Compare Lockly Visage Zeno Series Smart Lock vs Schlage Encode Smart Lock

Access logs and history views are available in-app, though one reviewer noted multiple log views can be confusing rather than helpful.

Activity history is consistently highlighted as useful and detailed, showing who locked/unlocked, when it happened, and which method was used, with logs available without a subscription in most discussions.

The built-in alarm exists on most configurations, but reviewers disagree on loudness: some call it very loud or irritating, while at least one source describes it as relatively quiet in practice.

Lockly Home offers a cleaner interface than older Lockly apps, but setup and navigation still feel uneven, with some settings hard to find and occasional crashes or quirks reported.

Schlage Home app is widely described as straightforward for everyday locking, code management, schedules, and history; the main complaints are onboarding confusion when pairing with third-party ecosystems or needing multiple apps for Amazon Key/Ring use.

Auto-lock is configurable and works well when the door and strike are well-aligned, but some reports suggest it can fail or beep if the deadbolt does not slide smoothly. Facial recognition auto-unlock is the headline feature and is widely described as fast, reliable, and hard to spoof, working in bright sun, low light, and with sunglasses in most tests.

Auto-lock is frequently praised for preventing forgotten locks, with adjustable delays from seconds to minutes; a minority caution that auto-lock can be annoying if the door is often opened/closed rapidly or if alignment causes bolt contact. Auto-unlock is repeatedly listed as missing, and reviewers suggest paying more for a different model if hands-free entry is a must-have.

After multiple invalid code attempts, the lock can temporarily disable keypad entry to slow brute-force guessing; this protection is noted as effective, though alerts about the event may be more visible in logs than as real-time notifications.

Backset appears adjustable for common 2 3/8-inch and 2 3/4-inch configurations, as shown in installation guidance.

Backset support is reported for common 2-3/8 inch and 2-3/4 inch configurations via an adjustable latch, covering typical residential doors; uncommon backsets may require different hardware.

Rechargeable battery packs (often with a spare included) reduce downtime, but real-world longevity varies by settings like always-on face scanning and Wi-Fi usage, ranging from weeks in max scanning mode to months with power saving.

Battery life is commonly estimated around six months for Wi-Fi use, with real-world reports ranging from better-than-expected to shorter than some non-Wi-Fi models; most agree Wi-Fi convenience comes with more frequent AA changes.

Bluetooth is required for initial setup and enrolling faces/fingerprints; it usually works, though some reviewers reported short connection windows or limited range (and noted the use of older Bluetooth versions).

Bluetooth is mentioned as a local fallback and pairing method, helping nearby control even when the internet is down; locksmith reviews call out modern, encrypted Bluetooth as a positive differentiator.

Build quality is often described as sturdy and premium (zinc alloy and a substantial feel), even when reviewers disagree about the aesthetics or bulk.

Build quality is consistently described as sturdy, heavy, and premium, with special praise for the exterior hardware; a few critiques focus on the bulky interior housing and plastic battery compartment aesthetics rather than durability.

The included wired door-sense/contact sensor is accurate but often criticized for looking inelegant and adding extra wiring; some users wish it were built-in or removable.

Door-sense is frequently cited as absent, which means the lock may auto-lock even if the door is not fully closed unless users are attentive or add a separate sensor-based workflow.

Door compatibility is typical for a full deadbolt swap, but the lock performs best when the door closes cleanly and the bolt slides smoothly into the strike.

Door fit is largely standard for deadbolt replacements, though some installers needed to adjust strike alignment or manage a tight cable path; once aligned, operation is smooth even on slightly imperfect doors.

It installs as a standard deadbolt replacement, and some reviewers noted they could reuse existing cutouts or sensor placements from prior locks, reducing additional door work.

Encode is a full deadbolt replacement but reuses standard door prep (common holes and latch dimensions), so most users do not need door modifications unless their existing setup is nonstandard or misaligned.

Several reviewers referenced firmware/app updates (or promised updates) aimed at improving setup reliability and usability, suggesting the experience can change over time.

Firmware or feature updates are referenced mainly during setup, with some users noting initial update friction; once updated, the lock generally runs smoothly and app features remain stable.

Fingerprint unlock is typically quick and accurate, though at least one reviewer found it hit-or-miss depending on finger angle and the scanner’s placement.

Fingerprint unlocking is not available on Encode, and at least one reviewer frames that absence as the main feature they would add.

Finish options and styling are often praised, and some sources cite top-grade finish ratings; most feedback suggests the exterior holds up well, with limited long-term wear data in the reviewed set.

Multiple reviews explicitly call out the lack of geofencing features on this model, so proximity-based automation is not part of the Encode experience.

Guest access is robust, including multiple user PINs, time-restricted or one-time codes, and in some cases offline codes or shared digital keys depending on platform.

Encode supports up to about 100 user PINs plus temporary or recurring schedules, making it well-suited for families, guests, and service providers without handing out physical keys.

The Visage’s built-in Wi-Fi means no separate hub is required, a clear upgrade over older hub-dependent smart locks.

Multiple reviewers praise that Encode connects directly to Wi-Fi with no bridge or hub, which simplifies setup and ongoing use compared with add-on adapters.

Installation is generally DIY-friendly with good templates and guides, but several reviewers said the process can be lengthy and cable management inside the housing can be frustrating.

Installation is usually quick with a screwdriver and standard deadbolt holes; the snap-in/faceplate design helps one-person installs, but a few testers found alignment or juggling parts tricky on certain doors.

Jam detection/alerts are mentioned as part of the notification set, allowing you to be warned if the lock reports a jam or locking issue.

Backup entry options include a physical key and a USB-C emergency power port, which reviewers view as important failsafes.

Physical key override is valued as a reliable fallback for dead batteries or connectivity issues; some reviewers note only one key is included, but the cylinder is easy to rekey or match to a home.

The PIN Genie keypad improves security by shuffling digits, but it can slow entry and increase mistakes compared with a normal keypad.

No summary yet.

The key cylinder is rekeyable (noted as a 5-pin style in some videos), though rekeying may take extra time due to seals and screws.

Keyway/cylinder quality is seen as solid and serviceable, with locksmith reviewers noting standard Schlage keyways and straightforward rekeying; ultimate high-security upgrades are possible for those who want them.

Unlock speed is frequently described as near-instant for face and fingerprint (around 1–2 seconds), while keypad entry is slower due to the shuffled layout.

Unlocking via code or app is usually near-instant, and the keypad response is praised; a few sources mention remote actions can take longer to reflect in the app due to cloud latency.

Motor noise is still present, but at least one reviewer noted it is noticeably quieter than older Lockly models.

Motor strength and reliability are praised for handling slight door misalignment, but multiple reviewers complain the motor can be loud or grinding, especially from the interior side.

Day-to-day locking reliability is mostly strong, especially for face unlock, though a minority of reviewers mention occasional Wi-Fi/app reliability issues or mechanical smoothness sensitivities.

Overall locking reliability is rated highly once installed and calibrated, with stable schedules and consistent app/keypad performance; most issues cluster around setup confusion and Wi-Fi signal quality, not day-to-day locking.

Notifications are flexible (lock/unlock, auto-lock, and sometimes jam alerts), but they can be noisy, leading some users to dial them back or disable duplicates across apps.

Notifications are generally responsive and configurable (including per-user alerts), but at least one reviewer notes that certain security events such as repeated wrong-code attempts may appear in history without an immediate push alert.

Physical security is described as solid, with references to ANSI Level 2 requirements, though at least one review noted the lock may not be formally certified, making it harder to validate beyond manufacturer claims.

Encode’s ANSI/BHMA Grade 1 ratings are repeatedly cited as a major advantage, with reviewers framing it as unusually robust for a consumer smart lock and better than typical Grade 2 options.

Several reviews point to strong resistance to common attacks and high-grade hardware, though most do not provide formal drill/pick test results; locksmith commentary suggests the cylinder is solid but not invulnerable and can be upgraded if desired.

Remote access via Wi-Fi/app is generally quick for lock/unlock and status checks, but some reviewers experienced occasional remote unavailability during testing.

Remote lock/unlock and status checks work well once connected, with occasional delays reported when commands travel through cloud integrations or Wi-Fi conditions are poor.

Security is reinforced by 3D facial scanning that resists photo spoofing, encrypted data handling claims, and the PIN Genie keypad design that reduces shoulder-surfing risk.

Security discussions highlight encrypted wireless communication (especially over Bluetooth in locksmith-focused reviews) and the importance of PIN requirements for sensitive actions like voice unlocking.

Integration is a major strength, with support for Apple Home/Home Key plus Alexa and Google; reviewers generally found commands and automations responsive once set up.

Integrations are strongest with Alexa, Google Assistant, Amazon Key, and select Ring doorbells/cameras; repeated drawbacks are no Apple HomeKit on this model, limited Google capabilities, no IFTTT/SmartThings, and known Ring Alarm limitations.

Tamper/forced-entry detection is available and sometimes adjustable in the app; it is treated as a useful deterrent, but real-world sensitivity and false-alarm rates are not uniformly tested across reviews.

The touchscreen is used for PIN entry and Home Key tapping; reviewers generally describe it as responsive and easy to read.

Touch interface is generally responsive and designed to reduce visible smudge patterns; several reviewers note it is not a phone-like glass touchscreen but works reliably in varied conditions.

User management is a strong point, with support for multiple users and methods (faces, fingerprints, PINs), though some reviewers found the workflow confusing at first until updates improved it.

User management is a standout: reviewers mention per-user schedules, easy creation/deletion of codes, optional virtual keys for app-based users, and role-like admin control through master codes.

At roughly $349, it sits at the premium end; many reviewers feel the feature set earns the price, while others think it is hard to justify without built-in video doorbell functionality.

Value is debated: many feel the hub-free Wi-Fi convenience and high security rating justify the premium, while others consider it expensive versus competitors, especially given missing HomeKit/geofencing and the need to replace AA batteries more often.

Voice control works with Alexa, Google, and Siri (via Apple Home), and reviewers commonly reported responsive lock/unlock commands and routine support.

Voice control is convenient for locking and status checks, and Alexa can unlock with a required voice PIN; Google Assistant is commonly reported as more limited, and voice actions can show mild latency.

Warranty expectations are generally positive, with specific mentions of multi-year electronics coverage and long mechanical coverage; support feedback is limited, but locksmith sources note brand familiarity and serviceability.

Weather protection is positioned as strong, with an IPX5 rating cited and settings like Rain mode intended to prevent false keypad triggers.

Weather resistance is generally treated as adequate for exterior use, with weatherproof keypad assemblies noted in at least one detailed spec-focused review.

Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi enables remote control without a hub, but a few reviewers saw intermittent connectivity or early firmware hiccups; power-saving modes can reduce Wi-Fi use to extend battery life.

Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi enables true remote control from anywhere; performance is generally reliable, though some users note occasional lag or weaker connections if the router signal is marginal.