Compare eufy Video Smart Lock S330 vs Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock

Access logs were useful for seeing who came and went and which credential unlocked the door.

Access logs were useful for seeing lock history, entry timing, and who entered.

The app was usually described as smooth, easy, useful, or user-friendly across reviews.

The app was generally described as simple, easy, and user-friendly, with good access controls and setup flow.

Auto-lock was valued for peace of mind, though one reviewer cautioned against using timed auto-lock without reliable door-position awareness.

Auto-lock was praised for peace of mind and convenience, but multiple reviewers flagged limits around timing and open-door behavior.

Failed-attempt lockout drew criticism from one reviewer because the settings and behavior were not clearly adjustable or explained.

Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though full charging can take several hours.

Battery impressions were good overall but not exceptional, ranging from solid and efficient to fine but not incredible.

Reviewers consistently praised the heavy, metal-feeling construction and durable build.

Most reviewers described the lock as solid, sturdy, or durable for the price, while one found the construction quality questionable.

Camera and doorbell performance was generally strong, especially video clarity, but motion timing, distance, and visitor button clarity were recurring caveats.

Door-sense evidence was mixed: departure detection was useful, but one reviewer criticized the lock for not knowing whether the door was open.

Door-sense was a clear weakness because reviewers noted there is no door sensor and the bolt can extend while the door is open.

Door fit was context-dependent: some installations worked smoothly, while shallow strike plates, alignment, and size constraints caused problems.

One reviewer cautioned that very thick doors may require modification even though standard doors worked well.

A post-review feature addition impressed one long-term reviewer by making live-view unlocking more convenient.

The 90-day follow-up praised Desloc for frequent firmware updates and meaningful improvements.

Fingerprint performance was strongly positive in most reviews, but one reviewer had repeated failed reads.

Fingerprint access was one of the most praised areas, with many fast and accurate reports, though PCWorld found it hit-and-miss.

Guest access was a standout use case, with reviewers liking temporary access, contractor use, and removable access.

Guest access was praised for one-pass, scheduled, IC-card, and Airbnb-style temporary access options.

The required bridge/chime was viewed positively when it improved chime, storage, or camera-feed experience.

Reviewers consistently liked that no separate hub or gateway is required.

Design was generally liked for its sleek or elegant look, though its large size stood out as a drawback.

Industrial design was praised as sleek, ergonomic, modern, and premium-looking rather than overly bulky.

Installation was often described as easy or manageable, but door fit and alignment created trouble for some reviewers.

Installation was usually described as quick and simple, but one reviewer had jammed bolts and another noted a short cord and over-tightening sensitivity.

One reviewer found jam reporting annoying because a calibration issue made the app keep showing the lock as jammed.

One reviewer specifically reported no jamming during several days of testing.

Backup mechanical keys were valued as a practical fallback, especially for power loss.

Keypad and touchpad feedback was mostly positive, though one reviewer had wake-up/tap responsiveness issues.

Keypad impressions were mixed: PCMag found it responsive and well-lit, PCWorld found it slow to wake, and another liked the soft glow.

When working well, unlocking was described as instant or very fast, especially through fingerprint recognition.

Speed was mostly positive for voice and remote response, though one reviewer found it fast but slower than pricier locks.

Motor feedback was split: one long-term reviewer found it solid, while another warned that small alignment resistance could stop locking.

Motor feel was mixed: one reviewer found it smooth and quiet, while another warned that over-tightening could make the bolt struggle.

Reliability was mixed, ranging from flawless and better-than-prior locks to failures when alignment or one-touch locking was imperfect.

Reliability was a strength across several reviews, with reports of perfect testing, stable 90-day use, and natural daily fit.

Notifications were mostly praised as quick and useful, but some reviewers reported missed or delayed motion events.

Notifications were useful for awareness and security, but one reviewer wanted push notifications instead of emergency emails that went to spam.

Reviewers repeatedly liked the small on-lock display, describing it as helpful for setup, status, battery, alerts, and local control, though one saw it as basic rather than groundbreaking.

Palm vein recognition was not included, and one reviewer missed that faster, convenient method from another lock.

Physical security impressions were positive, centered on wanting a sturdier alternative to flimsy plastic doorbells.

Physical resistance evidence was moderate: reviewers cited BHMA certification and durability, but one emphasized it is the lowest acceptable commercial level.

Remote access was a clear strength, with reviewers valuing lock control from the app while away.

Remote access was a major convenience, especially for managing the lock away from home or unlocking for guests.

Security/encryption evidence was limited but noted an encryption message before streaming, alongside privacy caution.

Security features such as anti-peeping and anti-hijacking were viewed as useful or reassuring, with PCMag also noting enhanced security options.

Smart-home integration was mixed because Alexa/Google support was useful, but reviewers noted the lack of Apple HomeKit, IFTTT, or Matter.

Smart-home integration was the main limitation: Alexa and Google were supported, but reviewers missed HomeKit, Matter, IFTTT, or broader security-system support.

Touchscreen feedback was split between responsive operation and needing repeated taps to wake it.

The touch surface/keypad was praised as responsive, well lit, and visually integrated into the front panel.

User management evidence was positive, especially around quickly adding additional users.

User access management was a strong point, with praise for simple schedules, temporary codes, and control over different users.

Most reviewers considered the price fair for the combined lock, camera, doorbell, fingerprint, and no-extra-fee package.

Value was the broadest strength because most reviewers saw a lot of features for the price, although PCWorld rejected the value claim after testing.

Voice control performed well in the one review that tested it directly.

Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, especially with Alexa and Google Assistant.

Weather resistance was generally viewed positively, including rain/outdoor use, though one reviewer called the IP54 rating tame.

Wi-Fi performance had limited but strong evidence, with one reviewer reporting no live-view latency.

Built-in Wi-Fi was praised for direct connectivity and remote use, and one follow-up noted updates that improved Wi-Fi stability and power use.