Compare Simplicity Vacuums Allergy Upright Vacuum, S20EZM vs Dyson Ball Animal 2 Upright Vacuum Cleaner

The headlight is consistently useful in positive feedback, though one reviewer questioned non-LED longevity.

The lack of LEDs on the floorhead was a clear drawback in the only opinionated evidence for this attribute.

Small-space suitability is strong because several users cite compact footprint and easy closet storage.

Small-space suitability was poor because the large ball and bulky body made tight spaces and storage harder.

Low-profile reach is favorable when reviewers say it gets under furniture better.

Low-profile cleaning was a repeated weakness because the ball and bulk limited reach under furniture and tight areas.

Ownership costs are a concern because OEM bags, belts, and optional pet tools add expense.

Ongoing ownership costs were favorable because the vacuum is bagless and uses washable or reusable filters.

Maintenance is mixed-to-negative because belts, filters, and brushroll cleaning can require ongoing attention.

Maintenance was considered straightforward, especially because filters can be washed and routine cleaning tasks are easy to access.

Stair use is limited by weight and lift-handle complaints despite useful step/edge attachments.

Stair cleaning was generally strong because of long hose and wand reach, though one review cited moving the heavy unit as cumbersome.

Under-furniture pickup is favorable when the machine or tools reach beneath furniture well.

Under-furniture pickup was mixed-to-negative; wand/tools helped some users, but the bulky ball limited precision and low-clearance reach.

Large-debris hard-floor intake is a weakness because users report thrown particles and litter blowback.

Hard-floor large-debris intake was mixed, ranging from strong cereal pickup to complaints that the head pushed larger debris.

Surface safety is a serious caveat because the active brush can damage rugs or beat one spot while using the hose.

Surface-safety evidence was positive where mentioned, especially the ability to stop the brush bar on hard floors or delicate rugs.

Hair-wrap/tangle resistance is a concern in pet homes when long hair is linked to brushroll lockup.

Hair-wrap evidence was mixed: pet-hair tools resisted tangling, but one lab measured substantial long-hair wrap on the brush roll.

Hard-floor sealing is weak where reviewers report no squeegee effect and debris being thrown back.

Floorhead sealing was mixed-positive, with suction-loss control praised but active-baseplate behavior linked to large-debris problems.

High-pile and thick carpet performance is generally strong, helped by brush agitation and height adjustment.

High-pile carpet was the clearest cleaning limitation, especially with cereal, rugs, shag, or strong suction pulling the head down.

Longevity feedback is mixed, ranging from multi-year praise to early belt, hose, motor, and handle failures.

Durability and longevity evidence was positive, with reviewers citing long-term use, flagship status, or confidence from warranty/build quality.

Clogging prevention is a weakness in Amazon feedback, with users reporting easy clogs and teardown hassle.

Clogging evidence was limited but negative, with reviewers noting occasional dog-hair bin sticking and a narrow tube that could clog on larger items.

Support and reliability are mixed: warranty backing and refunds help, but some service attempts disappoint.

Support and reliability evidence was positive, driven by the five-year warranty and reviewer confidence in coverage.

Controls are mixed: the height dial is easy, but many users dislike the always-on roller and limited suction control.

Controls were viewed favorably when mentioned, especially suction settings and brush controls that let users adjust spinning or suction behavior.

Storage is mostly good thanks to compact footprint, though stability concerns appear in owner feedback.

Upright-stand stability and storage were weak spots, with multiple reviewers describing bulk or difficulty getting the vacuum to stay upright.

Fine dust hard-floor evidence is mixed, with some strong cleaning praise and other hard-floor complaints.

Hard-floor fine-dust pickup was strong in some tests but weaker in floor cracks and gaps.

Noise is a recurring concern, though a few users find the tone tolerable or quieter than prior vacuums.

Noise opinions varied sharply, from quiet and acceptable in some reviews to loud or noisy in others.

Above-floor pickup is mixed: hose suction can be strong, but upholstery and long cat hair disappoint some owners.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning was a strength because the wand, hose, and attachments were useful on sofas, stairs, furniture, and high areas.

Value is generally favorable, especially against higher-end vacuums, but ongoing parts costs temper the score.

Value was the main split: some reviewers said the power justified the price, while others called it too expensive or best only on sale.

Crevice pickup is praised when using the crevice tool for narrow gaps and hard-to-reach areas.

Crevice and groove pickup was split: one test praised deep crevice pickup, while hard-floor gap and larger-debris tests exposed limitations.

Innovation centers on the five-level height system, described as unusual for uprights in this class.

Innovation evidence centered on Dyson’s ball and self-adjusting systems, which reviewers called distinctive or inventive, but sometimes with practical tradeoffs.

Cord length is mixed across homes: some call it long, while others say larger spaces still require replugging.

Cord reach was consistently positive where mentioned, with reviewers appreciating the long cord or cable for larger cleaning areas.

Low-pile carpet evidence is positive but less detailed, mainly tied to nap revival and general carpet cleaning.

Low-pile and general carpet pickup drew strong praise, with several reviewers reporting excellent or near-record cleaning results.

Edge and baseboard cleaning gets positive mentions from both the attachment layout and edge-cleaning system.

Edge and baseboard cleaning was praised in test evidence, including near-edge debris collection and edge-to-edge cleaner-head design.

Area-rug handling is polarized: some rugs revived, while one flat-weave rug was damaged by the roller.

Area-rug results were mixed: one owner cleaned small rugs quickly with tools, while testers found strong suction could make rugs unworkable or sticky.

Ease of use is mostly positive, though physical effort and control quirks keep it from being universally easy.

Ease of use was generally positive, especially for routine movement and cleaning tasks, though weight-related handling complaints appear under other attributes.

Medium/all-pile carpet evidence is favorable, with reviewers calling the carpet performance outstanding or broadly ideal.

Medium or thicker-carpet suitability was supported by reviewers who described the wider brush bar and flooring range as appropriate for thicker or medium pile.

Carpet hair pickup is usually praised, especially for dogs, cats, and high-shedding homes.

Hair pickup on carpets and pet hair tests was a major strength across lab and owner reviews.

Overall opinion is positive but not unanimous: reviewers praise cleaning power while noting convenience and durability tradeoffs.

Overall opinion was mixed-to-positive: many reviewers loved the cleaning power, but some rejected it over price, weight, or handling.

Tool changes are usually easy with the included setup, though compatibility with older attachments is limited.

Tool changes were generally described as easy, with attachments clicking on, staying secure, or being simple to use.

Heavy-duty suitability is good for frequent pet-home use when the unit stays intact, with workhorse praise from some owners.

Heavy-duty suitability was mixed: reviewers admired its power for busy homes, but some found it impractical for varied carpets or prolonged whole-house use.

Tools are useful and available, but Amazon reviewers split over whether the included set is adequate.

Reviewers consistently liked the included tools and attachments, especially when they made hair, upholstery, and detailed cleaning easier.

Hose reach is mixed: videos praise long reach, while some owners find the attached hose too short or awkward.

Hose and wand reach were praised for stairs and above-floor cleaning, though one owner disliked a stiff non-bending section.

Versatility is good for carpets, tools, and above-floor cleaning, but hard-floor limitations reduce flexibility.

Versatility was strong for tool-based cleaning, although one professional review noted it was less versatile than some uprights.

Comparative comments often favor the Simplicity over Shark-type vacuums, though Rainbow-style deep cleaning can outperform it.

Comparative performance was strong overall, but not unanimous: some reviews ranked it among the best, while others found cheaper models performed better.

Assembly is treated as very easy, with reviewers emphasizing the simple handle and hose setup.

Assembly evidence was positive, with reviewers describing a simple setup and parts that clicked together easily.

Handling is mixed: it rolls or maneuvers well for some, but weight and suction make pushing difficult for others.

Maneuverability was polarizing: the ball design helped turning, but weight and suction made some users work harder.

Pet-ready performance is a major strength for carpet hair and allergens, though long-haired pets can expose brushroll issues.

Pet-ready performance was a strong point, with pet hair and upholstery hair pickup repeatedly praised, though one turbine-tool comment was critical.

Suction is the strongest recurring praise, with multiple reviewers calling it powerful or excellent.

Suction was the strongest consensus attribute, repeatedly praised as exceptional, powerful, or among the strongest tested.

Onboard tool storage is a clear convenience when the tools stay accessible and easy to use.

Onboard tool storage was praised when mentioned, especially the integrated storage for upright accessories.

Weight is one of the clearest tradeoffs, with users calling it substantial or hard to push despite cleaning power.

Weight was one of the most repeated drawbacks, with reviewers calling it heavy or difficult to lug, despite some tool-based workarounds.

The floorhead has strong agitation but mixed design feedback because the brush roll cannot be shut off.

Floorhead design was a tradeoff: reviewers liked the wide, self-adjusting head, but some found it poor with larger debris.

The finish and styling draw light but positive comments, with reviewers liking the color or clean design.

Reviewers who commented on looks described the Dyson as cool, futuristic, or one-of-a-kind, with no major finish complaints in the evidence.

Emptying and mess control are strong because the bag avoids the dirty, dusty bin-cleaning process users dislike.

Emptying and mess control were consistently praised, with several reviewers saying the bin empties easily and keeps hands away from debris.

Filtration and dust containment are among the strongest themes, especially for allergies and bagged dust control.

Filtration and containment were strong overall thanks to HEPA or washable filtration, though one lab noted a partly weakened seal on an older unit.

Build quality is disputed: video reviewers praise durable parts, while Amazon complaints cite cheap plastic and failures.

Build quality evidence was mixed-positive: some reviewers called the plastics robust and durable, while one disliked a cheap-feeling hose handle.

The bagged system is a strength because users like simple bag changes, contained dust, and steady suction.

The bagless bin was praised for large capacity and reduced interruptions, though most comments focused on capacity and disposal rather than aesthetics.

The self-adjusting head earned praise for adapting across floors, but multiple tests found that the same tight seal could hinder large debris or rugs.

Hard-floor debris blowback appears in negative Amazon feedback when litter was thrown back at the user.

One reviewer liked that the rollers stop in the upright position, framing it as a useful safety behavior around children.

The bag-full indicator receives both praise for usefulness and complaints when it fails to reset.

Handheld conversion was a weakness because a reviewer noted it cannot become a lightweight handheld unit like some alternatives.

Cord management earns praise for simple wrapping and top cord routing, with some wishing for retractability.

Cyclone performance was praised as central to the vacuum’s suction and constant cleaning power.

Hair-channel and brushroll serviceability is a concern where users cannot easily clean a locked beater bar.

Kid-friendliness evidence was positive, with one household reporting children enjoyed using the tools and another praising upright roller safety.

The forward-propel feel helps some users, but others still miss true self-propelled drive.

Stuck resistance evidence was negative, focused on area rugs and mats that strong suction could grab or lift.

Wool-rug evidence is limited but positive, with one owner saying wool rugs looked better after use.