Compare Dyson Ball Animal 2 Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752

Included tools (combination/crevice, stair, turbine/pet tools, and variant-specific extras) are generally seen as useful, though at least one review finds the turbine tool underpowered.

Most reviews highlight a strong accessory bundle (crevice, upholstery tools, dusting variants, and often hard-floor and pet tools), plus the option of a caddy on some kits. Complaints focus on missing or downgraded accessories in some packages, limited included brushes, and frustration sourcing compatible add-ons.

Design feedback is generally positive, with some reviewers calling the finish modern and attractive. A few owners describe the look as dated or purely utilitarian, but aesthetics rarely impact overall satisfaction compared to performance factors.

Area rug handling can be challenging: several reviewers note the vacuum may stick, pull up mats, or feel overly aggressive on certain rugs due to strong suction and head design.

Area rug handling is frequently described as challenging on smaller or lighter rugs due to strong suction, with reports of bunching, stalling, or difficulty pulling backward. Heavier rugs tend to fare better, and using the high-pile/area-rug setting improves usability but does not eliminate the issue.

Assembly is consistently described as straightforward with a few click-in parts and minimal setup time.

Assembly is widely described as fast and straightforward, with parts clicking into place cleanly. Unboxing-style reviews often highlight that setup can be done in minutes without special tools.

Several reviews describe protective shutoff behavior or clear warning indicators when the brush stops or a clog occurs, helping prevent belt damage or overheating. Users who encounter clogs often resolve them by clearing hair/string from the brush roll and obstructions from internal pathways.

Bagless bin capacity is described as large (roughly 0.48–0.55 gal / about 2L), supporting longer sessions; sealing is generally good, with occasional minor leakage notes in lab testing.

The bagless dust cup is described as convenient, but capacity is debated: some call it large for longer sessions, while others say usable volume feels smaller than expected (especially in heavy pet homes). Many agree the shape helps collect a lot quickly, which can mean frequent emptying when tackling deep-clean jobs.

Build quality is often described as robust with durable plastics, but a minority of comments call out cheaper-feeling hose/handle plastics.

Build quality sentiment is mixed: many describe solid plastics and secure connections (sometimes noting a metal wand), while others cite flimsy-feeling latches, hose cracking over time, or dust-cup component breakage. Overall impressions range from sturdy workhorse to cost-optimized in specific parts.

High-pile carpet results are mixed: suction is strong, but several reviews report it can be difficult to push or it may struggle to capture larger debris sitting high in the pile.

High-pile carpet performance is generally rated strong when using the high-pile/area-rug setting, and many reviewers highlight effective pet hair removal. Some also report the lack of height adjustment and strong suction can cause rug grabbing, carpet seam lift, or long-term wear on certain rugs.

Low-pile carpet performance is a consistent strength, with strong debris and hair pickup reported across both consumer and test-focused reviews.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, with many reviewers describing one-pass improvement and deep debris recovery compared to prior vacuums. The main drawback in low-pile settings is that strong suction can make backward pulls feel like a workout for some users.

No summary yet.

Medium-pile carpet performance is consistently strong in both subjective impressions and structured pickup tests, with many reviewers describing visibly revived carpets. Some note that the unit may require multiple passes for very heavy debris loads, but overall effectiveness remains a key selling point.

Debris flow is generally reliable, but a narrow wand/tube can clog if large items are picked up, and hair tangling around the brush can add periodic clearing.

Clogging reports are mixed: several reviewers note it can power through messy tests and does not easily choke on typical carpet debris, but others report hair/dirt buildup in the floorhead and occasional clogs in pet tools. Users who maintain filters and clear hair from the brush roll report smoother ongoing performance.

Comparative discussions often place it among the most powerful uprights tested, though some reviewers prefer newer or less expensive competitors depending on features and value.

Comparisons commonly position the NV752 as competitive with pricier Dyson uprights on carpet while offering more configuration flexibility. In head-to-head pet-hair testing, some competitors outperform it on anti-tangle and certain upholstery tool behavior, while the Shark often wins on filtration and hard-floor behavior versus kickback-prone designs.

Controls are simple and functional, commonly including suction-level selection and brush control; most feedback is positive with few learning-curve complaints.

Controls on the handle and a three-surface selector are frequently praised as convenient and intuitive. The most common control-related complaints are the lack of fine-grained suction/height adjustment and, in a few cases, a power button that feels finicky or hard to press.

Powered Lift-Away is repeatedly cited as the core differentiator: it enables cleaning under beds and furniture while keeping the powered head active, and it improves stair cleaning compared to standard uprights. The main downside is that the detached pod can feel heavy to carry during extended above-floor sessions.

Cord length and reach are strong for a corded upright (often cited around 30–35 ft cord and extended total reach), reducing outlet changes during cleaning.

Cord length is commonly described as usable but not class-leading, with some citing 30 ft and others noting newer units closer to 25 ft. Many owners explicitly wish for an extra 2 to 5 ft to reduce outlet switching.

Cord wrap and basic cord management are mentioned as straightforward and adequate for storage.

Cord management is generally manual wrap, and side routing can get in the way for some users. Multiple reviewers specifically wish for a retractable cord or better routing to reduce tangles during use.

Crevice and groove pickup is often called out as a strong point thanks to high suction, though fine powder in floor gaps can still require extra passes or tool use.

The crevice tool and wand setup are repeatedly cited as effective for corners, baseboard gaps, vents, and furniture seams. Lighted wand configurations (when included) are viewed as especially helpful for seeing debris in tight crevices.

Cyclone system is repeatedly credited for strong, consistent pickup and maintaining performance room-to-room, with only occasional notes that floorhead design (not suction) limits large-debris pickup.

No summary yet.

Swivel steering and cornering are frequently praised, especially on carpet, and many users describe a smooth glide. The most common handling negatives are top-heaviness, wrist/back strain for some users, and a tendency to tip when pulling on the hose during above-floor cleaning.

Reviews mention this area with mixed to positive feedback overall (average score about 4.20), with performance varying by flooring, settings, and user expectations.

Ease of use is generally rated high for standard upright floor cleaning due to swivel steering, strong pickup, and quick controls. Usability drops for some in lift-away and wand modes because of pod weight, tipping risk, and managing cord plus hose together.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is repeatedly rated near the top, with strong edging tests and effective side channels at the floorhead.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is generally rated positively, with several reviewers noting it can run tight to baseboards. A few mention side-to-side asymmetry where one side cleans edges more effectively than the other, sometimes requiring extra passes.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and hygienic (one-button or point-and-shoot style), with minimal need to touch debris.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and cleaner than many competitors, often via a bottom-drop mechanism and an additional top access point on some designs. While a few mention breakage or lid issues, the dominant theme is easy, low-mess dumping and less hair sticking inside.

Whole-machine HEPA filtration and washable filters are praised for allergen control, though one lab-style review noted the system can be only partially sealed over years of use.

Filtration is consistently a standout: multiple test reviews emphasize sealed, HEPA-style filtration and strong containment, including smoke-test style demonstrations. Allergy-focused users frequently cite cleaner air and less dust blowback compared to alternatives.

Self-adjusting floorhead design improves sealing and surface adaptation, but multiple reviewers say it can sit too close and push larger debris or reduce usability on some rugs.

The floorhead is widely viewed as strong on carpets and supported by helpful indicators and lighting in some reviews, but its low front lip and aggressive suction can create issues on hard floors and with large debris. A recurring complaint is the lack of true height adjustment, which can contribute to rug grabbing and, in some homes, wear on certain area rugs.

Carpet hair pickup, especially pet hair, is repeatedly rated excellent and aligns with the product positioning for homes with shedding animals.

Carpet hair pickup is one of the strongest consensus positives, with multiple reviews describing major hair recovery even after other vacuums were used. This is frequently highlighted by multi-pet households and deep-clean comparisons against older machines.

Hair pickup on hard floors varies widely. Some reviewers note it struggles to pull hair in with the main head on bare floors, while others report good results when using the dedicated hard-floor tool or adjusting settings appropriately.

Long-hair management is a weak spot on the main brush in some objective testing (notable tangling reported), even though pet-hair pickup is strong and some turbine tools resist tangles.

Tangle resistance is inconsistent and highly hair-length dependent. Some reviewers describe acceptable real-world performance, while multiple others report long pet and human hair wrapping the brush roll and requiring scissors or manual cleaning, including a head-to-head test where it performed poorly on detangling.

On hard floors, fine dust pickup is generally strong, but multiple tests note residue can remain in cracks/crevices (e.g., flour between boards) depending on technique and settings.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is often reported as good, with sand and powder-like debris generally handled well in tests. Some owners with grouted tile or tricky surfaces report needing multiple passes, indicating results can depend on floor texture and the chosen mode/tool.

Large-debris pickup is inconsistent: some reviewers get solid results with the correct head setting, while others report the self-adjusting head can push cereal/large bits instead of ingesting them.

Large debris intake on hard floors is the most polarized performance area: some reviewers report no snowplowing and easy pickup of cereal and crumbs, while others (including a pro review) say it can push larger particles unless the dedicated hard-floor tool is used. Expect best results when using the correct attachment and surface setting.

Multiple sources note the floorhead lacks LED headlights, which can make it harder to see debris in darker spaces.

LED lighting is one of the most consistently praised features, with reviewers highlighting bright lights on the floorhead and, in many configurations, on the wand/handle for attachment use. Lights are frequently credited with revealing dirt that would otherwise be missed.

Hose and wand reach are frequently praised for above-floor work (stairs, corners, behind furniture), though one reviewer notes the wand/tube can feel narrow for larger items.

Hose length is a frequent complaint: multiple reviewers describe it as short and not very extendable, making high-reach cleaning harder without moving the base. The lift-away pod helps compensate but shifts the burden to carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

A few comments suggest kid-friendliness via safety behavior when parked upright (rollers/brush not spinning), though overall usability still depends on handling the unit's weight.

Maintenance is viewed as simple: wash filters on a schedule, empty the bin, and occasionally clear hair/debris from the brush or airway.

Routine maintenance is generally considered manageable, with washable filters and accessible components emphasized in multiple reviews. The biggest maintenance pain point is brush-roll hair removal, which can range from occasional to frequent depending on hair length and pet load.

Noise impressions vary by test: some measurements place it in the high-60s/low-70s dB range while others find it louder; overall it is not silent, but generally within typical upright ranges.

Noise impressions skew positive for an upright: several reviews call it quieter than some competing uprights and certain Dyson models. It is still commonly acknowledged as not truly quiet, especially under high-suction carpet modes.

Onboard storage for key tools and brackets is appreciated for keeping frequently used attachments accessible without a separate bag.

Onboard storage is often described as limited, commonly holding only a couple of tools on the body. Several reviewers mention tools falling off or needing a separate bag/caddy for the remaining accessories.

Longevity reports are mixed: many owners claim multi-year service (often 5 to 10+ years) and repeat purchases, while others report earlier failures such as hose splitting, dust cup/lid breakage, or brush-motor issues. Overall durability seems highly dependent on usage intensity and hair load.

Overall sentiment trends positive on cleaning power and results, with the most common drawbacks being weight, high price, and occasional usability quirks on rugs/tight spaces.

Packaging is usually described as adequate to good, especially when double-boxed, but there are notable complaints about missing parts in used or open-box purchases. When fully complete, kits often include bags or caddies that help keep accessories organized.

Pet-focused performance is a highlight, with strong pet-hair pickup and useful pet tools, though tool effectiveness can vary by included kit and expectations.

Most reviewers frame the NV752 as a strong pet-home upright thanks to deep carpet cleaning, a pet-focused tool set, and sealed filtration. The main drawbacks for pet owners are brush-roll hair wrap on long hair and mixed performance from some air-powered pet tools depending on the included version.

Price is a frequent criticism: many reviewers call it expensive, recommending it most when discounted or when maximum suction matters more than cost.

Value is commonly rated high: many compare it favorably to more expensive Dysons, citing similar cleaning results at a lower price. Detractors argue that missing accessories, short hose/cord, and hair-wrap maintenance reduce the value proposition for their specific homes.

The self-propelled or drive-assist feel is widely mentioned as making carpet cleaning faster and easier. Some users love it, while others find it overly aggressive, describing the vacuum as pulling forward or being difficult to control in tight spaces.

Stair cleaning is a standout: the long hose/wand reach lets users clean many steps from one position, reducing the need to carry the main body upstairs.

Stair cleaning is frequently called out as easier than typical uprights because Lift-Away lets users bring suction and tools to the stairs without moving the full base. The main limitation is the weight of the pod during longer stair sessions.

Bulky storage footprint and upright-stand behavior show tradeoffs: some users report an finicky click/lock into the upright position and overall size that can be harder to store.

Storage footprint is often described as reasonable for a full-size upright, but stability is inconsistent: several users call it top-heavy and prone to tipping when using the hose or lift-away in certain configurations. Some mitigate this by using the caddy or carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

Reviews consistently describe class-leading suction that deep-cleans carpets and pulls embedded debris, but the strength can make the vacuum feel grabby on plush carpet and some rugs.

Across reviews and test-style videos, the NV752 is repeatedly described as very high suction with strong airflow (often measured in the low-to-mid 20 kPa range). A recurring theme is that suction can feel almost too strong on small rugs and some attachment use-cases.

Multiple reviews (including professional cleaners and heavy pet households) describe it as a capable workhorse for deep cleaning and high hair load. The main heavy-duty downsides are frequent bin emptying in extreme pet homes and brush-roll hair maintenance.

Support experiences vary widely. Some reviewers report helpful troubleshooting and reasonable parts discounts, while others describe warranty gaps (especially around brush-head components) and a frustrating parts/coverage process.

Tool swaps are typically described as quick click-on/click-off, making it easy to move between floor cleaning and above-floor attachments.

Tool swaps and mode changes are generally described as button-driven and quick, with the wand and pod detaching cleanly. A minority of users find handling awkward when they must carry the pod while using attachments, which can reduce the perceived simplicity.

Under-furniture reach is limited for an upright; bulk and the ball housing prevent cleaning far under low-clearance furniture without moving items or switching to the wand.

Under-furniture pickup is repeatedly praised as a core benefit of the Powered Lift-Away design, enabling flatter reach under beds and many couches without losing powered-head performance. A few users still report limitations under very low-clearance furniture, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning are frequently praised when using the turbine and combination tools, especially for furniture and blankets with hair.

Above-floor cleaning is often praised when using the wand and upholstery tools, especially for couches, pet beds, and car interiors. Performance varies by included pet tool version: motorized tools are usually applauded, while air-powered tools sometimes stall or collect hair on their rollers.

Versatility is good for an upright via wand and tools, but it is not a true convertible handheld and can feel less flexible than lift-away or cordless designs.

Versatility is a major strength: reviews repeatedly emphasize moving between upright cleaning, lift-away pod use, and wand/attachment work for stairs, upholstery, ceilings, and under-furniture cleaning. The tradeoff is that full versatility sometimes requires carrying the pod and managing cord and hose together.

Multiple reviewers flag the unit as heavy (roughly 16–17.5 lb), which can add arm strain during whole-home cleaning or when carrying it between floors.

Most reviews place weight around 15 to 16 lb and call it heavy or top-heavy, particularly for users with back or wrist sensitivity. Many also note the self-propelled feel helps offset pushing effort during carpet cleaning.