YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.7
eufy Video Smart Lock S330 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the eufy Video Smart Lock S330 if you want one wireless lock, camera, doorbell, and fingerprint system. Skip it if you need HomeKit/Matter, a subtle doorbell button, or tolerance for imperfect door alignment.
Best for
Best for households that want one wireless device to handle locking, video doorbell duties, remote access, guest access, and fingerprint entry. It especially fits users who value local storage and do not want separate lock and doorbell hardware.
Not for
Not for users who need Apple HomeKit, Matter, IFTTT, subtle hardware, or long-range camera coverage. It is also a poor fit for doors with marginal deadbolt alignment unless the installer is willing to fine-tune the strike area.
Verdict
The eufy Video Smart Lock S330 stands out as an ambitious front-door all-in-one: reviewers repeatedly liked the fingerprint unlock, local-storage-friendly camera setup, remote control, and broad access options. Its best moments are convenience-driven, especially for households, contractors, deliveries, or anyone who wants a lock and video doorbell in one wireless unit. The tradeoff is that the product asks for more patience and space than a simpler smart lock. Some reviewers found installation and calibration easy, while others hit door-fit or jam-message frustrations, and camera/motion performance ranged from excellent to delayed or limited at distance. The strongest evidence points to a feature-rich, generally reliable lock with a few rough edges around setup precision, ecosystem limits, and event detection.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
29 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 38% 11 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 48% 14 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 10% 3 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 3% 1 feature
- Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features
Pros
-
Guest access was a standout use case, with reviewers liking temporary access, contractor use, and removable access.
-
When working well, unlocking was described as instant or very fast, especially through fingerprint recognition.
-
Remote access was a clear strength, with reviewers valuing lock control from the app while away.
-
User management evidence was positive, especially around quickly adding additional users.
-
Voice control performed well in the one review that tested it directly.
-
Wi-Fi performance had limited but strong evidence, with one reviewer reporting no live-view latency.
-
Reviewers consistently praised the heavy, metal-feeling construction and durable build.
-
Access logs were useful for seeing who came and went and which credential unlocked the door.
-
The app was usually described as smooth, easy, useful, or user-friendly across reviews.
-
A post-review feature addition impressed one long-term reviewer by making live-view unlocking more convenient.
-
Physical security impressions were positive, centered on wanting a sturdier alternative to flimsy plastic doorbells.
-
Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though full charging can take several hours.
-
Fingerprint performance was strongly positive in most reviews, but one reviewer had repeated failed reads.
-
Camera and doorbell performance was generally strong, especially video clarity, but motion timing, distance, and visitor button clarity were recurring caveats.
-
Auto-lock was valued for peace of mind, though one reviewer cautioned against using timed auto-lock without reliable door-position awareness.
-
Keypad and touchpad feedback was mostly positive, though one reviewer had wake-up/tap responsiveness issues.
-
The required bridge/chime was viewed positively when it improved chime, storage, or camera-feed experience.
-
Installation was often described as easy or manageable, but door fit and alignment created trouble for some reviewers.
-
Reliability was mixed, ranging from flawless and better-than-prior locks to failures when alignment or one-touch locking was imperfect.
-
Most reviewers considered the price fair for the combined lock, camera, doorbell, fingerprint, and no-extra-fee package.
-
Notifications were mostly praised as quick and useful, but some reviewers reported missed or delayed motion events.
-
Design was generally liked for its sleek or elegant look, though its large size stood out as a drawback.
-
Touchscreen feedback was split between responsive operation and needing repeated taps to wake it.
-
Motor feedback was split: one long-term reviewer found it solid, while another warned that small alignment resistance could stop locking.
-
Security/encryption evidence was limited but noted an encryption message before streaming, alongside privacy caution.
Cons
-
Door-sense evidence was mixed: departure detection was useful, but one reviewer criticized the lock for not knowing whether the door was open.
-
Smart-home integration was mixed because Alexa/Google support was useful, but reviewers noted the lack of Apple HomeKit, IFTTT, or Matter.
-
Door fit was context-dependent: some installations worked smoothly, while shallow strike plates, alignment, and size constraints caused problems.
-
One reviewer found jam reporting annoying because a calibration issue made the app keep showing the lock as jammed.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smart Locks, this product is above average in Wi-Fi, Remote access, Voice control, below average in Jam detection, Security features (encryption), Door compatibility (deadbolt fit).
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 63% 5 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 38% 3 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jam detection | 2.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | 5.0 | 3.7 | +1.3 |
| Remote access | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 |
| Security features (encryption) | 3.5 | 4.6 | -1.1 |
| Voice control | 5.0 | 4.1 | +0.9 |
| Door compatibility (deadbolt fit) | 2.7 | 3.5 | -0.9 |
| Battery | 4.4 | 3.7 | +0.7 |
| Guest Codes and Access | 5.0 | 4.3 | +0.7 |
FAQ
Is the eufy Video Smart Lock S330 easy to install?
Most reviewers found installation easy or manageable, but several noted that door alignment, strike-plate depth, or physical size can make setup tricky.
How good is the fingerprint reader?
Most evidence is very positive, with reviewers calling it fast, accurate, and instant. One reviewer had repeated failed reads, so performance may depend on the user or setup.
Does the camera perform well?
Reviewers generally liked the 2K video clarity and door-area visibility. The main caveats were delayed motion recording, weaker long-distance detail, and some missed motion or loitering events.
How is the battery life?
Battery life was repeatedly praised as long-lasting, with some reviewers reporting months between charges. One reviewer noted that a full recharge can take several hours.
Can it be controlled remotely?
Yes. Reviewers valued being able to check or unlock the door from the app, including while away from home, and several liked using it for guest or contractor access.
Does it work with Apple HomeKit or Matter?
Review evidence notes Alexa and Google support, but not Apple HomeKit, IFTTT, or Matter. Reviewers treated this as a limitation for broader smart-home interoperability.
Is it worth the price?
Most reviewers considered the price reasonable because it combines a smart lock, doorbell, 2K camera, fingerprint reader, app access, chime, and local-storage options in one device.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Lockly Vision Elite
- Compared: compactness and similar biometric/video/app control The reviewer describes Lockly Vision Elite as more compact while sharing many of the same core functions.
- Compared: combined doorbell-camera-lock concept The review frames Lockly Vision Elite as another example of the same doorbell-camera-lock category.
EZVIZ Video Doorbell
- Cheaper: basic video doorbell price The reviewer notes that a simple wired video doorbell can be far cheaper if deadbolt control is not needed.
Lockly Vision Doorbell Camera Smart Lock
- Worse: motion detection The review says eufy includes motion detection that the comparably priced Lockly model lacks.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Security features (encryption)
Choose Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock. It scores 4.3 vs 3.5 for Security features (encryption), with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread)
Choose Lockly Visage Zeno Series Smart Lock. It scores 4.4 vs 3.0 for Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread), with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better Jam detection
Choose Aqara U50 Smart Lock. It scores 4.5 vs 2.0 for Jam detection, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better Value and Price
Choose Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Smart Lock. It scores 5.0 vs 4.2 for Value and Price, with a 4.3 overall score.
Top Smart Locks to Consider
Choose the Tapo DL110 if you want fast fingerprint entry, strong app control, long battery life, and premium features under a lower price. Skip it if your door/strike alignment is...
Pros: Value and Price, Lock/unlock speed
Cons: Existing hardware reuse, Door compatibility (deadbolt fit)
Choose the Lockin Veno Pro if you want touchless palm unlocking, local video storage, and one device for lock plus doorbell. Skip it if you need polished Matter features, discreet...
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Wi-Fi
Cons: Feature additions via updates, Warranty and support
Choose the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 for low-cost Wi-Fi, fast fingerprint entry, and flexible codes. Skip it if you need Matter/HomeKit support, rechargeable batteries, or stronger door-sense behavior.
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Keypad
Cons: Door-sense, Battery
Choose it if you want a fast, camera-equipped smart lock with strong biometric options and myQ ecosystem control. Skip it if open smart-home integrations, subscription-free advanced alerts, or a basic...
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Locking motor
Cons: Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google