The default frequency response was judged broadly listener-friendly, especially for casual listeners.
Pros: Volume output, Multipoint connectivity reliability
Cons: Water/sweat resistance rating, Codec support
Best 2024 Over-Ear Headphones for Frequency response accuracy
Narrow by product type
Showing Over-Ear Headphones only. Switch back to all Headphones & Earbuds anytime.
Release year
Frequency balance was generally praised as natural, flat or properly balanced, though PCMag and What Hi-Fi wanted more default liveliness.
Pros: Award recognition, Battery
Cons: Water/sweat resistance rating, Touch control responsiveness
Frequency-response comments were moderate, with cohesive, smooth output offset by limited high-end extension and resolution.
Pros: Sound leakage, Battery
Cons: Sustainability and repairability, Auto on/off reliability
Frequency-response judgments are highly divided: some hear clear, competent tuning, while lab-focused reviews call the response inaccurate or disappointing.
Pros: Battery, Volume output
Cons: Preset EQ profile quality, Weight comfort
Frequency-response accuracy was criticized mainly for over-emphasized bass and treble that could become fatiguing.
Pros: Weight comfort, Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Cons: Cable quality, ANC sound impact on audio
Objective or listening comments pointed to imperfect frequency response, especially noisy or exaggerated low and high frequency areas.
Pros: Multipoint connectivity reliability, Battery
Cons: Water/sweat resistance rating, Transparency mode quality
Measured frequency-response commentary was negative, with one review saying the tuning deviated drastically from the preferred curve.
Pros: Ear cup swivel/rotation range, Multi-platform compatibility
Cons: aptX, Water/sweat resistance rating