-
Taken purely as a hard-floor specialist, the Omni-Glide still feels fun, innovative, and extremely maneuverable, but extensive testing now shows severe clogging, hair-tangle, and crevice-cleaning flaws that lead many reviewers to generally not recommend it except as a niche secondary vacuum.
-
While its hard-floor performance and maneuverability can be excellent, newer testing highlights serious clogging, crevice-cleaning, and hair-tangle drawbacks, so many reviewers no longer see it as good value compared with alternatives like the cheaper Dyson V8.
-
-
Fog-based containment tests show the Omni-Glide seals dust and fine particles well without visible leaks, though its easily clogged filter means owners must clean it often to maintain suction.
-
A small, removable battery keeps the handle light but delivers only about 20 minutes on standard power and a few minutes on max, which is adequate for quick hard floor sessions but limiting for bigger spaces.
-
The dust bin uses Dyson's familiar inline emptying mechanism but has a much smaller capacity than most Dyson sticks, so its roughly 100 milliliter volume needs to be emptied frequently in larger homes.
-
Bench tests show the Omni-Glide has substantially lower airflow and suction than other Dyson cordless models, but its dual soft-roller head still lets hard-floor pickup feel strong in everyday use.
-
This model excels on hard floors but is purpose built for that role, performing poorly on carpet and offering limited versatility in mixed-floor homes.
-
-
Tests show the Omni-Glide struggles on carpet, especially with fine debris, though it can manage large pieces like cereal; overall it is still not recommended for carpeted areas.
-
Recent long-hair tests found 8- and 14-inch strands tangling heavily along the cleaner-head edges and rollers, so owners with long hair or pets should expect more frequent manual untangling than with other Dyson sticks.
-
Lab flour-clog tests show its pre-motor filter loads up quickly with fine debris, leading to faster suction drop-off and more frequent filter cleaning than other Dyson sticks.
-
In hard-floor crevice testing it failed to lift most of the flour even after many passes, performing noticeably worse than other Dyson cordless vacuums on debris trapped in grooves.