Compare eufy Video Smart Lock E330 vs Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock

Event history is a consistent strength, with multiple reviewers highlighting detailed lock and camera logs that can identify who unlocked the door by fingerprint or code.

Reviews highlight detailed event history in the app, with lock/unlock entries tied to user and method; one reviewer notes being able to review long windows of history for shared spaces.

The Eufy app is broadly praised for setup, live view, quick lock controls, access management, and clear event history, with few complaints beyond battery-related settings tradeoffs.

The Lockly app is generally described as clean and responsive for basic lock/unlock, logs, and settings, but some reviewers found PIN and guest workflows overly complicated compared with rivals.

Auto-lock is widely described as reliable and flexible, with adjustable timers and scheduling, though it is timer-based rather than true door-position sensing.

Auto-locking is widely praised and configurable (often cited in the 5–300 second range), helping the door re-secure itself without relying on habits.

Wrong-try protection appears well implemented, letting owners lock out further attempts after repeated bad fingerprints or PIN entries.

A lockout style safeguard is described that disables keypad input after too many failed attempts, reducing brute-force code guessing.

The adjustable deadbolt and removable fit pieces help it adapt to common backset and bore variations on standard doors.

Battery life is the biggest unresolved weakness: light use can be respectable, but several reviewers saw much shorter runtimes than the 8-12 month marketing claim once motion, video, and notifications were active.

Battery life is described as strong on four AA cells, and the external 9V jump option reduces the risk of lockouts when batteries die.

Bluetooth helps with setup and is mentioned by some reviewers as an available unlock path, though Wi-Fi and fingerprint are the primary day-to-day methods.

Bluetooth performance is usually fast and stable for in-range control, though at least one review reports occasional trouble discovering the lock on some phones during setup.

Build quality is generally rated highly, with reviewers calling the exterior solid, premium-looking, and well made for a lock-camera combo.

Multiple reviews describe the hardware as sturdy and premium, but also noticeably large and heavy compared with sleeker competitors.

Reviewers generally liked the sharp 2K image, usable night vision, fast live view, and subscription-free local storage, but the camera side remains more compromised than a dedicated video doorbell because field of view, package visibility, and button discoverability can vary a lot by door layout.

Reviews indicate the E330 lacks true door-open and door-closed sensing, so auto-lock relies on timers instead of confirming the door position.

A door sensor is mentioned as an optional add-on to report open/closed state, but it is not consistently tested across reviews.

It fits standard deadbolt doors well, but compatibility gets worse with deep jambs, screen doors, unusual spacing, or layouts that block the camera's view.

Most reviewers report compatibility with standard doors, but at least one install required extra door prep (strike/side bracket work) and the weight can make alignment more sensitive.

Some installations reuse the existing strike plate or fit the current bore cleanly, but others require minor modification or a new strike fit.

Fingerprint entry is one of the product's clearest wins, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, and the preferred way to unlock.

The 3D fingerprint reader is repeatedly called fast and accurate; enrollment takes multiple scans but day-to-day unlocking is a standout convenience.

One review cites strong finish coverage, including a lifetime warranty on exterior finishes, supporting long-term cosmetic durability expectations.

Lineup comparisons indicate the E330 does not offer the location-based auto features found on higher-tier Eufy models.

Guest access is flexible, with permanent, temporary, scheduled, and one-time code options that reviewers found genuinely useful.

Access sharing is a strength: reviews mention temporary, scheduled, one-time, offline codes, and app-based sharing options; however, some find the onboarding and messaging flow confusing for casual guests.

A hub is optional rather than required: the lock works on its own, while HomeBase 3 mainly adds AI features, storage flexibility, and ecosystem extras.

Out of the box the lock is Bluetooth-first, and multiple reviews note that a separate Wi-Fi hub is needed for remote control and voice assistants.

Installation is usually quick and straightforward for standard doors, often landing in the 10-20 minute range, though edge cases can require minor door work.

Installation experiences vary from quick (around 15 minutes) to frustrating; the app guidance helps, but the heavy hardware and documentation can make assembly and alignment harder than average.

The hidden physical key and external USB-C emergency power option give the E330 credible backup access if the battery runs down.

Backup entry options are well covered, with a traditional key cylinder and an exterior 9V jump-power method noted for dead batteries.

The keypad works well and supports scramble PIN entry, but several reviewers note that the button area can be hard for visitors to find in the dark.

The PIN Genie keypad that shuffles digit positions is consistently praised for improving code privacy, though a reviewer notes it can feel disorienting for people who remember codes by shape.

The physical key backup is useful, but the cylinder cannot be rekeyed, which several reviewers see as a practical downside.

Locking and unlocking are generally quick, especially by fingerprint, with several reviewers describing the response as near-instant or sub-second.

Lock/unlock actions are commonly described as quick, including near-instant app commands within Bluetooth range and a few-second mechanical cycle.

Limited direct commentary suggests the motor is reasonably quick and quiet, but this is not as heavily discussed as fingerprint speed or battery drain.

Motor operation is described as relatively quiet compared with typical smart deadbolts.

The lock mechanism itself is consistently dependable in reviews, with few complaints about failed locking or unlocking once properly installed and calibrated.

Most reviews describe solid day-to-day operation, but one outlet reports calibration/status mismatches that made locked vs unlocked reporting unreliable in their testing.

Notifications are a strong point, with repeated praise for fast alerts from motion events, doorbell presses, and lock actions.

Push notifications are specifically called out as missing versus competing smart locks.

Evidence is limited but positive, including BHMA-related claims and durability figures that suggest a sturdier-than-average smart lock build.

Remote locking, unlocking, live view, and answering the door from the app all work well and are central to the product's appeal.

Remote locking/unlocking is not available without the optional Wi-Fi hub; with the hub, reviews describe convenient anywhere access through the app.

Security is a core theme: reviewers cite AES256/BLE security claims, the PIN-shuffling keypad, biometric anti-spoofing, lockout behavior, and privacy mode style controls.

Integration is good but not universal: Alexa and Google are commonly supported, HomeBase 3 adds more capability, and HomeKit support is notably absent.

Smart-home integration is limited without accessories; Alexa and Google support is tied to the Wi-Fi hub, while HomeKit, Matter, Thread, and IFTTT-style automation are repeatedly noted as absent or limited.

The touch-sensitive keypad is responsive and modern, though nighttime discoverability is not as polished as on some dedicated doorbells.

The touchscreen is generally responsive and easy to read, but its glossy surface can show fingerprints; its main value is supporting the dynamic PIN layout.

At least one review describes multi-step account or device activation verification (codes via SMS and email), indicating stronger account protection than many simple Bluetooth locks.

User management is robust, supporting admins, shared users, remote passcode assignment, and sizeable limits for codes and fingerprints.

User and guest management is feature-rich, offering multiple access types and schedules, but the depth can feel like overkill and harder to administer for short-term visitors.

Value is mixed: the combined lock-camera-doorbell design and no-subscription local storage are appealing, but the price stings more when battery life or fit issues reduce the benefit.

Value is the most common knock: reviewers call it expensive for a Bluetooth-first lock, especially once the Wi-Fi hub accessory is added.

Voice control through Alexa or Google is commonly supported and useful for basic lock commands, though it is more of a convenience layer than a standout feature.

Voice control is not native; Alexa and Google voice commands are described as available only when paired with the Wi-Fi hub.

Support and warranty coverage look adequate rather than exceptional, with a one-year warranty mentioned and at least one battery-drain support interaction that did not fully solve the issue.

Warranty coverage is described as strong (including finish and electronics coverage), but reviewers also flag usability and setup complexity as an area needing improvement.

Weather resistance is generally viewed as solid for outdoor use, with repeated IP65 mentions and positive rain-use feedback, even if one comparison suggested a lower resistance tier than the S330.

One review explicitly praises weather toughness across extreme temperatures, suggesting good outdoor suitability when installed correctly.

Wi-Fi performance is typically stable once connected, with fast remote access and alerts, but setup expects a 2.4 GHz network.

There is no built-in Wi-Fi in the base lock; Wi-Fi connectivity is achieved through an add-on hub or bundled variant, which affects total cost and complexity.