Arlo Essential Video Doorbell

Verdict

The Arlo Essential Wireless Video Doorbell is easy to install and offers flexible power options plus useful package and smart detection features, but its video sharpness trails top rivals and most of its best capabilities require an Arlo Secure subscription. It makes the most sense for buyers already in, or planning to build, an Arlo ecosystem who are comfortable paying a small monthly fee.

Pros

  • Complete kit in box 2 reviews 4.8
  • Delivery package monitoring 2 reviews 4.8
    Package detection reliably alerts when parcels are dropped off and is highlighted as one of the doorbell’s most genuinely useful security and convenience features.
  • Field of view & framing 5 reviews 4.7
    The doorbell’s tall, wide 1:1 view does a good job capturing visitors and packages on the doorstep, though it still trims roughly the first foot at the base of the doorframe.
  • Installation & Mounting 4 reviews 4.7
    Reviewers find the Arlo Essential Wireless Video Doorbell easy to install, whether using it as a battery-powered unit or wiring it into an existing doorbell circuit.
  • Phone call integration 2 reviews 4.6
  • Conversation recording completeness 1 review 4.5
  • Security ecosystem integration 1 review 4.5
  • Weather & temperature tolerance 1 review 4.5
  • Object & person detection 3 reviews 4.3
    Smart detection can distinguish people, vehicles, animals, and packages, providing flexible targeted alerts when used with an Arlo Secure subscription.
  • Battery & Charging 2 reviews 4.3
    The removable battery helps avoid downtime by letting owners swap in a charged spare, though reaching the battery requires taking most of the doorbell off its mount.
  • Controls & indicators 2 reviews 4.3
  • Snapshot capture 1 review 4.2
  • Zones & activity areas 3 reviews 4.2
    Customizable activity zones help limit nuisance notifications to specific areas, though zones are restricted to simple rectangular shapes unlike the more flexible polygon-based zones on some rivals.
  • Chime 3 reviews 4.1
  • Video resolution & detail 3 reviews 4.0
    Daytime video looks decent but tends to be darker, muddier, and less detailed than footage from higher-end Nest and Ring doorbells, so overall sharpness trails the best competitors.
  • Quick-reply / pre-recorded message usefulness 2 reviews 4.0
  • Quiet-time / do-not-disturb scheduling 1 review 4.0
  • Theft & Tamper 1 review 4.0
  • Notifications 4 reviews 3.9
  • Design aesthetics 4 reviews 3.9
    The doorbell has a clean, unobtrusive rectangular design with a black face and white sides, but it looks a bit bulkier on the wall than some slimmer rivals.
  • App, software & firmware 4 reviews 3.8
    The Arlo app is generally easy to use for live viewing, alerts, and two-way talk, but some settings like activity zones, package detection, and smart notifications are split between device menus and global settings, which can feel confusing to navigate.
  • Price & value 3 reviews 3.8
    At around $200, the doorbell can offer decent value, especially for Arlo users willing to add a low-cost Secure plan, but its softer video and reliance on paid features mean some competing models may deliver better overall value for certain buyers.
  • Power Options & Compatibility 5 reviews 3.8
    The doorbell can run on its built-in battery or be wired into an existing doorbell circuit, giving homeowners flexible power options.
  • Motion detection performance 1 review 3.8
  • System completeness 1 review 3.8
  • Siren loudness (if built-in) 2 reviews 3.8
  • Audio 3 reviews 3.7
  • Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread) 3 reviews 3.5
  • Low-light & Night vision 2 reviews 3.5
    Night vision is generally good and usable for identifying people and activity, though fine detail and clarity are softer than what leading rival models deliver in low light.
  • Peace of mind 2 reviews 3.5
  • Recommendation for new buyers 2 reviews 3.5
    Reviewers often recommend the doorbell to buyers who already own or plan to build an Arlo camera system and are comfortable with a small monthly fee, while shoppers who prioritize sharper video, free storage, or avoiding subscriptions may find better options among rival brands.

Cons

  • Build quality & durability 1 review 3.3
  • Ongoing ownership costs 2 reviews 3.3
    Compared with rivals that include local or limited free storage, Arlo adds an ongoing subscription cost of about $2.99 per month for one camera or $9.99 for multiple, which is modest but still an extra expense to unlock full functionality.
  • Size & form factor 1 review 3.0
    Because of its removable battery the unit protrudes over an inch and a half from the wall, making it noticeably chunkier than many competing video doorbells.
  • Reliability (general) 2 reviews 2.9
  • Storage 5 reviews 2.5
    Without an Arlo Secure subscription there is effectively no cloud storage, forcing users to rely on ad hoc screen recordings instead of having saved clips in the app.
  • Subscription 4 reviews 2.5
    Core features like recording, saving, and sharing clips require an Arlo Secure subscription, leaving only live view and notifications without it, but reviewers note the single camera fee is a relatively modest single digit monthly charge that is generally worth paying despite cheaper subscription free rivals.
  • Recording 2 reviews 2.3
    Video events are not recorded or saved unless you pay for Arlo Secure, so live viewing works but you cannot revisit past incidents without the subscription.