Compare Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Smart Lock vs Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock

One hands-on review praises the activity history/logging as robust and detailed.

Access logs were useful for seeing lock history, entry timing, and who entered.

The app is useful but uneven: one review calls it overloaded during onboarding, while another praises its automation area as the coolest part of the app.

The app was generally described as simple, easy, and user-friendly, with good access controls and setup flow.

Auto-lock is viewed positively for end-of-day or accidental-unlocked protection, with praise for configurable lock behavior.

Auto-lock was praised for peace of mind and convenience, but multiple reviewers flagged limits around timing and open-door behavior.

Failed-attempt lockout drew criticism from one reviewer because the settings and behavior were not clearly adjustable or explained.

Battery feedback is mixed: one review notes an eight-month target is a slight hit, while another dislikes the non-rechargeable AA approach as a step back.

Battery impressions were good overall but not exceptional, ranging from solid and efficient to fine but not incredible.

Build quality is praised, with reviews describing the upgraded body as closer to premium brands and the build as awesome.

Most reviewers described the lock as solid, sturdy, or durable for the price, while one found the construction quality questionable.

One review flags the lack of open/close detection as a weakness because auto-lock can engage without knowing whether the door is shut.

Door-sense was a clear weakness because reviewers noted there is no door sensor and the bolt can extend while the door is open.

One reviewer cautioned that very thick doors may require modification even though standard doors worked well.

The 90-day follow-up praised Desloc for frequent firmware updates and meaningful improvements.

Fingerprint access is one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly praising speed, accuracy, convenience, and the learning scanner, though one notes it is not perfect.

Fingerprint access was one of the most praised areas, with many fast and accurate reports, though PCWorld found it hit-and-miss.

Finish durability gets positive comments for resisting visible fingerprints and improving smudge resistance and visibility.

Guest and code access is praised for flawless one-time codes and flexible household access options.

Guest access was praised for one-pass, scheduled, IC-card, and Airbnb-style temporary access options.

Reviewers praise the lack of a hub requirement because Wi-Fi removes the need for helper devices and puts the lock closer to pricier competitors.

Reviewers consistently liked that no separate hub or gateway is required.

Design reactions are generally positive but not unqualified: one review calls it clean but uninspired, while others praise the tempered-glass update and lower profile.

Industrial design was praised as sleek, ergonomic, modern, and premium-looking rather than overly bulky.

Setup is mostly viewed as DIY-friendly, but one review reports failed first onboarding/calibration attempts, keeping the overall impression mixed.

Installation was usually described as quick and simple, but one reviewer had jammed bolts and another noted a short cord and over-tightening sensitivity.

One reviewer specifically reported no jamming during several days of testing.

One demo shows the physical key backup working without issue.

Backup mechanical keys were valued as a practical fallback, especially for power loss.

The keypad earns praise in one hands-on review for fast, seamless unlocking.

Keypad impressions were mixed: PCMag found it responsive and well-lit, PCWorld found it slow to wake, and another liked the soft glow.

Unlocking speed is strongly positive, with reviewers calling keypad/fingerprint unlocking speedy, seamless, and quick.

Speed was mostly positive for voice and remote response, though one reviewer found it fast but slower than pricier locks.

The motor is praised for quiet operation, though one review says the lock chimes enough that the reviewer turned operation volume off.

Motor feel was mixed: one reviewer found it smooth and quiet, while another warned that over-tightening could make the bolt struggle.

Locking reliability is praised, with one review saying the lock works great and another describing it as built for everyday reliability.

Reliability was a strength across several reviews, with reports of perfect testing, stable 90-day use, and natural daily fit.

Notifications benefit from the move to Wi-Fi, with one review framing real-time alerts as part of what v2 fixes over the earlier Bluetooth-only model.

Notifications were useful for awareness and security, but one reviewer wanted push notifications instead of emergency emails that went to spam.

Reviewers repeatedly liked the small on-lock display, describing it as helpful for setup, status, battery, alerts, and local control, though one saw it as basic rather than groundbreaking.

Palm vein recognition was not included, and one reviewer missed that faster, convenient method from another lock.

Physical durability/security is treated as good enough for typical homes, with one review citing suburban suitability and another praising durability.

Physical resistance evidence was moderate: reviewers cited BHMA certification and durability, but one emphasized it is the lowest acceptable commercial level.

Remote access is a major strength: reviewers praise true remote control, app operation from far away, and full control from anywhere.

Remote access was a major convenience, especially for managing the lock away from home or unlocking for guests.

Security features are praised around anti-peep PIN protection and local biometric storage, which reviewers frame as reassuring.

Security features such as anti-peeping and anti-hijacking were viewed as useful or reassuring, with PCMag also noting enhanced security options.

Smart-home integration is mixed: the lock fits Wyze well and supports common assistants, but limited third-party support and missing Matter/HomeKit remain caveats.

Smart-home integration was the main limitation: Alexa and Google were supported, but reviewers missed HomeKit, Matter, IFTTT, or broader security-system support.

Tamper detection is viewed positively as an added security layer, with one demo showing the lock reacting to repeated failed attempts.

The touchscreen/touchpad is praised for a sleeker tempered-glass upgrade plus better smudge resistance and visibility.

The touch surface/keypad was praised as responsive, well lit, and visually integrated into the front panel.

User access management receives strong praise for being intuitive and fast.

User access management was a strong point, with praise for simple schedules, temporary codes, and control over different users.

Value is the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly emphasizing sub-$100 pricing, feature density, and premium-like capabilities for the cost.

Value was the broadest strength because most reviewers saw a lot of features for the price, although PCWorld rejected the value claim after testing.

Voice control is praised in the context of Alexa and Google Assistant hands-free control, though broader ecosystem limits remain separate caveats.

Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, especially with Alexa and Google Assistant.

Weather resistance is adequate to positive: one review calls IP53 less impressive than typical, while others say it suits residential use and rain exposure.

Weather resistance was generally viewed positively, including rain/outdoor use, though one reviewer called the IP54 rating tame.

Wi-Fi is framed as a major upgrade that makes the lock more powerful while preserving the low price.

Built-in Wi-Fi was praised for direct connectivity and remote use, and one follow-up noted updates that improved Wi-Fi stability and power use.