H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro

H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro Review

Brand: H2O Audio
Released: September 1, 2025
Updated: 20 hours ago
3.8
Overall review score
92
Review evidence points
30
Scored features
6
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for dedicated lap swimming if secure goggle-mounted fit, clear underwater audio, and onboard playback matter most. Skip it if you want versatile everyday headphones or a frictionless streaming and setup experience.

Best for

Best for dedicated lap swimmers who want a headset that stays locked to goggles, sounds clear underwater, and can play stored music or podcasts without keeping a phone nearby.

Not for

Not ideal for runners, cyclists, or everyday headphone users, nor for anyone who wants effortless streaming, broad EQ control, or a conventional wear-anywhere design.

Verdict

The H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro is exceptionally well matched to dedicated swimmers. Reviewers consistently praise its rock-solid goggle-mounted stability, clear underwater sound, strong waterproofing, and useful phone-free playback, while battery life is generally more than adequate for long pool sessions. The main compromises are equally consistent: loading streaming content through Playlist+ can be slow and awkward, the form factor is poor for running or everyday listening, and some testers found the tuning too bass-heavy. Bluetooth streaming from a watch can work underwater when the source is kept close, but it is not completely dropout-free. For swimmers who value a secure fit and dependable underwater audio over versatility, the specialized design makes sense.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

30 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    9 (30%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    9 (30%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (33%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    2 (7%)

Pros

  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Water/sweat resistance rating: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Water protection is a major strength. Reviewers repeatedly praised the IPX8 rating and treated the headset as fully suited to sustained swimming at its stated depth limit.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Overall satisfaction: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Overall sentiment is strongly positive when the headset is used for lap swimming: reviewers repeatedly call it excellent, easy to recommend, or outstanding in that niche. Enthusiasm drops sharply when judged as an all-purpose headset.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews low consensus
    Stability: 4.5, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Secure fit is one of the product’s clearest strengths. Multiple reviewers could not knock the headset loose through flips, fins, butterfly, or vigorous laps, although one tester raised concerns about cable and strap stability.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Offline playback and onboard storage: 4.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Phone-free playback is a major advantage for swimming. Reviewers liked the onboard player and Playlist+ for keeping music and podcasts available underwater, but several complained that getting streaming content onto the headset takes too much time.
  • 4.2
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Sound quality: 4.2, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Underwater sound is the headline strength: every reviewer found it clear or enjoyable in the pool, with several calling it excellent or top-tier. It is not audiophile-neutral, though, and one test placed it behind Shokz for balance and clarity.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Battery: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life is generally considered strong for swimming, with reviewers citing roughly 9–10 hours in some modes and calling that enough for serious sessions. One test saw shorter endurance from the onboard player.

Cons

  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Equalizer customization: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    There is no useful onboard EQ for memory playback, a notable limitation because several reviewers found the default tuning bass-heavy. More app-based EQ control was specifically requested.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Sound leakage: 2.0, 1 review
    One reviewer found that the open bone-conduction design leaks audio noticeably, especially when listening louder.
  • 2.8
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Software/setup simplicity: 2.8, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Setup is the most persistent friction point. Playlist+ can require real-time recording, the optional watch clip can make fitting awkward, and one tester called music setup challenging, although direct file transfer was straightforward in another test.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Frequency response accuracy: 2.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The tuning is not especially neutral. Multiple reviewers heard an elevated low end, and one said the overall balance trails the Shokz OpenSwim Pro.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Cable quality: 2.5, 1 review
    One tester wanted the flexible cable between the two sides to feel more stable, especially because the headset depends on goggles or another strap for support.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Carry case quality: 2.5, 1 review
    The soft-shell case is compact, but it does not provide extra charging. One reviewer called out that missing function when comparing the headset’s battery package with wireless earbuds.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Open-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Portability/foldability, Water/sweat resistance rating, Volume output, near average in Button control usability, Bass performance, below average in Sound leakage, Equalizer customization, Charging.

Comparison summary

27 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    8 (30%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    9 (33%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    10 (37%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Sound leakage 2.0 3.7 -1.7
Equalizer customization 2.0 3.7 -1.7
Charging 2.5 4.0 -1.5
Software/setup simplicity 2.8 4.1 -1.4
Carry case quality 2.5 3.6 -1.1
App 3.0 4.0 -1.0
Portability/foldability 4.5 3.5 +1.0
Design and Aesthetics 3.3 4.1 -0.7

Consider This Instead

If you want better Firmware/audio stability

Choose H2O Audio Tri Run. It scores 5.0 vs 3.0 for Firmware/audio stability, with a 3.6 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Equalizer customization

Choose Cleer ARC 5. It scores 4.8 vs 2.0 for Equalizer customization, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Software/setup simplicity

Choose Shokz OpenFit Pro. It scores 4.4 vs 2.8 for Software/setup simplicity, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Shokz OpenSwim Pro

  • Compared: offline playback features The Shokz OpenSwim Pro costs more and lacks the Sonar's Playlist+ recording feature.
  • Better: sound quality The Sonar 2 Pro does not match the Shokz OpenSwim Pro for balance, power, and clarity.
  • More expensive: price The Sonar 2 Pro is positioned as less expensive than the Shokz OpenSwim Pro.

H20 Audio Tri 2 Pro

  • Better: multi-sport versatility For running or other land use, the reviewer prefers the Tri 2 Pro.

FAQ

Is the Sonar 2 Pro good for swimming?

Yes. Across the reviews, its clearest strengths are secure goggle-mounted stability, strong IPX8 water protection, and clear underwater audio.

Does it stay in place during hard laps and flip turns?

Usually very well. Multiple testers reported that it did not budge through flips, fins, butterfly, and vigorous swimming, though one reviewer raised cable and strap-stability concerns.

Can Bluetooth work underwater?

It can work when the source is kept very close, such as a watch mounted near the headset. One reviewer found it better than expected but still experienced occasional dropouts, especially during turns or changing head position.

How easy is it to load music?

Direct file transfer can be straightforward, but Playlist+ is the bigger friction point because recording streaming content can take real time. Several reviewers called the process awkward, slow, or clunky.

How is the battery life?

Reviewers generally found it sufficient for serious swim sessions, commonly citing roughly 9–10 hours in some modes. One test reported shorter endurance when playing from onboard storage.

How does it sound underwater?

Most reviewers found the sound clear to excellent in the pool. Bass is strong and motivating for some listeners, but others found it too dominant, and one reviewer heard grainy treble.

Is it a good choice for running or everyday use?

Mostly no. The clip-on form factor is built around goggles or another strap, and several reviewers said it is far less versatile than conventional bone-conduction headphones away from the pool.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

trustedreviews.com

The H20 Audio Sonar 2 Pro offers good underwater sound, plus a way to stream music over Bluetooth in the water

Review score
3.2

Top Open-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Cleer ARC 5
4.5

Best for all-day comfort, secure open-ear awareness, long battery life, and a genuinely useful touchscreen case. Skip it if deep bass, strong isolation, compact size, or consistently premium music quality...

Pros: Instrument separation, Multipoint connectivity reliability

Cons: Noise isolation (passive)

#2 EarFun Clip 2
4.4

Best for lightweight all-day comfort, outstanding battery life, dependable physical controls, and premium features at a budget price. Skip it if you need deep bass, noise isolation, flawless high-volume sound,...

Pros: Weight comfort, Hinge durability

Cons: Active noise cancellation, Sensors

#3 Shokz OpenFit 2
4.4

Best for secure, comfortable open-ear workouts, strong battery life, and easier physical controls. Skip them if you need ANC, sealed-earbud sound, or the best value at full price.

Pros: Microphone noise reduction, Bluetooth

Cons: Active noise cancellation, Codec support

#4 Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2

Best for open-ear comfort, secure runs, long battery life, and convenient wireless charging. Skip it if you need ANC, deep bass, LDAC, or earbuds that never shift under helmets, buffs,...

Pros: Clamping force comfort, Battery

Cons: Active noise cancellation, Noise isolation (passive)