Medium-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, including embedded dirt and pet hair. It performs close to the better carpet-focused robots in normal use.
Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Filtration / Dust Containment
Cons: Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters
Medium-pile carpet pickup was generally strong, with above-average or very strong carpet-cleaning results reported.
Pros: Maneuverability and Handling, Versatility
Cons: Under-Furniture Pickup, Low-profile design
Medium-pile carpet evidence was positive in one detailed test that praised sand pickup on low and medium pile carpet.
Pros: Hair Pickup — Carpets, Large debris handling
Cons: Stuck resistance, Dirty water sensor
Medium-pile carpet performance is excellent, with strong grooming and clean carpet lines without needing floorhead adjustments.
Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Tool-change simplicity
Cons: Noise level, Product availability
One reviewer found the carpet looked refreshed after a pass, but carpet-specific evidence was otherwise more mixed by pile type.
Pros: Tool-change simplicity, Versatility
Cons: Value-for-money, Support and Reliability
Medium-carpet pickup was inconsistent, with some oat and benchmark pickup praise but poor sand, flour, and deeper carpet results in other tests.
Pros: Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed, Ongoing ownership costs (bags
Cons: Filtration / Dust Containment, Under-Furniture Pickup
Carpet pickup is mixed in PCMag's test: rice pickup was strong, but sand pickup was weak.
Pros: Stuck resistance, Assembly and Setup
Cons: Clogging and debris prevention, Suitability for small spaces
Medium/carpet pickup was a weak point in one review, which reported performance dropping when vacuuming carpets.
Pros: Versatility, Floor shine after cleaning
Cons: Odor control, Stuck resistance
Medium/fluffier carpet pickup was weaker in one home test, where powder and oats remained after cleaning.
Pros: Sanitizing performance, Odor control
Cons: Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed, Ongoing ownership costs (bags