Dyson Purifier Big+Quiet Formaldehyde BP04

Dyson Purifier Big+Quiet Formaldehyde BP04 Air Purifier Review

Brand: Dyson
Released: May 1, 2023
Updated: 4 weeks ago
4.0
Overall review score Expert score: 4.2 Customer score: 3.8
177
Review evidence points
49
Scored features
9
Total reviews
7 expert / 2 customer

Bottom Line

Choose the Dyson BP04 for quiet, sensor-rich purification in large or open rooms. Skip it if price, bulk, or a smaller-room need matters more than premium design and wide pollutant tracking.

Best for

Best for larger rooms, open-plan homes, and buyers who want quiet whole-room airflow plus detailed air-quality monitoring. It also suits people especially concerned with VOCs, odors, formaldehyde, smoke, and sensor visibility.

Not for

Not for shoppers who mainly need a compact, inexpensive purifier for a small room or basic dust and allergy relief. It is also a poor fit if you need easy carrying up stairs or standardized CADR comparisons.

Verdict

The Dyson Purifier Big+Quiet Formaldehyde BP04 earns strong praise for quiet operation, large-room airflow, detailed air-quality monitoring, chemical and VOC filtration, and a polished app experience. Multiple testers found it powerful enough for open spaces and unusually quiet for its output, with useful sensors and long filter-life claims helping offset some running costs. The tradeoff is equally clear: it is physically large, expensive, and not always the fastest-reacting or easiest-to-benchmark purifier because CADR data is limited. It is best viewed as a premium whole-room purifier for buyers who value design, silence, and information as much as raw value.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

49 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 35% 17 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 55% 27 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 8% 4 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 2% 1 feature
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 4.8
    based on 6 reviews
    noise level: 4.8, based on 6 reviews
    Quiet operation is one of the strongest points, with reviewers praising low noise even at high airflow.
  • 4.8
    based on 3 reviews
    ease of use: 4.8, based on 3 reviews
    Setup, controls, app pairing, and operation are repeatedly described as simple, intuitive, and easy.
  • 4.7
    based on 8 reviews
    air purification performance: 4.7, based on 8 reviews
    Expert and customer evidence strongly supports effective purification, from quick pollutant reduction to broad whole-home confidence.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    activated carbon filter: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    The carbon filter is repeatedly tied to strong chemical, odor, gas, and nitrogen dioxide handling, with one reviewer calling chemical filtration best tested.
  • 4.6
    based on 5 reviews
    air circulation: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
    Reviewers praise strong, pleasant, large-room airflow, though one notes air disperses with distance.
  • 4.6
    based on 5 reviews
    VOC reduction: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
    VOC reduction is a standout, with praise for detecting, tracking, and reducing VOCs and TVOC levels.
  • 4.6
    based on 4 reviews
    odor reduction: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
    Odor reduction is strongly supported, including cooking smells, deodorant/aerosol odors, and general scent removal.
  • 4.6
    based on 4 reviews
    particle removal effectiveness: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
    Particle removal is strong in measured and experiential tests, including PM2.5 reduction, fog clearing, and HEPA particle capture.
  • 4.6
    based on 3 reviews
    smart features: 4.6, based on 3 reviews
    Smart features are a strength, including app data, history, voice assistant support, schedules, and remote-style controls.
  • 4.6
    based on 3 reviews
    true HEPA filter: 4.6, based on 3 reviews
    True HEPA/H13-style filtration evidence is positive, especially sealed filtration and high particle-capture capability.
  • 4.5
    based on 5 reviews
    app connectivity: 4.5, based on 5 reviews
    The app is consistently described as useful, slick, detailed, and easy to use, though one reviewer wanted broader reporting.
  • 4.5
    based on 5 reviews
    real-time air quality monitoring: 4.5, based on 5 reviews
    Real-time monitoring is a major strength, with reviewers praising detailed pollutant graphs, current readings, and visibility into home air.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    HEPA filtration: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    The HEPA H13 filtration and sealed filter path are viewed as high-grade, efficient, and important for particles.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    energy efficiency: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Energy use is praised as low relative to output, with one review calling measured wattage impressive.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    filter stages: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Reviewers describe the multi-stage filtration positively, especially the improved three-step system and well-sealed filters.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    PM2.5 detection: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    PM2.5 detection is positive overall, with one reviewer saying the Dyson was ahead of a monitor and another observing a quick match-test response.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    power consumption: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Power draw is rated positively, especially measured low and high settings relative to the Dyson’s output.
  • 4.4
    based on 9 reviews
    overall satisfaction: 4.4, based on 9 reviews
    Overall satisfaction is high across experts and customers, with the main reservations centered on cost, size, and fit for smaller homes.
  • 4.4
    based on 5 reviews
    air quality sensor accuracy: 4.4, based on 5 reviews
    Sensors are generally praised as advanced and responsive, but one reviewer found some reaction times slower than expected.
  • 4.4
    based on 5 reviews
    maintenance ease: 4.4, based on 5 reviews
    Filter access and replacement are described as simple, improved, and supported by app guidance.
  • 4.4
    based on 4 reviews
    replacement experience: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
    Replacement experience is positive because filter access is simple and the app can guide care and replacement timing.
  • 4.4
    based on 2 reviews
    fan speed options: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
    The ten-speed fan controls and airflow angle options are useful for comfort and control.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    adjustable vents: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Adjustable airflow angles are useful for matching bedroom, living-room, and cooling needs.
  • 4.2
    based on 7 reviews
    room coverage: 4.2, based on 7 reviews
    Room coverage is strong for large and open rooms, but reviewers warn smaller homes may not make full use of it.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    filter life: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Long filter life is a consistent positive, though one reviewer cautions that heavy smoke use could shorten real-world replacement intervals.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    filter replacement cost: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Running filter costs are considered reasonable or low for this room size when spread over claimed filter lifetimes.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    sleep mode: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Sleep and night-mode evidence is positive, with quiet operation and dimmed lighting noted.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    smoke removal: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Smoke removal is positive overall, but one review says smoke CADR is good rather than exceptional for the unit’s size.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    VOC sensor accuracy: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    VOC sensor evidence is positive, with reviewers noting automatic VOC display changes, detailed graphs, and good VOC readings.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    voice assistant compatibility: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Voice assistant support is noted favorably as part of the premium smart-control package.
  • 4.2
    based on 2 reviews
    allergen reduction: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
    Evidence supports allergen reduction through reviewer testing and HEPA-related discussion of pollen, mold spores, and pet dander.
  • 4.2
    based on 2 reviews
    scheduling options: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
    Scheduling evidence is favorable but limited, mainly through the app’s simple scheduling controls.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    mold spore reduction: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Mold-spore evidence is limited but favorable through the reviewer’s HEPA particle-filtration assessment.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    pet dander removal: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Pet-dander evidence is limited but favorable through the reviewer’s HEPA particle-filtration assessment.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    pollen removal: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Pollen evidence is limited but favorable through the reviewer’s HEPA particle-filtration assessment for seasonal allergies.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    reliability: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Reliability evidence is sparse but positive from one user’s history with Dyson purifiers not failing.
  • 4.1
    based on 5 reviews
    auto mode performance: 4.1, based on 5 reviews
    Auto mode is useful and can ramp up when pollutants appear, although one long-term tester could not reliably replicate the automatic increase.
  • 4.1
    based on 5 reviews
    design and appearance: 4.1, based on 5 reviews
    Design draws strong reactions: many like the premium, unmistakable Dyson look, while some find it clunky, bold, or scratch-prone.
  • 4.1
    based on 4 reviews
    formaldehyde removal: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
    Formaldehyde evidence is positive but partly sensor-based; reviewers note falling levels or normalizing readings after tests.
  • 4.1
    based on 3 reviews
    build quality: 4.1, based on 3 reviews
    Most reviewers praise build quality and sealing, while one criticizes the plastic exterior as scratch-prone.
  • 4.1
    based on 3 reviews
    display readability: 4.1, based on 3 reviews
    The small screen is useful for pollutant status and trend visibility, but its size and placement make it a secondary interface.
  • 3.9
    based on 5 reviews
    remote control: 3.9, based on 5 reviews
    The remote is useful and magnetically stored, but one reviewer worries the tiny remote may get lost.
  • 3.8
    based on 1 review
    dust removal: 3.8, based on 1 review
    Dust evidence is positive but less dramatic than odor or VOC performance, with one dust test creating only a slight change before returning to normal.
  • 3.7
    based on 7 reviews
    portability: 3.7, based on 7 reviews
    Hidden wheels help on hard floors, but the unit is bulky, awkward, and harder to move over carpet or stairs.

Cons

  • 3.2
    based on 7 reviews
    value for money: 3.2, based on 7 reviews
    Value is mixed to negative: reviewers acknowledge premium performance but repeatedly call the BP04 expensive, pricey, or not a great value.
  • 3.0
    based on 6 reviews
    size and footprint: 3.0, based on 6 reviews
    Size is the most consistent physical drawback: reviewers repeatedly call it big, large, bulky, or overkill for compact homes.
  • 2.9
    based on 2 reviews
    CADR rating: 2.9, based on 2 reviews
    CADR evidence is mixed to negative: one reviewer wants a published rating, and another says smoke CADR is good but not exceptional for the size.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    durability: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Durability evidence is limited but negative around the plastic finish, which one reviewer says can chip and scratch.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    condition on arrival: 2.0, based on 1 review
    One customer reports receiving a refurbished unit despite saying it works well.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in replacement experience, app connectivity, VOC sensor accuracy, below average in size and footprint.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 88% 7 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 13% 1 feature
Attribute This product Category average Difference
replacement experience 4.4 2.9 +1.5
app connectivity 4.5 3.2 +1.3
VOC sensor accuracy 4.2 2.9 +1.3
smart features 4.6 3.3 +1.3
remote control 3.9 2.7 +1.2
reliability 4.2 3.0 +1.2
VOC reduction 4.6 3.5 +1.1
size and footprint 3.0 3.9 -0.9

FAQ

Is the Dyson BP04 quiet?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly describe it as very quiet, with one measuring 57dB at the highest setting and another saying the hum fades into background white noise.

Does it work well in large rooms?

Yes, large-room use is one of its strongest themes. Reviewers cite strong airflow, corner placement, and coverage for open-plan or large spaces, while noting it may be overkill in smaller homes.

How good is it for VOCs and odors?

Very good based on the supplied reviews. Testers praised chemical filtration, VOC reduction, cooking-smell reduction, and odor handling.

Is the app useful?

Yes. Reviewers liked the MyDyson app for controls, air-quality data, schedules, filter care, and detailed pollutant history, though one wanted broader weekly or monthly reports.

What are the main downsides?

The biggest downsides are price and size. Some reviewers also mention slower reaction times, hard-to-benchmark CADR data, carpet portability limits, and a tiny remote.

Are filter costs reasonable?

Several reviewers saw filter running costs as reasonable for the size class because of long claimed filter life, though one warned that heavy smoke use could shorten real-world life.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Blueair Signature

  • Better: pollutant clearing speed The Blueair Signature is said to clear pollutants faster than the Dyson.

Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Formaldehyde

  • Alternative: price and versatility The Hot+Cool Formaldehyde is described as cheaper and more versatile, but less capable in large spaces.

Hoover H-Purifier 500

  • Better: size and room handling The Dyson is compared unfavorably because the Hoover is smaller yet handles slightly larger rooms.

Consider This Instead

If you want better durability

Choose Levoit EverestAir. It scores 4.7 vs 2.5 for durability, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better size and footprint

Choose Shark HP102. It scores 4.9 vs 3.0 for size and footprint, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.5

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.4

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability

#3 Levoit EverestAir
4.4

Best for quiet, smart large-room cleaning and strong odor control. Skip it if $99 filters, true-HEPA wording, or occasional sensor/fan reliability complaints are dealbreakers.

Pros: air purification performance, allergen reduction

Cons: reliability, filter replacement cost

#4 AirDoctor 5000
4.4

Best for large rooms, strong particle cleanup, quiet everyday running, and easy rolling. Skip it if you need app control, compact placement, automatic restart after outages, or low filter costs.

Pros: ozone-free operation, particle removal effectiveness

Cons: filter replacement cost, app connectivity