Compare eufy Video Smart Lock S330 vs eufy Video Smart Lock E330

Reviewers who discussed logs found useful entry history, including how the lock opened and which fingerprint was used, with one transcript explicitly describing an activity log.

Reviewers describe the app as keeping useful event history, including lock/unlock, doorbell, motion, and door open/close records.

The included chime can get loud enough for household alerts across rooms or floors, though reviewers discussed chime volume rather than a separate siren.

One review states the E330 lacks a siren, so there is no supported siren loudness evidence beyond doorbell/chime behavior.

The app was generally praised as smooth, clean, user-friendly, and feature-rich, with live video, settings, and remote controls accessible from the phone.

The app is consistently described as easy to use for setup, live view, clips, event browsing, and lock management.

Auto-lock was repeatedly seen as a useful peace-of-mind feature, with timing and schedule controls, although one reviewer warned it may lock when the door is open.

Auto-lock is repeatedly supported as a useful timer-based feature, with reviewers noting reliable locking after a set interval.

Wrong-try protection and passcode lockout were clearly supported, giving the lock a configurable response after repeated failed attempts.

Wrong-try protection can lock the device down after incorrect PIN or fingerprint attempts, giving it a supported failed-attempt lockout feature.

Backset support is well documented for common 2 3/8-inch and 2 3/4-inch sizes.

Backset adjustment is supported by an extendable deadbolt mechanism that can be twisted to fit the door depth.

Battery feedback was strongly positive overall, with multiple reviewers citing several months of use, USB-C charging, and only occasional recharges.

Battery life is the clearest mixed area: some reviewers saw weeks or two to three months, while one reported roughly six months.

Bluetooth is present through the included bridge, which PCMag says contains both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth radios.

Bluetooth appears as a supported unlocking path in the review evidence, alongside physical key access.

Build quality was consistently described as sturdy, metal, heavy-duty, or durable, although the hardware is also physically large.

Build quality is rated highly, with reviewers citing metal construction and durability claims around repeated lock/unlock cycles.

Camera and doorbell performance were usually praised for 2K clarity and useful detection, but a few reviews reported missed, delayed, or weaker night events.

Camera and doorbell performance is generally strong for 2K clarity, night vision, and detection, but field of view and placement limitations reduce consistency.

Door-sense style features are mixed: one review praised leaving detection, while another said auto-lock did not know whether the door was open or closed.

Door-sense is weakly supported because one reviewer specifically wanted a sensor to know whether the door is open or closed.

Deadbolt fit is the biggest installation caveat: it replaces a standard deadbolt but can be sensitive to strike-plate depth, alignment, and size constraints.

Door compatibility is conditional: standard deadbolt setups work, but screen doors, storm doors, spacing, strike plates, and door geometry can cause compromises.

SafeWise explicitly noted that the existing deadbolt can be reused if the Eufy deadbolt does not fit flush.

Several reviewers reused existing strike plates or avoided optional strike plates, though fit still depends on the door.

At least one long-term reviewer observed a useful live-view unlocking feature added after the original review.

Fingerprint performance was split: several reviewers called it fast and accurate, while PCWorld had repeated recognition problems.

Fingerprint access is one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it fast and accurate, though wet or sweaty fingers can affect readings.

Finish evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer noting the matte finish helps reduce visible fingerprints.

Geofencing or phone-proximity unlock was not available in the reviewed app experience; one reviewer specifically wished for it.

Guest access is a strength, with temporary passcodes, schedules, and easy programming mentioned across reviews.

Guest access is strong, with timed, temporary, single-entry, scheduled, and high-capacity passcode/fingerprint options described.

The bridge/chime is central to the system: reviewers described it as included, useful for indoor chimes and storage, and in one case mandatory.

A hub is not strictly required for recordings because onboard storage is available, though HomeBase can add functions and storage options.

Installation was mostly manageable and often easy, but several reviewers noted alignment, strike-plate depth, or two-handed handling challenges.

Installation and setup receive broad praise, with multiple reviewers completing setup in about 10 to 15 minutes or calling it very easy.

Jam detection can be frustrating when calibration or strike-plate depth is off, with one reviewer saying the app kept showing jammed despite a secure bolt.

Key backup is well covered: reviewers repeatedly noted the hidden or included physical key option for emergencies.

Key override support is reliable in the reviewed evidence, with included physical keys and emergency USB-C power options noted.

The keypad generally worked well and supports PIN entry, though one review found the touchscreen sometimes needed extra wake-up taps.

The keypad works well and is backlit, though one review found the dark doorbell/keypad area less obvious to visitors at night.

The keyway is a limitation because multiple reviews state the lock cannot be rekeyed or does not support common rekeying.

Lock and unlock speed was strong in favorable tests, especially through fingerprint access, with instant or very quick operation reported.

Lock and unlock speed is strong, especially through fingerprint access and the quiet, fast locking action.

The motor can be sensitive to deadbolt alignment; one review warned it may fail to lock if the motor struggles.

The locking motor is described as smooth, fast, and quiet in the review evidence.

Locking reliability ranged from flawless or year-long solid use to sensitivity when alignment was imperfect or one-touch locking failed.

Locking reliability is positive, with reviewers citing reliable auto-locking and responsive smart-lock behavior.

Notifications were generally fast and useful for activity, motion, lock/unlock events, and thumbnails, though one review noted delayed motion recording.

Notifications are consistently described as fast, including doorbell, motion, lock, and thumbnail alerts.

Physical resistance was not attack-tested, but the lock offers extra screws for added security and reviewers described sturdy hardware.

Physical attack resistance has some support from BHMA-style durability and force/impact testing claims in review evidence.

Remote access was a clear strength, with reviewers locking or unlocking from the app, even away from home.

Remote access is strong, with reviewers unlocking through the app from away from home or from live camera views.

Security features include scramble passcodes, wrong-try protection, and an encryption message, while one review also mentioned broader Eufy privacy concerns.

Security features include scramble passcodes, wrong-attempt lockout, local storage, and a USB-C port that does not expose data in the reviewed evidence.

Alexa and Google support were consistently reported, while reviewers also consistently noted missing HomeKit, IFTTT, and Matter support.

Smart-home integration is useful but incomplete: reviewers cite Alexa and Google support, while one explicitly notes no Apple HomeKit support.

Touchscreen and touchpad feedback was mixed, ranging from PCMag's responsive touchpad to PCWorld's wake-up issues.

The touch-sensitive keypad/touchscreen area is functional and illuminated on interaction, though visibility depends on conditions.

User access management is strong, with high user/fingerprint limits, individual codes, and easy additional-user enrollment.

User access management is flexible, with admin sharing, other users, codes, fingerprints, and family/friend access described.

Reviewers generally found the price reasonable for the all-in-one lock, doorbell, camera, local storage, and no-fee value, while still calling it pricey.

Value opinions are mixed: some call it pricey, while others view it as a saving versus separate devices or a good value versus S330.

Voice control works through Alexa and Google according to multiple reviews, but Apple ecosystem support is absent.

Voice control is supported through Alexa and Google, including voice-assistant lock control in the review evidence.

Warranty/support evidence is limited, but one review includes one-year warranty and customer service contact information; another reviewer contacted support.

Weather resistance is supported by an IP65 waterproof rating and operating-temperature claims in the reviewed materials.

Weather resistance is supported by IP65/weatherproof claims and rain-use observations, with generally positive outdoor durability evidence.

Wi-Fi works through the bridge and supports remote use, but reviewers noted 2.4GHz-only setup and dependence on the bridge/chime connection.

Wi-Fi is necessary and works well in some tests, but reviewers note 2.4 GHz setup and dependence on wireless network quality.