Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock Feature Scores
Explore all 33 feature scores for Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
33 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.09 (27%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.419 (58%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.44 (12%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.41 (3%)
Pros
Sort
-
Value was the broadest strength because most reviewers saw a lot of features for the price, although PCWorld rejected the value claim after testing.
-
Fingerprint access was one of the most praised areas, with many fast and accurate reports, though PCWorld found it hit-and-miss.
-
The app was generally described as simple, easy, and user-friendly, with good access controls and setup flow.
-
Installation was usually described as quick and simple, but one reviewer had jammed bolts and another noted a short cord and over-tightening sensitivity.
-
User access management was a strong point, with praise for simple schedules, temporary codes, and control over different users.
-
Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, especially with Alexa and Google Assistant.
-
Guest access was praised for one-pass, scheduled, IC-card, and Airbnb-style temporary access options.
-
Remote access was a major convenience, especially for managing the lock away from home or unlocking for guests.
-
Reviewers repeatedly liked the small on-lock display, describing it as helpful for setup, status, battery, alerts, and local control, though one saw it as basic rather than groundbreaking.
-
Reviewers consistently liked that no separate hub or gateway is required.
-
Reliability was a strength across several reviews, with reports of perfect testing, stable 90-day use, and natural daily fit.
-
Built-in Wi-Fi was praised for direct connectivity and remote use, and one follow-up noted updates that improved Wi-Fi stability and power use.
-
Most reviewers described the lock as solid, sturdy, or durable for the price, while one found the construction quality questionable.
-
Security features such as anti-peeping and anti-hijacking were viewed as useful or reassuring, with PCMag also noting enhanced security options.
-
Weather resistance was generally viewed positively, including rain/outdoor use, though one reviewer called the IP54 rating tame.
-
Battery impressions were good overall but not exceptional, ranging from solid and efficient to fine but not incredible.
-
Industrial design was praised as sleek, ergonomic, modern, and premium-looking rather than overly bulky.
-
Auto-lock was praised for peace of mind and convenience, but multiple reviewers flagged limits around timing and open-door behavior.
-
Speed was mostly positive for voice and remote response, though one reviewer found it fast but slower than pricier locks.
-
The touch surface/keypad was praised as responsive, well lit, and visually integrated into the front panel.
-
Access logs were useful for seeing lock history, entry timing, and who entered.
-
Backup mechanical keys were valued as a practical fallback, especially for power loss.
-
Physical resistance evidence was moderate: reviewers cited BHMA certification and durability, but one emphasized it is the lowest acceptable commercial level.
-
The 90-day follow-up praised Desloc for frequent firmware updates and meaningful improvements.
-
Keypad impressions were mixed: PCMag found it responsive and well-lit, PCWorld found it slow to wake, and another liked the soft glow.
-
Notifications were useful for awareness and security, but one reviewer wanted push notifications instead of emergency emails that went to spam.
-
One reviewer specifically reported no jamming during several days of testing.
-
Motor feel was mixed: one reviewer found it smooth and quiet, while another warned that over-tightening could make the bolt struggle.
Cons
Sort
-
Door-sense was a clear weakness because reviewers noted there is no door sensor and the bolt can extend while the door is open.
-
Smart-home integration was the main limitation: Alexa and Google were supported, but reviewers missed HomeKit, Matter, IFTTT, or broader security-system support.
-
Failed-attempt lockout drew criticism from one reviewer because the settings and behavior were not clearly adjustable or explained.
-
Palm vein recognition was not included, and one reviewer missed that faster, convenient method from another lock.
-
One reviewer cautioned that very thick doors may require modification even though standard doors worked well.