Asus ROG Raikiri II

Asus ROG Raikiri II Feature Scores

Explore all 85 feature scores for Asus ROG Raikiri II, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

85 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    44 (52%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    20 (24%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (13%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    9 (11%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (1%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    16 reviews strong consensus
    trigger stop effectiveness: 5.0, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Trigger stops are one of the most consistently praised features, switching quickly into a firm, extremely short micro-switch action that suits shooters.
  • 5.0
    13 reviews strong consensus
    trigger responsiveness: 5.0, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Trigger response is outstanding in short mode, with near-instant mouse-like clicks that repeatedly impress shooter-focused testers.
  • 4.8
    17 reviews strong consensus
    included accessories: 4.8, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    The accessory bundle is a standout, typically including a protective case, charging stand, cable, dongle storage and alternate stick caps. It makes the premium package feel complete and travel-ready.
  • 4.8
    20 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 4.8, 20 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life is a major strength, commonly landing around 30–50 hours depending on RGB, vibration and audio settings. Testers rarely felt pressured to recharge during normal use.
  • 4.7
    21 reviews moderate consensus
    TMR stick performance: 4.7, 21 reviews, moderate consensus
    TMR is one of the controller’s headline strengths, delivering crisp, smooth and highly precise stick behavior in most testing. A minority found the default deadzones or tuning disappointing until adjusted.
  • 4.6
    25 reviews moderate consensus
    button quality: 4.6, 25 reviews, moderate consensus
    Micro-switch buttons are one of the most consistently praised parts of the controller, offering crisp, tactile and very fast presses. Some testers find the rigid click harsh over long sessions.
  • 4.6
    23 reviews strong consensus
    overall comfort: 4.6, 23 reviews, strong consensus
    Comfort is a broad strength thanks to the familiar Xbox-style shape, textured grips and balanced shell. The main caveat is that rear-button placement and hard micro-switch presses can reduce comfort for some hands.
  • 4.9
    11 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.9, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    The controller itself is overwhelmingly described as solid, rigid and well assembled, with tight seams and very little flex or creaking.
  • 4.8
    12 reviews strong consensus
    customization depth: 4.8, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Customization is deep, covering stick curves and deadzones, trigger ranges, vibration, lighting, mappings and profiles. Testers repeatedly describe the tuning range as one of the controller’s premium strengths.
  • 4.8
    12 reviews strong consensus
    polling rate: 4.8, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The 1,000Hz polling mode on PC is a major performance selling point, giving the controller a fast, immediate feel over both wired and 2.4GHz connections.
  • 5.0
    9 reviews strong consensus
    competitive gaming suitability: 5.0, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Competitive play is the controller’s clearest use case. Fast micro-switches, trigger stops, rear controls and low-latency connectivity repeatedly earn praise for shooters and other reaction-heavy games.
  • 4.9
    10 reviews strong consensus
    grip texture: 4.9, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The textured and rubberized grip surfaces are repeatedly praised for staying secure without feeling overly rough or sticky.
  • 4.8
    11 reviews strong consensus
    face button responsiveness: 4.8, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Face buttons register exceptionally quickly, with immediate micro-switch actuation that suits fast play. Extremely rapid repeated presses can occasionally expose reset behavior on some units.
  • 5.0
    8 reviews strong consensus
    connection reliability: 5.0, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Connection reliability is excellent across the tested modes, with repeated reports of seamless switching, stable RF performance and no meaningful dropouts.
  • 4.4
    36 reviews moderate consensus
    overall satisfaction: 4.4, 36 reviews, moderate consensus
    Overall sentiment is strongly positive: most testers see this as a high-performance premium controller with standout precision and speed. The main dissent centers on setup, price, harsh buttons and a few awkward design choices.
  • 4.7
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    analog trigger precision: 4.7, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    The full-range TMR triggers are excellent for nuanced analog control, especially throttle and braking in racing games. One tester found the feel less subtle than expected.
  • 4.7
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    input lag: 4.7, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Input lag is consistently low in testing, especially over wired and 2.4GHz connections. A small number of measurements found stick latency less impressive, but gameplay usually felt immediate.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    wireless latency: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Wireless latency over 2.4GHz is exceptionally low in most testing, often feeling nearly indistinguishable from wired play.
  • 4.6
    11 reviews low consensus
    stick drift resistance: 4.6, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Stick-drift resistance is a major reason reviewers favor the TMR hardware, with repeated confidence that it avoids the wear problem of traditional potentiometers. One test unit did show drift-like calibration behavior, tempering the otherwise strong consensus.
  • 4.6
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    premium feel: 4.6, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    The controller usually feels convincingly premium through its solid shell, finish, controls and presentation. A few testers think the light weight or cheaper dock materials weaken that impression.
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    back button usefulness: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The rear buttons can keep thumbs on the sticks and move common actions under the fingers, which testers found genuinely useful for faster play.
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    racing game suitability: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Racing games are a strong fit because the full-travel analog triggers allow fine throttle and brake control, while the precise sticks help with steering.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    analog stick smoothness: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Stick movement is consistently described as smooth, springy and controlled, with anti-friction rings helping the sticks glide cleanly.
  • 4.3
    22 reviews low consensus
    back button placement: 4.3, 22 reviews, low consensus
    Rear-button placement is usually a highlight, sitting naturally under the middle and ring fingers. Some hand positions cause accidental presses, so the layout is not universal.
  • 4.6
    9 reviews strong consensus
    software customization: 4.6, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Software tuning is extensive, with detailed control over curves, deadzones, triggers, vibration, lighting and profiles. The settings are powerful even when the delivery method is divisive.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    compatibility with PC: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    PC is where the controller feels most complete, with full customization, 1,000Hz operation and flexible wired, Bluetooth and 2.4GHz use.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    design and aesthetics: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The design is widely praised as sleek, restrained and recognizably ROG without becoming overly flashy. Subtle lighting and varied textures add to the premium look.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    2.4GHz dongle performance: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The 2.4GHz link is repeatedly praised for low latency and dependable response, with the compact dongle also earning points for practical storage and positioning.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    audio jack quality: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The 3.5mm headset jack performs very well, with strong volume and very low audio latency even over the wireless dongle.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    upgrade value: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    As an upgrade from earlier Raikiri models, the II is widely seen as a substantial step forward in responsiveness, wireless capability, controls, accessories and overall execution.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    wired performance: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Wired USB-C performance is excellent, delivering the lowest latency and stable high polling while remaining available for play-and-charge.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews low consensus
    weight balance: 4.4, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Weight is usually praised as light yet balanced and substantial enough to feel premium. One reviewer preferred a heavier controller and thought the lighter feel reduced perceived quality.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    brand software support: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    ASUS responded to early software and dongle issues with firmware fixes, and those updates resolved problems in follow-up testing.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    consistency across sessions: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Across longer tests and multiple genres, the controller stayed consistent, with reliable connections, stable controls and strong day-to-day behavior.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    face button travel: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Face-button travel is exceptionally short, creating near-instant actuation. That speed is a competitive advantage but contributes to the harder, less cushioned feel some testers dislike.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    d-pad feel: 4.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The D-pad generally feels springy, crisp and satisfying, although a few testers describe it as spongy or less refined in certain directions.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    ergonomics: 4.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The Xbox-style shape is generally comfortable and natural, with thoughtful grip contours. Fit becomes more personal around the trigger reach and rear-button layout.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    firmware update support: 4.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Firmware support has been responsive enough to fix early connectivity or tuning problems, though one setup-heavy experience still found the update process frustrating.
  • 4.0
    9 reviews low consensus
    onboard profile storage: 4.0, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Five onboard profiles are useful for storing different game setups, but profile switching and identification are not equally convenient in every environment, especially on Xbox.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    bumper quality: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The bumpers feel strong and well implemented, with micro-switch construction giving them a crisp, premium character.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    platformer control precision: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Platformers generally benefit from the quick buttons and precise directional response, though the D-pad is less convincing for more complex motion-heavy play.
  • 3.8
    14 reviews low consensus
    analog stick precision: 3.8, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Fine stick control can be excellent after tuning, with strong praise for tiny aiming and steering adjustments. Several testers found the stock deadzones or wide stick wells caused over-correction or weak micro-aiming.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    portability: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The compact case and integrated dongle storage make the controller easy to carry, with strong protection for travel.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    programmable button support: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Programmable rear controls are genuinely useful because they can be assigned quickly and moved to important in-game actions without taking a thumb off the sticks.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    travel friendliness: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The protective case, in-case charging and integrated dongle storage make the controller particularly practical for tournaments and trips.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    wireless stability: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The 2.4GHz connection stays stable under testing, with no obvious dropouts and polling behavior that closely matches wired mode.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    durability: 4.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Early durability impressions are mostly strong, helped by TMR sticks and micro-switch construction. Concerns center on smaller plastic parts such as removable stick caps rather than the main shell.
  • 4.0
    6 reviews low consensus
    button remapping options: 4.0, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Remapping is flexible for controller inputs and can be very quick, including on-the-fly changes. The main limitation is that several buttons can only mirror existing controller commands rather than keyboard keys or combos.
  • 4.0
    6 reviews low consensus
    FPS performance: 4.0, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The controller is a strong FPS fit once the sticks are tuned, thanks to rapid triggers and responsive inputs. Default deadzones or game-specific trigger behavior can make fine aiming less convincing for some players.
  • 3.9
    8 reviews low consensus
    RGB lighting usefulness: 3.9, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The RGB is generally seen as tasteful and highly customizable, and the battery-status lighting can be genuinely useful. A few testers felt grip lighting was wasted power because it is hidden under the hands.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    cable length and quality: 4.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The included braided cable feels strong and premium, and its generous length is useful. One tester found it stiff enough to prefer a more flexible third-party cable.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    bumper responsiveness: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Bumpers actuate quickly and with very little force. That speed is useful, though the light touch may require a short adjustment period.
  • 3.5
    17 reviews low consensus
    companion app quality: 3.5, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Gear Link offers strong control without a heavy desktop app, and many testers like the browser-based approach. Others strongly dislike the internet requirement, PC dependence or setup friction, making the software experience one of the most divisive areas.
  • 3.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    compatibility with Xbox: 3.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Xbox support works well at the hardware level, including wireless dongle connectivity, but console-only users face more software and profile-management friction than PC players.
  • 3.5
    21 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 3.5, 21 reviews, low consensus
    Value depends heavily on priorities. Many reviewers think the $190-class package earns its price through TMR hardware and accessories, while others see cheaper alternatives or setup flaws as reasons to spend less.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    microphone passthrough quality: 5.0, 1 review
    Headset passthrough is strong, with solid audio quality and low latency through the controller’s 3.5mm connection.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    paddle quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The rear paddle-style controls respond quickly and click crisply, reinforcing the controller’s fast mechanical feel.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    retro gaming suitability: 5.0, 1 review
    Retro games work cleanly in the tested use case, with no input problems reported when using the controller for older-style play.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    steering precision: 5.0, 1 review
    Fine steering adjustments are a strong point; small stick movements translated into precise directional changes in racing tests.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    USB-C convenience: 5.0, 1 review
    USB-C play-and-charge keeps the controller usable when the battery runs low, avoiding downtime during longer sessions.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    size suitability for different hand sizes: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Medium and larger hands are generally well served by the grip shape, while smaller hands may find the trigger reach and overall span less natural.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    ease of setup: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Basic mode switching can be simple, but setup quality depends heavily on software. One tester encountered a long sequence of installs and updates that turned setup into a major frustration.
  • 3.5
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Bluetooth performance: 3.5, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Bluetooth is useful for quick pairing and mobile-style use, but several testers preferred the 2.4GHz dongle because it delivers lower latency and higher polling performance.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    trigger smoothness: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Trigger feel is mixed: the full-range mode can be buttery smooth, while another tester found the short-pull triggers less satisfying than rival implementations.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Start and Select button design: 1.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The extra ROG Ally shortcut keys repeatedly interfere with the usual Start/View layout. Several testers hit the wrong button or found the real menu controls awkward to reach.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    button label visibility: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The face-button lettering is difficult to read in low light because there is no backlighting behind the labels, a recurring usability complaint.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    macro support: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Macro support is a clear limitation: complex macros, turbo and button-combination programming are unavailable or non-functional in the tested software.
  • 2.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    mobile compatibility: 2.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Mobile support is inconsistent. Some Windows-handheld use works well, but smartphone recognition is incomplete and one tester explicitly advises iOS and Android users to avoid it.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    battery replaceability: 2.0, 1 review
    The integrated battery cannot be replaced easily, which was specifically called out as a repairability drawback.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    haptic feedback quality: 2.0, 1 review
    Haptic immersion is limited; the light rumble was described as understated and less textured than stronger first-party feedback systems.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    onboard audio controls: 2.0, 1 review
    Dedicated headset control has regressed because the former mute function is no longer clearly available from a hardware button.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    repairability: 2.0, 1 review
    Repairability takes a hit from the sealed, integrated battery, which is not designed for straightforward user replacement.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    screenshot button usefulness: 2.0, 1 review
    The share/screenshot control sits lower than ideal, making its placement a minor usability complaint.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    thumbstick grip: 2.0, 1 review
    The removable stick-cap system is convenient, but one reviewer found the plastic connection fragile and insufficiently secure for frequent swapping.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    accessibility features: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Vibration adjustment can help players who are sensitive to strong rumble, but the lack of illuminated face-button labels was called out as a real accessibility problem in dark rooms.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    analog stick tension: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Stick tension is divisive: some testers found the TMR sticks unusually light or too loose, especially if they prefer firmer resistance.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews low consensus
    fighting game suitability: 2.8, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Fighting-game performance is inconsistent. Some testers liked the fast buttons and one praised the rotating D-pad, while others found diagonal sequences and circular motions unreliable.
  • 2.9
    7 reviews low consensus
    vibration quality: 2.9, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Vibration is serviceable rather than a standout. Some testers find it controlled and precise, but others call it weak or too understated for immersive single-player play.
  • 3.0
    8 reviews low consensus
    charging dock support: 3.0, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The charging dock is convenient and can keep the pad topped up, especially when paired with the case and dongle port. Build quality varies sharply by reviewer, with several calling the stand cheap, light or flimsy.
  • 3.0
    6 reviews low consensus
    button noise: 3.0, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The mechanical buttons deliver a pronounced click that some testers enjoy, but others find noticeably loud during rapid play. Noise tolerance will matter here.
  • 3.0
    5 reviews low consensus
    casual gaming suitability: 3.0, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Casual and single-player suitability is mixed. The shape is comfortable, but the aggressive micro-switch feel and competitive focus can make softer controllers more appealing for long, relaxed sessions.
  • 3.3
    7 reviews low consensus
    material quality: 3.3, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Materials are mixed by component. The controller shell and grips usually feel high quality, while the charging dock and some removable plastic parts attract criticism for feeling cheap or fragile.
  • 3.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    hand fatigue over long sessions: 3.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The shell itself handles long sessions well, but button fatigue divides testers. Some report hours without discomfort, while others found the hard micro-switch impacts tiring on fingers and joints.
  • 3.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    learning curve: 3.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The controller has a modest learning curve around ultra-short buttons, deadzone tuning, profile controls and unusual menu-key placement. Most testers adapted after some use.
  • 3.4
    9 reviews low consensus
    d-pad accuracy: 3.4, 9 reviews, low consensus
    D-pad accuracy is mixed: it works well for menus and simpler directional play, but complex diagonals and fighting-game motions expose inconsistency for several testers.