The Beauty, Season 1

The Beauty, Season 1 Feature Scores

Explore all 42 feature scores for The Beauty, Season 1, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

42 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    2 (5%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    21 (50%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    14 (33%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (10%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.4
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.4, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The dialogue quality is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 3.8
    21 reviews moderate consensus
    entertainment value: 3.8, 21 reviews, moderate consensus
    The entertainment value divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.8
    17 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 3.8, 17 reviews, low consensus
    The story quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.7
    12 reviews low consensus
    sexual content level: 3.7, 12 reviews, low consensus
    The sexual content level divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    villain quality: 3.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The villain quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    faithfulness to source material: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The faithfulness to source material is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 3.6
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    plot originality: 3.6, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The plot originality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.5
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    acting quality: 3.5, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    The acting quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    bingeability: 4.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The bingeability is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    character likability: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The character likability is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    suspense: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The suspense is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 3.7
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    visual style: 3.7, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The visual style divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    humor: 5.0, 1 review
    The humor is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 3.6
    5 reviews low consensus
    episode pacing: 3.6, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The episode pacing divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    cast chemistry: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The cast chemistry is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    pilot episode quality: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The pilot episode quality is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    emotional impact: 4.0, 1 review
    The emotional impact is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    finale satisfaction: 4.0, 1 review
    The finale satisfaction is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    fourth-wall narration: 4.0, 1 review
    The fourth-wall narration is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    main cast performance: 4.0, 1 review
    The main cast performance is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    practical effects quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The practical effects quality is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    supporting cast performance: 4.0, 1 review
    The supporting cast performance is a recurring strength, helping the series land its most effective moments.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    episode structure: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The episode structure divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.0
    1 review
    cultural representation: 1.0, 1 review
    The cultural representation is a recurring weakness, with critics finding it ineffective or poorly handled.
  • 2.6
    10 reviews low consensus
    tone consistency: 2.6, 10 reviews, low consensus
    The tone consistency divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    cliffhanger effectiveness: 2.0, 1 review
    The cliffhanger effectiveness is a recurring weakness, with critics finding it ineffective or poorly handled.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    costume design: 2.0, 1 review
    The costume design is a recurring weakness, with critics finding it ineffective or poorly handled.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    language level: 2.0, 1 review
    The language level is a recurring weakness, with critics finding it ineffective or poorly handled.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    production design: 2.0, 1 review
    The production design is a recurring weakness, with critics finding it ineffective or poorly handled.
  • 3.0
    6 reviews low consensus
    action quality: 3.0, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The action quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    plot clarity: 3.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The plot clarity divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    character balance: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The character balance divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    plot twists: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The plot twists divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    score quality: 3.0, 1 review
    The score quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    soundtrack quality: 3.0, 1 review
    The soundtrack quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    world-building: 3.0, 1 review
    The world-building divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.2
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    character development: 3.2, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The character development divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    audience appeal: 3.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The audience appeal divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    violence level: 3.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The violence level divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.3
    11 reviews low consensus
    genre satisfaction: 3.3, 11 reviews, low consensus
    The genre satisfaction divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.3
    11 reviews low consensus
    writing quality: 3.3, 11 reviews, low consensus
    The writing quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.3
    20 reviews low consensus
    theme depth: 3.3, 20 reviews, low consensus
    The theme depth divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.

Cast & Creators

  • Actor
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Isabella Rossellini: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Isabella Rossellini's work is singled out as a strength, bringing energy or credibility to the series.
  • Jordan Bennett
    4.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Rebecca Hall: 4.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Rebecca Hall's work is singled out as a strength, bringing energy or credibility to the series.
  • Cooper Madsen
    3.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Evan Peters: 3.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Reactions to Evan Peters's contribution are divided, with both strengths and reservations.
  • The Assassin
    3.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    Anthony Ramos: 3.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Reactions to Anthony Ramos's contribution are divided, with both strengths and reservations.
  • Jeremy
    3.5
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Jeremy Pope: 3.5, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Reactions to Jeremy Pope's contribution are divided, with both strengths and reservations.
  • The Corporation
    3.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    Ashton Kutcher: 3.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Reactions to Ashton Kutcher's contribution are divided, with both strengths and reservations.
  • Actor
    3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Bella Hadid: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reactions to Bella Hadid's contribution are divided, with both strengths and reservations.