The Outbound Ghost

The Outbound Ghost Review

Brand: Merge Games
Released: November 25, 2022
Updated: 6 hours ago
3.2
Overall review score
311
Review evidence points
74
Scored features
34
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for gorgeous papercraft art, memorable music, flexible difficulty, and experimental party builds. Skip it if repetitive battles, unresolved storytelling, weak navigation, or painfully long console loading screens will outweigh the charm.

Best for

Best for Paper Mario-style RPG fans who value charming presentation, flexible difficulty, party-building, and experimental status-based combat—especially on PC or Steam Deck.

Not for

Skip it if you need a tightly resolved story, rewarding exploration, fast console transitions, or consistently balanced battles with clear maps and polished menus.

Verdict

The Outbound Ghost has the look and musical personality of a delightful Paper Mario-inspired RPG, and its best battles reward creative Figment and Aspect combinations. Shared party experience and unusually flexible difficulty settings also make experimentation easy. However, the broader experience is inconsistent: exploration often leads through oversized, lightly populated areas, regular combat can become repetitive, and the story’s promising afterlife mystery loses focus before an abrupt, unresolved ending. Platform matters greatly. PC and Steam Deck impressions are generally smoother, while Switch and some console reviews report blurry text, crashes, pop-in, and exceptionally long battle loads. The result is a charming but uneven RPG best approached by genre fans who value presentation and customization over narrative polish.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

74 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 24% 18 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 24% 18 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 16% 12 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 27% 20 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 8% 6 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    progression system: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    Shared experience across all Figments is widely praised because reserve party members stay useful without extra grinding or constant rotation.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    animation quality: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Character movement and presentation are smooth, appealing, and well suited to the papercraft style.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    age appropriateness: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Despite themes of death and the afterlife, the tone stays cute, gentle, and approachable enough for younger players who are comfortable reading substantial dialogue.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    checkpoint system: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Losing a fight immediately offers a retry or reload option, making experimentation forgiving and reducing lost progress.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    enemy variety: 5.0, based on 1 review
    The broad range of colorful ghostly apparitions stays visually distinct across regions and gives the bestiary plenty of personality.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    family friendliness: 5.0, based on 1 review
    The wholesome presentation, mild tone, and adjustable difficulty make it suitable for families, though the game is single-player and text-heavy.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    immersion: 5.0, based on 1 review
    For receptive players, the blend of exploration, mystery, music, and heartfelt themes makes Outbound easy to become absorbed in.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    onboarding experience: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Systems are introduced gradually instead of through a long opening lecture, helping the game feel approachable from the start.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    visual effects quality: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Dramatic lighting and colorful effects enhance the papercraft environments, although occasional spell stutter and console blur can reduce their impact.
  • 4.7
    based on 16 reviews
    art direction: 4.7, based on 16 reviews
    The papercraft characters, expressive designs, and colorful 3D environments are the most consistent source of praise. Even strongly negative reviews usually call the game charming, gorgeous, or visually distinctive.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    emotional impact: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    When the themes of regret, mortality, and moving on connect, they create genuine empathy and a heartfelt payoff. These moments are among the story’s strongest qualities.
  • 4.6
    based on 5 reviews
    accessibility options: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
    Granular difficulty controls are one of the game’s strongest features, including damage, experience, encounters, and special modifiers. Visual accessibility is weaker, particularly color reliance and tiny or blurry Switch text.
  • 4.6
    based on 4 reviews
    environmental detail: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
    Distinct biomes, dramatic lighting, and picturesque set pieces make many areas memorable. Pop-in and repeated assets sometimes undermine that detail.
  • 4.5
    based on 5 reviews
    character development: 4.5, based on 5 reviews
    The ghosts’ personal burdens and chapter-specific arcs can make the cast lovable and emotionally meaningful. Uneven writing keeps that growth from landing consistently.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    atmosphere: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Whimsical music, colorful environments, and gentle ghostly humor create an appealing adventurous mood even when the story turns darker.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    lore depth: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Environmental signs, background details, and scattered clues invite players to reconstruct the town’s history, though the main story leaves many larger questions unresolved.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    stealth mechanics: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Bush hiding is a simple but useful way to avoid encounters or start battles with an advantage, without turning the game into a demanding stealth experience.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    tutorial quality: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The mandatory tutorial is brief and unobtrusive, with deeper explanations left in the help menu for players who need them.
  • 4.4
    based on 7 reviews
    fun factor: 4.4, based on 7 reviews
    The charming world, customization, and active combat can be highly enjoyable. Repetition and weak story structure can make the same experience feel dull despite its presentation.
  • 4.3
    based on 18 reviews
    soundtrack quality: 4.3, based on 18 reviews
    Jazz, blues, and whimsical battle themes are catchy, relaxing, and memorable. Repetition can become noticeable, and some combat tracks could carry more urgency.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    world-building: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Colorful regions, environmental clues, and small visual details can make Outbound feel rich and mysterious. Reused assets and unresolved lore prevent the world from feeling fully realized.
  • 4.0
    based on 11 reviews
    graphics quality: 4.0, based on 11 reviews
    The core visual design is excellent on PC and stronger hardware, but console versions—especially Switch—can look blurry, fuzzy, or low resolution.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    save system reliability: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Frequent save points make it easy to stop without losing progress, though a temporary PlayStation save scare required a restart.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    facial animations: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Character expressions communicate emotion effectively within the simple papercraft style.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    innovation: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Figment roles, Aspect combinations, and flexible status builds offer creative tactical possibilities even though the broader structure remains familiar.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    open-world design: 4.0, based on 1 review
    The world offers side paths and gradual unlocking within a mostly linear structure, giving players limited freedom without becoming a true sandbox.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    quest design: 4.0, based on 1 review
    The focused main path avoids traditional side-quest clutter, but the absence of meaningful optional quests can also make the world feel empty.
  • 3.9
    based on 13 reviews
    crafting system: 3.9, based on 13 reviews
    The Aspect system supports flexible builds and strong synergies, earning high praise from enthusiastic players. Others found it poorly organized, unnecessary, or filled with niche upgrades that never justified the effort.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    learning curve: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Basic combat is easy to grasp, but the huge number of Figments, skills, statuses, and Aspects can overwhelm less experienced RPG players.
  • 3.6
    based on 4 reviews
    user interface design: 3.6, based on 4 reviews
    The interface generally matches the papercraft style and can be clean and readable on stronger platforms. Poor sorting, cut-off assets, and Switch scaling issues create notable friction.
  • 3.5
    based on 30 reviews
    combat system: 3.5, based on 30 reviews
    Combat is highly divisive: timed inputs, Figment roles, and build experimentation can be exciting, but regular fights often become repetitive, shallow, or poorly balanced. Bosses range from clever tactical puzzles to padded wars of attrition.
  • 3.5
    based on 3 reviews
    level design: 3.5, based on 3 reviews
    Some zones reward curiosity with hidden routes and colorful spaces, while others feel oversized, padded, and difficult to navigate.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    frame rate stability: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    PC and PlayStation 5 can run smoothly, but heavy drops may occur when entering or leaving areas and battles.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    grind level: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Shared party experience reduces routine grinding, although poor boss balance may still push players toward extra battles on harder settings.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    AI behavior: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Enemy behavior is usually straightforward, but some field encounters show unexpectedly sharp tactics that can contribute to sudden difficulty spikes.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    character roster: 3.5, based on 1 review
    The large Figment roster supports many party roles and build experiments, but the sheer number of characters and abilities can feel daunting.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 4 reviews
    replay value: 3.4, based on 4 reviews
    Difficulty modifiers, randomized Figment order, hidden Figments, and alternate Aspect choices encourage repeat runs. Weak post-game payoff and the unresolved ending can reduce the desire to return.
  • 3.3
    based on 9 reviews
    value for money: 3.3, based on 9 reviews
    Value depends heavily on tolerance for technical issues and narrative disappointment. The roughly 15-hour RPG can feel worthwhile to genre fans, while others may prefer a sale.
  • 3.3
    based on 2 reviews
    loot system: 3.3, based on 2 reviews
    Loot is useful for players who engage deeply with crafting, yet many pickups feel repetitive or worthless once Aspect forging loses its appeal.
  • 3.2
    based on 10 reviews
    difficulty balance: 3.2, based on 10 reviews
    Extensive sliders let players tailor damage, experience, and enemy presence, but the default curve can swing from trivial encounters to sudden spikes and lengthy bosses.
  • 3.2
    based on 3 reviews
    gameplay mechanics: 3.2, based on 3 reviews
    AP banking, timed attacks, and status combinations can create clever tactical moments, but the timing gimmicks and status rules can also feel cumbersome or exploitable.
  • 3.1
    based on 5 reviews
    performance optimization: 3.1, based on 5 reviews
    Performance varies sharply by platform. PC and Steam Deck reports are mostly smooth, while Switch and some console versions suffer pop-in, blurry visuals, long transitions, and other port-specific compromises.
  • 3.1
    based on 4 reviews
    sound design: 3.1, based on 4 reviews
    Sound effects are mixed: many are timely and charming, while others feel sparse or irritating.
  • 3.0
    based on 29 reviews
    narrative quality: 3.0, based on 29 reviews
    The premise of unresolved ghosts and an amnesiac protagonist is strong, and parts of the story feel heartfelt or engrossing. The meandering chase, shifting perspectives, unresolved mysteries, and abrupt ending undermine the payoff.
  • 2.7
    based on 3 reviews
    dialogue quality: 2.7, based on 3 reviews
    Tender exchanges and character humor occasionally land, but repetitive misunderstandings, overlong conversations, and unclear motivations wear down the cast’s appeal.
  • 2.5
    based on 4 reviews
    boss design: 2.5, based on 4 reviews
    Bosses are inconsistent: the better fights reward clever status strategies, but others arrive without warning, have enormous health pools, or become long healing contests.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    class balance: 2.5, based on 1 review
    The Figment roster covers many roles, but numerous characters and status types feel unnecessary when a few reliable strategies handle most encounters.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    economy and resource balance: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Crafting resources can feel unevenly distributed, with desired Aspects sometimes blocked by one missing material and no clear bestiary or shop to help locate it.
  • 2.3
    based on 13 reviews
    exploration quality: 2.3, based on 13 reviews
    The scenery often invites exploration, but the rewards rarely justify it. Many areas feel too large and empty, with side paths commonly yielding crafting materials that some players barely use.
  • 2.3
    based on 7 reviews
    puzzle design: 2.3, based on 7 reviews
    Torch puzzles and lock-picking provide occasional breaks from combat, but they are usually simple, repetitive, or increasingly trivial rather than progressively more interesting.
  • 2.3
    based on 3 reviews
    side character depth: 2.3, based on 3 reviews
    The cast is colorful and often charming, yet many supporting ghosts receive too little development or dialogue for players to form strong attachments.
  • 2.3
    based on 2 reviews
    movement feel: 2.3, based on 2 reviews
    Large areas can feel slow to cross, and faster movement would reduce the drag of repeated backtracking.
  • 2.2
    based on 3 reviews
    polish: 2.2, based on 3 reviews
    Text glitches, interface scaling problems, bugs, and rushed narrative structure leave the game feeling less finished than its attractive presentation suggests.
  • 2.1
    based on 4 reviews
    handheld play suitability: 2.1, based on 4 reviews
    Steam Deck impressions are positive, but Switch handheld play is repeatedly criticized for blurry graphics, tiny text, and unreadable menus.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    bug frequency: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Graphical anomalies, stuck characters, broken map elements, and at least one game-breaking issue were reported, although several problems were patched quickly.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    camera behavior: 2.0, based on 1 review
    The fixed camera can hide patrolling enemies near the screen edge, forcing unwanted encounters that players cannot reasonably anticipate.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    controls responsiveness: 2.0, based on 1 review
    A D-pad bug on PlayStation made menu navigation unreliable until patches addressed it.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    protagonist appeal: 2.0, based on 1 review
    The emotion-based Figments provide mechanical roles but little personality, weakening attachment to the protagonist’s battle party.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    upgrade system: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Aspects offer many options, but their effects can feel too subtle to meaningfully change combat outcomes.
  • 1.8
    based on 4 reviews
    endgame content: 1.8, based on 4 reviews
    Post-game play adds superbosses, remaining Figments, and collection cleanup, but almost no new story. Chapter 5 is especially disappointing for anyone seeking answers.
  • 1.5
    based on 8 reviews
    writing quality: 1.5, based on 8 reviews
    Writing is the clearest narrative weakness. Dialogue, motivations, humor, and the final resolution often feel amateurish, underdeveloped, or confusing.
  • 1.5
    based on 6 reviews
    pacing: 1.5, based on 6 reviews
    The story’s momentum is a major weakness. Long chases, uneven chapter lengths, repeated events, and heavy backtracking make the middle and final acts feel padded.
  • 1.5
    based on 4 reviews
    map and navigation design: 1.5, based on 4 reviews
    Maps and minimaps are widely criticized as tiny, unclear, or nearly useless. Missing objective direction and poor location tracking often lead to getting lost or backtracking.
  • 1.5
    based on 2 reviews
    content variety: 1.5, based on 2 reviews
    Outside combat, exploration, a small lock-picking game, and occasional torch puzzles, the game offers few meaningful diversions. More minigames or side activities would help break up the repetition.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    core gameplay loop: 1.5, based on 1 review
    The repeated cycle of walking, battling, and waiting through loads loses momentum once combat settles into familiar patterns.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    menu usability: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Aspect management is cumbersome, with long unalphabetized lists and awkward steps required to remove or replace equipment.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    platform-specific feature support: 1.5, based on 1 review
    The Switch version is the clearest weak point, with blurry handheld text, crashes, and severe loading that make other platforms easier to recommend.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    world interactivity: 1.5, based on 1 review
    There is surprisingly little to do in the attractive environments beyond gathering materials, fighting enemies, and completing a few basic interactions.
  • 1.4
    based on 4 reviews
    originality: 1.4, based on 4 reviews
    The Paper Mario influence is unmistakable, and the game rarely develops a strong identity of its own. Emotion-based Figments add an interesting idea but do not fully overcome the imitation.
  • 1.3
    based on 8 reviews
    load times: 1.3, based on 8 reviews
    Long black screens before and after battles are the most consistent technical complaint. On consoles, waits of roughly eight to eleven seconds repeatedly break the flow and sometimes look like crashes.
  • 1.3
    based on 3 reviews
    HUD clarity: 1.3, based on 3 reviews
    Status icons, maps, and battle text can be difficult to understand or read, particularly in handheld mode where text may become nearly illegible.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    crash stability: 1.0, based on 1 review
    The Switch version was reported to crash randomly to the dashboard, making frequent saving important.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    mission design: 1.0, based on 1 review
    The campaign repeatedly funnels players from one location to the next through enemy waves and cutscenes, making objectives feel overly linear and repetitive.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    mission variety: 1.0, based on 1 review
    Much of the campaign follows the same pattern of crossing large areas, chasing the next character, and fighting enemies, with little variation in objectives.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is below average in load times, mission variety, core gameplay loop.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 0% 0 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 100% 8 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
load times 1.3 4.1 -2.8
mission variety 1.0 3.7 -2.7
core gameplay loop 1.5 4.1 -2.6
content variety 1.5 4.1 -2.6
originality 1.4 3.9 -2.5
world interactivity 1.5 4.0 -2.5
mission design 1.0 3.5 -2.5
platform-specific feature support 1.5 3.9 -2.4

FAQ

Is The Outbound Ghost’s combat good?

It depends on what you enjoy. Timed attacks, Figment roles, and Aspect builds can be strategic and addictive, but regular fights often become repetitive and some bosses are poorly balanced.

Does the story have a satisfying ending?

Generally, no. The premise and several character moments are appealing, but many sources criticize the prolonged chase, shifting perspectives, unresolved plot threads, and abrupt ending.

Which platform offers the best experience?

The supplied sources are most positive about PC and Steam Deck performance. Switch receives the strongest criticism for blurry handheld text, crashes, and long battle loading screens.

Is it suitable for younger players?

The tone is cute, gentle, and family-friendly despite themes of death and the afterlife. Younger players should be comfortable with substantial reading and turn-based RPG systems.

Does it have replay value?

Difficulty sliders, randomized Figment order, hidden party members, alternate Aspect choices, and challenge modifiers support replaying, though the weak ending and limited post-game story may reduce motivation.

How long does it take to finish?

Several supplied sources place the main experience around 12–18 hours, with additional time for hidden Figments, superbosses, trophies, and completion.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

nodegamers.com

The Outbound Ghost is an adventure RPG about helping ghosts ascend to the afterlife.

Review score
3.3
ladiesgamers.com

The Outbound Ghost is a cute RPG for those looking for something casual and wholesome, but Switch may not be the best platform at this stage.

Review score
3.5
switchaboo.com

The Outbound Ghost is an RPG from Conradical Games (the studio name of the developer Conrad Grindheim) that stars an adorable little ghost.

Review score
3.0

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Paper Mario

  • Similar: character art The character art imitates Paper Mario’s papercraft style effectively.
  • Compared: identity and RPG inspiration The game attempts to capture early Paper Mario but struggles to form its own identity.
  • Similar: papercraft art style The visual style successfully recalls the charm of Paper Mario.

Bravely Default

  • Similar: banking actions in combat Aether Up resembles Bravely Default’s turn-banking approach.

Consider This Instead

If you want better load times

Choose Ghost of Yōtei. It scores 5.0 vs 1.3 for load times, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better exploration quality

Choose Avowed. It scores 4.6 vs 2.3 for exploration quality, with a 3.6 overall score.

Compare

Top Video Games to Consider

#1 Hades II
4.5

Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...

Pros: skill tree depth, dialogue quality

Cons: emotional impact, economy and resource balance

#2 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.4

Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.

Pros: gameplay mechanics, world interactivity

Cons: economy and resource balance, enemy variety

#3 It Takes Two
4.4

Best for joyful, inventive co-op with a partner, especially on couch. Skip it if divorce themes, uneven story tone, or Switch visual compromises would distract you.

Pros: core gameplay loop, movement feel

Cons: character development, dialogue quality

#4 Resident Evil Requiem
4.4

Best for tense Grace-led horror, slick Leon action, and lavish franchise callbacks. Skip it if you want a bolder reinvention, evenly mixed pacing, or substantial post-game modes.

Pros: driving mechanics, protagonist appeal

Cons: platform-specific feature support, checkpoint system