Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) Feature Scores

Explore all 50 feature scores for Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen), organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

50 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    9 (18%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    28 (56%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (20%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    3 (6%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Active noise cancellation: 4.9, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers strongly agree that ANC is the standout feature: it removes airplane, subway, traffic, keyboard, cafe, and other ambient noise better than most or all earbuds they tested, with only minor caveats about hiss or sudden spikes.
  • 4.5
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Sound quality: 4.5, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Sound quality is broadly strong, with rich, detailed, bass-forward playback praised by most reviewers, though a few disliked the stock tuning.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.4, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Comfort is a major strength for many reviewers over long sessions, flights, runs, and daily use, though very small ears may struggle.
  • 4.1
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    Bass performance: 4.1, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Bass is generally rich, punchy, and deep, but some reviewers think Bose overboosts the low end or gives it too much emphasis for neutral listening.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Stability: 4.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Stability is mostly excellent, especially for running and workouts, but one reviewer still disliked the running feel and movement.
  • 4.1
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Charging: 4.1, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Charging is a notable upgrade thanks to wireless charging and case improvements, although one running-focused review found quick charging slower than ideal.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Instrument separation: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Instrument separation is widely praised, with reviewers hearing open mixes, distinct sections, and easy-to-pick-out track elements.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Eartips fit: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Fit is generally secure and seal-friendly, helped by the ovoid nozzle, ear tips, and stability bands, though individual ear shape still matters.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Bluetooth: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Bluetooth reliability is mostly positive, with several reviewers reporting no dropouts, though one reviewer wished Bose had moved beyond Bluetooth 5.3.
  • 3.9
    9 reviews low consensus
    Treble clarity: 3.9, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Treble is often described as clear, sparkly, or balanced, but measurement-focused reviews say it can be overemphasized or occasionally hard to fix with EQ.
  • 4.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Design and Aesthetics: 4.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Design impressions are mixed-positive: some like the sleek, subtle, creative look, while others note the chunky or busy shape may divide people.
  • 3.9
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    Microphone quality for calls: 3.9, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Call microphone quality is mixed: some reviewers call it exceptional or much improved, while others say it is merely fine or still affected by noise.
  • 3.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Transparency mode quality: 3.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Transparency mode is generally good to excellent, especially Aware/ActiveSense, but several reviewers still prefer Apple or note wind, hiss, or manual-adjustment limits.
  • 3.9
    8 reviews low consensus
    Microphone noise reduction: 3.9, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Microphone noise reduction ranges from excellent SpeechClarity performance to weaker lab samples, but the overall reviewer consensus is improved and often strong.
  • 3.8
    9 reviews low consensus
    Midrange clarity: 3.8, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Midrange clarity is usually praised for warm vocals or crisp presentation, but measurement-focused reviewers complain that boosted lows and highs recess the mids.
  • 3.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Spatial audio: 3.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Spatial audio is divisive: some reviewers find it natural, cool, or useful, while others prefer standard stereo or dislike the processing.
  • 4.1
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Multipoint connectivity reliability: 4.1, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Multipoint is a welcome and often seamless upgrade, though one reviewer noted setup/custom tune trouble when audio was already playing.
  • 4.6
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Integrated microphone: 4.6, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Integrated microphones are praised in stronger call-focused reviews for clear voice pickup and background rejection.
  • 4.6
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Soundstage width: 4.6, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Soundstage width is praised for an open, wide, detailed presentation that helps mixes feel bigger than typical earbuds.
  • 3.7
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    Touch control responsiveness: 3.7, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Touch controls split reviewers: some find them responsive, intuitive, and complete, while others call them fussy or hard to use precisely during runs.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Multi-platform compatibility: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Cross-platform use is positive, with reviewers recommending Bose for both Android and iPhone users and reporting smooth use on both platforms.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Noise isolation (passive): 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Passive isolation benefits from a tight seal and secure nozzle shape, with reviewers noting strong sealing and little noise bleed.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Build quality: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Build quality is described as premium for the earbuds themselves, even when the case does not always feel equally high-end.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Water/sweat resistance rating: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Water and sweat resistance is considered sufficient for workouts and light rain, though not fully waterproof.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Voice assistant integration: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Voice assistant integration gets limited but positive evidence, with reviewers saying Google Assistant or assistant shortcuts worked without hassle.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Weight comfort: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Weight comfort is positive despite the buds being chunky or slightly heavier; reviewers said the weight was not annoying and still felt fine.
  • App
    3.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    App: 3.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The Bose app is useful and sometimes clean, offering modes, controls, sources, EQ, and fit tools, but reviewers also found it mandatory, occasionally daunting, and not especially customizable.
  • 4.7
    1 review
    Volume output: 4.7, 1 review
    Volume output is strong in the one direct measurement-style review, which says Bose makes loud earbuds.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Codec support: 4.5, 1 review
    Codec support is praised as premium because the earbuds support high-quality Bluetooth codecs.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Included accessories: 4.5, 1 review
    Included fit accessories are appreciated when they help tailor the fit, though other reviews still wanted more size options.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Maximum volume clarity: 4.5, 1 review
    Maximum-volume clarity is strong in the running review, which heard clarity and no distortion even when volume was raised.
  • 4.4
    1 review
    Sound leakage: 4.4, 1 review
    Sound leakage is rated positively in the one direct test, with the reviewer reporting little outside noise bleed.
  • 4.4
    1 review
    Soundstage depth: 4.4, 1 review
    Soundstage depth is praised in orchestral and spacious listening comments, though evidence is less extensive than for overall sound quality.
  • 3.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Audio-video sync accuracy: 3.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Audio-video sync is praised for video editing, but gaming latency is criticized for quick-reaction games, making latency performance mixed by use case.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Android compatibility: 4.0, 1 review
    Android users are treated as a strong audience because the earbuds support advanced options and Snapdragon-related features, though some phone compatibility limits remain.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    aptX: 4.0, 1 review
    aptX Lossless/Snapdragon Sound support is viewed as a useful premium codec feature for compatible devices.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Lossless audio support: 4.0, 1 review
    Lossless support through aptX Lossless/Snapdragon Sound is treated as a useful premium feature for compatible devices.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.1
    6 reviews low consensus
    Equalizer customization: 2.1, 6 reviews, low consensus
    EQ customization is the clearest software weakness: many reviewers criticize the basic three-band EQ as too limited for premium earbuds.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Preset EQ profile quality: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Preset EQ profiles are poorly regarded because they are basic and do not adequately fix the tuning complaints.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Frequency response accuracy: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Measurement-focused reviews say the frequency response is heavily shaped, with overemphasized bass and treble and recessed mids.
  • 2.6
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Earpad noise: 2.6, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Several runners or active users noticed footstep thud or earbud movement noise, especially during runs or with sweaty ears.
  • 2.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Sensors: 2.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Sensor behavior is a weak spot in the few comments available, with reviewers criticizing early CustomTune firing and suggesting in-ear detection be disabled.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Cable quality: 2.5, 1 review
    The included cable drew a minor complaint because PCMag wanted a longer USB-C-to-USB-C cable.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Ear tip size options: 2.5, 1 review
    Ear tip and wing options help fit, but the running-focused review wanted more than three sizes at this price.
  • 2.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Carry case quality: 2.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The case is functional and now charges wirelessly, but reviewers repeatedly describe it as bulky, clunky, or less premium than the earbuds.
  • 2.8
    1 review
    Button control usability: 2.8, 1 review
    For running, one reviewer would prefer physical button controls because touch gestures are harder to use precisely during workouts.
  • 2.8
    1 review
    Software/setup simplicity: 2.8, 1 review
    Setup simplicity is imperfect because one reviewer reported trouble with CustomTune when connecting another device during playback.
  • 3.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Portability/foldability: 3.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Portability is mixed because the earbuds and case are pocketable, but the case is often called large or hard to carry while running.
  • 3.0
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Battery: 3.0, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life is consistently described as adequate or average rather than class-leading, usually around six hours with ANC and less with immersive audio.
  • 3.4
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    Value for money: 3.4, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Value depends heavily on priorities: reviewers see the premium price as justified for ANC and sound, but weak for Gen 1 owners or bargain-focused buyers.