Glorious Model O Eternal

Glorious Model O Eternal Feature Scores

Explore all 42 feature scores for Glorious Model O Eternal, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

42 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    17 (40%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    19 (45%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    5 (12%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Value for money was the strongest consensus point, with every substantive review calling the mouse an excellent budget or bargain pick.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    weight: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Weight was universally praised, with reviewers repeatedly emphasizing the 55g body as unusually light, nippy, and central to the mouse's appeal.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Accuracy and tracking precision: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently praised precision, saying the mouse felt trustworthy, quick, and accurate, with strong tracking confidence across games.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    button responsiveness: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Main button responsiveness was a clear strength, with reviewers praising spam-friendly buttons, tactile response, and precise clicks.
  • 4.3
    5 reviews strong consensus
    shape comfort: 4.3, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Shape comfort was broadly positive, especially for the symmetrical, familiar body, though palm and claw use had some caveats.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    ergonomic design: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Ergonomics were broadly praised, with reviewers calling the frame comfortable, sculpted, balanced, and supportive across common grip styles.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    fingertip grip comfort: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Fingertip grip was one of the strongest comfort use cases, repeatedly described as comfy or especially well suited to the shape and low weight.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    sensor performance: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Sensor performance was consistently strong in practice, with reviewers reporting no skips, reliable operation, and potent performance for the price.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    left and right click quality: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Left and right click quality was a standout, with reviewers praising main clicks as loved, responsive, precise, and tight.
  • 4.4
    3 reviews strong consensus
    premium feel: 4.4, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Premium feel was mostly positive thanks to expensive-feeling clicks, wheel, and overall feel, though one review noted a less premium finish.
  • 4.2
    4 reviews strong consensus
    software usability: 4.2, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Software usability was generally positive for being simple, tidy, and functional, even if not loaded with advanced controls.
  • 4.1
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    claw grip comfort: 4.1, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Claw grip feedback was mostly positive, though one reviewer found the back too shallow and not grippy enough for that style.
  • 4.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    RGB features: 4.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    RGB feedback was mostly positive for brightness and customization, but one reviewer felt it detracted from the clean look.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    DPI range: 4.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The DPI range was generally seen as enough for most budget buyers, though reviewers noted it trails the extreme numbers of high-end mice.
  • 4.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    motion consistency: 4.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Motion consistency was praised through precise, quick movement implementation and the absence of skips or tracking errors.
  • 4.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    switch durability: 4.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Switch durability was praised for the high click rating and for comparing favorably with budget rivals.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    durability over time: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Durability-over-time evidence centered on the high switch lifespan rating, which reviewers framed as top level or longer than budget rivals.
  • 4.1
    3 reviews strong consensus
    FPS gaming suitability: 4.1, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    FPS suitability was positive for most players and shooter testing, with the main caveat being competitive high-refresh players who may want higher polling.
  • 3.9
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    palm grip comfort: 3.9, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Palm grip comfort was mixed: some reviewers found it supported or comfortable, but others noted side-button access and shallowness issues.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    button customization: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Button customization was reviewed positively through Glorious Core, with simple effective programming and free reconfiguration of mouse buttons.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    onboard memory: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Onboard memory was viewed positively for storing profiles and for clear save-to-mouse behavior.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    programmable buttons: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Programmable buttons were reviewed positively through simple effective programming and free mouse-button reconfiguration.
  • 4.1
    2 reviews limited evidence
    scroll wheel quality: 4.1, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Scroll wheel quality was split between very strong praise for luxury smoothness and a caveat that it was somewhat too smooth-running.
  • 4.8
    1 review
    balance and weight distribution: 4.8, 1 review
    One reviewer tied the balanced dimensions and low weight directly to the mouse's grip flexibility and overall user experience.
  • 4.8
    1 review
    click latency: 4.8, 1 review
    Click latency was praised in the PCGamesN review, which found no discernible latency and described the mouse as fast for gaming.
  • 4.8
    1 review
    glide smoothness: 4.8, 1 review
    Glide smoothness received strong praise from IGN, which said the small feet did not hurt glide and the mouse slid elegantly.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    click noise: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Click noise was mixed: one review liked the crisp but controlled sound, another found clicks loud, and another called them prominent but not hollow.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    build quality: 4.5, 1 review
    Build quality evidence was positive in hands-on stress checks, with the shell described as solid and not creaky despite the honeycomb design.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    connection stability: 4.5, 1 review
    The wired USB connection drew positive stability evidence from PC Gamer, which reported no issues and immediate operation.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    switch feel: 4.5, 1 review
    Switch feel was praised in PC Gamer's review for the solid tactile feel of the Huano switches.
  • 3.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    polling rate: 3.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Polling rate was viewed as adequate for most buyers, but 1,000Hz is a clear budget limitation versus higher-end mice.
  • 3.6
    3 reviews low consensus
    side button quality: 3.6, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Side button quality was divisive: one reviewer strongly criticized size and misclicks, while others found the buttons large or convenient.
  • 4.2
    1 review
    ecosystem integration: 4.2, 1 review
    Glorious ecosystem integration was praised as practical for users with several Glorious products thanks to Glorious Core support.
  • 4.2
    1 review
    long-session comfort: 4.2, 1 review
    Long-session comfort was supported by IGN's report that several hours of use remained comfortable.
  • 4.2
    1 review
    profile switching: 4.2, 1 review
    Profile switching evidence was positive where the review praised storing up to three individual profiles on onboard memory.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    handedness options: 4.0, 1 review
    Handedness evidence was cautiously positive: the symmetrical shape helps left-handed use, although the mouse is still primarily right-handed.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    1 review
    water and dust resistance: 2.0, 1 review
    Water and dust resistance was a caveat rather than a strength because the open honeycomb shell requires care around spills.
  • 2.6
    3 reviews strong consensus
    cable flexibility: 2.6, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Cable flexibility was one of the most consistent weaknesses, with reviewers describing kinking, cheap feel, stickiness, and less free movement.
  • 2.9
    2 reviews limited evidence
    lift-off distance: 2.9, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Lift-off distance drew mixed evidence because one review disliked missing adjustment, while another said the fixed distance had little practical impact.
  • 3.2
    1 review
    materials quality: 3.2, 1 review
    Materials quality was more limited, with one review saying the finish felt less premium than the original's coating.
  • 3.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    acceleration control: 3.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Acceleration capability was treated as acceptable rather than elite: one review said the sensor trails higher-end specs, while another called the acceleration figure decent but unexceptional.
  • 3.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    grip texture: 3.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Grip texture was mixed: it did not slip in one review, but another found the rear insufficiently grippy for claw grip.