Compare Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones vs Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones

ANC is generally rated as strong for the price and especially helpful against low-frequency hum/rumble, but it is not consistently described as flagship-grade and can let in some noise (notably on flights or distant traffic). Some reviews highlight granular ambient/ANC controls in the app and adaptive behaviors, while others focus on simple mode toggling. Overall adjustability is viewed as good for the price.

Compatibility is framed as mainstream-friendly across phones and computers via Bluetooth and a 3.5mm jack; Android-specific advantages are primarily discussed in the context of codec support in one source.

The Sony companion app is repeatedly cited as a major value add, offering EQ, feature toggles, and adaptive behaviors; one review notes account requirements for full access.

Multiple reviews explicitly call out that aptX (including low-latency variants) is not supported, positioning these as more mainstream than enthusiast-focused for codecs.

Several sources imply this is not a gaming/low-latency-focused headset, noting missing low-latency modes/codecs. At least one review says video sync issues are minimal for most people, but latency could be better.

Bass is frequently emphasized: some praise punch and warmth, while others describe it as boomy/loose or overwhelming without EQ, and not as controlled as higher-end options.

Bass is generally controlled and textured, with some listeners hearing a fuller, pillowy low end and others calling it restrained or dry compared with bassier alternatives. Sub-bass is present but not the main emphasis, so slam-heads may want more weight.

Battery life is a consistent strength. Multiple reviews cite around 35 hours with ANC on, and at least one measured test lands near 40 hours.

Once paired, Bluetooth stability is generally reported as solid, with stable connections across typical use; a few note initial pairing quirks on some devices.

Build is the most common compromise: many describe a plasticky, budget feel (sometimes even 'toy-like'), while others find it sturdy enough with minimal creaks. Durability concerns come up often.

Build quality is consistently described as excellent, with premium materials, tight assembly, and a refined feel. Several reviews highlight serviceability and long-term durability as part of the value proposition.

Physical buttons are broadly seen as reliable and easy to use. Multiple reviewers note the buttons can feel similar, causing occasional mis-presses until you learn them.

Cables are generally considered usable, though at least one review calls out the included cables as short for some desk/PC setups.

Cable impressions are mixed: many find the stock cable sturdy and functional, but some report microphonics or less-than-ideal ergonomics, and several note the lack of a balanced stock option.

A recurring complaint is the lack of an included carrying case/pouch, pushing buyers toward aftermarket protection if traveling.

The included hard/semi-hard case is widely praised as well-made and protective, with room for cables/adapters and a secure zipper. It supports storage and occasional transport effectively.

Fast top-ups are a highlight across several sources, commonly described as roughly an hour of playback from a very short charge. Full recharge times are described as reasonable for the class.

Most describe a secure but not crushing clamp that stays put; a minority warn glasses wearers may feel pressure.

Clamp force is generally described as moderate and well-distributed, supporting stability without obvious pain. A handful of impressions mention the clamp feeling a bit tight out of the box, with minor adjustment/break-in helping.

Codec support is commonly described as limited at this price tier (often AAC/SBC), with repeated mentions that premium/low-latency options are missing.

Comfort is widely praised, especially for all-day desk use and commuting. A few note heat/stickiness over time or fit sensitivity (glasses pressure, ear contact for some).

Comfort is a consistent strength: the self-adjusting suspension design and soft pads enable long listening sessions for most people. A few note fit quirks (small cups for some ears or clamp that starts slightly tight).

Design is generally described as minimalist and attractive enough for everyday wear, with common color options and a clean look that reads more understated than flashy.

Design is a standout, with walnut accents and Meze’s mid-century styling repeatedly called premium-looking and distinctive. Even critics of the tuning tend to praise the aesthetics and finish quality.

The detachable dual 3.5mm system is convenient for replacement, yet recessed/narrow connector sizing can limit third-party cable compatibility compared with more universal designs. Connection security itself is generally praised.

The included USB-C DAC dongle/adapter is viewed as a nice convenience for modern devices, generally adequate for casual listening. Enthusiast reviewers still expect better performance from dedicated DAC/amps.

Padding is generally described as decent for the price, though several reviews call it thinner/less plush than premium models and some mention it can feel sticky with longer wear.

Velour/suede pads are commonly described as plush, breathable, and comfortable, helping distribute pressure and avoid hotspots. Some users wish for a touch more ear room, but pad comfort is still rated highly.

No summary yet.

Cup articulation is generally sufficient for a good seal/fit, with tilt helping the pads conform, though some describe movement as limited compared with more freely articulating designs.

EQ control is frequently praised as effective, with several reviewers recommending EQ tweaks to reduce treble fatigue or rebalance bass/mids.

Tonality is often described as balanced or smooth rather than strictly neutral, with a coherent frequency integration that avoids obvious bloat. Some characterize it as tastefully colored (warm-bright/W-shaped) rather than reference-flat.

The auto/self-adjusting headband system is repeatedly singled out as one of the best parts of the design, requiring little to no fiddling while spreading pressure evenly. It also helps with consistent fit and comfort over time.

Hinge/long-term durability is frequently treated as a watch-out due to light plastics and the non-folding design; at least one review warns pressure on the swivel/hinge could risk breakage.

Build discussions suggest robust hinges and a durable chassis, with spring-steel structures and solid joints expected to hold up well over years of use.

In-box accessories are usually described as basic: commonly a USB-C charging cable and a 3.5mm audio cable, with no case included.

Accessories are generally seen as generous for the price: a protective case, cables, and adapters (often including USB-C). The main recurring complaint is the absence of a balanced cable in the box.

Instrument separation is generally framed as good for casual listening but not class-leading; several reviews explicitly say separation/resolution trails more expensive models.

Instrument separation and imaging are widely regarded as excellent for the price, helping complex mixes stay organized and making positional cues easy to track. Even reviewers who nitpick tuning tend to credit the Silva’s placement and delineation.

Most reviews state there is no LDAC/hi-res support, but one review explicitly lists LDAC among available codecs. Treat LDAC support as inconsistent across sources and confirm if it matters to you.

When pushed louder, reviewers who mention it report the presentation staying composed, with bass and treble control holding together without obvious strain.

Noise reduction for calls is described as above average for the class (including some wind handling), but multiple sources say it can struggle in very noisy settings like loud cafes or heavy traffic.

Call mic quality is generally reported as good for a built-in headphone mic, with clear speech in typical environments.

Midrange is a mixed bag: several say vocals can be strong or pleasant (especially after EQ), while others report recessed or slightly muffled mids in the default tuning.

Midrange is a highlight for many, with clear, forward vocals/instruments and an overall transparent character. A few note that certain vocal ranges can sound a bit thin, scooped, or pushed depending on recording and pairing.

Reviewers frequently describe good compatibility across sources (phones with dongles, laptops, DAPs, and desktop amps), helped by easy drivability. Some note it scales with source quality and can reveal harshness from poor gear.

Multipoint is repeatedly mentioned as a key convenience feature and usually works well, though some report occasional switching wobbles that resolve on a second try or after enabling it in-app.

Passive isolation is typically described as decent but limited by lighter padding versus premium models, making ANC do more of the heavy lifting.

As open-backs, passive isolation is low and sound leakage is expected; a couple of reviewers note mild attenuation compared to very open designs, but these are still best for quiet rooms.

Most sources emphasize the headphones do not fold, typically only swiveling flat, which hurts packability even though the low weight makes them easy to carry.

Portability is mixed: they’re easy to drive and include a protective case, but the open-back design and size make them better suited to home or quiet environments than true travel/commute use.

Preset EQ profiles are described as useful but can be taste-dependent; at least one review notes a preset can make bass or treble feel overcooked until adjusted.

Where discussed, earpads are replaceable and intended for long-term ownership, with guides or documentation supporting pad swaps and maintenance.

Wear-detection sensors are repeatedly called out as missing, and auto-pause features are often described as reserved for higher-end Sony models.

Finish-related notes vary: some mention a matte texture that helps with fingerprints, while at least one review warns lighter colorways can pick up dirt and need cleaning.

Overall sound is described as enjoyable and competitive for the price, often bass-forward and lively. Many recommend using EQ to refine balance; multiple reviews still note limits in dynamics, resolution, or naturalism versus premium models. Wired listening via 3.5mm is supported and generally works well when powered. Some notes suggest passive/off listening changes the sound and is less impressive.

Across reviews, the 105 Silva is described as an engaging open-back with a premium “Meze” presentation: natural timbre, strong technicalities for the price, and a tuning that favors musical enjoyment over strict neutrality. A minority find the voicing less competitive on pure sound-per-dollar versus cheaper rivals without EQ.

Soundstage impressions vary: some call it wider than expected for the price, while others describe it as narrower/compact compared to Sony flagships, with depth often the weaker dimension.

Soundstage impressions vary: some describe it as expansive, airy, and three-dimensional, while others find it only moderately wide or a touch narrow with limited depth/layering. Imaging is commonly cited as more consistent than sheer stage size.

No summary yet.

Fit stability is usually strong thanks to moderate clamp and the suspension design, with reports of little slippage and secure positioning. One review flags potential fit issues for smaller heads due to the frame geometry.

Sustainability is repeatedly tied to Meze’s serviceable approach: parts can be replaced rather than discarding the headphone, supporting longevity and repairability over time.

Transparency/ambient mode is often described as effective and natural for the price, though a few mention mild hiss or a slightly processed effect.

Treble is often described as clear but can be boosted/peaky and fatiguing for some listeners until EQ adjustments tame it; others find it smooth enough for longer sessions.

Treble is typically praised for clarity and refinement, but several reviews note peaks/extra air that can sound a little spicy, sizzly, or less forgiving on bright or compressed tracks. Others hear it as smooth and well-balanced for long sessions.

USB-C charging is repeatedly noted and treated as the expected modern standard for this model.

USB-C support comes via an included adapter/dongle, enabling plug-and-play use with phones and computers lacking a headphone jack. It’s positioned as convenience rather than a high-end solution.

Voice assistant support is mentioned across reviews (e.g., triggering assistants via button hold), and is treated as a standard convenience feature rather than a headline differentiator.

Multiple reviews call the 105 Silva very easy to drive (high sensitivity, modest impedance) and capable of reaching loud listening levels from phones, dongles, laptops, and DAPs. Higher-quality sources can still improve refinement and control.

Water/sweat resistance is described as absent (no waterproof rating), and at least one review cautions against heavy sweat, making them a fair-weather choice.

A consistent standout: reviewers repeatedly call these exceptionally light for over-ears (around the ~190g range) and easy to wear for long sessions.

At roughly mid-300g, the Silva isn’t ultra-light, but reviewers frequently say it feels lighter on-head due to excellent weight distribution. Most report minimal fatigue from weight during extended sessions.