ASUS ROG Keris II Ace

ASUS ROG Keris II Ace Feature Scores

Explore all 53 feature scores for ASUS ROG Keris II Ace, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

53 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    25 (47%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    23 (43%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    4 (8%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    14 reviews strong consensus
    sensor performance: 4.9, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Sensor performance was one of the best-reviewed areas, repeatedly described as accurate, top-tier, or flawless.
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    weight: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Weight was consistently praised as very light, impressive, and control-friendly.
  • 4.6
    11 reviews strong consensus
    glide smoothness: 4.6, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Glide smoothness was consistently praised across stock PTFE feet and multiple surfaces.
  • 4.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    wireless performance: 4.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Wireless performance was repeatedly praised as low-latency, stable, and responsive.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    balance and weight distribution: 4.7, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Weight distribution was usually praised as well balanced, though one reviewer found the mouse slightly forward-balanced.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    FPS gaming suitability: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    FPS suitability was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for competitive aiming, speed, and esports performance.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.5, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was mostly strong, with repeated praise for rigidity and lack of flex, though one reviewer reported average build with creaking.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    surface compatibility: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Surface compatibility was strongly praised, including glass, mouse pads, tables, and varied surfaces.
  • 4.4
    11 reviews strong consensus
    polling rate: 4.4, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Polling rate support was widely praised, especially 4K wireless and included booster access, with some debate over 8K usefulness.
  • 4.2
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    shape comfort: 4.2, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Shape comfort was generally praised, especially for right-handed ergonomic users, but hand size and finger length created caveats.
  • 4.2
    12 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 4.2, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life was generally praised as good to excellent, with caveats that high polling rates and active use drain it faster.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Bluetooth support: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Bluetooth was viewed as a useful convenience for work, travel, and multi-device use, not as the preferred competitive mode.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    cable flexibility: 4.5, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The cable was usually praised as flexible, free-flowing, and low-friction, with one reviewer calling it a bit stiff.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Accuracy and tracking precision: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently praised tracking accuracy and precision, with only one reviewer warning that extreme DPI values became irregular.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    click latency: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Click latency was praised as very low or competitive, including measured or perceived fast response.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    connection stability: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Connection stability was strongly praised, with reviewers reporting no dropouts, hiccups, or interference.
  • 4.0
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    switch feel: 4.0, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Switch feel was mixed but often positive, with some crisp/punchy praise and some dull or mushy complaints.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    long-session comfort: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Long-session comfort was strongly positive where reviewers mentioned low strain, no hand pain, or reduced fatigue.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    claw grip comfort: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Claw-grip comfort was generally positive, especially relaxed claw, though hand size affected comfort.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    RGB features: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    RGB was generally appreciated as a rare lightweight-mouse touch, though a few reviewers disliked the implementation.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    palm grip comfort: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Palm grip comfort was positive for average or compatible hands, though not universal for larger hands.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    ergonomic design: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The ergonomic design was broadly praised for right-handed comfort, while left-handed users were consistently excluded.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    switch durability: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Switch durability was scored where reviewers linked optical switches to double-click prevention, hot-swapping, or durability.
  • 3.8
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    side button quality: 3.8, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Side button quality was mixed: several reviewers praised crisp placement, while others found them small, high, or stiff.
  • 4.1
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    wireless latency: 4.1, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Wireless latency was praised in 2.4GHz mode but Bluetooth was criticized as too latent for competitive gaming.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    button responsiveness: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Button responsiveness was praised for snappy, reliable, and fast actuation in several reviews.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    cross-platform compatibility: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Cross-platform use was praised through Bluetooth multi-device pairing and easy movement between PCs, laptops, tablets, and handhelds.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    onboard memory: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Onboard control and memory features were praised when reviewers could change settings or avoid software.
  • 3.6
    17 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 3.6, 17 reviews, moderate consensus
    Value was mixed: reviewers praised the feature set but often called the price expensive or hard to justify.
  • 3.6
    12 reviews low consensus
    scroll wheel quality: 3.6, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Scroll wheel quality was mixed, ranging from excellent and distinct to average, light, or prone to overscrolling.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    click noise: 4.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Click noise impressions were mixed, from quiet and pleasant to fairly loud, depending on reviewer and switch comparison.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    left and right click quality: 4.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Left and right click quality was mostly positive, with praise for consistency and similar actuation between sides.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    motion consistency: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Motion consistency was praised through comments about precise recognition, consistent tracking, and polling stability.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    DPI range: 4.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The DPI ceiling was seen as technically impressive, but one reviewer found very high DPI practically unusable.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews low consensus
    charging convenience: 3.8, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Charging and dongle convenience were mixed: USB-C and cable placement helped, but the booster/dongle setup could feel chunky.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews low consensus
    lift-off distance: 3.8, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Lift-off distance was mixed: one reviewer liked the low setting, while another found low too low and high too high.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    button customization: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Customization was considered adequate to strong where reviewers described remapping, DPI, and profile tools as straightforward or sufficient.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    2.4GHz connectivity: 4.5, 1 review
    Reviewers discussed the 2.4GHz receiver mainly as part of the broader wireless setup, with praise for low-latency use when paired with the booster.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    acceleration control: 4.5, 1 review
    The acceleration spec was only scored where a reviewer connected the 50g capability to confident fast maneuvers in FPS play.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    ecosystem integration: 4.5, 1 review
    Ecosystem integration was praised where reviewers used the Omni receiver or Aura Sync-style setup without delays.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    materials quality: 4.5, 1 review
    Materials quality was scored through reviewer judgments about the nylon/PBT shell, coating, and perceived premium or slippery feel.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    portability: 4.5, 1 review
    Portability was supported by dongle storage, Bluetooth, and multi-device/travel use.
  • 3.5
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    premium feel: 3.5, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Premium feel was mixed: some found the mouse premium, while others felt the coating or hollow shell hurt the premium impression.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    durability over time: 4.0, 1 review
    Long-term durability was not directly tested, but switch durability and repairability evidence supported limited durability scoring.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    MMO gaming suitability: 4.0, 1 review
    MMO suitability had limited but positive evidence from FFXIV/raid use and button mapping comments.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    programmable buttons: 4.0, 1 review
    Programmable buttons were considered competitive and sufficient for this class, though not extensive like MMO mice.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    skate durability: 4.0, 1 review
    Skate durability had limited evidence, but one reviewer said the skates held up well on glass.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    software stability: 4.0, 1 review
    Software stability had limited evidence, with Armoury Crate Gear praised for not affecting system performance.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    handedness options: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Handedness scored low because reviewers repeatedly noted the right-handed ergonomic shape and lack of a left-handed option.
  • 2.9
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    software usability: 2.9, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Software usability was the clearest weakness, with repeated complaints about Armoury Crate being bloated, slow, or needing improvement.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    profile switching: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Profile switching was mixed, with praise for onboard switching but criticism of the underside DPI/profile button placement.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    fingertip grip comfort: 3.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Fingertip grip comfort was mixed; some found it possible, while others found the ergonomic shell awkward for fingertip use.
  • 3.4
    12 reviews low consensus
    grip texture: 3.4, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Grip texture was the most divided attribute, ranging from non-slip praise to strong complaints about slippery coating.