Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard

Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard Feature Scores

Explore all 44 feature scores for Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

44 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    10 (23%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    29 (66%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    5 (11%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    typing feel: 4.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for cushioned, smooth, pleasant and premium-feeling keystrokes.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    typing comfort: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Typing comfort was strongly praised, especially for long sessions, office work and cushioned typing.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    connectivity: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Connectivity was a strong point, with reviewers praising tri-mode flexibility, easy switching and multi-device productivity.
  • 4.3
    7 reviews strong consensus
    RGB customization: 4.3, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    RGB customization was consistently treated as a strength, with reviewers praising effects, brightness controls, modes and easy software control.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    acoustics: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Acoustics were widely praised for clacky, thocky or natural sound, despite separate concerns about occasional pinging.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    sound dampening: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Sound dampening was a strength, with reviewers repeatedly crediting foam, dampers or gasket design for reduced noise and vibration.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    wireless performance: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Wireless performance was positive overall, with reviewers citing stability, negligible Bluetooth impact, durable range and multi-device use.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    key responsiveness: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Responsiveness was a strength, with reviewers describing the switches as quick, responsive and comfortable for fast inputs.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Value for money was consistently positive, with reviewers pointing to the low price, affordability or not-bad value.
  • 4.2
    6 reviews strong consensus
    built-in calculator: 4.2, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers generally liked the built-in calculator for quick number work and productivity, though one reviewer found the implementation basic.
  • 4.2
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    switch feel: 4.2, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Switch feel was mostly praised as smooth, light or pleasant, but one reviewer found the Wisteria-style linears generic.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    ease of switch replacement: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Switch replacement was praised as easy, with reviewers highlighting simple swapping and no soldering.
  • 4.1
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    keycap quality: 4.1, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Keycap quality was mostly praised for PBT durability and feel, though two reviewers criticized inconsistent legends or overall keycap quality.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    desk space efficiency: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Desk space efficiency was mostly praised because the keyboard keeps a numpad while saving space, though one reviewer felt the tradeoff in navigation.
  • 4.1
    6 reviews strong consensus
    RGB lighting quality: 4.1, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    RGB lighting quality was generally positive, with vibrant or balanced lighting, but some evidence noted weak side lighting or less-bright underglow.
  • 4.6
    3 reviews strong consensus
    hot-swappable switches: 4.6, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Hot-swappable switches were a clear positive where reviewers judged the feature, especially because swapping avoids soldering and was called a godsend.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    durability: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Durability evidence centered on PBT keycaps and wear resistance, while one review raised concern about PCB bending over time.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    noise level: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Noise level was mostly favorable, with several reviews finding it controlled or quiet, but one review said metallic ping hurt the sound profile.
  • 4.6
    3 reviews strong consensus
    latency: 4.6, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Latency evidence was positive, especially for wired and 2.4GHz use, with Bluetooth impact described as negligible by one reviewer.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    size and form factor: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Size and form factor were mostly praised for keeping numpad utility in a compact body, with one reviewer noting sacrifices from the compressed layout.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    customization options: 4.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Customization options were praised across software, inputs, lighting and key changes, with reviewers calling the tools intuitive or full-featured.
  • 4.1
    5 reviews strong consensus
    software quality: 4.1, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Software quality was generally positive for ease of use and complete features, but not every reviewer found it deeply customizable.
  • 4.4
    3 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 4.4, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life evidence was favorable, with reviewers saying it eased charging worries or lasted longer than expected.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    backlight brightness: 4.0, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Backlight brightness was mostly praised as vibrant or bright enough, though one reviewer found the side underglow weak.
  • 3.9
    6 reviews strong consensus
    stabilizer quality: 3.9, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Stabilizer quality was mixed: several reviews praised rattle-free or solid large keys, while others wanted more lube or tuning.
  • 3.8
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    design aesthetics: 3.8, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Design aesthetics were mixed: several reviewers liked the sleek or modern look, while others disliked the colorway or found it too feminine.
  • 3.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 3.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was divided: many reviewers called it sturdy or solid, while others found flex, hollow feel or budget-plastic compromises.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    macro customization: 4.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Macro customization was supported by evidence around easy macro setup, recording and mouse-click detection.
  • 4.6
    2 reviews limited evidence
    gaming performance: 4.6, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Gaming performance was reviewed positively, especially for fast-paced games and rapid movements.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    polling rate: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The polling rate drew praise where discussed, with one reviewer calling the 1000Hz rate impressive and another tying it to minimal latency.
  • 3.9
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    key stability: 3.9, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Key stability was mixed: several reviews praised stable larger keys, while one review criticized keys dipping into the PCB.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    reliability: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reliability evidence was positive but limited, with reviewers describing consistent switches and a workhorse feel.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    extra gaming features: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Extra gaming features were positively reviewed through programmable shortcuts and anti-ghosting/N-key rollover that prevent lost inputs.
  • 3.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    materials quality: 3.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Materials quality was acceptable for the price but not uniformly premium, with plastic build comments ranging from sturdy to hollow.
  • 4.6
    1 review
    actuation consistency: 4.6, 1 review
    One reviewer specifically praised actuation consistency, saying the keypresses felt consistent and smooth.
  • 3.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    compatibility: 3.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Compatibility evidence was mildly positive for Windows and Mac, but one review noted the lack of dedicated Mac hotkeys.
  • 4.2
    1 review
    ergonomics: 4.2, 1 review
    One reviewer directly liked the typing position, supporting a positive ergonomics score.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    portability: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Portability was mixed, with one review calling the board lightweight and portable while another noted its surprising heft.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    cable quality: 3.5, 1 review
    Cable quality was only lightly judged: one reviewer called the cable generic but serviceable.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.5
    1 review
    key spacing: 2.5, 1 review
    One reviewer criticized key spacing and navigation because the arrow area felt harder to locate and more cramped.
  • 2.7
    1 review
    layout options: 2.7, 1 review
    Layout options received a negative score from one reviewer who disliked the 96% layout tradeoff and preferred a proper full size.
  • 2.9
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    switch options: 2.9, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Stock switch variety was a recurring limitation: reviewers noted the board mainly offers two similar linear choices, even though one review liked both options.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    legend visibility: 3.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Legend visibility was mixed, with one review praising sharp visible legends while others noted inconsistent thin lettering or low contrast.
  • 3.4
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    frame rigidity: 3.4, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Frame rigidity was mixed, with some reviewers reporting flex or hollowness and others saying the board felt solid with no flex.