Cleaning performance on carpet the average amount of hair they were able to pick up was 77% after two runs
Cleaning performance on hard floors for hard floors they were all nearly perfect at pet hair pickup
Dust-bin emptying the option to adjust the number of times in the app that the robot returns to its dock to empty its bin
Front-facing camera like the ability to go check up on your pets or video calls
Obstacle & cliff avoidance (robots) it wouldn't really be the best robot vacuum for pets unless I included their ability to avoid that problem
Overall opinion number three the yui x10 Pro
Scheduling feature use the scheduling feature that every robot vacuum has and run it as many times as you need to each week to keep the hair under control
Needs Improvement
Hair-wrap prevention / anti-tangle tech hair Tangles on the brush roll are something that you just have to deal with at least for nowonly the best of the best can do this effectively and even they have their limits
Automatic suction adjustment (dirt sensing) carpet boost or dirt detect where they can boost suction automatically to save on battery life
Extendable mop pads mops to extend to clean edges and Corners automatically
Front-facing camera go find your pets and video call with them
Generic Performance very good for basic sweeping of hard floors and carpets
Mobile-app functionality & reliability virtual barriers where you can draw lines or boxes on the map in the app to keep them from going places you don't want them to go
Mop detachability pads that will lift up when they sense carpets so as not to get your carpets damp
Mopping performance (robotic or wet-dry) for a much better mopping performance
Obstacle & cliff avoidance (robots) recognize household objects and avoid them
Self-cleaning mop function wash the mop pads dry
Self-emptying base Auto empty docks
Just Okay
Airflow (CFM) raw power like their suction and air flow
Carpet deep clean performance embed sand into medium pile carpet and run it on max power for a set amount of time
Coverage efficiency (how completely a robot covers a floor) area they covered divided by how long it took them to complete it
Crevice‑cleaning effectiveness crevice pickup test which helps us to measure their power as well as their seal on hard floors
Customizing room cleaning behaviors lots of options for customizing room cleaning behaviors
Fast mapping fast mapping
Liquid/spill pickup (wet-dry models) wet stains
Mapping/navigation accuracy (robotics) using either cameras called vslam or lasers called lar to map and navigate around your house in an efficient manner
Suction power (air watts) raw power like their suction and air flow
Battery runtime / Charging time could probably cover an area of 138 Square ft per charge which is also above average
Cleaning performance on carpet it did exceptionally well
Cleaning performance on hard floors had no problems with debris from fine to extra large on hard floors
Coverage efficiency (how completely a robot covers a floor) its navigation efficiency and Battery efficiency were both above average
Edge-cleaning effectiveness get closer to the edges of walls with its mop
Mapping/navigation accuracy (robotics) it did map our floor plan in about 5 minutes
Mop lifting system they lift an impressive 12 mm which is way above average
Mopping performance (robotic or wet-dry) genuinely impressive clearing both stains completely with minimal Passage one of the best performances I've seen
No-go-zone / virtual-wall precision (robots) virtual wall barriers to keep it from going places that you don't want it to go
Obstacle & cliff avoidance (robots) one of the best obstacle avoidance systems on the market
Price significantly lower price than many of its competitors
Self-cleaning mop function automatically washes its mop pads
Self-emptying base automatically empties the contents of its dust bin into the Disposable bag
Value-for-money seems to me like a great buy if you want top-of-the-line features at a good price
Just Okay
Mobile-app functionality & reliability a little more buggy and a little less polished of an app experience compared to its competitors
Suction power (air watts) overall Power power numbers were a little below average
Needs Improvement
Crevice‑cleaning effectiveness lackluster results with the crevice pickup test where it was also below average