The Testaments, Season 1

The Testaments, Season 1 Review

Brand: Hulu
Released: April 8, 2026
Updated: 3 weeks ago
3.8
Overall review score
296
Review evidence points
51
Scored features
37
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for magnetic performances, vivid Gilead production, and a timely girlhood-centered rebellion. Skip it if slow setup, YA tonal shifts, graphic abuse, or heavy dependence on The Handmaid’s Tale outweigh its promise.

Best for

Best for Handmaid’s Tale viewers who want a younger, friendship-driven perspective on Gilead and can commit to a deliberate multi-season setup. The performances and political themes reward patient viewers.

Not for

Not ideal for viewers exhausted by Gilead, sensitive to grooming and violence against young women, or unwilling to tolerate slow pacing, blunt dialogue, and unresolved setup.

Verdict

The Testaments finds its strongest identity in the young ensemble, especially Chase Infiniti, Lucy Halliday, Mattea Conforti, and the ever-commanding Ann Dowd. Its purple-and-white production design, painterly imagery, and focus on friendship and indoctrination give familiar Gilead material a fresh emotional angle. The tradeoff is a first season that often behaves like an extended prologue: several critics found the pacing slow, the dialogue too blunt, and the YA tone difficult to reconcile with sexual abuse and authoritarian violence. Connections to The Handmaid’s Tale enrich the story for longtime viewers but can also make the sequel feel repetitive or dependent on prior knowledge. Still, the performances, political urgency, and unresolved rebellion leave substantial potential for Season 2.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

51 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    16 (31%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    16 (31%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    9 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    8 (16%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (4%)

Pros

  • 5.0
    11 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 5.0, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Girlhood, indoctrination, complicity, friendship, resistance, and patriarchal power give the season substantial thematic weight. This is one of the show’s most consistently praised qualities.
  • 4.8
    16 reviews strong consensus
    modern political framing: 4.8, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    The contemporary parallels are among the strongest points of agreement, especially around reproductive control, authoritarianism, grooming, and complacency. For some viewers, that relevance is so close and repetitive that it becomes exhausting.
  • 4.9
    10 reviews strong consensus
    acting quality: 4.9, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Acting is one of the strongest areas of agreement. Even negative reviews usually praise the young ensemble, with only a few reservations about Daisy’s performance.
  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    renewal interest: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Interest in another season is consistently high among favorable reviewers, who see abundant room for rebellion, character growth, and a larger payoff. Even several mixed reviews hope later seasons fix the pacing.
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The friendships feel lived-in, believable, and essential to the story. Reviewers especially respond to Agnes and Becka’s bond, Agnes and Daisy’s developing trust, and the wider sisterhood.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    visual style: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Bright pastels, purple-and-white uniforms, and carefully composed iconography give the sequel a striking look. Even skeptical critics generally acknowledge the polish, though some find it too similar to its predecessor.

Cons

  • 2.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    cultural representation: 2.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Diverse casting is visible, but critics repeatedly say the series avoids meaningful engagement with race and leaves its queer-coded elements underdeveloped.
  • 1.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    sexual content level: 1.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The marriage market, predatory older men, grooming, and molestation make the sexual material deeply unsettling rather than titillating.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    age appropriateness: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Despite the YA framing and teenage leads, the material is intensely adult and often harder to watch because the victims are young. One critic also found the actors’ ages distracting for the roles.
  • 1.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    character consistency: 1.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Aunt Lydia is the main point of friction: several reviewers feel her softening, redemption, and double-agent direction clash with the character established earlier.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    continuity: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Differences among the novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, and this sequel create noticeable strain. Aunt Lydia’s history and the shortened timeline are the most frequently questioned points.
  • 2.4
    7 reviews low consensus
    dialogue quality: 2.4, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Reactions to the dialogue are sharply divided. One reviewer found the teenage speech authentic, while many others called it trite, clunky, overly explanatory, or painfully on the nose.

Cast & Creators

  • Agnes
    4.7
    27 reviews strong consensus
    Chase Infiniti: 4.7, 27 reviews, strong consensus
    Infiniti is the clearest acting consensus, praised as magnetic, devastating, subtle, and ideally cast. Her controlled expressions sell Agnes’s innocence and awakening even when scripts restrict the character.
  • Aunt Lydia
    4.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Ann Dowd: 4.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Dowd remains one of the season’s most reliable strengths, described as blistering, magnetic, captivating, and brilliant. Reviewers often praise her even while criticizing Aunt Lydia’s inconsistent arc.
  • Becka
    4.8
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Mattea Conforti: 4.8, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Conforti is one of the season’s most acclaimed performers, frequently called a standout and sometimes the strongest young actor. Her natural, heartbreaking work makes Becka an emotional center.
  • Daisy
    4.5
    19 reviews moderate consensus
    Lucy Halliday: 4.5, 19 reviews, moderate consensus
    Halliday receives substantial praise as a breakout, ferocious co-lead who can match Infiniti’s energy. A minority of critics find the performance stiff or constrained by Daisy’s one-note writing.
  • Shunammite
    4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Rowan Blanchard: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Blanchard brings memorable mean-girl bite and welcome comic timing to Shunammite. Reviewers repeatedly cite her as an energetic supporting standout.
  • Paula
    4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Amy Seimetz: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Seimetz is repeatedly praised for turning Paula’s hostility into something memorable and unexpectedly nuanced. Even critics of the character writing find her icy presence effective.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in realism, modern political framing, theme depth, near average in faithfulness to source material, season pacing, below average in audience appeal, sexual content level, cultural representation.

Comparison summary

51 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    17 (33%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    16 (31%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    18 (35%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
audience appeal 2.0 3.9 -1.9
sexual content level 1.3 3.1 -1.9
cultural representation 2.0 3.8 -1.8
realism 5.0 3.4 +1.6
modern political framing 4.8 3.5 +1.2
directing quality 3.0 4.4 -1.4
season length 1.5 2.9 -1.4
continuity 1.8 3.2 -1.4

Consider This Instead

If you want better sexual content level

Choose Dark Winds, Season 4. It scores 4.8 vs 1.3 for sexual content level, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better entertainment value

Choose Spider-Noir, Season 1. It scores 4.3 vs 3.1 for entertainment value, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Beverly Hills: 90210

  • Compared: teen ensemble format One critic reduces the premise to Beverly Hills: 90210 inside a totalitarian state.

Bridgerton

  • Compared: young-adult marriage-market drama Its marriage-market story is compared to Bridgerton within a darker dystopian frame.

Gen V

  • Compared: younger franchise perspective The sequel is compared to Gen V as a younger lens on an established universe.

FAQ

Do I need to watch The Handmaid’s Tale first?

Not necessarily. Several reviewers found Season 1 accessible to newcomers, but others thought its stakes and callbacks depend heavily on prior knowledge.

Is it as graphic as The Handmaid’s Tale?

It is generally less graphically violent, but mutilation, executions, grooming, molestation, and violence against women still make it a disturbing watch.

Is the adaptation faithful to Margaret Atwood’s novel?

It keeps the novel’s core spirit but changes timelines, ages, relationships, plot order, and the amount of story covered in Season 1.

What is the strongest part of the season?

The acting receives the clearest praise, especially Chase Infiniti, Ann Dowd, Mattea Conforti, and much of the young ensemble. The production design and cinematography are also frequent highlights.

What is the biggest criticism?

The season often feels like extended setup. Reviewers also disagree over whether the YA tone refreshes Gilead or clashes with the darker subject matter.

Does Season 1 provide a complete ending?

No. It closes with unresolved character and rebellion threads, and many reviewers see the season as preparation for a larger second-season payoff.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

pluggedin.com

‘The Testaments’ acts as a sequel to ‘The Handmaid’s Tale,’ and it brings back every horrific deed depicted in the process.

Review score
1.0

Top TV Shows to Consider

#1 The Pitt, Season 2
4.7

Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.

Pros: episode structure, main cast performance

Cons: age appropriateness, plot clarity

#2 Kylie, Season 1
4.5

Choose Kylie for a heartfelt, candid music documentary with rich archives, sharp editing, and big emotional payoff. Skip it if you need a fully exhaustive career chronology or dislike authorized...

Pros: episode pacing, season finale quality

Cons: episode structure, season pacing

#3 It's Not Like That, Chapter 1
4.5

Best for heartfelt family drama, strong performances, natural faith themes, and an easy binge. Skip it if you need fast pacing, strict doctrinal portrayals, or a satisfying romantic resolution.

Pros: season finale quality, screenplay quality

Cons: character consistency, continuity

#4 Margo’s Got Money Troubles
4.4

Best for exceptional performances, heartfelt family chemistry, and a humane take on motherhood and sex work. Skip it if you need gritty realism, fast setup, or perfectly cohesive tone.

Pros: episode structure, dialogue quality

Cons: plot twists, season finale quality