eufy Robot Vacuum Omni S1 Pro

eufy Robot Vacuum Omni S1 Pro Review

Brand: eufy
Released: June 19, 2024
Updated: 2 weeks ago
4.0
Consolidated expert score
105
Review insights
53
Scored features
8
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the eufy Omni S1 Pro for mostly hard floors, wet-spill mopping, strong obstacle avoidance, and a polished dock. Skip it if carpet deep cleaning, low maintenance, edge mopping, or the lowest price matters most.

Best for

Best for homes with mostly hard floors where mopping quality, wet-stain handling, obstacle avoidance, and a highly automated dock matter more than carpet deep cleaning.

Not for

Not ideal for mostly carpeted homes, users who need strong edge/baseboard mopping, or anyone who wants the lowest-maintenance robot with minimal dirty-water cleanup.

Verdict

The eufy Omni S1 Pro earned its strongest praise as a hard-floor mopper. Reviewers repeatedly highlighted the roller mop, onboard dirty-water handling, stain removal, low streaking, and obstacle avoidance as standout strengths. Its dock also adds real convenience through auto-emptying, mop washing, drying, and water handling, while the tall futuristic design was often viewed as attractive and practical. The tradeoff is that its cleaning excellence is uneven: carpet deep cleaning, carpet hair pickup, edge/baseboard reach, and some wet-tank maintenance drew criticism. The app was usable, but not as feature-rich or integration-friendly as some rivals. Overall, the evidence points to a premium hard-floor robot mop first and an all-around carpet vacuum second.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

dream Tech l10s Ultra

  • Better: overall value and availability The Dream Tech l10s Ultra was favored as the more well-rounded affordable option.
  • Better: carpet and hard-floor vacuuming The Dream Tech l10s Ultra beat the S1 Pro in the vacuuming-only comparison.

yui x10 Pro

  • Better: maintenance burden The S1 Pro required more maintenance than the traditional yui x10 Pro.
  • Worse: carpet rice pickup The S1 Pro was slightly better than the yui x10 Pro in a carpet rice pickup test, though still below average.

C20

  • Compared: eufy lineup options The S1 Pro was directly compared with the C20 as part of a eufy lineup decision.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

53 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 45% 24 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 32% 17 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 21% 11 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 2% 1 feature
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 7 reviews
    Mopping performance: 5.0, based on 7 reviews
    Mopping performance was the strongest consensus positive, with multiple reviewers calling it best-in-class or top-tier.
  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Innovation compared to competitors: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    Reviewers repeatedly framed the S1 Pro as innovative because of its roller mop, low-profile navigation, and distinctive dock design.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Maneuverability and Handling: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Furniture navigation and maneuverability drew strong praise, including avoiding contact and understanding tight spaces well.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Emptying and Mess Control: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Emptying and mess control were strong, with the dock completely emptying the dust bin in testing.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Large debris handling: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Large debris handling on hard floors was strong, with reviewers saying it picked up extra-large debris.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Self-cleaning cycle: 5.0, based on 1 review
    The self-cleaning cycle impressed in dock washing tests and left the roller looking clean.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 5.0, based on 1 review
    The dock was praised as a brilliant use of space despite its unusual vertical form.
  • 4.8
    based on 3 reviews
    Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 4.8, based on 3 reviews
    Mapping and path efficiency were praised for coverage, easy map editing, and reliable room division.
  • 4.8
    based on 4 reviews
    Dried-On Stain Removal: 4.8, based on 4 reviews
    Dried-on stain removal was a major strength across tests, with the S1 Pro leading or near-leading mopping stain results.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Docking and auto-empty reliability were strong, with reviewers reporting near-complete or complete bin emptying.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Large hard-floor debris intake was strong, with reviewers reporting high pickup and broad debris handling.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Streaking / Residue: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Streaking and residue control were major strengths, especially compared with spinning-pad systems.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Aesthetic design and finish: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Reviewers consistently liked the futuristic, distinctive design and said it looked attractive in the home.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Obstacle avoidance was one of the clearest strengths, including a rare perfect score and strong real-world avoidance.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Comparative performance: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Comparative performance was strong for cleaning innovation and mopping, though one ranking placed another robot ahead overall.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Low-profile design: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    The low-profile design was praised for reducing height and improving access under furniture.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Overall cleaning convenience: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    The automated dock made ownership easier by handling major cleaning-cycle tasks with minimal user work.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Floorhead design: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The dual side brushes and floating main brush were praised for working well together.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Hard-floor pet-hair and debris pickup was described as effective in a flagship comparison.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Hard-floor fine pickup was praised as excellent in at least one comparison review.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Solution / Liquid system: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The detergent/liquid system was praised for removing the guesswork from premixing solution.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Tool-change simplicity: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The removable mop roller was judged easy to remove and reinstall.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The lower-profile design helped the robot reach under more furniture.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Water tank: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The clear front water tank made water level checks easy at a glance.
  • 4.4
    based on 7 reviews
    Overall opinion: 4.4, based on 7 reviews
    Overall sentiment was very positive for mopping, design, navigation, and hard floors, with recurring caveats around carpet and edge performance.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Controls and UI: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Controls were considered useful and convenient, especially the base controls for switching cleaning modes.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Crevice and groove cleaning was positive overall, especially in plank joints, though one test called it only decent.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Sanitizing performance: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    The ozone/sanitizing water system was treated as a notable cleaning feature, though evidence was mostly tied to the water system rather than independent lab verification.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Wet-spill handling was a standout in some tests, but one reviewer warned against large wet spills because there is no mop-only mode.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Privacy controls: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Privacy controls were a relative strength because the camera was not available as a live video feed in the app.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Area Rug Handling: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Small rug handling was good in one review, with the mop lift clearing small rugs in testing.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Ease of use: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Ease of use was positive, with the app described as easy to use and well laid out.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Pet-Ready Features: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Pet-readiness was supported by object avoidance around dog waste, though separate carpet hair pickup evidence was weaker.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Value-for-money: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Value-for-money was helped by a flagship price that was lower than some rival flagships.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Versatility: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Versatility was helped by easy switching between vacuum-only and vacuum-and-mop modes.
  • 3.9
    based on 4 reviews
    Suction and Airflow: 3.9, based on 4 reviews
    Suction evidence was mixed: reviewers praised above-average suction and easy pickup on hard floors, while one comparison review called its suction a little low.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Mop lifting system: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Mop lifting was mixed, keeping medium-pile carpets dry in one test but raising too late over carpet corners in another.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Price and Value: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Price was a tradeoff: reviewers called it high, but also noted it undercut some competing flagships.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Tangle resistance was mixed: the vacuum brush tangled with long hair in one test, but another reviewer saw no mop-drive hair wrap.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Stuck resistance: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Stuck resistance was mixed: the low-profile design helped avoid getting stuck, but longer pile rugs caused at least one issue.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Hard-floor seal and crevice pickup were decent rather than class-leading.

Cons

  • 3.3
    based on 3 reviews
    AI, Smart, App and Automation: 3.3, based on 3 reviews
    The app and automation story was mixed: the apps were solid, but yui lacked some integrations and advanced options.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    Bin and Bag: 3.0, based on 1 review
    The onboard dust bin was viewed as somewhat small.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Medium-pile carpet pickup was below average in one rice pickup test.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    Noise level: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Noise was described as roughly average in one dock/vacuum sound test rather than unusually quiet or unusually loud.
  • 2.8
    based on 3 reviews
    Corner Cleaning (Robot): 2.8, based on 3 reviews
    Corner cleaning was mixed: the square shape helped in theory, but cautious navigation and missed areas limited results.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Dock noise: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Dock drying noise was noticeable, especially when the roller rotated during drying.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Maintenance requirements: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Maintenance was not fully hands-off because tanks, filters, and dirty-water parts still needed recurring attention.
  • 2.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 2.5, based on 2 reviews
    Edge and baseboard mopping was a weak spot, with multiple reviewers noting it did not clean right up to baseboards or walls.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Clogging and debris prevention: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Clogging was a caveat in a stress test where the S1 Pro was the only unit to clog at an extreme fluff load.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Odor control: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Odor control had a maintenance caveat because residual dirty water could smell if the robot was not used daily.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Weight: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Weight was a drawback for the base station, which one review described as a bit heavy.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Carpet hair pickup was weak in the pet-hair test, where it left the most hair tufts.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Robotic Vacuums, this product is above average in Storage footprint and upright-stand stability, Streaking / Residue, Mopping performance, below average in Hair Pickup — Carpets, Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors), Odor control.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 38% 3 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 63% 5 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Hair Pickup — Carpets 1.5 4.1 -2.6
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 2.5 4.1 -1.6
Storage footprint and upright-stand stability 5.0 3.5 +1.5
Odor control 2.5 3.8 -1.3
Streaking / Residue 4.8 3.6 +1.2
Maintenance requirements 2.8 3.9 -1.1
Mopping performance 5.0 4.0 +1.0
Clogging and debris prevention 2.5 3.6 -1.1

FAQ

Is the eufy Omni S1 Pro good for hard floors?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised its hard-floor mopping, low streaking, stain removal, and ability to lift dirty water into an onboard tank.

How does it perform on carpet?

Carpet performance is the main weakness. It can pick up surface debris, but reviewers reported below-average carpet deep cleaning and weak carpet hair pickup.

Does the roller mop make a real difference?

Yes. Multiple reviewers singled out the roller mop as the reason it performed unusually well on dried stains, wet spills, and residue control.

Is the dock actually hands-free?

The dock automates dust emptying, mop washing, drying, water handling, and solution mixing, but reviewers still noted recurring tank, filter, and dirty-water maintenance.

Is it good at avoiding obstacles?

Yes. Obstacle avoidance was one of the strongest areas, including rare perfect-score language and praise for avoiding objects and furniture.

Does it clean edges and corners well?

Not as well as its shape suggests. Reviewers liked the square design in theory, but noted cautious navigation, baseboard gaps, and missed corner-adjacent areas.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Consider This Instead

If you want better Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors)

Choose 3i S10 Ultra Robot Vacuum and Mop. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors), with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Odor control

Choose Roborock Saros 20. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for Odor control, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Robotic Vacuums Alternatives

#1 Roborock Qrevo Curv Vacuum and Mop
4.5

Choose the Roborock Qrevo Curv if you want premium hands-off vacuuming and mopping with strong pet-hair results. Skip it if the high price, missing solution tank, or imperfect cable avoidance...

Pros: Overall cleaning convenience, Runtime

Cons: Solution / Liquid system, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)

#2 Mova V50 Ultra Complete
4.4

Best for powerful vacuuming, excellent mopping, pet-focused automation, and strong accessory value. Skip it if you need flawless obstacle avoidance, simple plug-and-play software, or the smallest possible dock.

Pros: Accessories and Tools, Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup

Cons: Airflow blowback, Scratch resistance

#3 Eureka J15 Ultra Self Emptying Robot Vacuum
4.3

Choose the Eureka J15 Ultra for hands-free vacuuming/mopping, strong suction, edge coverage, and value. Skip it if you need the most advanced obstacle avoidance, compact dock, detergent dispensing, or quieter...

Pros: Kid-friendliness, Reverse cleaning performance

Cons: Solution / Liquid system, Low-profile design

#4 Roborock Saros 10R Robot Vacuum and Mop
4.3

Choose the Saros 10R for low-profile reach, strong mopping, hair resistance, and a hands-off dock. Skip it if low-pile carpet pickup, cord avoidance, faster cleaning, or a lower price matter...

Pros: Tool-change simplicity, Battery and Charging

Cons: Cord management, Support and Reliability