several reviewers call setup or the app easy, while others report slow pairing or calibration/connectivity friction.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Setup and software simplicity are mostly positive, but the lack of a physical pairing button adds friction for one reviewer.

Sound leakage
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Sound leakage is a weakness in the one scored review, which says loud music can be heard in a quiet room.

Sound quality
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.3

Reviewers generally like the sound for the price, often calling it good, rich, or entertaining, though some note bass-heavy tuning and imperfect balance.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the AZ100's sound as clear, detailed, musical, and high-end, though one review found the stock tuning odd.

Soundstage depth
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Soundstage depth is usually strong, with reviewers praising depth, immersion, and layering, though one long-term reviewer wanted more depth.

Soundstage width
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Soundstage is viewed as respectable to impressive for the price, though one reviewer felt pricier Pro buds opened up audio more.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Soundstage width receives strong praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as spacious, broad, expansive, and room-like.

Spatial audio
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6

Spatial audio divides reviewers: some call it immersive and unusually good at this price, while others find it underwhelming, fake, or unnatural.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Spatial audio is mixed: reviewers appreciate Dolby/head-tracking support, but several find it merely decent, distracting, or less clear than stereo.

Stability
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Fit stability is mostly good for exercise and daily use, though some reviewers see it as better for lighter activity or dependent on eartip fit.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Stability is mixed: several reviewers found the fit secure, while others would not trust it for vigorous movement.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1

Touch controls are mostly praised for responsiveness and customization, but some reviewers report missed taps, accidental presses, or awkward use while moving.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Touch controls are generally responsive and customizable, though sensitivity and personal preference create some mixed reactions.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.7

Transparency mode ranges from natural and useful to confusingly ineffective, with reviewer experiences varying more than for most other features.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Transparency mode is mixed: some find it natural or useful, while others hear hiss, over-processing, or weaker situational awareness.

Treble clarity
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.7

Treble receives split feedback, from clear and detailed to blown out, spicy, harsh, or insufficiently crisp depending on reviewer and volume.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Treble is usually considered clear, airy, detailed, and non-harsh, though one review says the default tuning lacks high-end content.

Value for money
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Value for money is one of the clearest strengths, with most reviewers praising the $100 feature set despite some tradeoffs.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Value is mixed-to-positive: reviewers like the premium feature set and sound, but several note the high price and strong competition.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Voice assistant integration is positive in the one scored review, which says assistant commands worked well hands-free.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Voice assistant integration is limited in coverage but works reliably where tested or described.

Volume output
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6

Volume output is a strength for reviewers who like loud earbuds, with both scored reviews describing the Buds 3 as louder than average.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Volume output is praised as top-tier and very loud in the reviews that discuss it.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Water and sweat protection is treated positively for rain and sweat use, though reviewers do not frame it as suitable for submersion.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Water and sweat resistance is adequate for workouts or rain, but one reviewer cautions against heavier rain exposure.

Weight comfort
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Weight comfort is a strength: reviewers describe the buds as lightweight enough to barely register or be easy to forget in the ear.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Weight comfort is praised because the earbuds feel better distributed, light, and easier to forget during use.