Nest Doorbell Wired, 2nd Gen

Nest Doorbell Wired, 2nd Gen Review

Brand: Google Nest
Released: October 2022
Updated: 2 months ago
4.2
Overall review score
149
Review evidence points
43
Scored features
10
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it if you want sharp HDR video, excellent smart alerts, Google Home integration and flexible zones. Skip it if subscription costs, a narrow horizontal view, wiring work or weaker speaker output would bother you.

Best for

Best for Google Home users who want accurate smart alerts, package monitoring, activity zones, and polished app control with minimal tinkering. It also fits buyers who value 24/7 cloud recording and are comfortable paying for longer history.

Not for

Not ideal for buyers who want local storage, no recurring fees, the widest field of view, or strong speaker output. Existing Nest Hello owners may also find the upgrade modest unless they want the design and Google Home changes.

Verdict

Across the supplied reviews, the Nest Doorbell Wired, 2nd Gen comes across as a polished Google-first doorbell with unusually strong software intelligence. Reviewers consistently praised its HDR image quality, fast live view, accurate people/package/animal/vehicle detection, customizable zones, and easy Google Home setup. The main tradeoff is that the hardware does not win every spec sheet: the horizontal field of view is narrower than some rivals, night vision and speaker output drew mixed reactions, and the most useful history and face features move behind a subscription. It is strongest as a low-friction, smart-alert doorbell for homes already using Google devices, rather than as a no-fee local-storage camera or a major upgrade for satisfied Nest Hello owners.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

43 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    21 (49%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    15 (35%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    6 (14%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros

  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    AI features: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    AI features were a standout strength, with reviewers praising intelligent alerts and detection that reduced false alarms.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Zones and activity areas: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Activity zones received very strong praise for customization and for reducing irrelevant alerts while still recording useful events.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Video resolution and detail: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers generally found the HDR video sharp and better than the modest paper resolution suggests, though some still noted the lower 960p spec.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Recommendation for new buyers: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Recommendations were positive overall, especially for new buyers, Google Home users, and first-time smart security buyers.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    App, software and firmware: 4.4, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The Google Home app was mostly praised for ease and clean design, though one reviewer disliked replacing the older Nest app experience.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Recording: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Recording was a major strength because reviewers valued 24/7 capability, event recording, and reviewable history, despite free-tier limits.

Cons

  • 2.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Storage: 2.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Storage was the most consistent limitation: free cloud history helps, but three hours and no local expandable storage frustrated reviewers.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Field of view and framing: 3.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers liked the taller portrait framing for packages and visitors but repeatedly criticized the narrower horizontal view and occasional face-framing issues.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Upgrade value vs previous model: 3.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Upgrade value was mixed: design and smart-home improvements helped, but several reviewers said first-gen owners may not need to upgrade.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Face recognition: 3.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Face recognition was helpful in principle but inconsistent or unavailable for some reviewers because of subscription or location limits.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Ongoing ownership costs: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Ownership costs were a tradeoff: reviewers saw possible savings versus higher tiers, but also complained about yet another monthly fee.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Quick-reply / pre-recorded message usefulness: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Quick replies were useful for some hands-off interactions, though at least one reviewer found premade responses personally unappealing.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Doorbells, this product is above average in Color options, Pre-roll buffer, Delivery package monitoring, near average in Recommendation for new buyers, Video resolution and detail, below average in Storage, Field of view and framing, Upgrade value vs previous model.

Comparison summary

43 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    23 (53%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    13 (30%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    7 (16%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Color options 5.0 3.1 +1.9
Pre-roll buffer 5.0 3.4 +1.6
Storage 2.4 3.7 -1.3
Delivery package monitoring 4.7 3.4 +1.2
AI features 5.0 3.8 +1.2
Field of view and framing 3.1 4.2 -1.1
Faceplate/accessory inclusion 4.8 3.6 +1.1
Lens distortion handling 4.5 3.4 +1.1

Consider This Instead

If you want better Upgrade value vs previous model

Choose Nest Doorbell Battery. It scores 4.5 vs 3.1 for Upgrade value vs previous model, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Ongoing ownership costs

Choose Aqara Smart Doorbell G410. It scores 5.0 vs 3.3 for Ongoing ownership costs, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

nest hello

  • Better: app experience The reviewer prefers the Nest Hello's Nest app path over the current model's Google Home app requirement.
  • Better: resolution and field of view The reviewer says the current wired Nest has lower resolution and a narrower view than the old Nest Hello.

Arlo Essential

  • Better: on-paper resolution Security.org notes the Arlo Essential has higher pixel count even though Nest still looks crisp.

FAQ

Do you need a subscription?

No subscription is needed for core smart alerts, activity zones, and a three-hour event history. Reviewers said longer event history, 24/7 review, and familiar-face features require a paid plan.

How good is the video quality?

Reviewers generally praised the HDR video as sharp and clear despite the modest 960-by-1280 resolution. The tradeoff is a narrower horizontal view and some mixed night-vision feedback.

Is the Google Home app easy to use?

Most reviewers found Google Home clean, simple, and easy for setup and daily use. One reviewer disliked losing the older Nest app experience.

How well does it handle packages?

Package monitoring was a strength. Reviewers praised delivery and pickup alerts, and several liked using zones to reduce irrelevant alerts while still recording useful activity.

Are notifications reliable?

Fast alerts were a common positive, and several reviewers saw little live-view delay. The repeated concern was notification cooldown behavior, where follow-up alerts could be delayed.

Is it worth upgrading from an older Nest doorbell?

The reviews were cautious on upgrades. The design, app, zones, and free features help, but several reviewers said satisfied Nest Hello owners may not see enough improvement to justify replacing it.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Video Doorbells to Consider

#1 Eufy Video Doorbell Kit, C210
4.3

Choose the Eufy C210 if you want a no-fee, battery-friendly doorbell with local storage and good 1080p video. Skip it if you need hardwired charging, HomeKit, or consistently instant motion...

Pros: Ongoing ownership costs, Subscription

Cons: Wi-Fi range and stability, Chime

#2 eufy Video Doorbell C31
4.3

Good if you want an easy, no-fee doorbell with wired/battery power, local storage, and solid 2K coverage. Skip it if you need premium video bitrates, effortless chime coexistence, or built-in...

Pros: Wi-Fi range and stability, Ongoing ownership costs

Cons: Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google

#3 Eufy 2K Video Doorbell S220
4.3

Good if you want sharp video, local storage and no required subscription. Skip it if you need 24/7 recording, flawless AI alerts, broad smart-home support or true six-month battery life.

Pros: Ongoing ownership costs, Privacy

Cons: Controls and indicators, Smart-home integration (Alexa

#4 Eufy Video Doorbell Dual Camera S330
4.2

Choose the Eufy S330 if package monitoring, local storage, and no subscription matter most. Skip it if you need slim hardware, HomeKit, consistently fast live view, or stronger night vision.

Pros: Ongoing ownership costs, Subscription

Cons: Wi-Fi range and stability, Law enforcement policy transparency