IQAir Atem X

IQAir Atem X Air Purifier Review

Brand: IQAir
Released: April 19, 2023
Updated: 2 months ago
4.0
Overall review score Expert score: 4.2 Customer score: 3.9
223
Review evidence points
54
Scored features
28
Total reviews
6 expert / 22 customer

Bottom Line

Choose the Atem X for premium design, powerful large-room particle removal, and rich app controls. Skip it if you need low cost, strong gas/odor filtration, or dependable customer support.

Best for

Best for buyers who want a design-forward purifier for large rooms, allergies, wildfire smoke, dust, or general particle control. It especially suits households that will use app monitoring and smart modes.

Not for

Not for budget shoppers, odor/VOC-focused buyers, or anyone who expects simple low-cost filter replacement. It is also risky for buyers who may need highly responsive support after purchase.

Verdict

The IQAir Atem X earns unusually strong praise for particle removal, large-room coverage, quiet low-speed operation, and a design that reviewers actually want in a living space. Experts consistently frame it as a premium purifier that backs up its looks with serious airflow, smart controls, and useful monitoring. The tradeoff is cost: the unit is expensive, replacement filters are pricey, and several customers had frustrating support or return experiences. It is also not the best choice for VOC or odor-focused buyers because the reviewed configuration lacks meaningful carbon filtration.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

54 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    30 (56%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    14 (26%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    2 (4%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (7%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    4 (7%)

Pros

  • 4.9
    15 reviews strong consensus
    air purification performance: 4.9, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers broadly praised the Atem X for strong air-cleaning performance, from lab-style particle tests to everyday home use. Even some critical customers still said the purifier itself worked well.
  • 5.0
    9 reviews strong consensus
    design and appearance: 5.0, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Design is one of the Atem X's biggest wins. Experts and customers repeatedly described it as beautiful, modern, sculptural, and easier to live with visually than boxy high-output purifiers.
  • 4.8
    10 reviews strong consensus
    app connectivity: 4.8, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The app was consistently described as useful, easy, and convenient. Reviewers liked remote control, live readings, and extra settings that are not available from the physical controls alone.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    auto mode performance: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Auto and smart modes were a real strength, especially because reviewers could let the purifier react to pollution or cap fan speed for comfort. Owners liked leaving it to manage air quality on its own.
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    room coverage: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Room coverage is a major strength, with expert and owner comments supporting use in large rooms, apartments, and open living areas. The Atem X is consistently treated as a large-space purifier.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    allergen reduction: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Customers with allergies reported fewer symptoms, less congestion, and more comfortable homes. Several tied the purifier to seasonal allergy, pet, and family health benefits.

Cons

  • 1.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    reliability: 1.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reliability feedback was mixed. Most users reported strong performance, but a handful of customers had early failures, burning-smell concerns, or noisy operation from the start.
  • 1.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    activated carbon filter: 1.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Several reviewers were disappointed that the Atem X does not include meaningful carbon or gas filtration as standard. It can handle particles very well, but odor and gas control are not its strongest lane.
  • 1.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    customer support: 1.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Customer support was the most serious recurring owner complaint. Multiple customers described slow responses, poor follow-through, or frustrating return and warranty communication.
  • 1.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    condition on arrival: 1.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    A small number of customers reported serious arrival problems, including a unit that would not work and a missing roller base. Those complaints contrast sharply with the otherwise premium positioning.
  • 1.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    replacement experience: 1.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Return and replacement experiences were a sore spot in negative reviews. Customers complained about shipping costs, wrong packaging, and refund delays after defective or problematic units.
  • 2.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    filter replacement cost: 2.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Replacement filters were a repeated cost concern. Experts consistently noted that the filter pack is expensive, even when they liked the purifier overall.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in remote control, app connectivity, CADR rating, near average in noise level, value for money, below average in voice assistant compatibility, activated carbon filter, filter availability.

Comparison summary

53 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    31 (58%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    10 (19%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    12 (23%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
voice assistant compatibility 1.0 3.6 -2.6
remote control 5.0 2.7 +2.3
activated carbon filter 1.6 3.8 -2.2
filter availability 1.5 3.5 -2.0
app connectivity 4.8 3.2 +1.6
condition on arrival 1.0 2.8 -1.8
replacement experience 1.3 3.0 -1.7
reliability 1.4 3.0 -1.7

Consider This Instead

If you want better replacement experience

Choose AirDoctor AD3000. It scores 5.0 vs 1.3 for replacement experience, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better filter availability

Choose Alen BreatheSmart 35i. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for filter availability, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better condition on arrival

Choose Alen BreatheSmart Flex. It scores 4.8 vs 1.0 for condition on arrival, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better overall satisfaction

Choose AirDoctor AD3500. It scores 4.9 vs 3.8 for overall satisfaction, with a 4.6 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Similar: overall purifier performance TechRadar said only the Levoit EverestAir had impressed them more, and only by a narrow margin.

Air Phanto 3 Pro

  • Worse: quiet-speed particle removal The video review said the Atem X beat the Air Phanto 3 Pro in a sub-45 dB cleaning comparison.

Alen BreathSmart 75i

  • Compared: odor filter design The reviewer contrasted the Atem X's lack of charcoal with the Alen BreathSmart 75i's odor filter.

FAQ

Is the IQAir Atem X good for large rooms?

Yes. Expert reviews repeatedly praised its large-room coverage, high CADR, and ability to move enough air for open living spaces and large bedrooms.

Is the Atem X quiet?

At lower speeds, many reviewers and owners found it very quiet. At maximum speed, expert testing and some customers said it can be loud.

Does it help with allergies?

Customer reviews strongly suggest it can help allergy-sensitive homes, with reports of less sneezing, congestion, and improved comfort.

Does it remove odors and VOCs?

Odor results were mixed, and VOC control is a weakness in the reviewed configuration. Several reviewers noted the lack of a standard carbon or gas filter.

Is the app useful?

Yes. Reviewers liked the app for remote control, air-quality readings, schedules, smart modes, and monitoring indoor air conditions.

Are replacement filters expensive?

Yes. Experts repeatedly called replacement filters pricey, even when they liked the purifier's performance and design.

What is the biggest buyer risk?

Customer support is the biggest non-performance risk. Several negative reviews described slow responses, poor follow-through, or frustrating return handling.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, dust removal

Cons: CADR rating, air changes per hour

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, HEPA filtration

Cons: customer support, warranty coverage

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability