Crimson Desert Feature Scores
Explore all 77 feature scores for Crimson Desert, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
77 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.015 (19%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.420 (26%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.423 (30%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.417 (22%)
-
Very negative below 1.52 (3%)
Pros
Sort
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: graphics quality was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 15 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: open-world design was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 9 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: content variety was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 9 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: combat system was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 17 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: world interactivity was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 5 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: skill tree depth was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 7 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: performance optimization was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 9 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: voice acting was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 5 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: exploration quality was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 8 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: sandbox freedom was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 4 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: progression system was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 5 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: frame rate stability was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 7 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: fun factor was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 6 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: animation quality was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: replay value was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: soundtrack quality was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: flying mechanics was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: loot system was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: environmental detail was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: quest design was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 4 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: originality was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: mission variety was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 4 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: innovation was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: level design was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: immersion was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: side character depth was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: value for money drew both praise and caveats across 4 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: platform-specific feature support drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: atmosphere was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: map and navigation design was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: world-building drew both praise and caveats across 4 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: companion AI was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: handheld play suitability was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is positive: sound design was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: gameplay mechanics drew both praise and caveats across 2 review(s).
Cons
Sort
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: narrative quality was consistently framed as a major weakness across 11 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: controls responsiveness was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 11 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: menu usability was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 6 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: protagonist appeal was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 5 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: save system reliability was consistently framed as a major weakness across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: character development was consistently framed as a major weakness across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: grind level was consistently framed as a major weakness across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: mission design was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 6 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: stealth mechanics was consistently framed as a major weakness across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: bug frequency was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 6 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: fast travel convenience was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: dialogue quality was consistently framed as a major weakness across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: endgame content was consistently framed as a major weakness across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: pacing was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: boss design was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 8 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: onboarding experience was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: aiming precision was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: checkpoint system was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: facial animations was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: lore depth was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: user interface design was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: camera behavior was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: crash stability was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: learning curve was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: polish was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 9 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: crafting system was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 4 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: core gameplay loop was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: platforming precision was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: upgrade system was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: puzzle design was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 9 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: weapon balance drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: art direction drew both praise and caveats across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: load times drew both praise and caveats across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: visual effects quality drew both praise and caveats across 1 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: difficulty balance drew both praise and caveats across 5 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: character roster drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: enemy variety drew both praise and caveats across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: writing quality drew both praise and caveats across 2 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: tutorial quality drew both praise and caveats across 5 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: economy and resource balance drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: emotional impact drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).
-
Reviewer evidence is mixed: movement feel drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).