Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Formaldehyde, HP09

Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Formaldehyde, HP09 Air Purifier Review

Brand: Dyson
Released: April 1, 2021
Updated: 2 months ago
3.7
Overall review score Expert score: 4.3 Customer score: 3.1
284
Review evidence points
54
Scored features
43
Total reviews
17 expert / 26 customer

Bottom Line

Choose the Dyson HP09 for premium design, heating, smart air data, and broad purification. Skip it if you need budget value, true air conditioning, or maximum clean-air output per dollar.

Best for

Best for buyers who want one premium device for heating, fan airflow, purification, formaldehyde monitoring, detailed app data, and allergy or odor management. It fits people who value design and year-round versatility as much as raw purifier output.

Not for

Not for shoppers who mainly need a low-cost purifier, true room air conditioning, or the highest CADR per dollar. It is also a poor fit if heat control through the app is essential.

Verdict

The Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Formaldehyde HP09 earns its strongest praise as a polished all-in-one appliance: reviewers repeatedly liked its design, heating, app data, smoke and odor response, formaldehyde focus, and allergy-related comfort. It is less convincing as a pure value play. Several tests and customers found cooling expectations misleading, high-speed noise noticeable, replacement filters pricey, and clean-air output weaker than less expensive dedicated purifiers. The evidence supports it best for people who will use the heater, fan, purifier, sensors, app, and formaldehyde feature together, not shoppers seeking the cheapest or fastest standalone purifier.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

54 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    20 (37%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    23 (43%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    5 (9%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    2 (4%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    4 (7%)

Pros

  • 5.0
    13 reviews strong consensus
    design and appearance: 5.0, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Design was one of the strongest positives, with frequent praise for the sleek, stylish, premium look.
  • 4.5
    15 reviews low consensus
    overall satisfaction: 4.5, 15 reviews, low consensus
    Overall sentiment ranged from enthusiastic recommendations to a few strong customer rejections, producing a mixed but generally positive pattern.
  • 4.7
    9 reviews strong consensus
    real-time air quality monitoring: 4.7, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Real-time monitoring was a major strength, with detailed app graphs, pollutant data, and visible sensor reactions.
  • 4.3
    23 reviews low consensus
    heating performance: 4.3, 23 reviews, low consensus
    Heating performance was frequently praised as fast, warm, and useful, though some users disliked energy use or heat-control limits.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    allergen reduction: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers with allergies or hay fever often reported less sneezing, better symptoms, or better sleep with the purifier running.
  • 4.4
    11 reviews low consensus
    app connectivity: 4.4, 11 reviews, low consensus
    The app was repeatedly described as easy, useful, and reliable, though one customer reported offline connection failures.

Cons

  • 1.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    reliability: 1.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Reliability evidence was negative in customer reports of units stopping after weeks or months.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    power consumption: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Power evidence was negative in customer/video comments about power use, especially when used for heating.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    smart features: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Smart features were useful overall but scored down by customers who could not control heating through the app.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    condition on arrival: 1.0, 1 review
    One customer reported poor arrival condition with parts and packaging scattered in the box.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    durability: 1.0, 1 review
    Durability evidence was negative from a customer whose unit broke in under a year.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    mold spore reduction: 1.0, 1 review
    One customer used it around mold-related basement air and felt the product failed to respond or improve conditions.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in customer support, Wi-Fi reliability, app connectivity, near average in air purification performance, overall satisfaction, below average in mold spore reduction, power consumption, durability.

Comparison summary

53 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    21 (40%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    21 (40%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    11 (21%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
mold spore reduction 1.0 4.1 -3.1
power consumption 1.5 3.9 -2.4
durability 1.0 3.3 -2.3
reliability 1.0 3.0 -2.0
customer support 5.0 3.0 +2.0
condition on arrival 1.0 2.8 -1.8
Wi-Fi reliability 5.0 3.2 +1.8
smart features 1.8 3.4 -1.6

Consider This Instead

If you want better mold spore reduction

Choose Levoit Core 600S. It scores 4.8 vs 1.0 for mold spore reduction, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better durability

Choose Levoit EverestAir. It scores 4.7 vs 1.0 for durability, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Alternative: price and missing heat/formaldehyde features PCMag says the TP07 is cheaper if heating and formaldehyde filtering are unnecessary.

AEG AX91-604GY Connected Air Purifier

  • Better: cooking-fume clearing speed Ideal Home says the AEG cleared cooking fumes faster than the Dyson in its test.

FAQ

Does the Dyson HP09 purify air well?

Most evidence says yes for smoke, odors, dust events, allergens, and general air-quality cleanup, but some tests found slower or weaker particle reduction than cheaper dedicated purifiers.

Does it actually cool a room?

It works as a fan and can feel cooling when airflow reaches you, but several reviewers stressed it is not an air conditioner and will not truly lower room temperature like one.

Is the heating function good?

Heating is one of the better-supported strengths. Many reviewers said it warmed rooms quickly, though one video reviewer disliked the power draw when using it as a heater.

Is the app useful?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised the MyDyson app for setup, controls, air-quality graphs, pollutant details, and remote monitoring, though heat controls are restricted by safety rules.

Is it quiet enough for bedrooms?

Usually at low or night settings. Many reviewers found it quiet or sleep-friendly, but high fan speeds were often described as loud or noticeably noisy.

Are replacement filters expensive?

They are a recurring cost concern. Some reviewers considered the annual cost reasonable, while others called replacement filters expensive compared with mid-priced purifiers.

Who should pay extra for the formaldehyde model?

The strongest case is for homes with new furniture, renovations, smoke, gas cooking, or concern about formaldehyde and VOCs. If you do not need that feature, some reviews suggest cheaper Dyson or non-Dyson alternatives.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, dust removal

Cons: CADR rating, air changes per hour

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, HEPA filtration

Cons: customer support, warranty coverage

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability