H2O Audio TRI 2 PRO Headphones

H2O Audio TRI 2 PRO Headphones Review

Brand: H2O
Released: August 22, 2024
Updated: 2 weeks ago
3.4
Consolidated expert score
196
Review insights
33
Scored features
16
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the TRI 2 PRO if swimming audio, IPX8 waterproofing, and onboard music matter most. Skip it for land workouts if you need rich bass, crisp vocals, easy controls, or simple playlist loading.

Best for

Best for swimmers, triathletes, and pool users who want music or podcasts without relying on Bluetooth underwater. It also suits athletes who prioritize open-ear awareness and comfort over hi-fi sound.

Not for

Not for buyers who want rich land-based audio, strong bass, easy track control, or a simple streaming-style workflow. Runners and gym users who do not need underwater playback are repeatedly pointed toward alternatives.

Verdict

Reviewers consistently frame the H2O Audio TRI 2 PRO as a specialist swim headset rather than a general-purpose sports headphone. Its strongest case is practical: secure fit in water, very high waterproof confidence, onboard storage, and Playlist+ make pool sessions possible without a phone or Bluetooth signal. The tradeoff is that the same bone-conduction design and offline workflow frustrate some reviewers on land, where bass, clarity, and maximum-volume behavior often fall short of regular earbuds or rival open-ear options. Controls and setup split opinions too, ranging from simple and tactile to stiff, finicky, or time-consuming.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Shokz OpenRun Pro 2

  • Compared: design and swimming limitation Tom's Guide compares the design to Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 but notes the Shokz are not suitable for swimming.
  • Better: battery life per charge TechRadar says the Tri 2 Pro battery is good, though the Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 lasts longer per charge.
  • Better: audio quality and price PCMag says non-swimmer athletes should consider the Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 for better audio at a lower price.

Shokz OpenSwim Pro

  • Worse: water submersion rating The Tri 2 Pro is credited with stronger submersion endurance than the Shokz OpenSwim Pro.
  • Better: onboard storage The Tri 2 Pro is framed as storage-limited because the Shokz OpenSwim Pro offers much more storage.

OpenSwim Pro

  • Better: sound quality and value The reviewer would personally buy the OpenSwim Pro instead to save money.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

33 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 12% 4 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 42% 14 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 33% 11 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 9% 3 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 3% 1 feature

Pros

  • 4.9
    based on 14 reviews
    Water/sweat resistance rating: 4.9, based on 14 reviews
    Water readiness is the strongest consensus area, with reviewers repeatedly praising pool, underwater, and waterproof performance.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Weight comfort: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Weight comfort is a clear strength; reviewers repeatedly call the headset lightweight enough for running, swimming, and extended workout use.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Android compatibility: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Android compatibility is supported by a reviewer pairing successfully with a Google Pixel phone.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Multi-platform compatibility: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Multi-platform compatibility is positive in the review that paired the headset with both a Google Pixel phone and a MacBook.
  • 4.4
    based on 4 reviews
    Build quality: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
    Build quality is a strength, with reviewers describing sturdy construction, flexible durability, and soft-touch or sleek materials.
  • 4.4
    based on 4 reviews
    Included accessories: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
    Included accessories are useful, especially earplugs, a protective case, and clear documentation that improve swim use and setup.
  • 4.3
    based on 10 reviews
    Stability: 4.3, based on 10 reviews
    Stability is a major strength in water and workouts, although one reviewer with fit issues felt less secure while running.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Charging: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Charging feedback is positive where reviewed, with magnetic connection clarity and roughly one-to-two-hour charging times.
  • 4.1
    based on 10 reviews
    Comfort during long use: 4.1, based on 10 reviews
    Comfort is generally strong thanks to low weight and soft contact, though a few reviewers report long-wear soreness or fit quirks.
  • 4.1
    based on 5 reviews
    Carry case quality: 4.1, based on 5 reviews
    Case quality is mostly praised as nice, protective, or convenient, though one reviewer found the standard case bulky.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Portability/foldability: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Portability is supported by a compact, gym-bag-friendly case in the review that discussed it.
  • 4.0
    based on 11 reviews
    Battery: 4.0, based on 11 reviews
    Battery life is mostly good for workouts and swims, though one review found real-world drain below the stated claim.
  • 3.8
    based on 6 reviews
    Design and Aesthetics: 3.8, based on 6 reviews
    Design works well for aquatic use and looks clean to some reviewers, but fit gaps and sizing for smaller heads create caveats.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Noise isolation (passive): 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Passive isolation depends on the open-ear tradeoff: awareness is strong, but external noise can drown out playback unless earplugs are used.
  • 3.7
    based on 12 reviews
    Offline playback and onboard storage: 3.7, based on 12 reviews
    Offline playback is the product's defining advantage for swimming, but Playlist+ recording and syncing can be cumbersome or unreliable.
  • 3.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Sound leakage: 3.5, based on 4 reviews
    Sound leakage is mixed: pool use appears discreet, but above-water leakage can appear at higher volumes.
  • 3.5
    based on 12 reviews
    Sound quality: 3.5, based on 12 reviews
    Reviewer opinion is split by use case: underwater and swim use often sounds good or even impressive, while several reviewers criticize above-water sound as tinny, muddy, or below regular earbuds.
  • 3.5
    based on 12 reviews
    Value for money: 3.5, based on 12 reviews
    Value depends heavily on the use case: swimmers often get enough benefit, while land users and audio-focused buyers face better-value alternatives.

Cons

  • 3.1
    based on 5 reviews
    Midrange clarity: 3.1, based on 5 reviews
    Midrange and vocals range from clear and full in some testing to static, under-defined, or not very cutting in more critical reviews.
  • 3.1
    based on 9 reviews
    Software/setup simplicity: 3.1, based on 9 reviews
    Setup is mixed: drag-and-drop loading can be easy, but Playlist+, app handling, and troubleshooting are often described as clumsy or time-consuming.
  • 3.0
    based on 11 reviews
    Bass performance: 3.0, based on 11 reviews
    Bass is highly inconsistent: some reviews praise punch or improved bass in water, while others say land playback lacks low-end impact or becomes woolly and hollow.
  • 3.0
    based on 11 reviews
    Button control usability: 3.0, based on 11 reviews
    Controls are divisive: some reviewers found them reachable or simple, while many criticized stiff buttons, accidental presses, and unreliable secondary commands.
  • 3.0
    based on 8 reviews
    Treble clarity: 3.0, based on 8 reviews
    Treble is serviceable but not consistently crisp; reviewers mention rolled-off, grainy, or missing high-end detail, with a few brighter elements coming through well.
  • 3.0
    based on 8 reviews
    Volume output: 3.0, based on 8 reviews
    Volume is adequate for some voices and workouts, but multiple reviewers had to raise it high, noticed vibration, or found volume changes distracting in water.
  • 2.9
    based on 7 reviews
    Bluetooth: 2.9, based on 7 reviews
    Bluetooth experiences vary sharply: pairing can be easy on phones and laptops, but underwater use, stutters, random disconnections, and clumsy setup hurt reliability.
  • App
    2.9
    based on 4 reviews
    App: 2.9, based on 4 reviews
    The app is adequate but limited; some found it easy to navigate, while others wanted clearer instructions, more customization, or smoother access to stored music.
  • 2.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Cable quality: 2.7, based on 3 reviews
    Charging and transfer cable feedback is mixed, from necessary for waterproofing to inconvenient proprietary limitations and one failed USB loading experience.
  • 2.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Frequency response accuracy: 2.5, based on 2 reviews
    Frequency balance is not very accurate; reviewers describe the response as not crisp and noticeably unbalanced.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Headband adjustability: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Adjustability is limited, with one reviewer wishing the band could be adjusted for a looser fit.
  • 2.3
    based on 4 reviews
    Microphone quality for calls: 2.3, based on 4 reviews
    Call quality is a weak point overall; some calls are usable, but several reviewers report quiet, distant, or incomplete microphone pickup.
  • 2.0
    based on 4 reviews
    Maximum volume clarity: 2.0, based on 4 reviews
    Maximum-volume playback is a recurring weakness, with distortion, muddiness, overpowering tracks, or bone-conduction tickle appearing at louder levels.
  • 1.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Instrument separation: 1.8, based on 2 reviews
    Instrument separation is weak in critical listening, with strings, guitar, and bass parts getting lost or failing to cut through the mix.
  • 1.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Equalizer customization: 1.0, based on 2 reviews
    EQ customization is essentially absent, with reviewers explicitly noting no EQ or presets to tune the sound.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Earbud Headphones, this product is above average in Water/sweat resistance rating, below average in Equalizer customization, Instrument separation, Maximum volume clarity.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 13% 1 feature
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 88% 7 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Equalizer customization 1.0 3.7 -2.7
Instrument separation 1.8 4.2 -2.5
Maximum volume clarity 2.0 4.0 -2.0
Microphone quality for calls 2.3 3.7 -1.5
Water/sweat resistance rating 4.9 3.8 +1.1
Bluetooth 2.9 4.1 -1.2
Bass performance 3.0 4.1 -1.1
Frequency response accuracy 2.5 3.7 -1.2

FAQ

Does the H2O Audio TRI 2 PRO work underwater?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly report that it works in the pool and underwater, with onboard memory solving the problem that Bluetooth does not work reliably when submerged.

Is the sound quality good?

It depends on the setting. Several reviewers liked the underwater sound, but many found above-water audio thin, muddy, bass-light, or weaker than regular earbuds and some rival open-ear options.

How comfortable is it for workouts?

Most reviewers found it lightweight, comfortable, and stable for swimming or exercise. The main fit caveat is sizing: a few reviewers with smaller heads or fit gaps found it less secure or slightly awkward.

Is Playlist+ easy to use?

Playlist+ is useful because it can put streaming audio onto the headset for offline swimming, but reviewers often describe the recording process as slow, clumsy, archaic, or requiring patience.

Can it replace everyday earbuds?

The review evidence says it is better treated as a specialist swim headset. For everyday land workouts, critics point to weaker sound, finicky controls, and better-value alternatives.

How is battery life?

Battery life is generally viewed as good enough for workouts and swims. Most reviewers report solid results, though at least one found real-world drain lower than the stated figure.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

If you want better Equalizer customization

Choose Samsung Galaxy Buds 4. It scores 4.5 vs 1.0 for Equalizer customization, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Microphone quality for calls

Choose Sony WF-1000XM6 Earbuds. It scores 4.6 vs 2.3 for Microphone quality for calls, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Earbud Headphones Alternatives

#1 JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.2

Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...

Pros: Codec support, Dongle

Cons: Sound leakage, Find My

#2 Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Choose the Technics EAH-AZ100 if sound quality, bass, ANC, battery life, and multipoint matter most. Skip them if you need flawless calls, Bose-level ANC, the most natural transparency, or a...

Pros: Volume output, Maximum volume clarity

Cons: aptX, Auracast support

#3 Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4 Earbuds
4.2

Choose these for excellent sound, deep app control, strong codec support, and a premium true-wireless package. Skip them if call quality, best-in-class ANC, iPhone integration, or a compact case matters...

Pros: Maximum volume clarity, Stability

Cons: Spatial audio, Microphone noise reduction

#4 Sennheiser CX 80U Wired Earbuds
4.2

Choose the Sennheiser CX 80U for detailed, comfortable USB-C wired listening at a low price. Skip them if you need deep sub-bass, waterproofing, wireless features, volume buttons, or a cleaner...

Pros: Comfort during long use, USB-C

Cons: Microphone noise reduction, Water/sweat resistance rating