IQAir Atem Desk

IQAir Atem Desk Air Purifier Review

Brand: IQAir
Released: October 24, 2017
Updated: 2 months ago
4.0
Overall review score Expert score: 4.5 Customer score: 3.6
289
Review evidence points
47
Scored features
98
Total reviews
8 expert / 90 customer

Bottom Line

Choose the IQAir Atem Desk for quiet, stylish personal clean air at a desk, bedside, or hotel. Skip it if you need whole-room coverage, cheap filters, or worry-free replacement support.

Best for

Best for people who want a quiet personal clean-air zone at a desk, bedside, office, hotel room, or small workspace. Allergy-sensitive users and frequent travelers found the clearest benefits when the airflow was aimed directly at them.

Not for

Not ideal for buyers who expect whole-room purification, very low ownership costs, or easy filter availability. It is also a poor fit for chemically sensitive users if they are concerned about initial odors.

Verdict

The IQAir Atem Desk earns strong praise as a premium personal air purifier: reviewers like its quiet airflow, modern design, easy desk placement, and noticeable allergy or breathing relief when it is aimed close to the user. Expert tests and several owners describe effective particle reduction for a small, focused clean-air zone. The tradeoff is that it behaves more like a personal bubble than a full-room purifier, and long-term ownership can be frustrating. Replacement filters are repeatedly called expensive or hard to find, and some customers report smell, app quirks, blue-light annoyance, broken units, or weak support. It is most convincing for close-range use, not broad coverage.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

47 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    12 (26%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    15 (32%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (17%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    12 (26%)

Pros

  • 4.4
    35 reviews strong consensus
    air purification performance: 4.4, 35 reviews, strong consensus
    Most reviewers say the Atem Desk noticeably improves the air around them, especially in offices, bedrooms, and close-range use. Negative comments usually involve heavy smoke, larger areas, or possible defective units.
  • 4.6
    14 reviews strong consensus
    design and appearance: 4.6, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Design is a clear strength: reviewers call it stylish, modern, attractive, and office-friendly. Even several mixed reviews still like the look.
  • 4.6
    12 reviews strong consensus
    allergen reduction: 4.6, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Allergy relief is one of the strongest patterns, with buyers reporting less sneezing, clearer sinuses, fewer headaches, or easier breathing. The praise is strongest when the purifier sits close to the user.
  • 4.2
    26 reviews moderate consensus
    noise level: 4.2, 26 reviews, moderate consensus
    Quiet operation is one of the strongest positives, especially on low and medium. Noise complaints usually involve high speed, rattles, or defective fan behavior.
  • 4.7
    8 reviews strong consensus
    breathing relief: 4.7, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Several users describe easier breathing from asthma, allergies, sinus issues, or stale air. These benefits are usually tied to close-range placement.
  • 4.2
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    size and footprint: 4.2, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Many reviewers like the compact footprint, but size expectations vary. Some find it desk-perfect while others say it is too large.

Cons

  • 1.5
    9 reviews strong consensus
    filter availability: 1.5, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Replacement-filter availability is the most repeated practical complaint. Many buyers say filters are hard to find, backordered, or unavailable on Amazon.
  • 1.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    filter replacement cost: 1.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Filter cost is a recurring downside, with customers calling replacements expensive. The cost matters most when filters need changing sooner than expected.
  • 2.0
    8 reviews low consensus
    reliability: 2.0, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Reliability is a meaningful risk in customer reviews. Complaints include stopped units, broken plugs, weak connectors, and stand problems.
  • 1.6
    3 reviews strong consensus
    replacement experience: 1.6, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Replacement experiences are poor in several defect cases. Buyers mention returns, no replacement, or difficulty getting help.
  • 2.1
    6 reviews low consensus
    initial chemical smell: 2.1, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Odor experiences are split: some users report clean air with no off-gassing, while chemically sensitive or unhappy buyers describe unpleasant smells.
  • 1.9
    3 reviews strong consensus
    customer support: 1.9, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Customer support draws repeated criticism in problem cases. Complaints mention disorganized replies, closed cases, and limited help after failures.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in app connectivity, control placement, air circulation, near average in noise level, size and footprint, below average in filter availability, smoke removal, VOC reduction.

Comparison summary

47 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    8 (17%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    19 (40%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    20 (43%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
filter availability 1.5 3.5 -2.0
smoke removal 2.2 4.3 -2.1
VOC reduction 1.5 3.6 -2.1
auto mode performance 2.0 3.9 -1.9
filter life 2.2 3.7 -1.5
filter replacement cost 1.8 3.3 -1.4
replacement experience 1.6 3.0 -1.4
reliability 2.0 3.0 -1.1

Consider This Instead

If you want better listing accuracy

Choose Honeywell HPA304. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for listing accuracy, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better VOC reduction

Choose AROEVE MK06. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for VOC reduction, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better filter availability

Choose Kenmore PM2010. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for filter availability, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better auto mode performance

Choose LG PuriCare 360. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for auto mode performance, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Dyson personal air purifyer

  • Compared: design and workplace visibility The reviewer considered Dyson's personal purifier but preferred the Atem Desk's less conspicuous desk design.

FAQ

Is the IQAir Atem Desk good for allergies?

Many allergy-focused reviewers reported less sneezing, clearer sinuses, fewer headaches, or easier breathing, especially when the unit was used close by.

Can it clean a whole room?

It is better understood as a personal-zone purifier. Some reviewers used it in small rooms, but several noted that it is not meant to clean a full room like a larger purifier.

Is it quiet enough for sleep or office work?

Most reviewers found it very quiet on low or medium, with some using it overnight or in offices. Noise complaints mostly involved high speed, rattles, or defective units.

Are replacement filters easy to get?

No, this is the biggest recurring complaint. Multiple customers said filters were expensive, out of stock, or hard to buy when needed.

Does the app work well?

Several reviewers liked the app for fan controls, filter status, and smart on/off. Others reported Bluetooth range, connection, or software-update frustrations.

Does it have any odor issues?

Some reviewers said the air smelled clean with no off-gassing, but several chemically sensitive or unhappy buyers reported unpleasant smells from the unit or filter.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, dust removal

Cons: CADR rating, air changes per hour

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, HEPA filtration

Cons: customer support, warranty coverage

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability