If you want better Wear detection auto-pause
Choose Sennheiser MOMENTUM 4 Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.8 vs 2.5 for Wear detection auto-pause, with a 3.9 overall score.
Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 Headphones Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Melomania P100 for audiophile-leaning sound, marathon battery life, strong value, and repairable parts. Skip it if you need class-leading ANC, lightweight comfort, compact travel, or a polished transparency mode.
Best for
Best for listeners who prioritize sound quality, long battery life, wired and Bluetooth flexibility, physical buttons, EQ control, and repairable parts over the strongest possible ANC.
Not for
Not for buyers who need the lightest over-ear fit, compact folding travel design, top-tier Bose/Sony-style noise cancellation, spatial audio, touch controls, or polished wear detection.
Verdict
The Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 lands as a value-focused over-ear with unusually strong reviewer consensus around sound quality, battery life, build and repairability. Most reviewers heard clean, detailed, spacious audio with controlled bass and strong codec support, and the battery life repeatedly stood out as class-leading. The tradeoff is that its ANC is good rather than best-in-class, and comfort depends on fit: some reviewers loved the long-wear feel, while others found the clamp, weight or headband tiring. The software and EQ are useful, but missing or imperfect extras such as spatial audio, touch controls, wear detection behavior and transparency clarity keep it from feeling fully premium.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
85 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.033 (39%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.439 (46%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.413 (15%)
Pros
-
Award recognition was strong because PCMag awarded the P100 an Editors’ Choice.
-
Battery life was the strongest consensus feature, repeatedly described as epic, class-leading, insane, benchmark-setting or outstanding.
-
Voice prompts were a standout novelty, especially the Matt Berry/Southwark option that reviewers found unusually enjoyable.
-
Sound leakage was praised by one reviewer, who found the closed-back design useful for recording because it did not leak externally.
-
Value for money was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly saying the P100 competes above its price.
-
Repairability and sustainability were major strengths, especially user-replaceable batteries and earpads plus longevity-focused design.
-
Replaceable earpads were a recurring repairability strength, with reviewers praising easy replacement and longer-term ownership.
-
Durability evidence was very positive, with reviewers noting no creaks, groans or visible wear after handling and travel.
-
The integrated microphones were praised by Tom’s Guide for superb speech recognition and accurate vocal capture.
-
Smart listening features were praised in one review as part of a broad feature set intended to elevate the listening experience.
-
Overall recommendations were strongly positive, with most reviewers calling the P100 high-value, competitive or easy to recommend, despite some caveats.
-
aptX support was repeatedly treated as a premium strength, especially aptX Lossless and Adaptive for higher-quality Bluetooth playback.
-
Codec support was praised as broad and high-end, centered on aptX Lossless and aptX Adaptive, though PCMag still preferred LDAC availability.
-
Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers calling the headphones premium, robust, top-notch or substantial.
-
USB-C was a strength, especially for charging and wired digital playback, with reviewers praising hi-res wired output and easy computer connection.
-
Fast charging was praised across reviews, with five-minute top-ups repeatedly described as useful, powerful or impressive.
-
Connectivity options were a strength, with reviewers valuing Bluetooth, USB-C digital audio, 3.5mm support and included cables.
-
Hi-res wired and DAC-related playback were viewed positively, especially USB-C lossless playback and direct wired listening quality.
-
Immersive audio quality was praised through spatiality, cohesive presentation and a sense of being pulled into the music.
-
Replaceable pads and battery support were a strong repairability advantage and helped reviewers view the headphones as longer-lasting.
-
Sustainable materials were praised, especially recycled content, plastic-free packaging and an eco-conscious design approach.
-
Cable quality was praised in Tom’s Guide, which described the bundled audio cables as durable woven fabric.
-
Reviewers broadly praised the P100’s sound as detailed, clean, spacious and high-value, though What Hi-Fi and PCMag wanted more energy or EQ help.
-
EQ customization was one of the clearest software strengths, with reviewers praising the seven-band EQ and how well the sound responds to tuning.
-
Multipoint was a consistent strength, with reviewers reporting smooth dual-device pairing, hitch-free operation or fast switching.
-
Bluetooth performance was generally reliable, with reviewers citing stable pairing, good range, basement roaming and compatibility across devices.
-
Premium feel was generally strong, with praise for materials, style and finish, though What Hi-Fi noted cheap-feeling earcups.
-
Soundstage evidence was positive overall, with reviewers describing wide, expansive, spacious or plausible imaging for a closed-back ANC headphone.
-
Ear cup padding was widely praised as soft, plush, well-cushioned or snug without suffocating the ears.
-
Android compatibility was positive, with Android USB recognition and Google Fast Pair both described favorably.
-
Firmware support was viewed positively where discussed, with the app framed as a path to future features and tweaks.
-
One reviewer praised high-volume clarity by noting zero distortion while highs remained retained clearly.
-
Sensors were praised in one review as a cool wear-detection feature, though other wear-detection attributes show reliability caveats.
-
Bass was usually described as punchy, controlled and substantial without overwhelming other frequencies, with only one What Hi-Fi comparison finding it short on kick.
-
Design was generally praised as attractive, stylish and well put together, though a few reviewers found the headband shape or bulk less flattering.
-
The app was generally viewed as useful, simple or feature-rich, though some reviewers saw it mainly as a firmware and EQ utility.
-
Physical button controls were mostly praised as simple, tactile and preferable to touch, despite Tom’s Guide finding the control layout imperfect.
-
Treble was generally praised for bite, sparkle and articulation without harshness, while PCMag noted some upper-register energy was missing by default.
-
Frequency balance was generally praised as natural, flat or properly balanced, though PCMag and What Hi-Fi wanted more default liveliness.
-
Instrument separation was a recurring strength, with reviewers noting clear detail retrieval, distinct vocals and instruments, and strong layering.
-
Setup and software simplicity were generally strong, with reviewers calling setup child’s play, the interface simple, and controls straightforward.
-
Included accessories were well received, especially the case, storage pouch and USB-C or 3.5mm cabling.
-
Bluetooth 5.3 was treated positively where evaluated, especially as newer, stronger and more reliable.
-
Headband adjustment was positively described as stable, seamless or cleanly integrated into the design.
-
Volume and dynamic output were rated highly, with reviewers describing strong headroom, loud maximum levels and excellent dynamic range.
-
Auto power-off was praised as useful for forgetful users and battery conservation.
-
What Hi-Fi praised the smoothly rotating hinges as part of the headphones’ assured style and construction.
-
Most reviewers found vocals and mids clear, expressive and well placed, although What Hi-Fi and one YouTube reviewer heard a thinner or less forward midrange.
-
Travel friendliness was strong because of battery life and isolation, but softened by the relatively bulky case and non-folding design.
-
Passive isolation was viewed positively, with reviewers saying the fit and earcups blocked or reduced outside sound effectively even before ANC.
-
Discreet aesthetics were mostly positive, with praise for subtle branding and finishes, though one reviewer disliked the headband silhouette.
-
ANC’s effect on the sound signature was mostly positive, with no tonal shift in one review and a bass boost in another.
-
Sidetone was praised by one reviewer who liked hearing some of their own voice during calls.
-
Audio-video sync was generally strong thanks to gaming or low-latency modes, though PCMag said latency was reduced rather than eliminated.
-
The case was usually praised for protection, storage and fit, but several reviewers still noted its larger or chunkier footprint.
-
3.5mm analog support was positive overall because reviewers valued wired flexibility, though one reviewer noted the port requires the supplied USB-C adapter.
-
Ecosystem integration evidence was limited but positive, with Google Fast Pair enabling one-tap pairing.
-
Call quality was mixed but mostly favorable, with strong speech intelligibility in some reviews and weaker, distant mic capture in PCMag.
-
Multi-platform support was generally positive across Android, iOS, macOS and Windows, though Apple wired behavior was less smooth in one review.
-
Voice assistant integration was rated adequate, with Tom’s Guide calling hands-free commands fine and speech capture accurate.
-
Long-use comfort was mixed: many found the P100 comfortable for hours, but Tom’s Guide and PCMag reported discomfort, weight or pressure points.
-
Transparency mode drew mixed-to-positive reactions: several found it useful or natural, while others said clarity and ambient audibility needed work.
-
Preset EQ reactions were mixed: some liked Flat or broader presets, while PCMag said presets did not restore enough energy.
-
ANC was seen as good to very good for the price, especially for low-frequency noise, but reviewers repeatedly said Bose, Sony or AirPods Max still do better.
-
Weight comfort was mixed: some reviewers felt the weight was distributed well, while others called the headphones heavy, bulky or heavier than rivals.
-
Ear cup swivel and rotation were generally useful, though PCMag felt the rotation would matter more if the case supported flat storage.
-
Advanced software features were adequate rather than class-leading, with useful app functions but fewer modern extras than some rivals.
-
Clamping force was divisive, with some calling it well judged or Goldilocks-approved and others finding the fit tight or pressure-inducing.
-
Launch features were viewed as adequate to good, but reviewers wanted more modern extras such as spatial audio or more polished software features.
-
Microphone noise handling was split: some reviewers heard reduced echo and clear calls, while PCMag found background noise still came through.
-
ANC’s audio impact was mixed: some heard no tonal shift or a useful bass boost, while others heard crackle or distracting movement artifacts.
-
Headband padding was mixed: one review wanted it softer, while others praised the soft lining or found pressure points after long wear.
Cons
-
ANC background noise was a concern in quieter use, with static or clicking mentioned by multiple reviewers.
-
Wind and movement noise handling was a recurring concern, with several reviewers hearing wind, popping, footstep or left/right ANC artifacts.
-
Auto-play/wear detection was mixed in PCMag because it resumed playback even when the user had paused manually.
-
Stability was weak for active use: reviewers reported looseness, popping with movement, slipping, or suitability mainly for stationary listening.
-
Portability was a limitation, with reviewers noting the P100 does not fold small and is not among the sleekest or most compact over-ears.
-
Smart Pause performance was weak to mixed, with reviewers reporting delayed, context-insensitive or inconsistent auto-pause behavior.
-
Wear detection performance was mixed-to-weak, with reviewers noting delays, context issues or oversensitivity before firmware updates.
-
LDAC was a weakness in the one review that discussed it, because the reviewer preferred LDAC over aptX Lossless for Android hi-res listening.
-
Spatial audio was a clear limitation, with reviewers noting no spatial audio and steering head-tracking seekers toward other brands.
-
Head-tracked 3D audio was a weak area because Stereo Guide recommended Sony, Apple or Bose for that feature set.
-
Touch controls were not implemented, and Tom’s Guide treated that absence as a missed opportunity for the earcup design.
-
Water resistance was a weakness in the one review that discussed it, noting there was no water-resistant rating.
-
Wear detection auto-pause was criticized by Tom’s Guide for not always initiating and sometimes delaying.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Cable quality, aptX, Sensors, near average in Overall recommendation, Sound quality, below average in Touch control responsiveness, Spatial audio, Stability.
Summary
85 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher42 (49%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts31 (36%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower12 (14%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cable quality | 4.6 | 3.0 | +1.6 |
| aptX | 4.6 | 3.3 | +1.3 |
| Sensors | 4.5 | 3.0 | +1.5 |
| Touch control responsiveness | 2.5 | 4.0 | -1.5 |
| Voice prompts/feedback | 4.9 | 3.6 | +1.3 |
| Sustainability and repairability | 4.7 | 3.6 | +1.0 |
| Spatial audio | 2.5 | 3.7 | -1.2 |
| Codec support | 4.6 | 3.7 | +0.9 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Stability
Choose Marshall Milton A.N.C.. It scores 4.8 vs 2.9 for Stability, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Touch control responsiveness
Choose JLab Epic Lux Lab Edition Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.6 vs 2.5 for Touch control responsiveness, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better Clamping force comfort
Choose Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones. It scores 4.8 vs 3.7 for Clamping force comfort, with a 4.0 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: noise cancellation Crutchfield places P100 noise cancellation a notch below Sony WH-1000XM5.
- Better: LDAC support PCMag prefers Sony WH-1000XM5 for LDAC support because the P100 lacks LDAC.
- More expensive: price What Hi-Fi says the P100 undercuts the official Sony WH-1000XM5 benchmark price.
- More expensive: sound quality and price Techaeris says AirPods Max can match the sound, but the P100 costs much less.
- Compared: updated tuning and comfort What Hi-Fi says the P100 SE appears to target the original P100's comfort and sound limitations.
FAQ
How good does the Melomania P100 sound?
Reviewers mostly praised the sound as clean, detailed, spacious and balanced, with controlled bass and clear vocals. The main caveat is that What Hi-Fi and PCMag wanted more default punch or energy.
Is the ANC class-leading?
No. Reviewers generally found ANC good or very effective for the price, especially for low-frequency noise, but several said Bose, Sony or AirPods Max still cancel noise better.
How strong is battery life?
Battery life is the strongest consensus point. Reviews repeatedly highlighted up to 60 hours with ANC and up to 100 hours without ANC as class-leading or benchmark-level.
Are the headphones comfortable for long sessions?
Comfort is mixed. Some reviewers wore them for hours comfortably, while others found the clamp, weight, headband or pressure points tiring.
Can they be used wired?
Yes. Reviews mention USB-C digital audio and USB-C-to-3.5mm analog support, with several praising the flexibility and hi-res wired playback quality.
Is the app useful?
Yes, mainly for EQ, ANC settings, firmware updates and wear detection toggles. Reviewers especially liked the seven-band EQ, though the broader feature set was not as advanced as some premium rivals.
Are they good for travel?
They suit travel because of battery life, passive isolation and solid ANC, but the large case and non-folding design make them less ideal for packing light.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
whathifi.com
- Review score
- 4.0
Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider
Best for thunderous adjustable bass, cleaner Bose-tuned sound, long battery life, and a feature-rich app. Skip it if you want neutral tuning, a light secure fit, top-tier consistency from ANC,...
Pros: Treble clarity, Instrument separation
Cons: Codec support, Headband adjustability
Choose the 105 Silva for premium comfort, repairable build, musical mids, and immersive home listening. Skip it if you need ANC, Bluetooth, strong isolation, or the most neutral sound at...
Pros: Sustainability and repairability, Replaceable pads/headband
Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Travel friendliness
Choose the Milton A.N.C. for class-leading on-ear battery life, tactile controls, repairable parts, and lively sound. Skip it if you need over-ear isolation, dependable wear detection, natural call quality, or...
Pros: Multipoint connectivity reliability, Codec support
Cons: aptX, Smart Pause performance
Choose the Px7 S3 if sound quality, premium build, and a slim stylish design matter most. Skip it if you need the strongest ANC, fold-flat travel compactness, LDAC, or feature-heavy...
Pros: Frequency response accuracy, Multipoint connectivity reliability
Cons: LDAC, Wear detection performance