Compare Dyson Ball Animal 2 Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs Bissell MultiClean Vacuum

Included tools (combination/crevice, stair, turbine/pet tools, and variant-specific extras) are generally seen as useful, though at least one review finds the turbine tool underpowered.

Included tools like the Pet TurboEraser and combo crevice/dusting brush are generally considered useful and pet-oriented. TechGearLab found the included mini brush tool underpowered and the set less competitive than some rivals.

Area rug handling can be challenging: several reviewers note the vacuum may stick, pull up mats, or feel overly aggressive on certain rugs due to strong suction and head design.

Suction or airflow relief and adjustment settings help it move on plush or thick rugs by reducing suction when needed. It may require tuning to balance push effort versus pickup on different piles.

Assembly is consistently described as straightforward with a few click-in parts and minimal setup time.

Assembly was described as straightforward and tool-free, with pieces clicking into place easily. Setup did not require special tools or complicated steps in the first-look review.

Bagless bin capacity is described as large (roughly 0.48–0.55 gal / about 2L), supporting longer sessions; sealing is generally good, with occasional minor leakage notes in lab testing.

The bagless bin is easy to remove and empty, and reviewers appreciated the simple pop-off canister. Bin capacity is described as slightly below average but usually not limiting for typical cleans.

Build quality is often described as robust with durable plastics, but a minority of comments call out cheaper-feeling hose/handle plastics.

High-pile carpet results are mixed: suction is strong, but several reviews report it can be difficult to push or it may struggle to capture larger debris sitting high in the pile.

High-pile and shag results are more mixed, with TechGearLab reporting weaker extraction and leftover heavy debris in fibers. It may require extra passes or may not satisfy users with thick plush rugs.

Low-pile carpet performance is a consistent strength, with strong debris and hair pickup reported across both consumer and test-focused reviews.

Generally solid on low-pile carpet, with several reviews showing good pickup on common debris and pet hair. One lab noted it works best with forward passes and can leave debris on the back stroke.

No summary yet.

In side-by-side demos, it picked up a mixed debris load from a medium-pile rug efficiently, sometimes in a single pass. Performance is generally framed as strong for a corded upright in its price class.

Debris flow is generally reliable, but a narrow wand/tube can clog if large items are picked up, and hair tangling around the brush can add periodic clearing.

Some debris can build up around the brush area when the brushroll is off on hard floors, requiring occasional clearing. Otherwise, reviews do not describe frequent full clogs during normal debris pickup.

Comparative discussions often place it among the most powerful uprights tested, though some reviewers prefer newer or less expensive competitors depending on features and value.

Vacuum Wars and a side-by-side comparison suggest its surface pickup competes with more expensive uprights, especially on debris pickup tests. Other testing places it mid-pack, indicating competitors may win on crevice or hardwood fine-dust priorities.

Controls are simple and functional, commonly including suction-level selection and brush control; most feedback is positive with few learning-curve complaints.

Controls include brushroll on/off plus suction or airflow-relief adjustments for plush versus low carpet. They are straightforward, though not as automatic as some competitors' sensor-driven modes.

The Lift-Off canister detaches from the floorhead, enabling portable above-floor cleaning. A limitation noted is that the canister does not pair with the powered floorhead like a true canister vacuum, reducing some flexibility.

Cord length and reach are strong for a corded upright (often cited around 30–35 ft cord and extended total reach), reducing outlet changes during cleaning.

Cord length is described as slightly below average on the Slim version, but not a major issue for many. A separate cord-rewind variant integrates the cord internally for convenience.

Cord wrap and basic cord management are mentioned as straightforward and adequate for storage.

The automatic cord rewind is a key convenience feature on the cord-rewind model and worked well in the demo. The same reviewer warned that rewind mechanisms can jam over time, creating uncertainty about longevity.

Crevice and groove pickup is often called out as a strong point thanks to high suction, though fine powder in floor gaps can still require extra passes or tool use.

Crevice performance is a recurring weakness, attributed to the large intake gates that reduce sealed suction. Reviewers note it collects less in crevice tests than peers and is not the best choice for tight gaps.

Cyclone system is repeatedly credited for strong, consistent pickup and maintaining performance room-to-room, with only occasional notes that floorhead design (not suction) limits large-debris pickup.

No summary yet.

Reviews mention this area with mixed to positive feedback overall (average score about 4.20), with performance varying by flooring, settings, and user expectations.

Opinions vary: some owners describe it as easy to maneuver, lightweight-feeling, and simple to operate. TechGearLab rated ease of use below average, citing harder pushing and turning and less seamless floor transitions.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is repeatedly rated near the top, with strong edging tests and effective side channels at the floorhead.

Edge cleaning is adequate when approaching head-on, but along-the-wall passes can leave material behind. Some users also noticed the floorhead rubber can drag instead of gliding smoothly against wood.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and hygienic (one-button or point-and-shoot style), with minimal need to touch debris.

Emptying is typically a one-button drop into the trash, and users describe it as straightforward and low-hassle. This simplicity is a consistent positive in owner-style reviews.

Whole-machine HEPA filtration and washable filters are praised for allergen control, though one lab-style review noted the system can be only partially sealed over years of use.

Sealed HEPA filtration is a standout, passing fog/particle tests with little to no visible leakage and earning strong filtration scores. Multiple reviewers call out the allergen system as a meaningful benefit for air quality.

Self-adjusting floorhead design improves sealing and surface adaptation, but multiple reviewers say it can sit too close and push larger debris or reduce usability on some rugs.

The floorhead uses large front gates and (on some versions) a rubber squeegee or strip that improves intake of bigger debris on hard floors. The same rubber elements can affect glide or push effort on certain hard floors and plush carpets.

A full-width squeegee behind the brushroll helps maintain contact and improve hard-floor suction for tile, laminate, and hardwood. This feature is framed as a practical upgrade for hard-floor pickup.

Carpet hair pickup, especially pet hair, is repeatedly rated excellent and aligns with the product positioning for homes with shedding animals.

Pet-hair tests and user demos show above-average carpet hair pickup for the category, leaving carpets looking clean. Some long hair can still remain or wrap around the brushroll depending on hair length and pile.

Long-hair management is a weak spot on the main brush in some objective testing (notable tangling reported), even though pet-hair pickup is strong and some turbine tools resist tangles.

The tangle-free brushroll is consistently praised for reducing hair wrap compared with typical uprights. However, long-hair wrap still occurred in some testing, and one reviewer found hair removal tedious because the roller could not be removed.

On hard floors, fine dust pickup is generally strong, but multiple tests note residue can remain in cracks/crevices (e.g., flour between boards) depending on technique and settings.

Vacuum Wars reports strong surface pickup including fine debris on hard floors, helped by the floorhead design and squeegee. TechGearLab found it left sand behind (especially with the brushroll stopped), so it may underperform on heavy fine-dust loads.

Large-debris pickup is inconsistent: some reviewers get solid results with the correct head setting, while others report the self-adjusting head can push cereal/large bits instead of ingesting them.

Large front gates let it ingest larger crumbs, litter, oats, and similar debris well, with Vacuum Wars calling it rare performance for an upright. Some testing still found below-average hardwood totals, suggesting results depend on debris type and technique.

Multiple sources note the floorhead lacks LED headlights, which can make it harder to see debris in darker spaces.

The Allergen Lift-Off Pet Slim versions reviewed include a bright bank of LED headlights that reviewers found more helpful than expected. A comparison video notes some lower-end Bissell variants omit lights, so availability depends on the exact model.

Hose and wand reach are frequently praised for above-floor work (stairs, corners, behind furniture), though one reviewer notes the wand/tube can feel narrow for larger items.

Reported hose length around 6 to 7 feet provides decent reach for above-floor tasks. It is generally seen as adequate rather than exceptional.

A few comments suggest kid-friendliness via safety behavior when parked upright (rollers/brush not spinning), though overall usability still depends on handling the unit's weight.

Maintenance is viewed as simple: wash filters on a schedule, empty the bin, and occasionally clear hair/debris from the brush or airway.

Routine maintenance includes rinsing pre-filters, keeping filters dry, and occasional hair or debris cleanup around the roller area. At least one tester disliked that the main roller cannot be removed, making hair removal more tedious.

The Slim head and swivel steering are praised for quick turns and tighter spaces. Conversely, lab testing reported it can be hard to push on mats or when turning, depending on floor type and settings.

Noise impressions vary by test: some measurements place it in the high-60s/low-70s dB range while others find it louder; overall it is not silent, but generally within typical upright ranges.

Multiple user-style reviews describe it as not super loud and relatively pleasant sounding, with a quiet brushroll. It is not described as whisper-quiet, but overall noise is viewed as reasonable for an upright.

Onboard storage for key tools and brackets is appreciated for keeping frequently used attachments accessible without a separate bag.

Some versions include onboard storage for a crevice tool or other accessories, which users liked for convenience. Storage details vary by model version.

Overall sentiment trends positive on cleaning power and results, with the most common drawbacks being weight, high price, and occasional usability quirks on rugs/tight spaces.

Most reviewers describe it as one of Bissell's strongest upright offerings and praise its all-around pickup, especially in Vacuum Wars testing. TechGearLab scored it average and highlighted weak suction and hardwood shortcomings, so impressions vary by test method and expectations.

At least one reviewer noted the vacuum arrived well protected with no box damage. Packaging experience appears positive but is not widely discussed.

Pet-focused performance is a highlight, with strong pet-hair pickup and useful pet tools, though tool effectiveness can vary by included kit and expectations.

Repeatedly positioned as pet-friendly thanks to the Pet TurboEraser, Lift-Off above-floor cleaning, and solid pet-hair pickup. Hair wrap can still happen, but overall it is seen as a practical choice for common pet messes.

Price is a frequent criticism: many reviewers call it expensive, recommending it most when discounted or when maximum suction matters more than cost.

Often viewed as a mid-level priced upright that can deliver debris pickup comparable to pricier models, making it a value play for many. One lab review and the cord-rewind reviewer felt the price was high relative to crevice/hardwood results or compared with other Bissell options.

Stair cleaning is a standout: the long hose/wand reach lets users clean many steps from one position, reducing the need to carry the main body upstairs.

Lift-Off mode and the included tools make stairs and pet beds easier than with a standard upright. Above-floor cleaning is repeatedly cited as a practical use case.

Bulky storage footprint and upright-stand behavior show tradeoffs: some users report an finicky click/lock into the upright position and overall size that can be harder to store.

Reviews consistently describe class-leading suction that deep-cleans carpets and pulls embedded debris, but the strength can make the vacuum feel grabby on plush carpet and some rugs.

Airflow at the floorhead is described as slightly above average, but sealed suction and hose metrics are often below average. The design favors open airflow for debris intake, which can reduce suction seal for crevice work.

The Slim version's narrower cleaning path improves maneuvering in tight areas and around furniture. The tradeoff noted is a shorter cord compared with the wider-head version.

Long-term reliability is not extensively covered, but the cord-rewind reviewer specifically questioned how durable the rewind mechanism will be. Basic operation and components generally seemed solid in first-look impressions.

The combo dusting brush bristles were described as fairly stiff, with a caution to avoid delicate surfaces like screens or plastics. Using the appropriate tool and gentle pressure helps reduce risk.

Tool swaps are typically described as quick click-on/click-off, making it easy to move between floor cleaning and above-floor attachments.

Parts click together without tools and attachments are easy to swap for most tasks. Some reviewers wished the handle separated from the wand to make switching to hose-attached tools faster.

Under-furniture reach is limited for an upright; bulk and the ball housing prevent cleaning far under low-clearance furniture without moving items or switching to the wand.

Because Lift-Off does not connect to the powered floorhead, it cannot fully mimic a low-profile canister setup for under-furniture cleaning. The slim head and wand can still help reach some areas, but expectations should be moderate.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning are frequently praised when using the turbine and combination tools, especially for furniture and blankets with hair.

The Pet TurboEraser and wand handle upholstery and above-floor dusting reasonably well, with some tests landing around average. A few reviewers felt the turbo tool was underpowered, especially on embedded debris.

Versatility is good for an upright via wand and tools, but it is not a true convertible handheld and can feel less flexible than lift-away or cordless designs.

Overall versatility is a major theme: it can switch between upright floor cleaning and Lift-Off above-floor tasks, and it includes pet-focused tools. Weak crevice suction and some hardwood fine-dust shortcomings are the main constraints.

Multiple reviewers flag the unit as heavy (roughly 16–17.5 lb), which can add arm strain during whole-home cleaning or when carrying it between floors.

Measured and listed weight is around 15 to 16 pounds, placing it in a mid-weight range for uprights. Some users still describe it as lightweight in hand, likely due to swivel and balance.