IQAir Atem Car

IQAir Atem Car Air Purifier Review

Brand: IQAir
Released: May 31, 2020
Updated: 2 months ago
3.8
Overall review score
174
Review evidence points
42
Scored features
50
Customer reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the IQAir Atem Car for cleaner-feeling cabin air, smoke, odor, pollen, and exhaust relief. Skip it if you need strong airflow for a large vehicle, low filter costs, simple non-app controls, or dependable support.

Best for

Best for drivers who spend a lot of time in traffic, wildfire smoke, new-car odors, pollen, or exhaust and want quiet personal air cleaning inside a car. It is especially appealing for allergy- or sensitivity-focused buyers who value cleaner-feeling cabin air.

Not for

Not ideal for buyers expecting rapid whole-cabin purification in an SUV, van, or RV. It is also a poor fit for anyone who wants low replacement costs, no app/Bluetooth friction, a remote, or a painless warranty/support experience.

Verdict

The IQAir Atem Car earns its best feedback from drivers dealing with wildfire smoke, exhaust, new-car odors, pollen, and chemical sensitivity. Many owners say it makes commuting feel cleaner and easier to breathe, and the quiet operation, compact design, and app controls often land well. The tradeoff is power and ownership friction: several reviewers say airflow is too weak for larger vehicles, filter life and replacement cost disappoint, and mounting, app setup, return terms, warranty service, or customer support can sour the experience. It looks strongest as a personal cabin-air helper, not as a fast whole-vehicle scrubber.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

42 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    13 (31%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    9 (21%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (7%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    10 (24%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    7 (17%)

Pros

  • 4.8
    13 reviews strong consensus
    breathing relief: 4.8, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Many reviewers describe real breathing relief, from less sneezing to feeling refreshed and more comfortable in polluted traffic. The strongest praise comes from allergy, asthma, exhaust sensitivity, and long-commute use cases.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    air purification performance: 4.5, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most owners say the Atem Car noticeably improves cabin air, especially during commutes through polluted areas. A smaller group felt the unit was underpowered or only partly effective in larger vehicles.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    noise level: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Noise is a consistent bright spot. Reviewers repeatedly call it quiet, whisper quiet, or barely noticeable, including while driving.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    allergen reduction: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Allergy feedback is consistently positive. Reviewers mention less sneezing, less stuffiness, and relief for family members with severe allergies.
  • 4.3
    12 reviews low consensus
    odor reduction: 4.3, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Odor reduction is a major strength in the reviews, covering exhaust, new-car smells, smoke smells, and unpleasant road odors. A few comments caution that it is not instant against acute odor blasts.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews low consensus
    ease of use: 4.4, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Ease of use is usually praised, especially setup, installation, and basic operation. A few reviewers found installation or headrest mounting difficult.

Cons

  • 1.7
    6 reviews low consensus
    customer support: 1.7, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Customer support is the most repeated service complaint. Several reviewers described slow, unavailable, or unhelpful support, including refund, repair, delivery, and app-connection issues.
  • 1.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    air circulation: 1.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Airflow is the clearest performance complaint. Several reviewers said it barely moved air or did not push enough air, while one installation-focused review liked being able to aim the airflow toward the cabin.
  • 1.5
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    car mount stability: 1.5, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The car mounting setup is a recurring complaint separate from ordinary installation. Some owners found the headrest adapter awkward, said the heavy unit would not stay attached, or reported that it fell off the holder too easily.
  • 1.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    particle removal effectiveness: 1.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Particle-removal feedback is split. Some owners trusted it as a HEPA scrubber, while others said particulates stayed high or questioned whether the low airflow could clean a car quickly.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    filter life: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Filter-life comments lean negative. Owners complained that filters needed changing often or that the remaining-life estimate was hard to trust.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    reliability: 1.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Reliability concerns center on power behavior and breakage. Some users disliked auto shutoff or car-only operation, and one unit failed just over a year in.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in documentation quality, app connectivity, mold spore reduction, near average in overall satisfaction, breathing relief, below average in particle removal effectiveness, air changes per hour, warranty coverage.

Comparison summary

41 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    8 (20%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    14 (34%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    19 (46%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
particle removal effectiveness 1.3 4.3 -3.0
air changes per hour 1.0 4.0 -3.0
warranty coverage 1.0 3.7 -2.7
durability 1.0 3.3 -2.3
room coverage 1.8 4.1 -2.3
air circulation 1.8 4.0 -2.2
filter replacement cost 1.0 3.3 -2.3
filter life 1.7 3.7 -2.1

Consider This Instead

If you want better particle removal effectiveness

Choose AirDoctor AD3500. It scores 5.0 vs 1.3 for particle removal effectiveness, with a 4.6 overall score.

Compare

If you want better air circulation

Choose IQAir Atem Desk. It scores 4.8 vs 1.8 for air circulation, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better customer support

Choose Aroeve MK01. It scores 4.8 vs 1.7 for customer support, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: airflow and expectations The reviewer loved the IQAir HealthPro Plus but expected more airflow from the Atem Car.

Austen air cleaners

  • Similar: overall air-cleaning usefulness The reviewer rated the Atem Car about equal to the Austen air cleaners they used elsewhere.

Austin Air machine

  • Older model: smoke use in a passenger car The reviewer saw the Atem Car as a better replacement for a small Austin Air setup in a passenger car.

FAQ

Does the IQAir Atem Car help with wildfire smoke?

Many reviewers say it helps with wildfire or campfire smoke and makes smoky drives more tolerable. One van owner still found it undersized for heavier smoke in a larger vehicle.

Is it good for car exhaust and odors?

Yes, odor and exhaust relief are among the strongest themes. Reviewers mention less diesel smell, less new-car odor, and cleaner-feeling air, though one says it is not instant against sudden blasts of fumes.

Is the Atem Car quiet?

Most noise comments are positive. Owners repeatedly describe it as quiet, whisper quiet, or barely noticeable while driving.

Does it work well in large vehicles?

Large-vehicle feedback is mixed to negative. Several SUV, van, and RV-related comments suggest it can feel too small or too low-flow outside smaller passenger spaces.

Are the app controls reliable?

App feedback is mixed. Some reviewers love the simple phone controls, while others dislike the Bluetooth/app requirement or could not connect the app at all.

Are filters expensive or short-lived?

Filter ownership is a common complaint. Some reviewers say filters are expensive, need replacing too often, or show confusing remaining-life information.

Is it worth the money?

Value depends on the use case. Buyers who feel breathing or odor relief often call it worth it, while critics say the weak airflow, filter costs, mounting issues, or support problems make it too expensive.

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, dust removal

Cons: CADR rating, air changes per hour

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, HEPA filtration

Cons: customer support, warranty coverage

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability