Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX Feature Scores
Explore all 56 feature scores for Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
56 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.025 (45%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.417 (30%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.410 (18%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.44 (7%)
Pros
Sort
-
Weight was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as feather-light, ultra-light, or impressively low for its size.
-
Wireless performance was consistently excellent, with reviewers reporting fast, stable, lag-free, high-performance wireless use.
-
Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting sturdy construction, no flex, no rattle, and solid fit despite the low weight.
-
Battery life was widely praised as long-lasting, often exceeding expectations, though high polling rates were noted to drain it faster.
-
The Hero 2 sensor was repeatedly described as top-tier, flawless, or working perfectly, with only isolated uncertainty around real-world need for the highest specs.
-
Button responsiveness was one of the stronger areas, with many reviewers calling clicks tactile, immediate, snappy, or super responsive.
-
Click/input latency was mostly praised as immediate, responsive, or low, with one measured latency result landing only mid-pack despite still being usable.
-
Ergonomic design was a major positive overall, with reviewers praising the hand support, contoured right-handed form, and FPS-friendly ergonomic balance.
-
Switch feel was mostly praised for crisp, tactile Lightforce clicks, though some reviewers found them inconsistent, loud, or merely satisfactory.
-
The 8K wireless polling rate impressed reviewers for speed and smoothness, though several called it overkill or battery-hungry outside competitive play.
-
FPS gaming suitability was strong overall, with praise for shooters, responsiveness, and control; negative reports centered on hand-size/shape fit rather than sensor performance.
-
Reviewers generally found tracking and aiming precise, with praise for pinpoint pixel work, fast shooters, and smooth control; one reviewer struggled mainly because the shape hurt aim.
-
Main click quality was usually strong, with repeated praise for tactile, crisp, snappy clicks, though a few reviewers wanted a sharper or more premium feel.
-
The DPI ceiling was treated as extremely high and impressive, with fine adjustment praised by reviewers who used G Hub.
-
Shape comfort split reviewers: many loved the ergonomic, right-handed shape, while several found it too bulky, awkward, or hand-size dependent.
-
Balance was mostly praised as well distributed and fatigue-free, though one reviewer felt the rear-heavy balance hurt lift-offs.
-
Dock compatibility was valued through Powerplay support, with reviewers praising continuous charging or easy mat integration despite cost caveats.
-
Palm grip comfort was usually strong, with reviewers praising the larger ergonomic rear and palm support; one source still advised some palm users toward a rival.
-
Wireless latency was praised as low or highly responsive, helping several reviewers feel comfortable using it wirelessly for serious gaming.
-
Connection stability was positive where tested, with no issues on Windows, reliable wireless impressions, and supportive receiver setup comments.
-
Long-session comfort was generally positive thanks to low weight and ergonomics, though awkward grip demands caused fatigue for one reviewer.
-
Scroll wheel feedback was generally usable and often quiet or tactile, but several reviewers noted rattle, mushiness, or weaker click feel.
-
2.4GHz connectivity was praised for stable, speedy Lightspeed/2.4GHz operation and high polling without a bulky receiver.
-
Charging convenience was strong when using USB-C or Powerplay, though one reviewer criticized the full recharge time.
-
Onboard memory was valued for saving profiles and reducing dependence on G Hub, with reviewers noting multiple memory slots or dongle/profile convenience.
-
Software usability was generally good when G Hub worked, with useful profiles, remapping, macros, and calibration; memory use and interface speed drew criticism.
-
Motion stayed consistent in fast movements, with reviewers reporting no acceleration, smoothing, or loss of tracking while sliding quickly.
-
Portability was excellent because the compact receiver and onboard storage make the high-polling setup easy to pack.
-
Button customization was strong in software, especially drag-and-drop remapping, but constrained by the DEX's simplified button layout.
-
Ecosystem integration was strong where mentioned, especially G Hub plus Logitech hardware features that set the mouse apart.
-
Grip texture was mixed: some liked the dry or grippy coating, while others found it too smooth, sticky over time, or in need of tape.
-
Macro support was useful through G Hub, but the limited button count reduced how far reviewers could take macro-heavy setups.
-
Materials quality was praised as premium and well assembled in the few reviews that explicitly judged the materials.
-
RGB absence was mostly framed as acceptable or even beneficial for battery and subtle looks, though it makes the mouse less flashy.
-
Glide smoothness was mixed: some praised effortless movement and PTFE feet, while many enthusiasts disliked the stock skates and wanted replacements.
-
Acceleration control was positively judged where tested, with movement described as consistent and free of acceleration or smoothing.
-
Premium feel was mixed: one reviewer initially found it budget-like due to lightness, while another praised the in-hand quality.
-
Claw grip comfort was mixed, working for relaxed claw or some users while feeling too large or high for others.
-
Durability over time had limited evidence but one month of use showed the coating had not decayed.
-
Switch durability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no double clicks or related issues during testing.
-
Surface compatibility was adequate but not universal, with one reviewer preferring padded surfaces and another reporting no glass-pad tracking issues.
-
MOBA gaming suitability had limited, mixed evidence, with one reviewer saying DOTA2 did not reveal much difference.
Cons
Sort
-
Cable flexibility was a repeated complaint, with reviewers calling the cable bad, not ultralight, or unsuitable for wired use.
-
Bluetooth support was a weakness because it is absent, though some reviewers accepted the tradeoff for weight and responsiveness.
-
Handedness options were a drawback because the DEX is strongly right-handed and several reviewers warned left-handers away.
-
Cross-platform compatibility was limited by the lack of Bluetooth and multi-device switching, making it less flexible than generalist mice.
-
Profile switching was a recurring weakness because reviewers missed a physical DPI/profile button and disliked leaving games to change settings.
-
Software stability was mixed to poor, led by a PC Gamer report of freezes, crashes, and reinstall trouble despite another reviewer finding basics usable.
-
Side buttons were the most divisive control: some found them easy and great in game, while many criticized mushiness, high placement, or extra travel.
-
Fingertip comfort was generally weak because the larger hump and body interfered with finger micro-adjustments, with only one reviewer finding it workable.
-
Programmable button evidence was mixed: G Hub assignment was useful, but the five-button layout and lack of extra controls limited flexibility.
-
Value for money was the most common strategic concern because reviewers liked the performance but repeatedly called the price high or premium.
-
Weight tuning evidence was limited to modding; removing components lowered weight but hurt the reviewer’s sense of balance.
-
Click noise was a caveat: main clicks were often loud or high-pitched, though some found the noise acceptable or preference-based.
-
Lift-off options were inconsistent across reviews: one reviewer could set LOD, another disliked the lack of millimeter values, and another found no adjustment.
-
Skate durability was mixed: one reviewer valued long-lasting skates, while others recommended replacement or noted wear concerns.