If you want better Warranty and Customer support
Choose Cuisinart 14-Cup Programmable Coffee Maker. It scores 4.8 vs 1.2 for Warranty and Customer support, with a 4.1 overall score.
SMEG 50’s Retro Style Drip Coffee Maker Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for retro style, simple drip coffee, and an easy wake-up timer. Skip it if you want specialty-level coffee, compact storage, easy reservoir filling, or stronger value for the price.
Best for
Best for buyers who care strongly about retro kitchen design and want an uncomplicated drip machine with a reusable filter and programmable wake-up timer. It also suits households that mostly brew pots rather than espresso-style drinks.
Not for
Not for coffee-first buyers who want SCA-level extraction, specialty features, compact storage, easy reservoir access or maximum value. It is also a poor fit for anyone who expects a thermal carafe, long warming cycles or app-connected controls.
Verdict
Reviewers consistently frame the Smeg 50's Retro Style Drip Coffee Maker as a design-first appliance that also makes acceptable to good drip coffee. Its retro colors, simple controls, reusable filter and programmable timer earn frequent praise, and several testers found the coffee smooth, consistent and easy to prepare. The tradeoff is that the performance rarely rises beyond standard drip brewing, while the body is bulky, the rear water reservoir can be frustrating to fill, and the warming plate timing divides users. Value depends heavily on whether the countertop look matters as much as the cup.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
21 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.02 (10%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.412 (57%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.43 (14%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.43 (14%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (5%)
Pros
-
Setup was consistently described as easy, with reviewers noting simple initial preparation and little to assemble.
-
Packaging comments were positive where mentioned, especially the zero-plastic or recyclable-cardboard presentation.
-
Design is the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly loved the retro styling, colors and countertop presence, while some still criticized its large footprint.
-
Reviewers generally liked the programmable timer and auto-start function, calling it convenient, easy to set and useful for wake-up coffee.
-
The reusable filter was mostly praised for convenience, low waste and durability, though one reviewer only rated it decent rather than exceptional.
-
Brewing performance was mostly positive for standard drip coffee: reliable, consistent and flavorful enough, though not positioned as specialty-level brewing.
-
Popularity evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer noting the machine had become a hit on Instagram.
-
Accessory evidence is limited, but one reviewer valued the included measuring scoop as helping portion grounds correctly.
-
Overall experience varied widely: many found it simple, quiet and pleasant, while harsher reviews said the quirks and tradeoffs outweighed the looks.
-
Beverage quality was acceptable to good for drip coffee, with praise for smooth, clean or tasty cups but repeated caveats that the coffee is standard rather than exceptional.
-
Capacity was usually adequate for households or multiple mugs, but reviewers repeatedly noted Smeg cup sizing makes the 10-cup claim feel smaller in real mugs.
-
Speed evidence was generally acceptable rather than fast; reviewers noted full jugs take several minutes but slower brewing helps avoid weak coffee.
-
Build quality was split: some praised metal construction, sturdiness and long-term durability, while others criticized plastic parts, a flimsy handle or failure after extended use.
-
Pot and keep-warm performance was mixed: some found the warming program effective, while others complained that 20, 40 or 60 minutes was not enough for their habits.
Cons
-
Carafe handling drew mixed reactions, with praise for ergonomics and pause-and-serve but complaints about non-dishwasher-safe glass and flimsy or awkward details.
-
Portability was mixed: one reviewer found it easy to move, while another emphasized its hefty weight and countertop bulk.
-
Value was one of the most divided areas: style-focused reviewers accepted the premium, but coffee-focused reviewers called it expensive for standard drip performance.
-
The water system was the most repeated complaint: reviewers criticized the narrow, awkward reservoir and, in some cases, overly frequent descaling alerts, though one long-term review praised easy descaling.
-
Design flaws centered on bulk, footprint and missing or imperfect convenience features, especially the lack of a standard brew-pause feature in one review.
-
Heating performance evidence was negative where scored, with the warming function failing to keep coffee hot enough in one detailed review.
-
Warranty and support evidence was negative, with one long-term owner saying help was difficult after a breakdown and no remedy was provided beyond the 12-month warranty.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Coffee Machines, this product is above average in Environmental packaging sustainability, Filter, Accessories, near average in Design, ergonomics and footprint, Pot function, below average in Warranty and Customer support, Heating-element power, Water system, maintenance and descaling.
Summary
21 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher3 (14%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts9 (43%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower9 (43%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warranty and Customer support | 1.2 | 3.6 | -2.4 |
| Heating-element power | 2.2 | 4.1 | -1.9 |
| Water system, maintenance and descaling | 2.4 | 4.0 | -1.6 |
| Environmental packaging sustainability | 4.5 | 3.2 | +1.4 |
| Value and Price | 3.0 | 3.9 | -0.9 |
| Espresso and beverage quality | 3.9 | 4.4 | -0.5 |
| Overall user experience | 4.0 | 4.4 | -0.4 |
| Filter | 4.3 | 3.9 | +0.4 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Heating-element power
Choose Technivorm Moccamaster KBGT Coffee Brewer. It scores 4.7 vs 2.2 for Heating-element power, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better Build quality and durability
Choose WOLF GOURMET Programmable Coffee Maker System 10 Cup. It scores 4.7 vs 3.5 for Build quality and durability, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Pot function
Choose Technivorm Moccamaster KBT Coffee Brewer. It scores 4.7 vs 3.5 for Pot function, with a 4.4 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Alternative: practical features The KitchenAid is named as a comparable-price option with practical features such as a removable tank.
- Alternative: practical features The KitchenAid is positioned as a similar-price option with more practical conveniences.
- Better: flexibility and controls The Ninja Dual Brew is recommended for buyers who want pods, grounds, more size control and a milk frother.
- Better: flexibility and brew control The Ninja Dual Brew is recommended for buyers wanting more flexibility than the Smeg offers.
- Better: specialty coffee brewing The Breville Precision Brewer is recommended over the Smeg for automatic drip buyers prioritizing specialty coffee.
FAQ
Does the Smeg drip coffee maker make good coffee?
Reviewers generally say it makes decent to good standard drip coffee, with some praising smooth, consistent cups. Several also stress that it is not specialty-level brewing and does not justify its price on coffee performance alone.
Is the Smeg coffee maker easy to use?
Yes, most reviewers found the controls simple, intuitive and easy to program. The main usability complaint is not the buttons, but the awkward rear water reservoir.
What is the biggest drawback reviewers mention?
The most repeated drawback is the water-filling design: the reservoir opening is narrow, sits at the back and can require a steady hand. Several reviewers also disliked the bulky footprint.
Is the Smeg worth the price?
It depends on how much you value the retro design. Style-focused reviewers considered the premium easier to accept, while coffee-focused reviewers said cheaper machines can produce similar or better coffee.
How well does the keep-warm function work?
Reviews are mixed. Some testers said the warming plate worked well, while others found the 20-, 40- or 60-minute limit too short or said the coffee cooled more than expected.
Does it use paper filters?
It includes a reusable filter that reviewers generally liked for convenience and reduced waste. Several reviews also note that paper filters can be used when a cleaner cup is preferred.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.6
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 2.6
Article Reviews
yahoo.com
- Review score
- 4.1
womanandhome.com
- Review score
- 4.0
Top Coffee Machines to Consider
Choose the OXO Brew 8-Cup if you want fast, consistent drip coffee in small or full batches. Skip it if you need programming, app controls, a larger pot, or the...
Pros: Brewing performance and consistency, Build quality and durability
Cons: Design flaws, Capsules
Choose the KitchenAid KF6 for rich espresso, quiet operation, easy cleaning, and strong value in a super-automatic. Skip it if dense cappuccino foam, plant-milk presets, touchscreen controls, or an included...
Pros: Automation and sensors, Grinder
Cons: Accuracy of marketing claims, Design flaws
Best for effortless, highly personalized hot and cold coffee in a busy multi-drinker home. Skip it if counter space is tight, you demand silky adjustable microfoam, or the premium price...
Pros: Pump pressure consistency, Capsules
Cons: Portability and travel-friendliness, Design flaws
Choose the Moccamaster KBT for fast, excellent drip coffee, durable build, and a thermal carafe that keeps coffee hot. Skip it if you need programmability, a compact footprint, or a...
Pros: Heating-element power, Espresso and beverage quality
Cons: Design flaws, Automation and sensors