SteelSeries Apex Pro Gen 3

SteelSeries Apex Pro Gen 3 Feature Scores

Explore all 51 feature scores for SteelSeries Apex Pro Gen 3, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

51 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    14 (27%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    27 (53%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (16%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    2 (4%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.6
    14 reviews strong consensus
    rapid trigger support: 4.6, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Rapid Trigger/Rapid Tap features were repeatedly praised for faster resets, movement, and competitive control.
  • 4.6
    13 reviews strong consensus
    gaming performance: 4.6, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Gaming performance was strongly praised across written and video reviews, especially for shooters, fast-paced games, and esports features.
  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was widely praised as sturdy, robust, premium, and tank-like despite some plastic construction caveats.
  • 4.9
    8 reviews strong consensus
    key responsiveness: 4.9, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Responsiveness was one of the strongest themes, with multiple reviewers saying inputs felt immediate and kept up with fast keystrokes.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    extra gaming features: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Extra gaming features such as Protection Mode, Rapid Tap, dual actuation, and OLED controls were often praised as genuinely useful.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    switch feel: 4.5, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Reviewers mostly liked the OmniPoint switches for smooth, linear, fast feel, though one found them too light and preferred another board.
  • 4.5
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    customization options: 4.5, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Customization was a major strength, with reviewers praising granular actuation, bindings, RGB, and profiles despite occasional complexity.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews strong consensus
    RGB customization: 4.4, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    RGB customization was a clear strength, with per-key control and many effects praised, though some reviewers found setup less straightforward.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    keycap quality: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Keycaps were generally praised for PBT texture, grip, visibility, or shape, with some caveats around non-premium caps on the Mini.
  • 4.3
    10 reviews low consensus
    typing feel: 4.3, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Typing feel was usually praised as smooth, satisfying, and enjoyable, though Mini and one video review found it less impressive.
  • 4.3
    9 reviews strong consensus
    wrist rest quality: 4.3, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    The wrist rest was usually praised for comfort, angle, magnetic attachment, and materials, though a few reviewers found it hard or awkward.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    size and form factor: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Form factor sentiment depended on model: TKL and Mini layouts saved space, while compactness could require adjustment.
  • 4.3
    8 reviews strong consensus
    profile management: 4.3, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Profile management was useful through QuickSet, presets, and OLED controls, but five always-loaded profiles and clunky menus created friction.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    typing comfort: 4.4, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Typing comfort was often excellent for long writing sessions, but TechRadar disliked the taller keycap typing experience.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    RGB lighting quality: 4.2, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    RGB lighting quality was often praised for even, attractive, non-intrusive lighting, but color accuracy and brightness were not universally strong.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    design aesthetics: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Design aesthetics were mostly positive for clean, minimal, premium looks, though one reviewer found the design nondescript.
  • 4.0
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    acoustics: 4.0, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Acoustics were mixed-positive: many liked the thocky or improved sound, while others heard hollow, clacky, or less refined notes.
  • 3.8
    17 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 3.8, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Value was the most divided category: many reviewers justified the cost, while others found the premium price hard to defend.
  • 3.9
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    software quality: 3.9, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Software quality was mixed: GG offered deep, useful tools, but several reviewers called it cluttered, bloated, or inconsistent.
  • 4.6
    3 reviews strong consensus
    macro customization: 4.6, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Macro customization was viewed positively, with reviewers noting easy setup and access through software or onboard controls.
  • 4.1
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    latency: 4.1, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Latency evidence was mostly positive in wired use, but Bluetooth and some measured results kept it from being flawless.
  • 4.1
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    sound dampening: 4.1, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sound dampening was generally seen as improved and effective, though one video reviewer still found the sound less refined than expected.
  • 4.2
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    materials quality: 4.2, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Materials were mostly praised for aluminum, matte finishes, and sturdy construction, but the Mini plastic-only case felt less premium.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews low consensus
    connectivity: 4.0, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Connectivity ranged from smooth setup and simple wired use to serious wireless/dongle complaints in one PCMag review.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    per-key lighting control: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Per-key lighting control was useful and flexible, but some custom profiles required GG running in the background.
  • 4.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    reliability: 4.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reliability was supported by accurate input registration and no missed rapid presses in some reviews, but wireless reliability was not perfect.
  • 3.9
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    portability: 3.9, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Portability varied by model: Mini and TKL versions were easy to move, while the full-size wired model was desk-bound.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    noise level: 4.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Noise level was usually considered reasonable, with reviewers saying it was quieter than before or not distracting.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    cable quality: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Cable quality was praised when reviewers mentioned the braided, detachable USB-C cable as welcome or less intrusive.
  • 3.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    actuation consistency: 3.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Actuation was often praised as consistent and precise, but a few tests found software settings did not perfectly match physical results.
  • 3.8
    4 reviews low consensus
    ergonomics: 3.8, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Ergonomics were strong for typing reach and long sessions, but some media-control placement and wrist positioning drew complaints.
  • 3.7
    4 reviews low consensus
    volume control: 3.7, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Volume control was generally useful, but the small or recessed wheel hurt ergonomics on some models.
  • 4.8
    1 review
    durability: 4.8, 1 review
    One review specifically praised durability, saying the board could withstand intense gaming and bumps.
  • 3.7
    4 reviews low consensus
    desk space efficiency: 3.7, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Desk-space efficiency was polarizing: full-size models consumed space, while Mini and TKL versions freed up room.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    key spacing: 4.5, 1 review
    One reviewer found the key reach comfortable, with nothing too far to stretch.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    layout options: 4.5, 1 review
    Layout options were appreciated in the review that noted full-size, tenkeyless, and wireless variants.
  • 3.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    legend visibility: 3.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Legend visibility was mixed: the white TKL was praised for readable legends, while Mini front legends were criticized for not shining through.
  • 4.2
    1 review
    frame rigidity: 4.2, 1 review
    The Mini review found the board difficult to flex or bend, supporting strong frame rigidity for that version.
  • 3.5
    3 reviews low consensus
    wireless performance: 3.5, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Wireless performance was mixed, with one reviewer reporting dongle issues while others found wireless latency or claimed battery behavior acceptable.
  • 3.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    polling rate: 3.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reviewers considered the 1000 Hz polling rate usable and solid, while noting it trails newer 8000 Hz rivals.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    key stability: 4.0, 1 review
    One review found individual key wobble small enough on the dual-rail Hall-effect switches, supporting generally stable key travel.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    passthrough features: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Passthrough was a clear weakness where reviewers missed USB passthrough or noted its absence alongside wired limitations.
  • 2.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    switch options: 2.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Switch choice drew mixed reactions: reviewers praised the Hall-effect base but criticized limited hardware versatility and mixed switch types on some keys.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    backlight brightness: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Brightness was a recurring caveat, with reviewers saying the lighting was dimmer than desired or less bright than nearby accessories.
  • 2.2
    1 review
    analog input support: 2.2, 1 review
    Analog-style control was a weak point in the TechRadar review, which wanted more gamepad-like analog mapping options.
  • 2.9
    4 reviews low consensus
    hot-swappable switches: 2.9, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Hot-swap evidence was mixed by model and reviewer, ranging from no hot-swap support to Hall-effect switch swapping on TKL/Mini units.
  • 2.9
    3 reviews low consensus
    ease of switch replacement: 2.9, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Switch replacement sentiment was split: keycap swapping was easy, but non-swappable or hard-to-repair switch designs frustrated reviewers.
  • 3.2
    6 reviews low consensus
    media controls: 3.2, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Media controls were mixed: OLED and volume controls were useful, but small wheels, cumbersome processes, and missing buttons drew complaints.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    onboard memory: 3.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Onboard memory was useful for profiles and cross-PC settings, but lighting behavior and profile requirements limited the experience.
  • 3.4
    3 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 3.4, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life was acceptable but not standout: reviewers reported several days or about two heavy days, while IGN called it not the greatest.
  • 3.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    stabilizer quality: 3.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Stabilizers were mixed: some reviewers praised reduced wobble or no rattling, while others reported rattly or inconsistent larger keys.