Compare Lockly Visage Zeno Series Smart Lock vs Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock

Access-log evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer valuing real-time lock-activity monitoring.

Reviewers who discussed logs liked the recordkeeping, citing accurate history entries and even a year of usable activity history.

The app drew mixed reactions: reviewers liked the newer interface or slick setup tools, but several found it undercooked, confusing, or only mostly reliable.

The app was generally considered easy, clear, and responsive, though one review separated that from a difficult guest-code workflow.

Auto-lock worked well in favorable installs, but one reviewer warned it becomes unreliable when the deadbolt does not slide smoothly.

Auto-lock has limited but strong evidence, with PCMag reporting that the feature worked very well in testing.

Battery impressions were split between praise for the two rechargeable packs and complaints about short life under always-on scanning or default settings.

Battery evidence is limited to one long-term review, but that reviewer called performance stellar after about a year of use.

Bluetooth feedback was mixed, with complaints about short setup windows and Bluetooth 4.2 alongside one Apple Home user finding response times surprisingly good.

Bluetooth evidence is positive, with stable connectivity and unusually quick app response over Bluetooth range.

Build quality was generally praised as sturdy, sleek, and more substantial than some alternatives.

Build quality was repeatedly praised as sturdy, well-built, strong, and rock solid.

Camera and doorbell feedback was mostly about absence: reviewers liked the lock but wished the price included video surveillance, package awareness, or doorbell-style features.

Door-sense was the most consistent hardware complaint: it worked accurately for some reviewers, but many disliked the exposed wired sensor or complicated sensor alternatives.

Deadbolt fit was mostly manageable as a direct swap, but reviewers warned that the door and bolt need to move smoothly or the lock may struggle to auto-lock.

Compatibility evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers noting standard-door fit and successful single-doorknob replacement.

Facial recognition was the clearest consensus win, with reviewers repeatedly describing it as fast, accurate, reliable, and difficult to fool.

Feature-update evidence was limited to ZDNET, which said app updates improved user management and usability.

Fingerprint performance was mostly strong, but not universal: several reviewers found it fast and accurate, while others disliked placement or had hit-and-miss scans.

Fingerprint access is the strongest feature across reviews, described as fast, accurate, responsive, effective, and unusually good.

Guest access was useful for family or visitors, with reviewers praising custom codes, iCloud sharing, and easier guest entry.

Guest access is mixed: several reviewers liked the flexible access options, while one found temporary-code delivery convoluted and buggy.

Review evidence for hub requirement was positive: TechRadar specifically liked not needing a separate hub.

The hub requirement is a drawback because remote and voice features require added hardware and cost.

Reviewers split on the design: one called it Lockly's least attractive smart lock, another saw the newer design as more attractive, and a video reviewer still found it not especially attractive.

Design opinions are mixed: reviewers liked the attractive, premium look, but several also called the lock large, bulky, or obvious.

Installation was usually described as easy, painless, or straightforward, but several reviewers noted setup pain from cabling, Bluetooth timing, or deadbolt alignment.

Installation is sharply mixed, ranging from simple, app-guided, and quick to unusually complicated and frustrating.

The physical keys were a reliable backup in the reviews that discussed them, with one saying they were easy to use and another saying they turned smoothly.

Key backup evidence is positive, with reviewers valuing physical-key and backup access as a practical fallback.

The keypad was viewed as secure thanks to PIN Genie, though reviewers also said it can slow entry or make code entry less convenient.

The keypad and PIN Genie concept were widely praised for security and usability, although one reviewer found the shifting layout disorienting.

Keyway quality evidence was limited to one reviewer who said rekeying was possible but harder and more time-consuming than expected.

Lock and unlock speed was a major strength, especially facial recognition, with reviewers repeatedly describing access as nearly instant, quick, or within seconds.

Lock and unlock speed was consistently positive, with instant app response or unlocks taking only a couple of seconds.

Motor feedback was mixed: one reviewer praised the quieter operation, while another said the deadbolt mechanism was not as smooth as a cheaper alternative.

Motor evidence is limited, but PCMag praised the lock for relatively quiet operation.

Overall locking reliability was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers saying the lock worked perfectly, performed well, or kept working every time.

Locking reliability is mixed: some testing found smooth, great performance, while Digital Trends encountered unresolved calibration errors.

Notifications worked, but reviewers could find them excessive when both lock and smart-home platforms sent alerts.

Notifications are a weakness in the limited evidence, with PCMag specifically missing push notification support.

Remote access was divided, with quick on-demand actions in one review and Wi-Fi inaccessibility in another.

Remote access is a repeated limitation because the lock lacks built-in internet control and needs extra Wi-Fi hardware.

Security evidence was strong for anti-spoofing and privacy, with reviewers unable to fool face unlock using photos and one citing encryption as a strength.

Security evidence is positive, with praise for hack resistance and unusually comprehensive account-security setup.

Smart-home integration was broadly praised, especially Apple HomeKit/Home Key and Alexa routines, though one reviewer noted Matter and Thread were absent.

Smart-home integration is one of the clearest weaknesses, with repeated criticism of missing or limited platform support.

Touchscreen evidence was limited but positive, with PCMag reporting touchpad entries were processed immediately.

The touchscreen evidence is positive, with reviewers praising seamless operation and responsive keypad behavior.

User access management was generally strong after app updates, but initial user setup could be confusing.

User access management is mixed, combining flexible access options with one strong complaint about difficult PIN assignment.

Value opinions were context-dependent: reviewers saw strong feature value, but the high price, missing video, and battery caveats kept it from being an easy buy for everyone.

Value is a common concern because reviewers repeatedly describe the lock, hub path, or overall package as expensive.

Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, with PCMag and Tom's Guide reporting responsive or snappy results.

Voice control is limited because it is not built in and depends on extra Wi-Fi hardware that reviewers criticized.

Warranty evidence is strongly positive, with Digital Trends calling it one of the best in the smart-lock market.

Weather resistance evidence is positive but limited to one review that judged the casing able to handle harsh conditions.

Wi-Fi was a recurring caveat, including failed syncing, 2.4GHz-only support, spotty remote access, and battery-drain tradeoffs.

Wi-Fi is mixed: the lack of built-in Wi-Fi is criticized, but one review found hub-connected Wi-Fi response very fast.