If you want better Wear detection auto-pause
Choose Sennheiser MOMENTUM 4 Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.8 vs 2.5 for Wear detection auto-pause, with a 4.1 overall score.
Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 Headphones Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Melomania P100 for audiophile-leaning sound, marathon battery life, strong value, and repairable parts. Skip it if you need class-leading ANC, lightweight comfort, compact travel, or a polished transparency mode.
Best for
Best for listeners who prioritize sound quality, long battery life, wired and Bluetooth flexibility, physical buttons, EQ control, and repairable parts over the strongest possible ANC.
Not for
Not for buyers who need the lightest over-ear fit, compact folding travel design, top-tier Bose/Sony-style noise cancellation, spatial audio, touch controls, or polished wear detection.
Verdict
The Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 lands as a value-focused over-ear with unusually strong reviewer consensus around sound quality, battery life, build and repairability. Most reviewers heard clean, detailed, spacious audio with controlled bass and strong codec support, and the battery life repeatedly stood out as class-leading. The tradeoff is that its ANC is good rather than best-in-class, and comfort depends on fit: some reviewers loved the long-wear feel, while others found the clamp, weight or headband tiring. The software and EQ are useful, but missing or imperfect extras such as spatial audio, touch controls, wear detection behavior and transparency clarity keep it from feeling fully premium.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
85 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.033 (39%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.439 (46%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.413 (15%)
Pros
-
Battery life was the strongest consensus feature, repeatedly described as epic, class-leading, insane, benchmark-setting or outstanding.
-
Value for money was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly saying the P100 competes above its price.
-
Repairability and sustainability were major strengths, especially user-replaceable batteries and earpads plus longevity-focused design.
-
Overall recommendations were strongly positive, with most reviewers calling the P100 high-value, competitive or easy to recommend, despite some caveats.
-
Reviewers broadly praised the P100’s sound as detailed, clean, spacious and high-value, though What Hi-Fi and PCMag wanted more energy or EQ help.
-
Codec support was praised as broad and high-end, centered on aptX Lossless and aptX Adaptive, though PCMag still preferred LDAC availability.
Cons
-
Spatial audio was a clear limitation, with reviewers noting no spatial audio and steering head-tracking seekers toward other brands.
-
Head-tracked 3D audio was a weak area because Stereo Guide recommended Sony, Apple or Bose for that feature set.
-
Touch controls were not implemented, and Tom’s Guide treated that absence as a missed opportunity for the earcup design.
-
Water resistance was a weakness in the one review that discussed it, noting there was no water-resistant rating.
-
Wear detection auto-pause was criticized by Tom’s Guide for not always initiating and sometimes delaying.
-
Smart Pause performance was weak to mixed, with reviewers reporting delayed, context-insensitive or inconsistent auto-pause behavior.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in aptX, Cable quality, Sound leakage, near average in Sound quality, Comfort during long use, below average in Touch control responsiveness, Spatial audio, Stability.
Comparison summary
85 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher42 (49%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts30 (35%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower13 (15%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| aptX | 4.6 | 3.2 | +1.4 |
| Cable quality | 4.6 | 3.0 | +1.6 |
| Touch control responsiveness | 2.5 | 4.0 | -1.5 |
| Sound leakage | 4.8 | 3.4 | +1.4 |
| Sensors | 4.5 | 3.2 | +1.3 |
| Voice prompts/feedback | 4.9 | 3.6 | +1.3 |
| Sustainability and repairability | 4.7 | 3.6 | +1.0 |
| Codec support | 4.6 | 3.7 | +0.9 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Stability
Choose Marshall Milton A.N.C.. It scores 4.8 vs 2.9 for Stability, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better Touch control responsiveness
Choose JLab Epic Lux Lab Edition Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.6 vs 2.5 for Touch control responsiveness, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Clamping force comfort
Choose Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones. It scores 4.8 vs 3.7 for Clamping force comfort, with a 4.2 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: noise cancellation Crutchfield places P100 noise cancellation a notch below Sony WH-1000XM5.
- Better: LDAC support PCMag prefers Sony WH-1000XM5 for LDAC support because the P100 lacks LDAC.
- More expensive: price What Hi-Fi says the P100 undercuts the official Sony WH-1000XM5 benchmark price.
- More expensive: sound quality and price Techaeris says AirPods Max can match the sound, but the P100 costs much less.
- Compared: updated tuning and comfort What Hi-Fi says the P100 SE appears to target the original P100's comfort and sound limitations.
FAQ
How good does the Melomania P100 sound?
Reviewers mostly praised the sound as clean, detailed, spacious and balanced, with controlled bass and clear vocals. The main caveat is that What Hi-Fi and PCMag wanted more default punch or energy.
Is the ANC class-leading?
No. Reviewers generally found ANC good or very effective for the price, especially for low-frequency noise, but several said Bose, Sony or AirPods Max still cancel noise better.
How strong is battery life?
Battery life is the strongest consensus point. Reviews repeatedly highlighted up to 60 hours with ANC and up to 100 hours without ANC as class-leading or benchmark-level.
Are the headphones comfortable for long sessions?
Comfort is mixed. Some reviewers wore them for hours comfortably, while others found the clamp, weight, headband or pressure points tiring.
Can they be used wired?
Yes. Reviews mention USB-C digital audio and USB-C-to-3.5mm analog support, with several praising the flexibility and hi-res wired playback quality.
Is the app useful?
Yes, mainly for EQ, ANC settings, firmware updates and wear detection toggles. Reviewers especially liked the seven-band EQ, though the broader feature set was not as advanced as some premium rivals.
Are they good for travel?
They suit travel because of battery life, passive isolation and solid ANC, but the large case and non-folding design make them less ideal for packing light.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
whathifi.com
- Review score
- 4.0
Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider
Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...
Pros: Volume output, Carry case quality
Cons: Connectivity options, Noise isolation (passive)
Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...
Pros: Frequency response accuracy, Clamping force comfort
Cons: Volume output, aptX
Best for spacious, detailed home listening, excellent comfort, and premium construction. Skip it for commuting, private shared-space use, built-in voice chat, or subwoofer-like bass impact.
Pros: Overall satisfaction, Glasses and hat compatibility
Cons: Travel friendliness, Sound leakage
Choose the Strada for premium build, long-session comfort, strong isolation and an unusually spacious closed-back presentation. Skip it if you have a small head, dislike energetic treble, or want consistently...
Pros: Hinge durability, Durability over time
Cons: Ear cup swivel/rotation range, Portability/foldability