Review: Amazon Basics Upright Vacuum

2.7
Based on methodology below
87
Insights analyzed
34
Grouped by key features
7
From expert reviews
Scores below reflect consolidated expert coverage across these features.
Bottom Line

Choose this ultra-light, ultra-cheap upright if you mainly vacuum low-pile carpet and can accept basic tools; Skip it for hard floors or allergies, since backscatter and poor filtration are recurring themes.

Best for

Small, mostly carpeted spaces with low-pile rugs where weight and upfront price matter most, and expectations are strictly budget-level.

Not for

Homes with lots of hard flooring, frequent large-debris messes (cereal/rice), or allergy-sensitive users who need sealed, high-filtration dust containment.

Verdict

The Amazon Basics Upright is built to hit a rock-bottom price, and the reviews generally agree it delivers a very light, simple corded upright that can handle basic carpet cleanup, especially fine debris and pet hair on low-pile. The tradeoff is that its floorhead and airflow control are not tuned for mixed-surface homes: multiple tests show debris scatter and weak results on hard floors and larger particles, plus a lack of sealed/HEPA-style filtration. Above-floor cleaning is possible, but hose suction and reach are frequently described as limited. For carpet-only, short-term, or backup use it can be serviceable; for whole-home cleaning it is often outclassed by slightly pricier uprights.

Pros

  • 4.9
    based on 6 reviews
    Weight: 4.9, based on 6 reviews
    Repeatedly described and measured as extremely lightweight for an upright (roughly 8–9 lb), making it easy to carry and maneuver.
  • 4.4
    based on 2 reviews
    Assembly and Setup: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
    Assembly is typically quick and simple, often limited to snapping the handle into place and parking the hose/tools.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    Emptying and Mess Control: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Emptying is mechanically easy, but multiple reviewers advise emptying outdoors due to dust exposure and lack of sealed containment.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    Suitability for small spaces: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Several comments frame it as most suitable for small, carpet-leaning spaces or as a backup vacuum, rather than a do-everything primary cleaner.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Pet hair pickup is frequently cited as a relative strength, including high pickup rates in some controlled tests.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Packaging quality: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Packaging is noted as simple and relatively eco-friendly in one unboxing, with heavy reliance on cardboard and minimal plastic.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 4.0, based on 1 review
    The vacuum is described as small and narrow, which can be convenient for storage and quick deployment, especially as a secondary unit.
  • 3.8
    based on 3 reviews
    Onboard tool storage: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
    Onboard tool storage is present and appreciated for convenience, though the overall tool set remains minimal.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    On low-pile carpet, fine debris pickup is one of its better areas in multiple reviews, often described as decent-to-good for the price.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Cord management: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Cord storage exists, but at least one reviewer notes awkward cord-hook placement and extra steps to avoid running over the cord during use.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 2 reviews
    Tool-change simplicity: 3.4, based on 2 reviews
    Tool use is straightforward in concept (wand/hose plus small tools), but some workflows are fiddly, such as managing the cord when removing the wand and dealing with limited reach.
  • 3.1
    based on 4 reviews
    Suction and Airflow: 3.1, based on 4 reviews
    Suction/airflow is generally described as adequate for basic carpet pickup, but multiple measured tests place it behind stronger uprights and especially limited through the hose/wand.
  • 3.0
    based on 6 reviews
    Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 3.0, based on 6 reviews
    On medium-pile carpet, results are mixed: sand can be picked up reasonably well, but medium-sized debris can be snowplowed due to fixed gates and no height adjustment.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Bin and Bag: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Bagless design with a relatively large bin for the class is convenient, but several reviewers point to a simple cyclone and poor sealing that can let fine dust migrate into filters or back out.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Controls and UI: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Controls are simple (basic on/off, foot-style operation mentioned), but the lack of key functionality like brush roll shutoff and height adjustment is a frequent criticism.
  • 2.9
    based on 3 reviews
    Versatility: 2.9, based on 3 reviews
    Versatility is limited by its weak hard-floor performance and short hose, though the light weight and basic wand/hose setup can cover occasional stairs or car touchups.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Hair wrap is a common drawback, especially with long hair, which can tangle around the brush roll and require manual removal.
  • 2.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Accessories and Tools: 2.7, based on 3 reviews
    Tools are basic and limited (commonly crevice and a small brush/upholstery-style tool depending on source), and at least one reviewer notes nonstandard sizing that makes upgrades difficult.
  • 2.5
    based on 3 reviews
    Maintenance requirements: 2.5, based on 3 reviews
    Ongoing maintenance is typical for cheap bagless uprights (frequent emptying and washable filter care), and reviewers often stress extra caution because of dusty handling.
  • 2.5
    based on 6 reviews
    Price and Value: 2.5, based on 6 reviews
    The price is a major draw, but several reviewers caution that the low cost comes with meaningful cleaning and filtration compromises, often recommending spending a bit more for broader usability.
  • 2.2
    based on 2 reviews
    Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 2.2, based on 2 reviews
    Above-floor cleaning is possible, but hose suction is repeatedly called weak and the short reach makes upholstery and tight-area cleaning less effective than better uprights.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Hose length: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Hose reach is commonly described as short/limited, which reduces comfort for cars, stairs, and above-floor tasks.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Overall opinion: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Overall sentiment trends negative to lukewarm: reviewers generally see it as a very cheap, lightweight option with narrow strengths, but too many compromises for mixed-floor homes or filtration-sensitive users.
  • 1.8
    based on 1 review
    Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 1.8, based on 1 review
    High-pile/shag carpet is repeatedly mentioned as a poor fit, with reviewers recommending spending more if you have thick carpet.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 1.5, based on 1 review
    Edge cleaning is commonly described as below average, with visible misses close to walls in side-by-side testing.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Low-profile design: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Low-profile reach is described as weak, with limited recline/clearance for getting under furniture compared with better-designed uprights.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Noise level: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Where measured, it is reported as loud for an upright class budget model (around the low-90 dB range in one comparison test).
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 1.5, based on 1 review
    At least one reviewer notes it does not get low under furniture and the head tends to lift, limiting under-bed/sofa reach.
  • 1.4
    based on 5 reviews
    Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 1.4, based on 5 reviews
    Hard-floor performance is often rated poor to merely passable; multiple tests show scatter and difficulty capturing sand/rice cleanly on bare surfaces.
  • 1.3
    based on 7 reviews
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 1.3, based on 7 reviews
    A consistent weakness: multiple sources note no HEPA-style filtration and poor sealing, with reports of fine particles escaping back into the air (including smoke/leak-style demonstrations).
  • 1.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors: 1.0, based on 3 reviews
    Hard-floor sealing is repeatedly criticized: reviewers cite no squeegee/poor sealing and no brush roll shutoff, contributing to scatter and weak hard-floor results.
  • 1.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 1.0, based on 3 reviews
    Large debris on hard floors (like rice/cereal) is a notable weak point in testing, with reports of significant scatter and low collection amounts in some trials.
  • 1.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Airflow blowback: 1.0, based on 2 reviews
    Backscatter is a recurring issue in hard-floor tests, with multiple mentions of debris being kicked or thrown behind/to the sides rather than contained.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 1.0, based on 1 review
    Crevice pickup is reported as weak in at least one measured test, showing minimal progress after multiple passes and frequent scatter.

FAQ

Is it good on hard floors?

Most reviews and tests report debris scatter on hard floors and weak pickup of larger debris, especially compared with slightly more expensive uprights.

Does it have a HEPA filter or sealed filtration?

Multiple reviewers note it does not have HEPA-style filtration and the bin/canister is not well sealed, which can allow fine dust to escape back into the air.

How heavy is it?

It is consistently described as extremely lightweight for an upright, around the 8–9 lb range in reviews that measured it.

How does it do with pet hair?

Pet hair pickup is often cited as one of its stronger points, but long hair can still wrap around the brush roll and require manual cleanup.

Where did these scores come from?

They were derived only from the provided review transcripts in the attached reviews.json.

Reviews we analyzed

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

#1
4.4
Choose the Shark Stratos for deep-cleaning power and a lift-away style body that's handy beyond the floor; Skip if you need a lightweight...
#2
4.4
Choose the Shark PowerDetect when you want an upright that crushes debris and pet hair on most floors; Skip it if you need...
#3
4.2
Choose Dreame H14 Pro for strong wet-dry pickup, lie-flat reach, and quick self-drying; Skip if you need very dry floors immediately or dislike...
#4
4.2
Choose Dyson Ball Animal 3 Extra for deep-clean power and pet-hair pickup on carpeted or mixed-floor homes. Skip it if you want something...
#5
4.1
Choose the Kenmore Featherlite Lift-Up for a featherweight, budget upright that shines on carpets and pet hair while keeping dust contained with sealed...
#6
4.1
Choose the Shark NV752 for strong carpet cleaning and versatile Powered Lift-Away reach; Skip it if you mainly vacuum hard floors with large...
#7
4.1
Choose the Dyson Ball Animal 3 for top-tier carpet deep cleaning and low-tangle pet-hair pickup. Skip it if you want a lighter, easier-to-push...
#8
4.1
Choose the Eureka OmniVerse if you want corded, high‑impact cleaning with QuickShift under‑furniture reach for the price. Skip it if you want cordless...