Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock Feature Scores
Explore all 28 feature scores for Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
28 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.09 (32%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.412 (43%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.41 (4%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.46 (21%)
Pros
Sort
-
Fingerprint access is the strongest feature across reviews, described as fast, accurate, responsive, effective, and unusually good.
-
The keypad and PIN Genie concept were widely praised for security and usability, although one reviewer found the shifting layout disorienting.
-
The app was generally considered easy, clear, and responsive, though one review separated that from a difficult guest-code workflow.
-
Lock and unlock speed was consistently positive, with instant app response or unlocks taking only a couple of seconds.
-
Build quality was repeatedly praised as sturdy, well-built, strong, and rock solid.
-
The touchscreen evidence is positive, with reviewers praising seamless operation and responsive keypad behavior.
-
Reviewers who discussed logs liked the recordkeeping, citing accurate history entries and even a year of usable activity history.
-
Installation is sharply mixed, ranging from simple, app-guided, and quick to unusually complicated and frustrating.
-
Bluetooth evidence is positive, with stable connectivity and unusually quick app response over Bluetooth range.
-
Key backup evidence is positive, with reviewers valuing physical-key and backup access as a practical fallback.
-
Security evidence is positive, with praise for hack resistance and unusually comprehensive account-security setup.
-
Auto-lock has limited but strong evidence, with PCMag reporting that the feature worked very well in testing.
-
Warranty evidence is strongly positive, with Digital Trends calling it one of the best in the smart-lock market.
-
Locking reliability is mixed: some testing found smooth, great performance, while Digital Trends encountered unresolved calibration errors.
-
Compatibility evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers noting standard-door fit and successful single-doorknob replacement.
-
Design opinions are mixed: reviewers liked the attractive, premium look, but several also called the lock large, bulky, or obvious.
-
Guest access is mixed: several reviewers liked the flexible access options, while one found temporary-code delivery convoluted and buggy.
-
Battery evidence is limited to one long-term review, but that reviewer called performance stellar after about a year of use.
-
Motor evidence is limited, but PCMag praised the lock for relatively quiet operation.
-
Weather resistance evidence is positive but limited to one review that judged the casing able to handle harsh conditions.
-
User access management is mixed, combining flexible access options with one strong complaint about difficult PIN assignment.
Cons
Sort
-
Smart-home integration is one of the clearest weaknesses, with repeated criticism of missing or limited platform support.
-
Remote access is a repeated limitation because the lock lacks built-in internet control and needs extra Wi-Fi hardware.
-
Voice control is limited because it is not built in and depends on extra Wi-Fi hardware that reviewers criticized.
-
Value is a common concern because reviewers repeatedly describe the lock, hub path, or overall package as expensive.
-
Notifications are a weakness in the limited evidence, with PCMag specifically missing push notification support.
-
The hub requirement is a drawback because remote and voice features require added hardware and cost.
-
Wi-Fi is mixed: the lack of built-in Wi-Fi is criticized, but one review found hub-connected Wi-Fi response very fast.