-
4.7
based on 1 review
Assembly and Setup: 4.7, based on 1 review
-
4.7
based on 1 review
Convertible handheld design: 4.7, based on 1 review
Convertible handheld design is repeatedly praised for enabling car, stairs, upholstery, and above-floor work, but several reviewers note handheld use can feel bulky/heavy or wrist-straining depending on configuration.
-
4.7
based on 2 reviews
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
Medium-pile carpet performance is commonly described as a strength, with strong embedded debris results and good overall cleaning efficiency.
-
4.6
based on 5 reviews
Versatility: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
Versatility is a standout strength: the 3-in-1 reconfiguration (stick/upright/handheld) is repeatedly highlighted as genuinely useful for mixed tasks and quick switches between floor and above-floor cleaning.
-
4.6
based on 1 review
Aesthetic design and finish: 4.6, based on 1 review
-
4.6
based on 5 reviews
Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
Storage and upright-stand stability are frequently praised: it can stand on its own in certain configurations, and wall-mount/charging setups help keep tools organized.
-
4.6
based on 4 reviews
Build quality and durability: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
Build quality is often described as premium and well-engineered, with sturdy plastics and a solid feel; a long-term note mentions a floorhead/bearing overheating issue that was resolved via replacement support.
-
4.5
based on 3 reviews
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
High-pile carpet handling is generally praised as above-average for a cordless, though real-world ease can depend on power mode and floorhead behavior.
-
4.5
based on 1 review
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 4.5, based on 1 review
Crevice/groove pickup is frequently described as strong, with test-style commentary noting effective pickup in narrow channels and along gaps.
-
4.4
based on 2 reviews
Debris illumination: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
-
4.4
based on 2 reviews
Support and Reliability: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
Support and reliability are generally viewed positively, with mentions of responsive customer service and straightforward part replacement; warranty references vary by model/retailer context.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 4.4, based on 1 review
Edge and baseboard cleaning is typically rated positively, with reviewers noting good edge pickup and reduced need to swap to crevice tools for routine skirting/edges.
-
4.4
based on 3 reviews
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
Low-pile carpet pickup is repeatedly reported as excellent, with powered floorhead performance and surface sensing supporting reliable cleaning.
-
4.4
based on 2 reviews
Hair Pickup — Carpets: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
Hair pickup on carpets is widely reported as very good (especially with pet-focused accessories), though some note top competitors can out-perform per pass.
-
4.3
based on 4 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is often strong (especially with good airflow/seal), with multiple reviewers noting quick removal of dust and small debris.
-
4.3
based on 10 reviews
Battery and Charging: 4.3, based on 10 reviews
Battery and charging earn strong marks overall: removable batteries are widely appreciated, with higher-end variants including extra packs/chargers; recharge times are commonly described as a few hours, and swapping reduces downtime.
-
4.3
based on 5 reviews
Maneuverability and Handling: 4.3, based on 5 reviews
Handling is commonly rated good to excellent in comfort/upright configuration (better weight distribution, stable feel), while steering and tight-space navigation are noted as less sharp than some competitors, especially with the wide head.
-
4.2
based on 8 reviews
Runtime (Measured, Default): 4.2, based on 8 reviews
Default/low-power runtime is often cited around the hour in the most conservative mode (sometimes without powered head), with more practical floorhead use commonly referenced around the ~30-minute range on low.
-
4.2
based on 5 reviews
Filtration / Dust Containment: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
Filtration is generally described as strong, with HEPA-focused variants highlighted for allergy households; however, one test-focused review reports visible leakage in a fog-style test, indicating results can vary by testing method and setup.
-
4.2
based on 7 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 4.2, based on 7 reviews
Across reviews, suction and airflow are described as strong in practical cleaning (especially on carpet), with some lab-style commentary noting competitive usable suction/airflow even if certain sealed metrics vary; overall performance is consistently framed as premium, but not always the absolute strongest per pass versus top competitors.
-
4.1
based on 4 reviews
Accessories and Tools: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
Accessory coverage is generally solid: core tools (crevice, dusting, upholstery) are common, and pet-focused variants add motorized mini tools; some reviewers consider the base set adequate but not expansive for the price.
-
3.9
based on 4 reviews
Floorhead design: 3.9, based on 4 reviews
The floorhead is often praised for coverage (wide head) and low-profile design, but criticized for tradeoffs: wide/nozzle geometry can be bulky in tight spaces and can contribute to larger-debris snowplowing on hard floors.
-
3.9
based on 5 reviews
Noise level: 3.9, based on 5 reviews
Noise is mixed-to-positive overall: some report it as relatively quiet around ~70 dB in typical high-power use, while another test-focused review reports notably higher loudness with the main nozzle in mid/max settings.
-
3.7
based on 7 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 3.7, based on 7 reviews
Large debris intake on hard floors is a recurring limitation: several reviews mention snowplowing/pushing cereal- or oat-sized debris, requiring extra passes to fully capture bigger pieces.
-
3.5
based on 2 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
Maintenance is a tradeoff: the brush roller can be removable for cleaning, but multiple reviewers mention filter removal/cleaning and bin handling can be stiff or dust-prone, especially during deep maintenance.
-
3.4
based on 6 reviews
Runtime (Measured, Boost/Turbo): 3.4, based on 6 reviews
Boost/turbo runtime is consistently described as short (often mid-teens to mid-20 minutes depending on mode and floorhead), but some reviewers still call it competitive given the performance level.
-
3.4
based on 8 reviews
Price and Value: 3.4, based on 8 reviews
Value is the most consistent downside: many reviewers call it expensive, arguing the premium is justified mainly if you’ll use the modular 3-in-1 design, battery swapping, and Miele’s build/filtration advantages.
-
3.3
based on 4 reviews
Emptying and Mess Control: 3.3, based on 4 reviews
Emptying and mess control are mixed: some describe hygienic emptying concepts, while others call the process fiddly or multi-step and note stiff parts during bin and filter handling.
-
3.2
based on 6 reviews
Weight: 3.2, based on 6 reviews
Weight is a mixed theme: some sources frame it as manageable due to configurable balance, while others emphasize it as heavy for handheld/overhead work and potentially challenging for users with limited strength or mobility.
-
2.8
based on 3 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 2.8, based on 3 reviews
Hair-wrap / tangle resistance is a consistent weak point in multiple reviews: the standard brush roll can wrap longer strands and may require manual removal with scissors.
-
2.7
based on 4 reviews
Bin and Bag: 2.7, based on 4 reviews
The bin is widely described as small (commonly 0.5L) versus many competitors, contributing to more frequent emptying during whole-home sessions.