Compare Dyson Ball Animal 2 Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs Eureka PowerSpeed Upright Vacuum Cleaner

Included tools (combination/crevice, stair, turbine/pet tools, and variant-specific extras) are generally seen as useful, though at least one review finds the turbine tool underpowered.

Reviews commonly mention multiple included tools (often including crevice, upholstery/dusting tools, and in some versions a pet/turbo brush), plus convenient onboard storage.

No summary yet.

Area rug handling can be challenging: several reviewers note the vacuum may stick, pull up mats, or feel overly aggressive on certain rugs due to strong suction and head design.

Assembly is consistently described as straightforward with a few click-in parts and minimal setup time.

Assembly is consistently described as quick and simple, with basic parts (handle, hose/cord hooks) snapping in and the unit ready in about a minute in some tests.

Bagless bin capacity is described as large (roughly 0.48–0.55 gal / about 2L), supporting longer sessions; sealing is generally good, with occasional minor leakage notes in lab testing.

The 2.6 L bagless bin is repeatedly highlighted as large and easy to empty via a bottom-release design, reducing how often you have to stop mid-clean.

Build quality is often described as robust with durable plastics, but a minority of comments call out cheaper-feeling hose/handle plastics.

Build quality is commonly described as more plastic and basic (not premium), but generally acceptable for the price point.

High-pile carpet results are mixed: suction is strong, but several reviews report it can be difficult to push or it may struggle to capture larger debris sitting high in the pile.

Performance on high-pile/shag is a common weak spot: reviewers cite reduced deep pickup and harder pushing, often requiring more passes and careful height selection.

Low-pile carpet performance is a consistent strength, with strong debris and hair pickup reported across both consumer and test-focused reviews.

On low-pile carpet it’s described as solid and competitive for the price, with multiple reviews noting good debris collection once height is set correctly.

No summary yet.

No summary yet.

Debris flow is generally reliable, but a narrow wand/tube can clog if large items are picked up, and hair tangling around the brush can add periodic clearing.

Comparative discussions often place it among the most powerful uprights tested, though some reviewers prefer newer or less expensive competitors depending on features and value.

Controls are simple and functional, commonly including suction-level selection and brush control; most feedback is positive with few learning-curve complaints.

Cord length and reach are strong for a corded upright (often cited around 30–35 ft cord and extended total reach), reducing outlet changes during cleaning.

Cord length is repeatedly praised as “long enough” for many rooms and general home use, though some users still need outlet changes in larger layouts.

Cord wrap and basic cord management are mentioned as straightforward and adequate for storage.

Cord hooks/wrap and storage are commonly mentioned as straightforward and practical for quick winding and organization.

Crevice and groove pickup is often called out as a strong point thanks to high suction, though fine powder in floor gaps can still require extra passes or tool use.

No summary yet.

Cyclone system is repeatedly credited for strong, consistent pickup and maintaining performance room-to-room, with only occasional notes that floorhead design (not suction) limits large-debris pickup.

No summary yet.

Maneuverability is limited by the non-swivel floorhead; users often describe it as light but less agile around furniture than swiveling competitors.

Reviews mention this area with mixed to positive feedback overall (average score about 4.20), with performance varying by flooring, settings, and user expectations.

Ease of use is mixed: the machine is light and simple with foot controls, but frequent notes mention no swivel head and bending down for manual height adjustments.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is repeatedly rated near the top, with strong edging tests and effective side channels at the floorhead.

Edge/baseboard reach is repeatedly described as limited, often leaving a small strip near walls that may require a tool pass.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and hygienic (one-button or point-and-shoot style), with minimal need to touch debris.

Whole-machine HEPA filtration and washable filters are praised for allergen control, though one lab-style review noted the system can be only partially sealed over years of use.

Filtration is described as decent-to-strong for the budget class in testing, but multiple reviews emphasize the lack of true HEPA and/or a fully sealed allergen system.

Self-adjusting floorhead design improves sealing and surface adaptation, but multiple reviewers say it can sit too close and push larger debris or reduce usability on some rugs.

Floorhead design is frequently described as basic and non-swiveling, with behavior that can plow or scatter debris on hard floors depending on debris type and pass angle.

Carpet hair pickup, especially pet hair, is repeatedly rated excellent and aligns with the product positioning for homes with shedding animals.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally described as good for pet hair, with performance often improving with extra passes.

Long-hair management is a weak spot on the main brush in some objective testing (notable tangling reported), even though pet-hair pickup is strong and some turbine tools resist tangles.

Long hair tangling is a recurring theme: several reviews report wrap on the brush roll, sometimes requiring cutting/clearing, especially because the roller is often described as non-removable.

On hard floors, fine dust pickup is generally strong, but multiple tests note residue can remain in cracks/crevices (e.g., flour between boards) depending on technique and settings.

Fine debris on hard floors can be frustrating in some tests because the brush roll can scatter/spray particles, leading to extra cleanup passes.

Large-debris pickup is inconsistent: some reviewers get solid results with the correct head setting, while others report the self-adjusting head can push cereal/large bits instead of ingesting them.

Larger debris on hard floors is helped by having height adjustment, but scatter can still occur depending on the debris type and technique.

Multiple sources note the floorhead lacks LED headlights, which can make it harder to see debris in darker spaces.

Some versions are noted to include headlights, improving visibility during cleaning, but this appears variant-dependent rather than universal.

Hose and wand reach are frequently praised for above-floor work (stairs, corners, behind furniture), though one reviewer notes the wand/tube can feel narrow for larger items.

Hose length feedback is mixed; some mention decent above-floor reach (sometimes cited as ~7 ft in certain versions) while others describe the hose as short for the category.

A few comments suggest kid-friendliness via safety behavior when parked upright (rollers/brush not spinning), though overall usability still depends on handling the unit's weight.

No summary yet.

Maintenance is viewed as simple: wash filters on a schedule, empty the bin, and occasionally clear hair/debris from the brush or airway.

Maintenance is mostly routine (washable filters, bin emptying), but brush-roll hair wrap and occasional odor/filter cleaning are common upkeep points.

Noise impressions vary by test: some measurements place it in the high-60s/low-70s dB range while others find it louder; overall it is not silent, but generally within typical upright ranges.

Noise is repeatedly noted as on the louder side for the class, especially at higher settings, though some owners describe it as not excessively loud for the price.

Onboard storage for key tools and brackets is appreciated for keeping frequently used attachments accessible without a separate bag.

Onboard tool storage is frequently called out as convenient, keeping common attachments accessible without hunting for them.

Longer-term ownership feedback includes reports of holding up well over a year-plus of regular family/pet use in at least one update-style review, though it remains an entry-level design.

Overall sentiment trends positive on cleaning power and results, with the most common drawbacks being weight, high price, and occasional usability quirks on rugs/tight spaces.

Overall sentiment trends positive for budget, carpet-first needs: praised for suction, bin size, and simplicity, with the most common complaints being hard-floor scatter, agility limits, and hair wrap maintenance.

Pet-focused performance is a highlight, with strong pet-hair pickup and useful pet tools, though tool effectiveness can vary by included kit and expectations.

Pet-focused value is a consistent theme: reviewers highlight strong pet hair pickup for the price and versions that include a pet/turbo tool for upholstery and stairs.

Price is a frequent criticism: many reviewers call it expensive, recommending it most when discounted or when maximum suction matters more than cost.

Value is consistently rated high: many reviews frame it as one of the better budget uprights if you prioritize carpet and can accept tradeoffs on hard floors and premium filtration.

Stair cleaning is a standout: the long hose/wand reach lets users clean many steps from one position, reducing the need to carry the main body upstairs.

Bulky storage footprint and upright-stand behavior show tradeoffs: some users report an finicky click/lock into the upright position and overall size that can be harder to store.

Reviews consistently describe class-leading suction that deep-cleans carpets and pulls embedded debris, but the strength can make the vacuum feel grabby on plush carpet and some rugs.

Reviewers frequently describe strong suction/airflow for a budget upright, with test-style content showing respectable airflow and lift relative to similarly priced competitors.

Reliability signals are generally positive in owner updates (no issues reported over extended use in at least one case), but support experiences are not deeply covered across the set.

Tool swaps are typically described as quick click-on/click-off, making it easy to move between floor cleaning and above-floor attachments.

Tool changes are generally described as simple: pop off the hose/handle and attach tools directly or via the handle extension for extra reach.

Under-furniture reach is limited for an upright; bulk and the ball housing prevent cleaning far under low-clearance furniture without moving items or switching to the wand.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning are frequently praised when using the turbine and combination tools, especially for furniture and blankets with hair.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is considered helpful with included tools, especially for quick pickups, though some reviews note it’s not as thorough as a mini motorized brush unless you use a turbo tool.

Versatility is good for an upright via wand and tools, but it is not a true convertible handheld and can feel less flexible than lift-away or cordless designs.

No summary yet.

Multiple reviewers flag the unit as heavy (roughly 16–17.5 lb), which can add arm strain during whole-home cleaning or when carrying it between floors.

Multiple sources call it lightweight for an upright (often around 10–12 lb depending on variant), making it easier to carry and use for quick cleanups.