If you want better fingertip grip comfort
Choose Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2. It scores 5.0 vs 2.8 for fingertip grip comfort, with a 4.1 overall score.
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX Gaming Mouse Review
Bottom Line
Choose the DEX if you want an ultra-light right-handed FPS mouse with excellent wireless responsiveness, sensor tracking, and battery life. Skip it if you need left-handed comfort, crisp side buttons, slick stock skates, or strong value.
Best for
Best for right-handed FPS and competitive players who want a very light wireless mouse with strong sensor performance, long battery life, and a supportive ergonomic shell. It also suits users already comfortable with Logitech G Hub and Powerplay.
Not for
Not for left-handed users, fingertip-first players with smaller hands, or anyone who needs many buttons, Bluetooth, a built-in DPI switch, or premium stock skates. Value-focused buyers may also find the price difficult to justify.
Verdict
The Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX comes across as a high-performance, right-handed FPS mouse built around speed, low weight, and a more supportive ergonomic shell. Reviewers repeatedly praised its Hero 2 tracking, wireless responsiveness, battery life, sturdy build, and main clicks, and many found the new shape more comfortable than the standard Superlight style. The tradeoff is that the same minimalist esports focus leaves little room for extra controls: side buttons, stock skates, cable quality, Bluetooth absence, and DPI/profile switching drew recurring complaints. Fit also depends heavily on hand size and grip, with palm and relaxed claw users faring better than fingertip users. Its performance is excellent, but the premium price makes the compromises harder to ignore.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
56 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.025 (45%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.417 (30%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.410 (18%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.44 (7%)
Pros
-
Motion stayed consistent in fast movements, with reviewers reporting no acceleration, smoothing, or loss of tracking while sliding quickly.
-
Portability was excellent because the compact receiver and onboard storage make the high-polling setup easy to pack.
-
Acceleration control was positively judged where tested, with movement described as consistent and free of acceleration or smoothing.
-
Wireless performance was consistently excellent, with reviewers reporting fast, stable, lag-free, high-performance wireless use.
-
Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting sturdy construction, no flex, no rattle, and solid fit despite the low weight.
-
Wireless latency was praised as low or highly responsive, helping several reviewers feel comfortable using it wirelessly for serious gaming.
-
Weight was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as feather-light, ultra-light, or impressively low for its size.
-
Button responsiveness was one of the stronger areas, with many reviewers calling clicks tactile, immediate, snappy, or super responsive.
-
Click/input latency was mostly praised as immediate, responsive, or low, with one measured latency result landing only mid-pack despite still being usable.
-
Ergonomic design was a major positive overall, with reviewers praising the hand support, contoured right-handed form, and FPS-friendly ergonomic balance.
-
The Hero 2 sensor was repeatedly described as top-tier, flawless, or working perfectly, with only isolated uncertainty around real-world need for the highest specs.
-
The DPI ceiling was treated as extremely high and impressive, with fine adjustment praised by reviewers who used G Hub.
-
Connection stability was positive where tested, with no issues on Windows, reliable wireless impressions, and supportive receiver setup comments.
-
2.4GHz connectivity was praised for stable, speedy Lightspeed/2.4GHz operation and high polling without a bulky receiver.
-
Ecosystem integration was strong where mentioned, especially G Hub plus Logitech hardware features that set the mouse apart.
-
Onboard memory was valued for saving profiles and reducing dependence on G Hub, with reviewers noting multiple memory slots or dongle/profile convenience.
-
Reviewers generally found tracking and aiming precise, with praise for pinpoint pixel work, fast shooters, and smooth control; one reviewer struggled mainly because the shape hurt aim.
-
Dock compatibility was valued through Powerplay support, with reviewers praising continuous charging or easy mat integration despite cost caveats.
-
Battery life was widely praised as long-lasting, often exceeding expectations, though high polling rates were noted to drain it faster.
-
Switch feel was mostly praised for crisp, tactile Lightforce clicks, though some reviewers found them inconsistent, loud, or merely satisfactory.
-
The 8K wireless polling rate impressed reviewers for speed and smoothness, though several called it overkill or battery-hungry outside competitive play.
-
Main click quality was usually strong, with repeated praise for tactile, crisp, snappy clicks, though a few reviewers wanted a sharper or more premium feel.
-
Materials quality was praised as premium and well assembled in the few reviews that explicitly judged the materials.
-
Durability over time had limited evidence but one month of use showed the coating had not decayed.
-
Switch durability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no double clicks or related issues during testing.
-
FPS gaming suitability was strong overall, with praise for shooters, responsiveness, and control; negative reports centered on hand-size/shape fit rather than sensor performance.
-
Balance was mostly praised as well distributed and fatigue-free, though one reviewer felt the rear-heavy balance hurt lift-offs.
-
Palm grip comfort was usually strong, with reviewers praising the larger ergonomic rear and palm support; one source still advised some palm users toward a rival.
-
Charging convenience was strong when using USB-C or Powerplay, though one reviewer criticized the full recharge time.
-
Shape comfort split reviewers: many loved the ergonomic, right-handed shape, while several found it too bulky, awkward, or hand-size dependent.
-
Long-session comfort was generally positive thanks to low weight and ergonomics, though awkward grip demands caused fatigue for one reviewer.
-
Button customization was strong in software, especially drag-and-drop remapping, but constrained by the DEX's simplified button layout.
-
Scroll wheel feedback was generally usable and often quiet or tactile, but several reviewers noted rattle, mushiness, or weaker click feel.
-
Software usability was generally good when G Hub worked, with useful profiles, remapping, macros, and calibration; memory use and interface speed drew criticism.
-
Premium feel was mixed: one reviewer initially found it budget-like due to lightness, while another praised the in-hand quality.
-
Macro support was useful through G Hub, but the limited button count reduced how far reviewers could take macro-heavy setups.
-
RGB absence was mostly framed as acceptable or even beneficial for battery and subtle looks, though it makes the mouse less flashy.
-
Grip texture was mixed: some liked the dry or grippy coating, while others found it too smooth, sticky over time, or in need of tape.
-
Glide smoothness was mixed: some praised effortless movement and PTFE feet, while many enthusiasts disliked the stock skates and wanted replacements.
-
Claw grip comfort was mixed, working for relaxed claw or some users while feeling too large or high for others.
-
Surface compatibility was adequate but not universal, with one reviewer preferring padded surfaces and another reporting no glass-pad tracking issues.
-
MOBA gaming suitability had limited, mixed evidence, with one reviewer saying DOTA2 did not reveal much difference.
Cons
-
Skate durability was mixed: one reviewer valued long-lasting skates, while others recommended replacement or noted wear concerns.
-
Lift-off options were inconsistent across reviews: one reviewer could set LOD, another disliked the lack of millimeter values, and another found no adjustment.
-
Value for money was the most common strategic concern because reviewers liked the performance but repeatedly called the price high or premium.
-
Click noise was a caveat: main clicks were often loud or high-pitched, though some found the noise acceptable or preference-based.
-
Side buttons were the most divisive control: some found them easy and great in game, while many criticized mushiness, high placement, or extra travel.
-
Fingertip comfort was generally weak because the larger hump and body interfered with finger micro-adjustments, with only one reviewer finding it workable.
-
Programmable button evidence was mixed: G Hub assignment was useful, but the five-button layout and lack of extra controls limited flexibility.
-
Profile switching was a recurring weakness because reviewers missed a physical DPI/profile button and disliked leaving games to change settings.
-
Software stability was mixed to poor, led by a PC Gamer report of freezes, crashes, and reinstall trouble despite another reviewer finding basics usable.
-
Weight tuning evidence was limited to modding; removing components lowered weight but hurt the reviewer’s sense of balance.
-
Bluetooth support was a weakness because it is absent, though some reviewers accepted the tradeoff for weight and responsiveness.
-
Handedness options were a drawback because the DEX is strongly right-handed and several reviewers warned left-handers away.
-
Cross-platform compatibility was limited by the lack of Bluetooth and multi-device switching, making it less flexible than generalist mice.
-
Cable flexibility was a repeated complaint, with reviewers calling the cable bad, not ultralight, or unsuitable for wired use.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Gaming Mice, this product is above average in portability, weight, dock compatibility, near average in battery life, FPS gaming suitability, below average in cross-platform compatibility, cable flexibility, programmable buttons.
Summary
56 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher16 (29%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts23 (41%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower17 (30%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| cross-platform compatibility | 2.3 | 4.0 | -1.7 |
| cable flexibility | 2.0 | 3.6 | -1.6 |
| programmable buttons | 2.8 | 4.1 | -1.3 |
| Bluetooth support | 2.4 | 3.6 | -1.2 |
| side button quality | 2.8 | 3.7 | -0.9 |
| portability | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 |
| profile switching | 2.7 | 3.8 | -1.1 |
| value for money | 2.9 | 3.8 | -0.9 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better side button quality
Choose Logitech G Pro Wireless. It scores 4.6 vs 2.8 for side button quality, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better glide smoothness
Choose Logitech G502 X Plus. It scores 4.8 vs 3.5 for glide smoothness, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better shape comfort
Choose Razer Viper V4 Pro. It scores 4.7 vs 4.2 for shape comfort, with a 4.2 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: ergonomics at the same price TechRadar viewed the Razer DeathAdder V3 Pro as a same-priced rival with better ergonomics.
- Better: palm grip and smaller-hand comfort Tom's Hardware preferred the Razer option for palm grippers or smaller hands.
- Worse: larger ergonomic feel Digital Reviews said the DEX felt more like the reviewer's old DeathAdder than the G309.
- Better: battery life and market position PC Gamer noted the Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed sits slightly ahead on battery and overall ranking.
FAQ
Is the Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX good for FPS games?
Yes. Most reviewers found it fast, accurate, and highly suitable for shooters, especially because of its low weight, responsive wireless performance, and strong Hero 2 sensor.
Is the DEX comfortable for palm grip?
Usually yes. Reviewers often praised the right-handed ergonomic shape for palm support, though one source preferred a rival for smaller hands or palm use.
Is it good for fingertip grip?
It is less consistent for fingertip grip. Several reviewers felt the larger body and hump got in the way, while only one found fingertip use reasonably workable.
How are the side buttons?
They are the main recurring weakness. Some reviewers liked their placement, but many called them mushy, high, hard to hit, or affected by too much travel.
Does it have Bluetooth?
No. Reviewers noted that it relies on Logitech Lightspeed wireless, and several treated the lack of Bluetooth as a flexibility tradeoff for performance and weight.
Is the battery life good?
Yes. Battery life was widely praised, with multiple reviewers reporting long use between charges, although high polling rates and optical-only modes can drain it faster.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Fresh Reviews
- Review score
- 4.1
YouTube - Brandon Taylor
- Review score
- 4.0
Article Reviews
eftm.com
- Review score
- 4.8
gamingtrend.com
- Review score
- 4.7
Top Gaming Mice to Consider
Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...
Pros: acceleration control, wireless latency
Cons: onboard memory, MMO gaming suitability
Best for MMO/MOBA control, swappable panels, strong wireless performance, and long battery life. Skip it if you want a light FPS mouse, low price, or no Synapse quirks.
Pros: sensor performance, click latency
Cons: software stability, Bluetooth support
Best for precise wireless tracking, smooth glide, strong battery life, and unusually good 8K value. Skip it if you need polished software, quiet snappy clicks, true left-handed controls, or gentle...
Pros: Accuracy and tracking precision, click latency
Cons: software stability, profile switching
Choose the Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 if you want a light, fast wireless FPS mouse with strong software and battery life. Skip it if you dislike honeycomb shells, need...
Pros: click latency, motion consistency
Cons: palm grip comfort, fingertip grip comfort