Nest Doorbell Wired, 2nd Gen

Nest Doorbell Wired, 2nd Gen Feature Scores

Explore all 43 feature scores for Nest Doorbell Wired, 2nd Gen, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

43 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    21 (49%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    15 (35%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    6 (14%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    AI features: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    AI features were a standout strength, with reviewers praising intelligent alerts and detection that reduced false alarms.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Zones and activity areas: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Activity zones received very strong praise for customization and for reducing irrelevant alerts while still recording useful events.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Video resolution and detail: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers generally found the HDR video sharp and better than the modest paper resolution suggests, though some still noted the lower 960p spec.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Recommendation for new buyers: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Recommendations were positive overall, especially for new buyers, Google Home users, and first-time smart security buyers.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    App, software and firmware: 4.4, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The Google Home app was mostly praised for ease and clean design, though one reviewer disliked replacing the older Nest app experience.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Recording: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Recording was a major strength because reviewers valued 24/7 capability, event recording, and reviewable history, despite free-tier limits.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Object and person detection: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Object and person detection earned strong praise for distinguishing people, packages, animals, vehicles, and other motion categories.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Pre-roll buffer: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Pre-roll was highly valued because reviewers said it helped prevent missed motion or doorbell events.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread): 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Smart-home integration was strongest for Google Home and Nest devices, with Alexa support viewed as useful but more limited.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Security ecosystem integration: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers who were already in the Google/Nest ecosystem found the doorbell especially well integrated and satisfying.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Price and value: 4.2, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers generally considered the price fair for the feature set, though some said limitations and subscriptions weakened the value.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Design aesthetics: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Design was broadly praised as sleek, modern, and easy to blend in, though one reviewer found the quiet look too utilitarian.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Delivery package monitoring: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Package monitoring was praised for notifying on deliveries, pickups, and package-related activity accurately.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Reliability (general): 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Longer-term and overall reliability impressions were positive, with reviewers calling it dependable and better than competing doorbells they had tested.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    lag): 4.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Live-view latency and response speed were usually strong, but notification cooldowns and occasional app reconnection delays remained caveats.
  • 4.1
    6 reviews low consensus
    Notifications: 4.1, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Notification speed was often praised, but some reviewers complained about cooldown behavior that delayed repeated alerts.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Motion detection: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Motion detection was praised for consistently identifying activity and separating relevant motion from general movement.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Personalization options: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Personalization was praised for offering useful filters, app options, and controls without overwhelming users.
  • 3.9
    7 reviews low consensus
    Audio: 3.9, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Audio was mixed: several reviewers found speech clear, while others criticized the speaker as quiet, average, or distorted at higher volumes.
  • 4.2
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Power Options and Compatibility: 4.2, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Wired power was valued for 24/7 recording and steadier operation, but wiring requirements made the battery model more appealing for some homes.
  • 3.9
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Low-light and Night vision: 3.9, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Low-light results were mixed: several reviewers praised night visibility and HDR handling, while others said night vision or distant faces could be weak.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Faceplate/accessory inclusion: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The included wedge was praised for materially improving the viewing angle and making the front-door view sufficient.
  • 3.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Installation and Mounting: 3.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Installation was usually manageable or easy with app guidance, but some reviewers hit wiring, wall, or chime-box complications.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Size and form factor: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The physical size was viewed positively, with reviewers liking the lower profile and more compact wired form factor.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Controls and indicators: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Controls and indicators were reviewed positively, including the satisfying button and speaker-chime customization.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    Chime: 4.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Existing chime compatibility and seasonal doorbell tones were useful, but one review noted that a chime is not included.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Base / Hub integration: 5.0, 1 review
    Nest Hub integration was strongly praised as a simpler way to view the doorbell feed inside the home.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Color options: 5.0, 1 review
    Color choice received praise because the doorbell offered unusually many finish options for the category.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Data-usage efficiency (bandwidth): 3.8, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Bandwidth evidence was mixed: continuous recording can use significant data, but compression and event-based use helped limit data consumption.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Lens distortion handling: 4.5, 1 review
    One reviewer valued that the view avoids the fisheye look common to wider-angle cameras.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Peace of mind: 4.5, 1 review
    Security reassurance was positive, with one reviewer saying the doorbell did a strong job protecting the home despite a few cons.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Quiet-time / do-not-disturb scheduling: 4.5, 1 review
    Quiet-time controls were viewed as useful for preventing the indoor chime from ringing when silence is needed.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    System completeness: 4.5, 1 review
    One review framed the product as a feature-stacked, user-friendly home security upgrade.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Theft and Tamper: 4.5, 1 review
    The revised mount was praised as more secure and easier to fasten.
  • 3.6
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Wi-Fi range and stability: 3.6, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Wi-Fi and connection-related evidence was mixed: one reviewer noted annoying connectivity snags, while another valued backup recording during outages.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Privacy: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Privacy controls and face recognition drew mixed evidence: disabling the camera was useful, while facial profiles were described as contentious.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Storage: 2.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Storage was the most consistent limitation: free cloud history helps, but three hours and no local expandable storage frustrated reviewers.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Field of view and framing: 3.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers liked the taller portrait framing for packages and visitors but repeatedly criticized the narrower horizontal view and occasional face-framing issues.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Upgrade value vs previous model: 3.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Upgrade value was mixed: design and smart-home improvements helped, but several reviewers said first-gen owners may not need to upgrade.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Face recognition: 3.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Face recognition was helpful in principle but inconsistent or unavailable for some reviewers because of subscription or location limits.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Ongoing ownership costs: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Ownership costs were a tradeoff: reviewers saw possible savings versus higher tiers, but also complained about yet another monthly fee.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Quick-reply / pre-recorded message usefulness: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Quick replies were useful for some hands-off interactions, though at least one reviewer found premade responses personally unappealing.
  • 3.4
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Subscription: 3.4, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Subscription sentiment was mixed: free features are unusually useful, but longer history, 24/7 review, and some AI features require payment.