-
Weight
4.6
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
8 reviews
4.6
Consistently described as lightweight, roughly 7 to 8 pounds, making stairs and quick sessions easier. Top-heavy balance can still make it feel heavier in the hand during long use.
-
Bagless design and washable filters keep recurring costs low. Owners mainly cite time spent on filter rinsing and brush-roll cleaning rather than paid consumables.
-
Low-profile head and the ability to lay flat are repeatedly praised for reaching under furniture. The slim stick format also reduces bulk compared with uprights.
-
Many comparisons against Dyson and other sticks favor the Shark on value and hard-floor and pet-hair pickup, though not always on plush-carpet deep cleaning. Several users keep it as a complement to robots or uprights rather than a full replacement.
-
Frequently recommended for apartments, trailers, and compact storage situations thanks to slim form factor and a long-enough cord. Limited bin size can mean more empty trips in small spaces with heavy shedding.
-
Generally strong on hard floors, commonly picking up rice, cereal, and other larger debris in a pass or two. A few lab tests note occasional scatter or snowplow of larger pieces depending on technique and floorhead design.
-
Frequently praised—detaching the motor unit turns it into a capable handheld for cars, couch cushions, and quick pickups. The cord remains attached to the handheld and motor section, which is both a power advantage and a minor nuisance.
-
Brand reliability and owner satisfaction are rated highly in at least one large-scale testing source, and some users cite helpful customer service or easy replacements. Individual experiences vary by retailer and model revision.
-
Versatility
4.3
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
2 reviews
4.3
Seen as a flexible cleaner that covers floors, stairs, and above-floor tasks with attachments. Versatility is highest for mixed hard floors, low-pile rugs, and targeted cleanups rather than deep-cleaning plush carpet.
-
Price & Value
4.3
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
7 reviews
4.3
Most reviews frame it as a high-value corded stick, often praised when purchased on sale under $150. Value is strongest for hard floors and pet hair; those needing plush-carpet performance may feel it’s only average for the money.
-
Stair Cleaning
4.3
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
4 reviews
4.3
A standout use case: light weight plus handheld mode makes stairs less of a chore, and several reviewers specifically bought it for stairs. Effectiveness depends on using the right tool head and managing the cord.
-
Praised by pet owners for pulling hair from tile and hardwood with minimal scatter. Performance can drop if the brush roll or filters are clogged with hair or dust.
-
Typically plug-and-play: parts click together quickly with minimal setup. A few users note the learning curve is more about storage and standing than initial assembly.
-
Some reviewers highlight floor-friendly touches like rubber-coated wheels or gentle brushes aimed at protecting hard floors. Proper tool selection still matters for delicate surfaces.
-
Several reviewers use it for frequent cleanups, multi-level homes, or even cleaning business tasks, and the corded power helps it keep up with repeated sessions. For true heavy-duty deep carpet cleaning, many still prefer a full-size upright.
-
Swapping between floor tool, wand, and handheld is usually quick with click-in connections and simple releases. Most owners find conversions intuitive once they learn the storage hook system.
-
Cord length
4.1
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
7 reviews
4.1
Cord length is generally considered generous, often cited around 25 to 30 feet, allowing multiple rooms per outlet. A few still want a longer cord for large houses.
-
Cord hooks and keepers help wrap and store the cable neatly, and some users say it rarely tangles. Emptying can still be annoying because the cord is tied to the motor section.
-
Generally praised for pet hair pickup and included pet/upholstery tools, with many pet owners saying it keeps up with daily shedding. A minority of testers found hair performance only average depending on brush and roller design.
-
Controls & UI
4.1
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
9 reviews
4.1
Simple two-mode controls (bare floor and area rugs vs carpet) and straightforward on and off switching are widely appreciated. Indicator lights for brush roll status are helpful on some versions, though power modes typically change brush speed rather than suction.
-
Commonly noted as a strong point: crevice, upholstery, dusting or anti-allergen brushes, and pet tools cover stairs, cars, and furniture. A few packages vary, and some users wish there were more or motorized upholstery tools.
-
Overall sentiment trends positive, especially among buyers switching from fading cordless batteries or bulky uprights. The most common detractors cite stand and storage annoyance, small bin and emptying quirks, and mixed results on thick carpet.
-
Reviews consistently describe strong, steady suction for a stick vacuum, with corded power avoiding fade. Some lab tests rate raw suction closer to high-end cordless levels rather than full-size plug-ins, and a few users still want more on deep carpet.
-
Described as sleek and minimal and more modern than bulky uprights. The top-mounted motor makes it look and feel different, which some users like and others find odd.
-
Swivel steering and light weight make it nimble around furniture for many owners, yet some tests describe it as twitchy or pull-forward on carpet. The top-heavy center of gravity takes getting used to and can lift the head on pull-back.
-
Many reviewers love that it lays flat and reaches under beds and low furniture, outperforming bulkier uprights. A few note the head can still be too tall for very low-clearance sofas.
-
Commonly strong on carpeted pet hair, especially on low and medium pile. Some testers still found residual fur or clumping when hair wraps around the brush roll.
-
Usually rated good on low-pile carpets, with many owners impressed by how much embedded dirt it pulls up. Technique and weight distribution can affect smoothness, and some find it skips or tugs.
-
Often handles flour and coffee grounds well, though some tests show trace dust left behind that needs extra sweeps. Keeping filters and internal channels clean helps maintain fine-dust performance.
-
Handheld configuration with upholstery and dusting tools works well for cushions, blinds, and cars in most reports. A few tests find the included upholstery tool only average for embedded pet hair without a motorized mini-brush.
-
Often rated good-to-very-good, sometimes requiring extra passes or a crevice tool for final dust. One design critique notes uneven edge reach on certain sides of the floorhead.
-
Emptying is usually a one-button dump, but mess control varies: some find it clean and quick, others report dust puffing or awkwardness because the bin is attached to the motor and cord. Small bin size also means frequent emptying.
-
Expect regular filter rinsing and periodic brush-roll or shroud cleaning, especially in pet homes. Reviews suggest suction and dust control drop quickly if maintenance is ignored.
-
Works well on many area rugs, but thin or light rugs can get sucked in, stall the brush roll, or feel grabby. Lower settings and careful technique help, but it’s not the most rug-forgiving stick.
-
Low-profile styling helps with debris intake and navigating furniture, but design varies by model and can influence edge reach and rug behavior. Some reviewers want a wider head or report sparse bristles or hair accumulation.
-
Durability feedback is split: some users report multiple years of heavy use, while others mention roller or quality issues or perceived downgrades in newer revisions. Keeping filters and brush rolls clean appears to affect longevity.
-
Cyclonic separation is credited with keeping suction steady when clean, but fine dust can cake on internal shrouds and needs periodic cleaning. Hair can also collect in the cyclone or spindle area on some versions.