Kenmore 400 Series Bagged Canister Vacuum Cleaner Feature Scores
Explore all 38 feature scores for Kenmore 400 Series Bagged Canister Vacuum Cleaner, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
38 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.015 (39%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.422 (58%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.41 (3%)
Pros
Sort
-
Reviewers consistently describe the vacuum as powerful, with nice suction power, strong brush-roll performance, and successful pickup in direct debris testing.
-
Every review that gave an overall judgment was positive, ranging from good and impressive to extremely satisfied.
-
Maneuverability is a repeated strength, with reviewers praising easy movement, lightweight handling, comfortable movement, and tight-space maneuverability.
-
Value is a major strength, with reviewers calling the price good, a great buy, and the best bang for the buck.
-
Filtration receives positive comments across reviews, including HEPA/allergy benefits and praise for keeping dust from being pushed back into the room.
-
The included tools and telescoping wand are generally praised for versatility, but one reviewer criticizes the crevice tool as too thin.
-
The bag system is viewed positively overall, with easy replacement and a large, quality-feeling bag, though one unboxing notes some figuring out was needed.
-
Versatility is praised across reviews, especially because the attachments and canister design cover varied cleaning tasks.
-
The dual-motor system is praised for power and deep-cleaning capability.
-
Comparative evidence is strong: reviewers say suction is very close to the 600 Series and performance rivals much more expensive canisters.
-
Cord reach is praised, with one review calling the cord very long and another saying it provides plenty of reach.
-
Ease of use is a repeated strength, with reviewers saying vacuuming is easy and the swiveling powerhead is easy to use.
-
Two reviewers like the look, with praise for the overall appearance and the dark red finish.
-
Cord management is positive, with praise for the cord rewind and easier put-away compared with hand-winding.
-
Tool changes and attachment fit are mostly easy, though one comparison says the 600 Series makes the wider attachment easier to pick up.
-
The floorhead earns positive remarks for swivel usability and for being wand-connected, which improves maneuverability.
-
Above-floor cleaning is supported by comments about couches, curtains, car floors, crevices, and attachment-based versatility.
-
Low-pile carpet pickup performs very well in one direct test where debris cleanup was described as a breeze.
-
One reviewer highlights the canister design as a strong option for smaller rooms and tight spaces.
-
Under-furniture cleaning is a clear positive in one review, which calls it a huge advantage for hard-to-reach areas.
-
Build-related comments are positive but narrow, focusing on a good-quality hose and thick bag material.
-
Onboard storage is mixed: some tools fit nicely, but the 600 Series is considered more convenient because it hides all attachments.
-
Area-rug handling is supported by one comparison review saying it performs as intended on carpets, rugs, and flat floors.
-
The bag-full indicator receives clear praise as helpful for knowing when to change the bag.
-
Emptying is praised through the bag system: reviewers describe grabbing the full bag, throwing it away, and replacing it.
-
One direct pickup test supports heavier-duty use by showing tough debris was no match for the sweeper.
-
One reviewer praises the vacuum as lightweight and easy to move around.
-
Maintenance is mostly positive, though one unboxing finds bag/filter handling a little tricky to figure out.
-
One unboxing praises the way the hard-floor tool fits snugly into the back of the vacuum for storage.
-
Setup evidence is limited but positive, with the hose/pipe connection described as very easy.
-
The suction adjustment and handle controls are liked, though one reviewer notes the adjustment location is unusual.
-
One comparison review says the floorhead movement helps reach room corners more easily.
-
Ownership cost evidence is tied to the bagged design being described as not very high maintenance despite requiring bags.
-
One reviewer describes the vacuum as reliable, supporting a positive but limited durability/longevity score.
-
Packaging evidence is limited to one reviewer describing the box as compact and containing everything needed.
-
Reliability is supported by one reviewer calling it a reliable vacuum, but there is no separate customer-support evidence.
-
Pet-related evidence is mixed: one comparison frames the 400 as better for people without pets, while another review says the included attachments can handle pet-hair cleanup.
Cons
-
Crevice pickup has a clear limitation from one reviewer who says the crevice tool is too thin for dirt to pass easily.