Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX Review

Brand: Logitech
Released: September 17, 2024
Updated: 2 weeks ago
4.0
Consolidated expert score
374
Review insights
56
Scored features
23
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the DEX if you want an ultra-light right-handed FPS mouse with excellent wireless responsiveness, sensor tracking, and battery life. Skip it if you need left-handed comfort, crisp side buttons, slick stock skates, or strong value.

Best for

Best for right-handed FPS and competitive players who want a very light wireless mouse with strong sensor performance, long battery life, and a supportive ergonomic shell. It also suits users already comfortable with Logitech G Hub and Powerplay.

Not for

Not for left-handed users, fingertip-first players with smaller hands, or anyone who needs many buttons, Bluetooth, a built-in DPI switch, or premium stock skates. Value-focused buyers may also find the price difficult to justify.

Verdict

The Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX comes across as a high-performance, right-handed FPS mouse built around speed, low weight, and a more supportive ergonomic shell. Reviewers repeatedly praised its Hero 2 tracking, wireless responsiveness, battery life, sturdy build, and main clicks, and many found the new shape more comfortable than the standard Superlight style. The tradeoff is that the same minimalist esports focus leaves little room for extra controls: side buttons, stock skates, cable quality, Bluetooth absence, and DPI/profile switching drew recurring complaints. Fit also depends heavily on hand size and grip, with palm and relaxed claw users faring better than fingertip users. Its performance is excellent, but the premium price makes the compromises harder to ignore.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: ergonomics at the same price TechRadar viewed the Razer DeathAdder V3 Pro as a same-priced rival with better ergonomics.
  • Better: palm grip and smaller-hand comfort Tom's Hardware preferred the Razer option for palm grippers or smaller hands.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

56 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 45% 25 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 30% 17 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 18% 10 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 7% 4 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    motion consistency: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Motion stayed consistent in fast movements, with reviewers reporting no acceleration, smoothing, or loss of tracking while sliding quickly.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    portability: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Portability was excellent because the compact receiver and onboard storage make the high-polling setup easy to pack.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    acceleration control: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Acceleration control was positively judged where tested, with movement described as consistent and free of acceleration or smoothing.
  • 4.9
    based on 12 reviews
    wireless performance: 4.9, based on 12 reviews
    Wireless performance was consistently excellent, with reviewers reporting fast, stable, lag-free, high-performance wireless use.
  • 4.9
    based on 4 reviews
    wireless latency: 4.9, based on 4 reviews
    Wireless latency was praised as low or highly responsive, helping several reviewers feel comfortable using it wirelessly for serious gaming.
  • 4.9
    based on 10 reviews
    build quality: 4.9, based on 10 reviews
    Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting sturdy construction, no flex, no rattle, and solid fit despite the low weight.
  • 4.8
    based on 9 reviews
    sensor performance: 4.8, based on 9 reviews
    The Hero 2 sensor was repeatedly described as top-tier, flawless, or working perfectly, with only isolated uncertainty around real-world need for the highest specs.
  • 4.8
    based on 3 reviews
    2.4GHz connectivity: 4.8, based on 3 reviews
    2.4GHz connectivity was praised for stable, speedy Lightspeed/2.4GHz operation and high polling without a bulky receiver.
  • 4.8
    based on 9 reviews
    button responsiveness: 4.8, based on 9 reviews
    Button responsiveness was one of the stronger areas, with many reviewers calling clicks tactile, immediate, snappy, or super responsive.
  • 4.8
    based on 9 reviews
    click latency: 4.8, based on 9 reviews
    Click/input latency was mostly praised as immediate, responsive, or low, with one measured latency result landing only mid-pack despite still being usable.
  • 4.8
    based on 9 reviews
    ergonomic design: 4.8, based on 9 reviews
    Ergonomic design was a major positive overall, with reviewers praising the hand support, contoured right-handed form, and FPS-friendly ergonomic balance.
  • 4.8
    based on 19 reviews
    weight: 4.8, based on 19 reviews
    Weight was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as feather-light, ultra-light, or impressively low for its size.
  • 4.8
    based on 6 reviews
    DPI range: 4.8, based on 6 reviews
    The DPI ceiling was treated as extremely high and impressive, with fine adjustment praised by reviewers who used G Hub.
  • 4.8
    based on 4 reviews
    connection stability: 4.8, based on 4 reviews
    Connection stability was positive where tested, with no issues on Windows, reliable wireless impressions, and supportive receiver setup comments.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    ecosystem integration: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Ecosystem integration was strong where mentioned, especially G Hub plus Logitech hardware features that set the mouse apart.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    onboard memory: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Onboard memory was valued for saving profiles and reducing dependence on G Hub, with reviewers noting multiple memory slots or dongle/profile convenience.
  • 4.6
    based on 6 reviews
    dock compatibility: 4.6, based on 6 reviews
    Dock compatibility was valued through Powerplay support, with reviewers praising continuous charging or easy mat integration despite cost caveats.
  • 4.6
    based on 10 reviews
    Accuracy and tracking precision: 4.6, based on 10 reviews
    Reviewers generally found tracking and aiming precise, with praise for pinpoint pixel work, fast shooters, and smooth control; one reviewer struggled mainly because the shape hurt aim.
  • 4.5
    based on 18 reviews
    battery life: 4.5, based on 18 reviews
    Battery life was widely praised as long-lasting, often exceeding expectations, though high polling rates were noted to drain it faster.
  • 4.5
    based on 14 reviews
    switch feel: 4.5, based on 14 reviews
    Switch feel was mostly praised for crisp, tactile Lightforce clicks, though some reviewers found them inconsistent, loud, or merely satisfactory.
  • 4.5
    based on 12 reviews
    polling rate: 4.5, based on 12 reviews
    The 8K wireless polling rate impressed reviewers for speed and smoothness, though several called it overkill or battery-hungry outside competitive play.
  • 4.5
    based on 10 reviews
    left and right click quality: 4.5, based on 10 reviews
    Main click quality was usually strong, with repeated praise for tactile, crisp, snappy clicks, though a few reviewers wanted a sharper or more premium feel.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    materials quality: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Materials quality was praised as premium and well assembled in the few reviews that explicitly judged the materials.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    durability over time: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Durability over time had limited evidence but one month of use showed the coating had not decayed.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    switch durability: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Switch durability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no double clicks or related issues during testing.
  • 4.4
    based on 8 reviews
    balance and weight distribution: 4.4, based on 8 reviews
    Balance was mostly praised as well distributed and fatigue-free, though one reviewer felt the rear-heavy balance hurt lift-offs.
  • 4.4
    based on 16 reviews
    FPS gaming suitability: 4.4, based on 16 reviews
    FPS gaming suitability was strong overall, with praise for shooters, responsiveness, and control; negative reports centered on hand-size/shape fit rather than sensor performance.
  • 4.4
    based on 8 reviews
    palm grip comfort: 4.4, based on 8 reviews
    Palm grip comfort was usually strong, with reviewers praising the larger ergonomic rear and palm support; one source still advised some palm users toward a rival.
  • 4.3
    based on 6 reviews
    charging convenience: 4.3, based on 6 reviews
    Charging convenience was strong when using USB-C or Powerplay, though one reviewer criticized the full recharge time.
  • 4.2
    based on 7 reviews
    long-session comfort: 4.2, based on 7 reviews
    Long-session comfort was generally positive thanks to low weight and ergonomics, though awkward grip demands caused fatigue for one reviewer.
  • 4.2
    based on 19 reviews
    shape comfort: 4.2, based on 19 reviews
    Shape comfort split reviewers: many loved the ergonomic, right-handed shape, while several found it too bulky, awkward, or hand-size dependent.
  • 4.1
    based on 4 reviews
    button customization: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
    Button customization was strong in software, especially drag-and-drop remapping, but constrained by the DEX's simplified button layout.
  • 4.0
    based on 11 reviews
    scroll wheel quality: 4.0, based on 11 reviews
    Scroll wheel feedback was generally usable and often quiet or tactile, but several reviewers noted rattle, mushiness, or weaker click feel.
  • 4.0
    based on 8 reviews
    software usability: 4.0, based on 8 reviews
    Software usability was generally good when G Hub worked, with useful profiles, remapping, macros, and calibration; memory use and interface speed drew criticism.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    premium feel: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Premium feel was mixed: one reviewer initially found it budget-like due to lightness, while another praised the in-hand quality.
  • 3.9
    based on 5 reviews
    macro support: 3.9, based on 5 reviews
    Macro support was useful through G Hub, but the limited button count reduced how far reviewers could take macro-heavy setups.
  • 3.9
    based on 4 reviews
    RGB features: 3.9, based on 4 reviews
    RGB absence was mostly framed as acceptable or even beneficial for battery and subtle looks, though it makes the mouse less flashy.
  • 3.7
    based on 9 reviews
    grip texture: 3.7, based on 9 reviews
    Grip texture was mixed: some liked the dry or grippy coating, while others found it too smooth, sticky over time, or in need of tape.
  • 3.6
    based on 11 reviews
    glide smoothness: 3.6, based on 11 reviews
    Glide smoothness was mixed: some praised effortless movement and PTFE feet, while many enthusiasts disliked the stock skates and wanted replacements.
  • 3.5
    based on 6 reviews
    claw grip comfort: 3.5, based on 6 reviews
    Claw grip comfort was mixed, working for relaxed claw or some users while feeling too large or high for others.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    surface compatibility: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Surface compatibility was adequate but not universal, with one reviewer preferring padded surfaces and another reporting no glass-pad tracking issues.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    MOBA gaming suitability: 3.5, based on 1 review
    MOBA gaming suitability had limited, mixed evidence, with one reviewer saying DOTA2 did not reveal much difference.

Cons

  • 3.2
    based on 3 reviews
    skate durability: 3.2, based on 3 reviews
    Skate durability was mixed: one reviewer valued long-lasting skates, while others recommended replacement or noted wear concerns.
  • 3.0
    based on 3 reviews
    lift-off distance: 3.0, based on 3 reviews
    Lift-off options were inconsistent across reviews: one reviewer could set LOD, another disliked the lack of millimeter values, and another found no adjustment.
  • 2.9
    based on 5 reviews
    click noise: 2.9, based on 5 reviews
    Click noise was a caveat: main clicks were often loud or high-pitched, though some found the noise acceptable or preference-based.
  • 2.9
    based on 12 reviews
    value for money: 2.9, based on 12 reviews
    Value for money was the most common strategic concern because reviewers liked the performance but repeatedly called the price high or premium.
  • 2.8
    based on 14 reviews
    side button quality: 2.8, based on 14 reviews
    Side buttons were the most divisive control: some found them easy and great in game, while many criticized mushiness, high placement, or extra travel.
  • 2.8
    based on 5 reviews
    fingertip grip comfort: 2.8, based on 5 reviews
    Fingertip comfort was generally weak because the larger hump and body interfered with finger micro-adjustments, with only one reviewer finding it workable.
  • 2.8
    based on 5 reviews
    programmable buttons: 2.8, based on 5 reviews
    Programmable button evidence was mixed: G Hub assignment was useful, but the five-button layout and lack of extra controls limited flexibility.
  • 2.7
    based on 5 reviews
    profile switching: 2.7, based on 5 reviews
    Profile switching was a recurring weakness because reviewers missed a physical DPI/profile button and disliked leaving games to change settings.
  • 2.5
    based on 2 reviews
    software stability: 2.5, based on 2 reviews
    Software stability was mixed to poor, led by a PC Gamer report of freezes, crashes, and reinstall trouble despite another reviewer finding basics usable.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    weight tuning: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Weight tuning evidence was limited to modding; removing components lowered weight but hurt the reviewer’s sense of balance.
  • 2.4
    based on 4 reviews
    Bluetooth support: 2.4, based on 4 reviews
    Bluetooth support was a weakness because it is absent, though some reviewers accepted the tradeoff for weight and responsiveness.
  • 2.4
    based on 4 reviews
    handedness options: 2.4, based on 4 reviews
    Handedness options were a drawback because the DEX is strongly right-handed and several reviewers warned left-handers away.
  • 2.3
    based on 2 reviews
    cross-platform compatibility: 2.3, based on 2 reviews
    Cross-platform compatibility was limited by the lack of Bluetooth and multi-device switching, making it less flexible than generalist mice.
  • 2.0
    based on 4 reviews
    cable flexibility: 2.0, based on 4 reviews
    Cable flexibility was a repeated complaint, with reviewers calling the cable bad, not ultralight, or unsuitable for wired use.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Gaming Mice, this product is above average in portability, below average in cross-platform compatibility, cable flexibility, programmable buttons.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 13% 1 feature
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 88% 7 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
cross-platform compatibility 2.3 3.9 -1.7
cable flexibility 2.0 3.6 -1.6
programmable buttons 2.8 4.1 -1.3
side button quality 2.8 3.8 -0.9
Bluetooth support 2.4 3.5 -1.2
portability 5.0 3.8 +1.2
profile switching 2.7 3.8 -1.1
glide smoothness 3.6 4.4 -0.9

FAQ

Is the Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX good for FPS games?

Yes. Most reviewers found it fast, accurate, and highly suitable for shooters, especially because of its low weight, responsive wireless performance, and strong Hero 2 sensor.

Is the DEX comfortable for palm grip?

Usually yes. Reviewers often praised the right-handed ergonomic shape for palm support, though one source preferred a rival for smaller hands or palm use.

Is it good for fingertip grip?

It is less consistent for fingertip grip. Several reviewers felt the larger body and hump got in the way, while only one found fingertip use reasonably workable.

How are the side buttons?

They are the main recurring weakness. Some reviewers liked their placement, but many called them mushy, high, hard to hit, or affected by too much travel.

Does it have Bluetooth?

No. Reviewers noted that it relies on Logitech Lightspeed wireless, and several treated the lack of Bluetooth as a flexibility tradeoff for performance and weight.

Is the battery life good?

Yes. Battery life was widely praised, with multiple reviewers reporting long use between charges, although high polling rates and optical-only modes can drain it faster.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

Overall Top Gaming Mice Alternatives

#1 ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.4

Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...

Pros: acceleration control, wireless latency

Cons: onboard memory, MMO gaming suitability

#2 Razer Naga V2 Pro
4.4

Best for MMO/MOBA control, swappable panels, strong wireless performance, and long battery life. Skip it if you want a light FPS mouse, low price, or no Synapse quirks.

Pros: sensor performance, click latency

Cons: software stability, Bluetooth support

#3 SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.3

Choose the Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 if you want a light, fast wireless FPS mouse with strong software and battery life. Skip it if you dislike honeycomb shells, need...

Pros: click latency, motion consistency

Cons: palm grip comfort, fingertip grip comfort

#4 Turtle Beach Kone II
4.3

Choose the Kone II if you want a large, ergonomic mouse with deep customization and strong sensor performance. Skip it if you have small hands, need an ambidextrous mouse, or...

Pros: click latency, motion consistency

Cons: handedness options, portability