Shark Cordless Vacuum IZ362H
Highest scored product for this feature based on supporting review evidence.
Highest scored product for this feature based on supporting review evidence.
Balances feature score, supporting reviews, and overall product strength.
Has the broadest review evidence for this feature.
Strongest overall product among items with scored evidence for this feature.
Showing Shark only. Switch back to all brands anytime.
Carpet pickup on the tested rug/fitted-carpet style surface was excellent, with debris cleaned in the initial pass.
Pros: Overall durability/longevity, Build quality and durability
Cons: Packaging quality, Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake
Medium-pile performance is described as excellent, including at least one deep-clean style test result that was essentially perfect. Overall sentiment suggests strong carpet cleaning when not dealing with plush high-pile.
Pros: Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup, Hair Pickup — Hard Floors
Cons: Clogging &, debris prevention
Medium-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, with high debris removal in lab-style tests and good deep-cleaning impressions.
Pros: Suction &, Airflow
Cons: Storage footprint &, upright-stand stability
Medium-pile and deep carpet evidence is strong, including perfect or near-leading deep-clean results in several tests.
Pros: Assembly and Setup, Carpet — High-Pile Pickup
Cons: Clogging and debris prevention, Cyclone performance
Medium-pile carpet performance is generally strong, with some testing showing excellent deep-clean pickup. Most reviewers consider it effective on typical rugs and mid-pile carpet.
Pros: Hair Pickup — Hard Floors, Suitability for heavy-duty use
Cons: Hose length, Suitability for small spaces
On medium-pile carpet, reviews that measured pickup report very high removal rates, helped by the PowerFins’ agitation.
Pros: Cordless convenience, Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup
Cons: Weight, Aesthetic design &
Medium-pile carpet deep cleaning is often a highlight, with at least one lab-style comparison giving it top-tier embedded debris results in its price segment.
Pros: Price &, Value
Cons: Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors), Carpet — High-Pile Pickup
Medium-pile carpet cleaning is frequently described as deep and thorough, with visible grooming lines and a surprising amount of hidden dirt pulled out. Some users say the head can feel...
Pros: Assembly and Setup, Cord length
Cons: Area Rug Handling, Cord management
Medium-pile carpet performance is consistently strong in both subjective impressions and structured pickup tests, with many reviewers describing visibly revived carpets. Some note that the unit may require multiple passes...
Pros: Filtration / Dust Containment, Versatility
Cons: Area Rug Handling, Hose length
Medium-carpet and general carpet cleaning is described as powerful, including strong deep-clean results for embedded grit and solid pickup in one to two passes. Some users still report a bit...
Pros: Carpet — High-Pile Pickup, Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup
Cons: Cordless convenience, Bin &
Medium-pile carpet performance is one of its best categories in testing-style reviews, including strong deep-clean outcomes; some households still report visible hair left behind depending on settings and battery constraints.
Pros: Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors), Bin &
Cons: Software-update support / feature longevity, Privacy controls
Across standardized testing and mainstream reviews, medium/standard carpet pickup is excellent with few repeat passes needed. A technician review strongly disagrees, reporting poor fine-sand pickup on carpet and scattered debris.
Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)
Cons: Overall durability/longevity, Support &
Carpet cleaning is often rated very good to excellent, including deep-clean style tests. One lab-style review found only average per-pass pickup versus top competitors, so expectations should be calibrated to...
Pros: Under-Furniture Pickup, Filtration / Dust Containment
Cons: Stuck resistance, Weight
Deep‑clean performance on medium pile is consistently strong in lab-style tests, often scoring in the mid‑90s range for embedded debris pickup.
Pros: Versatility, Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors
Cons: Overall durability/longevity, Storage footprint &
Medium-carpet pickup was good overall with the motorized tool, though some tests still required additional passes.
Pros: Clogging and debris prevention, Cyclone performance
Cons: Onboard tool storage, Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors
One reviewer found the carpet looked refreshed after a pass, but carpet-specific evidence was otherwise more mixed by pile type.
Pros: Tool-change simplicity, Versatility
Cons: Value-for-money, Support and Reliability
Medium-pile cleaning is described as decent overall, though some debris can flick sideways and may need additional passes. Pet hair removal on medium pile improves notably when using the mini...
Pros: Assembly and Setup, Hair Pickup — Hard Floors
Cons: Cordless convenience, Filtration / Dust Containment
Adequate-to-good on medium pile, sometimes needing multiple passes for fine dust at the center and edges. Performance is generally below full-size plug-in uprights but competitive with many sticks.
Pros: Weight, Ongoing ownership costs (bags
Cons: Onboard tool storage, Ease of use
Medium-pile or deep-carpet pickup was only average to below average in test-heavy reviews, especially with embedded sand.
Pros: Tool-change simplicity, Overall durability/longevity
Cons: Clogging and debris prevention, Suitability for heavy-duty use
Medium/longer carpet pickup was mixed to weak, with reviewers noting visible fluff or granular debris left behind.
Pros: Stair Cleaning, Filtration / Dust Containment
Cons: Support and Reliability, Heating element
Medium/general carpet evidence was weak, with one reviewer saying it did not get deep into carpet effectively.
Pros: Tool-change simplicity, Stair Cleaning
Cons: Onboard tool storage, Carpet — High-Pile Pickup