SMEG 50’s Retro Style Drip Coffee Maker

SMEG 50’s Retro Style Drip Coffee Maker Review

Brand: SMEG
Released: May 2019
Updated: 3 months ago
3.9
Overall review score
133
Review evidence points
21
Scored features
15
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for retro style, simple drip coffee, and an easy wake-up timer. Skip it if you want specialty-level coffee, compact storage, easy reservoir filling, or stronger value for the price.

Best for

Best for buyers who care strongly about retro kitchen design and want an uncomplicated drip machine with a reusable filter and programmable wake-up timer. It also suits households that mostly brew pots rather than espresso-style drinks.

Not for

Not for coffee-first buyers who want SCA-level extraction, specialty features, compact storage, easy reservoir access or maximum value. It is also a poor fit for anyone who expects a thermal carafe, long warming cycles or app-connected controls.

Verdict

Reviewers consistently frame the Smeg 50's Retro Style Drip Coffee Maker as a design-first appliance that also makes acceptable to good drip coffee. Its retro colors, simple controls, reusable filter and programmable timer earn frequent praise, and several testers found the coffee smooth, consistent and easy to prepare. The tradeoff is that the performance rarely rises beyond standard drip brewing, while the body is bulky, the rear water reservoir can be frustrating to fill, and the warming plate timing divides users. Value depends heavily on whether the countertop look matters as much as the cup.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

21 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    2 (10%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    12 (57%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (14%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    3 (14%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (5%)

Pros

  • 4.4
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Design, ergonomics and footprint: 4.4, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Design is the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly loved the retro styling, colors and countertop presence, while some still criticized its large footprint.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Automation and sensors: 4.4, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers generally liked the programmable timer and auto-start function, calling it convenient, easy to set and useful for wake-up coffee.
  • 4.3
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Filter: 4.3, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    The reusable filter was mostly praised for convenience, low waste and durability, though one reviewer only rated it decent rather than exceptional.
  • 4.3
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Brewing performance and consistency: 4.3, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Brewing performance was mostly positive for standard drip coffee: reliable, consistent and flavorful enough, though not positioned as specialty-level brewing.
  • 4.0
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    Overall user experience: 4.0, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Overall experience varied widely: many found it simple, quiet and pleasant, while harsher reviews said the quirks and tradeoffs outweighed the looks.
  • 3.9
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Espresso and beverage quality: 3.9, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Beverage quality was acceptable to good for drip coffee, with praise for smooth, clean or tasty cups but repeated caveats that the coffee is standard rather than exceptional.

Cons

  • 2.4
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    Water system, maintenance and descaling: 2.4, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The water system was the most repeated complaint: reviewers criticized the narrow, awkward reservoir and, in some cases, overly frequent descaling alerts, though one long-term review praised easy descaling.
  • 2.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Design flaws: 2.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Design flaws centered on bulk, footprint and missing or imperfect convenience features, especially the lack of a standard brew-pause feature in one review.
  • 1.2
    1 review
    Warranty and Customer support: 1.2, 1 review
    Warranty and support evidence was negative, with one long-term owner saying help was difficult after a breakdown and no remedy was provided beyond the 12-month warranty.
  • 2.2
    1 review
    Heating-element power: 2.2, 1 review
    Heating performance evidence was negative where scored, with the warming function failing to keep coffee hot enough in one detailed review.
  • 3.0
    12 reviews low consensus
    Value and Price: 3.0, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Value was one of the most divided areas: style-focused reviewers accepted the premium, but coffee-focused reviewers called it expensive for standard drip performance.
  • 3.4
    3 reviews low consensus
    Cup, tray and carafe handling: 3.4, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Carafe handling drew mixed reactions, with praise for ergonomics and pause-and-serve but complaints about non-dishwasher-safe glass and flimsy or awkward details.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Coffee Machines, this product is above average in Environmental packaging sustainability, Filter, Accessories, near average in Build quality and durability, Pot function, below average in Warranty and Customer support, Heating-element power, Water system, maintenance and descaling.

Comparison summary

21 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    3 (14%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    10 (48%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    8 (38%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Warranty and Customer support 1.2 3.6 -2.4
Heating-element power 2.2 4.1 -1.9
Water system, maintenance and descaling 2.4 4.0 -1.6
Environmental packaging sustainability 4.5 3.2 +1.3
Value and Price 3.0 3.9 -0.9
Espresso and beverage quality 3.9 4.4 -0.5
Overall user experience 4.0 4.4 -0.4
Filter 4.3 3.9 +0.5

Consider This Instead

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Alternative: practical features The KitchenAid is named as a comparable-price option with practical features such as a removable tank.
  • Alternative: practical features The KitchenAid is positioned as a similar-price option with more practical conveniences.
  • Better: specialty coffee brewing The Breville Precision Brewer is recommended over the Smeg for automatic drip buyers prioritizing specialty coffee.

FAQ

Does the Smeg drip coffee maker make good coffee?

Reviewers generally say it makes decent to good standard drip coffee, with some praising smooth, consistent cups. Several also stress that it is not specialty-level brewing and does not justify its price on coffee performance alone.

Is the Smeg coffee maker easy to use?

Yes, most reviewers found the controls simple, intuitive and easy to program. The main usability complaint is not the buttons, but the awkward rear water reservoir.

What is the biggest drawback reviewers mention?

The most repeated drawback is the water-filling design: the reservoir opening is narrow, sits at the back and can require a steady hand. Several reviewers also disliked the bulky footprint.

Is the Smeg worth the price?

It depends on how much you value the retro design. Style-focused reviewers considered the premium easier to accept, while coffee-focused reviewers said cheaper machines can produce similar or better coffee.

How well does the keep-warm function work?

Reviews are mixed. Some testers said the warming plate worked well, while others found the 20-, 40- or 60-minute limit too short or said the coffee cooled more than expected.

Does it use paper filters?

It includes a reusable filter that reviewers generally liked for convenience and reduced waste. Several reviews also note that paper filters can be used when a cleaner cup is preferred.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Coffee Machines to Consider

#1 OXO Brew 8 Cup Coffee Maker
4.4

Choose the OXO Brew 8-Cup if you want fast, consistent drip coffee in small or full batches. Skip it if you need programming, app controls, a larger pot, or the...

Pros: Brewing performance and consistency, Build quality and durability

Cons: Design flaws, Capsules

#2 KitchenAid KF6 Fully Automatic Espresso Machine
4.4

Choose the KitchenAid KF6 for rich espresso, quiet operation, easy cleaning, and strong value in a super-automatic. Skip it if dense cappuccino foam, plant-milk presets, touchscreen controls, or an included...

Pros: Automation and sensors, Grinder

Cons: Accuracy of marketing claims, Design flaws

#3 Philips Café Aromis 8000
4.4

Best for effortless, highly personalized hot and cold coffee in a busy multi-drinker home. Skip it if counter space is tight, you demand silky adjustable microfoam, or the premium price...

Pros: Pump pressure consistency, Capsules

Cons: Portability and travel-friendliness, Design flaws

#4 Technivorm Moccamaster KBT Coffee Brewer
4.4

Choose the Moccamaster KBT for fast, excellent drip coffee, durable build, and a thermal carafe that keeps coffee hot. Skip it if you need programmability, a compact footprint, or a...

Pros: Heating-element power, Espresso and beverage quality

Cons: Design flaws, Automation and sensors