The Outbound Ghost

The Outbound Ghost Feature Scores

Explore all 74 feature scores for The Outbound Ghost, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

74 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    18 (24%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    18 (24%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    12 (16%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    20 (27%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    6 (8%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.7
    16 reviews strong consensus
    art direction: 4.7, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    The papercraft characters, expressive designs, and colorful 3D environments are the most consistent source of praise. Even strongly negative reviews usually call the game charming, gorgeous, or visually distinctive.
  • 4.3
    18 reviews moderate consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.3, 18 reviews, moderate consensus
    Jazz, blues, and whimsical battle themes are catchy, relaxing, and memorable. Repetition can become noticeable, and some combat tracks could carry more urgency.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    accessibility options: 4.6, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Granular difficulty controls are one of the game’s strongest features, including damage, experience, encounters, and special modifiers. Visual accessibility is weaker, particularly color reliance and tiny or blurry Switch text.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    fun factor: 4.4, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The charming world, customization, and active combat can be highly enjoyable. Repetition and weak story structure can make the same experience feel dull despite its presentation.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    character development: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The ghosts’ personal burdens and chapter-specific arcs can make the cast lovable and emotionally meaningful. Uneven writing keeps that growth from landing consistently.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    progression system: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Shared experience across all Figments is widely praised because reserve party members stay useful without extra grinding or constant rotation.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    environmental detail: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Distinct biomes, dramatic lighting, and picturesque set pieces make many areas memorable. Pop-in and repeated assets sometimes undermine that detail.
  • 4.0
    11 reviews low consensus
    graphics quality: 4.0, 11 reviews, low consensus
    The core visual design is excellent on PC and stronger hardware, but console versions—especially Switch—can look blurry, fuzzy, or low resolution.
  • 3.9
    13 reviews low consensus
    crafting system: 3.9, 13 reviews, low consensus
    The Aspect system supports flexible builds and strong synergies, earning high praise from enthusiastic players. Others found it poorly organized, unnecessary, or filled with niche upgrades that never justified the effort.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    When the themes of regret, mortality, and moving on connect, they create genuine empathy and a heartfelt payoff. These moments are among the story’s strongest qualities.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    animation quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Character movement and presentation are smooth, appealing, and well suited to the papercraft style.
  • 3.5
    30 reviews low consensus
    combat system: 3.5, 30 reviews, low consensus
    Combat is highly divisive: timed inputs, Figment roles, and build experimentation can be exciting, but regular fights often become repetitive, shallow, or poorly balanced. Bosses range from clever tactical puzzles to padded wars of attrition.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews low consensus
    world-building: 4.2, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Colorful regions, environmental clues, and small visual details can make Outbound feel rich and mysterious. Reused assets and unresolved lore prevent the world from feeling fully realized.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    age appropriateness: 5.0, 1 review
    Despite themes of death and the afterlife, the tone stays cute, gentle, and approachable enough for younger players who are comfortable reading substantial dialogue.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    checkpoint system: 5.0, 1 review
    Losing a fight immediately offers a retry or reload option, making experimentation forgiving and reducing lost progress.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    enemy variety: 5.0, 1 review
    The broad range of colorful ghostly apparitions stays visually distinct across regions and gives the bestiary plenty of personality.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    family friendliness: 5.0, 1 review
    The wholesome presentation, mild tone, and adjustable difficulty make it suitable for families, though the game is single-player and text-heavy.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    immersion: 5.0, 1 review
    For receptive players, the blend of exploration, mystery, music, and heartfelt themes makes Outbound easy to become absorbed in.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    onboarding experience: 5.0, 1 review
    Systems are introduced gradually instead of through a long opening lecture, helping the game feel approachable from the start.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    visual effects quality: 5.0, 1 review
    Dramatic lighting and colorful effects enhance the papercraft environments, although occasional spell stutter and console blur can reduce their impact.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    save system reliability: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Frequent save points make it easy to stop without losing progress, though a temporary PlayStation save scare required a restart.
  • 3.6
    4 reviews low consensus
    user interface design: 3.6, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The interface generally matches the papercraft style and can be clean and readable on stronger platforms. Poor sorting, cut-off assets, and Switch scaling issues create notable friction.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    atmosphere: 4.5, 1 review
    Whimsical music, colorful environments, and gentle ghostly humor create an appealing adventurous mood even when the story turns darker.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    lore depth: 4.5, 1 review
    Environmental signs, background details, and scattered clues invite players to reconstruct the town’s history, though the main story leaves many larger questions unresolved.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    stealth mechanics: 4.5, 1 review
    Bush hiding is a simple but useful way to avoid encounters or start battles with an advantage, without turning the game into a demanding stealth experience.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    tutorial quality: 4.5, 1 review
    The mandatory tutorial is brief and unobtrusive, with deeper explanations left in the help menu for players who need them.
  • 3.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    learning curve: 3.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Basic combat is easy to grasp, but the huge number of Figments, skills, statuses, and Aspects can overwhelm less experienced RPG players.
  • 3.5
    3 reviews low consensus
    level design: 3.5, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Some zones reward curiosity with hidden routes and colorful spaces, while others feel oversized, padded, and difficult to navigate.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    facial animations: 4.0, 1 review
    Character expressions communicate emotion effectively within the simple papercraft style.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    innovation: 4.0, 1 review
    Figment roles, Aspect combinations, and flexible status builds offer creative tactical possibilities even though the broader structure remains familiar.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    open-world design: 4.0, 1 review
    The world offers side paths and gradual unlocking within a mostly linear structure, giving players limited freedom without becoming a true sandbox.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    quest design: 4.0, 1 review
    The focused main path avoids traditional side-quest clutter, but the absence of meaningful optional quests can also make the world feel empty.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    frame rate stability: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    PC and PlayStation 5 can run smoothly, but heavy drops may occur when entering or leaving areas and battles.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    grind level: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Shared party experience reduces routine grinding, although poor boss balance may still push players toward extra battles on harder settings.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    AI behavior: 3.5, 1 review
    Enemy behavior is usually straightforward, but some field encounters show unexpectedly sharp tactics that can contribute to sudden difficulty spikes.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    character roster: 3.5, 1 review
    The large Figment roster supports many party roles and build experiments, but the sheer number of characters and abilities can feel daunting.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.3
    8 reviews strong consensus
    load times: 1.3, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Long black screens before and after battles are the most consistent technical complaint. On consoles, waits of roughly eight to eleven seconds repeatedly break the flow and sometimes look like crashes.
  • 1.5
    8 reviews strong consensus
    writing quality: 1.5, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Writing is the clearest narrative weakness. Dialogue, motivations, humor, and the final resolution often feel amateurish, underdeveloped, or confusing.
  • 1.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    pacing: 1.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The story’s momentum is a major weakness. Long chases, uneven chapter lengths, repeated events, and heavy backtracking make the middle and final acts feel padded.
  • 1.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    originality: 1.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The Paper Mario influence is unmistakable, and the game rarely develops a strong identity of its own. Emotion-based Figments add an interesting idea but do not fully overcome the imitation.
  • 1.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    map and navigation design: 1.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Maps and minimaps are widely criticized as tiny, unclear, or nearly useless. Missing objective direction and poor location tracking often lead to getting lost or backtracking.
  • 1.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    HUD clarity: 1.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Status icons, maps, and battle text can be difficult to understand or read, particularly in handheld mode where text may become nearly illegible.
  • 1.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    endgame content: 1.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Post-game play adds superbosses, remaining Figments, and collection cleanup, but almost no new story. Chapter 5 is especially disappointing for anyone seeking answers.
  • 2.3
    13 reviews low consensus
    exploration quality: 2.3, 13 reviews, low consensus
    The scenery often invites exploration, but the rewards rarely justify it. Many areas feel too large and empty, with side paths commonly yielding crafting materials that some players barely use.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    content variety: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Outside combat, exploration, a small lock-picking game, and occasional torch puzzles, the game offers few meaningful diversions. More minigames or side activities would help break up the repetition.
  • 2.3
    7 reviews low consensus
    puzzle design: 2.3, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Torch puzzles and lock-picking provide occasional breaks from combat, but they are usually simple, repetitive, or increasingly trivial rather than progressively more interesting.
  • 2.1
    4 reviews low consensus
    handheld play suitability: 2.1, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Steam Deck impressions are positive, but Switch handheld play is repeatedly criticized for blurry graphics, tiny text, and unreadable menus.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    crash stability: 1.0, 1 review
    The Switch version was reported to crash randomly to the dashboard, making frequent saving important.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    mission design: 1.0, 1 review
    The campaign repeatedly funnels players from one location to the next through enemy waves and cutscenes, making objectives feel overly linear and repetitive.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    mission variety: 1.0, 1 review
    Much of the campaign follows the same pattern of crossing large areas, chasing the next character, and fighting enemies, with little variation in objectives.
  • 2.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    polish: 2.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Text glitches, interface scaling problems, bugs, and rushed narrative structure leave the game feeling less finished than its attractive presentation suggests.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    bug frequency: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Graphical anomalies, stuck characters, broken map elements, and at least one game-breaking issue were reported, although several problems were patched quickly.
  • 2.3
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    side character depth: 2.3, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The cast is colorful and often charming, yet many supporting ghosts receive too little development or dialogue for players to form strong attachments.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    core gameplay loop: 1.5, 1 review
    The repeated cycle of walking, battling, and waiting through loads loses momentum once combat settles into familiar patterns.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    menu usability: 1.5, 1 review
    Aspect management is cumbersome, with long unalphabetized lists and awkward steps required to remove or replace equipment.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    platform-specific feature support: 1.5, 1 review
    The Switch version is the clearest weak point, with blurry handheld text, crashes, and severe loading that make other platforms easier to recommend.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    world interactivity: 1.5, 1 review
    There is surprisingly little to do in the attractive environments beyond gathering materials, fighting enemies, and completing a few basic interactions.
  • 2.5
    4 reviews low consensus
    boss design: 2.5, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Bosses are inconsistent: the better fights reward clever status strategies, but others arrive without warning, have enormous health pools, or become long healing contests.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    movement feel: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Large areas can feel slow to cross, and faster movement would reduce the drag of repeated backtracking.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    camera behavior: 2.0, 1 review
    The fixed camera can hide patrolling enemies near the screen edge, forcing unwanted encounters that players cannot reasonably anticipate.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    controls responsiveness: 2.0, 1 review
    A D-pad bug on PlayStation made menu navigation unreliable until patches addressed it.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    protagonist appeal: 2.0, 1 review
    The emotion-based Figments provide mechanical roles but little personality, weakening attachment to the protagonist’s battle party.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    upgrade system: 2.0, 1 review
    Aspects offer many options, but their effects can feel too subtle to meaningfully change combat outcomes.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    dialogue quality: 2.7, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Tender exchanges and character humor occasionally land, but repetitive misunderstandings, overlong conversations, and unclear motivations wear down the cast’s appeal.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    class balance: 2.5, 1 review
    The Figment roster covers many roles, but numerous characters and status types feel unnecessary when a few reliable strategies handle most encounters.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    economy and resource balance: 2.5, 1 review
    Crafting resources can feel unevenly distributed, with desired Aspects sometimes blocked by one missing material and no clear bestiary or shop to help locate it.
  • 3.0
    29 reviews low consensus
    narrative quality: 3.0, 29 reviews, low consensus
    The premise of unresolved ghosts and an amnesiac protagonist is strong, and parts of the story feel heartfelt or engrossing. The meandering chase, shifting perspectives, unresolved mysteries, and abrupt ending undermine the payoff.
  • 3.1
    5 reviews low consensus
    performance optimization: 3.1, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Performance varies sharply by platform. PC and Steam Deck reports are mostly smooth, while Switch and some console versions suffer pop-in, blurry visuals, long transitions, and other port-specific compromises.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews low consensus
    sound design: 3.1, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Sound effects are mixed: many are timely and charming, while others feel sparse or irritating.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews low consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 3.2, 3 reviews, low consensus
    AP banking, timed attacks, and status combinations can create clever tactical moments, but the timing gimmicks and status rules can also feel cumbersome or exploitable.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    loot system: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Loot is useful for players who engage deeply with crafting, yet many pickups feel repetitive or worthless once Aspect forging loses its appeal.
  • 3.2
    10 reviews low consensus
    difficulty balance: 3.2, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Extensive sliders let players tailor damage, experience, and enemy presence, but the default curve can swing from trivial encounters to sudden spikes and lengthy bosses.
  • 3.4
    4 reviews low consensus
    replay value: 3.4, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Difficulty modifiers, randomized Figment order, hidden Figments, and alternate Aspect choices encourage repeat runs. Weak post-game payoff and the unresolved ending can reduce the desire to return.
  • 3.3
    9 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 3.3, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Value depends heavily on tolerance for technical issues and narrative disappointment. The roughly 15-hour RPG can feel worthwhile to genre fans, while others may prefer a sale.